Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The average price of oil dropped from $70 to $61 per barrel, but hedging mitigated this drop, keeping overall revenues flat [17][18] - Revenues remained level as hedging efforts offset a temporary dip in production [16] - Interest expense decreased by $230,000 per quarter compared to 2024, reflecting ongoing balance sheet improvements [17][20] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Production at the Grayburg Jackson field increased from approximately 800 barrels per day to about 920 barrels per day, with a goal to reach 1,400 to 1,500 barrels per day by year-end [12][30] - The South Justice field's production rose from 88 barrels per day at acquisition to 117 barrels per day after reactivating idle wells [36][37] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is targeting funding between $40 million and $50 million to support operations and reduce debt [8][27] - The company anticipates being cash flow positive in Q4 2025, with a significant increase in cash flow expected from debt reduction [13][14] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on increasing production through horizontal drilling, with plans to kick off a drilling program in late Q1 2026 [35][62] - Management aims to retire senior debt and seller obligations, which will significantly enhance cash flow [13][27] - The company is exploring overriding royalty interest (ORE) as a financing strategy to avoid dilution of shares and reduce financial risk [58][60] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about transitioning from a struggling company to a more successful entity, with significant potential for growth in 2026 [40][84] - The management team is confident in their ability to navigate the current oil market, despite potential price fluctuations [47][48] Other Important Information - The company has made significant progress in reducing general and administrative costs, with ongoing efforts to further decrease expenses [19][73] - The company has successfully reduced senior debt from $28 million to approximately $21 million [20] Q&A Session Summary Question: What are the expectations for oil prices going into winter? - Management indicated that oil prices may remain in the $60 range, with geopolitical factors influencing market conditions [46][48] Question: Will Chevron be purchasing the oil produced from new wells? - Management confirmed Chevron's interest in purchasing increased production, indicating a positive relationship with the buyer [52] Question: How important are the four rigs on both properties for the next two quarters? - Management emphasized the critical role of the rigs in boosting production, with plans to optimize their use across fields [69][70] Question: Is there a plan to reduce legal consulting expenses? - Management acknowledged ongoing discussions to reduce costs and improve efficiency in legal and consulting services [72][73] Question: What is the expected impact of horizontal drilling on production? - Management explained that horizontal drilling could significantly increase production rates, potentially yielding 400 to 600 barrels per day per well [63][64]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The advisory non-binding vote regarding the compensation of Microchip's named executives was not approved, marking a significant change from the previous fourteen years where the average approval rate was over 92% [5][4] - The compensation committee approved a new RSU award for the permanent CEO that is 60% performance-based and 40% time-based, indicating a shift towards performance-oriented compensation structures [7] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The RSU awards granted to other Microchip executives in July 2025 were structured to be 50% performance-based and 50% time-based, reflecting a consistent approach across the executive team [7] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The board and compensation committee emphasized the importance of leadership transition and minimizing disruption to operations, which influenced the decision to grant performance-based awards to the new CEO [7] Management Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed disappointment regarding the lack of approval for the advisory vote on executive compensation, indicating potential challenges in aligning shareholder expectations with compensation practices [5][4] Other Important Information - The RSU award for the interim CEO was criticized for being time-based rather than performance-based, which was a key reason for the negative vote from proxy advisory firms and shareholders [5] Q&A Session Summary - No specific questions or answers were recorded in the provided content, indicating that the meeting may have concluded without a formal Q&A session [9]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The shareholders did not approve the advisory non-binding proposal regarding the compensation of Microchip's executive officers, which is a notable change from the previous fourteen years where the average approval rate was over 92% [5][4] - The compensation committee approved a new RSU award for the permanent CEO that was 60% performance-based and 40% time-based, indicating a shift towards performance-oriented compensation structures [7] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The RSU awards granted to other Microchip executives in July 2025 were structured to be 50% performance-based and 50% time-based, reflecting a consistent approach across the executive team [7] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific market data or key metrics changes were discussed in the provided content Company Strategy and Development Direction and Industry Competition - The board and compensation committee emphasized the importance of leadership transition and minimizing disruption to the company's operations and strategic initiatives, indicating a focus on stability during leadership changes [7] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed disappointment regarding the lack of approval for the compensation proposal, attributing it to feedback from proxy advisory firms and shareholders, which may influence future compensation strategies [5][4] Other Important Information - The RSU award for the interim CEO was approved after considering various mechanisms, highlighting the company's approach to executive compensation during transitional periods [6] Q&A Session All Questions and Answers - No Q&A session content was provided in the documents

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a total of 8,569,338 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the record date [7] - A quorum was established with more than half of the outstanding shares present at the meeting [8] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific data or metrics related to individual business lines were provided in the meeting records Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific market data or metrics were discussed during the meeting Company Strategy and Development Direction and Industry Competition - The meeting included proposals for the election of directors and the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm, indicating ongoing governance and compliance efforts [10][11] - The company proposed an amendment to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the equity incentive plan, suggesting a focus on incentivizing management and employees [11] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management did not provide specific comments on the operating environment or future outlook during the meeting Other Important Information - The meeting was conducted virtually, allowing shareholders to vote online [4] - The results of the voting will be disclosed in a current report on Form 8-K within four business days [13] Q&A Session All Questions and Answers Question: Were there any shareholder questions during the meeting? - No questions were submitted by shareholders during the meeting [14]

Intrusion (INTZ) FY 2025 Annual General Meeting August 19, 2025 10:00 AM ET Company ParticipantsTony Scott - President, CEO & DirectorAnthony LeVecchio - ChairmanOperatorWelcome to the twenty twenty five Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Intrusion Inc. I will now hand it over to Tony Scott. Tony, you may begin.Tony ScottGood morning, and welcome to the twenty twenty five Annual Stockholders Meeting of Intrusion Inc. I am Tony Scott, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intrusion, Inc. It's my pleasure t ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The preliminary voting results indicate that the nominees for the board have been duly elected and Whitley Penn has been selected as the independent CPA for fiscal year ending 2025 [12] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific data or metrics regarding individual business lines were provided during the meeting [14] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific market data or metrics were discussed in the meeting [14] Company Strategy and Development Direction and Industry Competition - The company is focused on maintaining a strong relationship with stockholders and values their opinions, particularly regarding executive compensation [10] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed gratitude for stockholder confidence and indicated a commitment to regular communication through quarterly updates [15][16] Other Important Information - The meeting was conducted virtually to enhance inclusivity and reach a broader audience of stockholders [3] - The company will address any unanswered questions on its corporate website following the meeting [4] Q&A Session Summary Question: Were there any questions submitted before the meeting? - There were no questions submitted in advance, and no questions were received during the meeting [15][14]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The meeting confirmed that a quorum was present, allowing for the transaction of business, with 52,352,764 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote [8] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific data on business lines or key metrics was provided in the meeting Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific market data or key metrics were discussed during the meeting Company Strategy and Development Direction and Industry Competition - The successful vote on the merger agreement is seen as a significant milestone for the company, reflecting months of hard work and careful planning [12] - The company expressed gratitude towards its partners, advisors, and shareholders for their support throughout the merger process [13] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management highlighted the importance of the successful vote as a result of collective efforts and commitment to the company's vision [12] - No specific comments on the operating environment or future outlook were provided Other Important Information - The proposal to approve the merger agreement was passed, and there was no need to present a second proposal for adjournment [11] Q&A Session All Questions and Answers - No questions were raised during the Q&A session as the formal portion of the meeting concluded without further inquiries [14]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - In Q2 2025, Workhorse shipped 32 trucks, a significant increase from 1 truck in Q2 2024, reflecting a year-over-year increase of 31 trucks [10] - Sales net of returns and allowances for Q2 2025 were $5.7 million, up from $800,000 in the same period last year, marking an increase of $4.8 million [11] - Operating expenses decreased by $7 million year-over-year while achieving record vehicle shipments [9] - The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2025, improved from $55.5 million in 2024 to $35.4 million in 2025 [17] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The W56 Step Van line secured 36 purchase orders and received overwhelmingly positive customer feedback, indicating strong demand [7] - Research and development expenses decreased to $1.2 million in Q2 2025 from $2 million in Q2 2024, primarily due to lower headcount and reduced prototype expenses [13] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company noted that there are currently over 60 W56 vehicles operating in customer and partner fleets across diverse routes, validating the vehicle's performance in real-world conditions [7] - The transaction with Motive is expected to enhance the combined company's market position in the medium-duty electric vehicle sector, targeting a market valued at $23 billion [35] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The merger with Motive aims to create a broader commercial truck product portfolio and strengthen financial positions, allowing Workhorse shareholders to benefit from the combined entity's growth potential [22] - The company plans to expand its product portfolio and ensure reliable fleet operations while finalizing plans for the W56 140kW production launch in 2026 [41] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management acknowledged that external factors, such as changing government regulations, have delayed fleet customer adoption rates, impacting revenue growth [21] - The combined company is expected to be better positioned to raise additional capital post-merger, enhancing its ability to pursue growth initiatives [29] Other Important Information - Workhorse completed a $20 million sale leaseback for its manufacturing facility and secured a $5 million convertible note financing to bolster liquidity [24] - The transaction is expected to close in 2025, subject to shareholder approval and customary closing conditions [26] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you discuss the relationship with Hudson County Motors and the New Jersey ZIP? - The relationship with Hudson County Motors is strong, and there are ongoing voucher programs that could extend to new locations, enhancing growth opportunities [46] Question: How will the combined company access government programs for growth? - The combined entity is expected to have a stronger balance sheet, which will facilitate access to government programs and enhance growth potential [52] Question: What are the terms of the sale and leaseback agreement? - Detailed terms of the sale leaseback and convertible note can be found in the SEC filings [76] Question: Will a reverse stock split be necessary for NASDAQ listing? - A reverse stock split may be required to meet NASDAQ's minimum price thresholds due to the change in control [78] Question: What is the expected valuation of the combined entity? - The combined entity is valued at $105 million, based on contributions from both companies and the sale leaseback transaction [80] Question: How will the product portfolios be integrated? - The integration will focus on developing a full range of Class four to six trucks, leveraging the strengths of both companies [83]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported revenues of $194 million for the quarter, with an EBITDA equivalent cash flow of $112 million [5][24] - The EBITDA equivalent over the last twelve months was $526 million [5] - The net profit for the second quarter was approximately SEK 1.5 million or $0.01 per share, compared to a net loss of approximately SEK 32 million or $0.02 per share in the previous quarter [26] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The container vessel segment generated approximately $2 million in revenue, while the car carrier fleet generated approximately NOK 26 million, slightly up from the last quarter [21][22] - The tanker fleet's gross charter hire decreased to approximately NOK 41 million from NOK 45 million in the previous quarter due to scheduled dry dockings [22] - The overall utilization across the shipping fleet was 98.1%, with an adjusted utilization of 99.9% [15] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The charter backlog currently stands at $4.2 billion, with two-thirds of this backlog from customers with investment-grade ratings [10][29] - The company has a diversified fleet consisting of 60 maritime assets, including 30 containerships, 16 large tankers, and two drilling rigs [12] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on strengthening its charter backlog by securing agreements with strong counterparties and investing in cargo handling and fuel efficiency upgrades [6][10] - The company has divested older, less efficient vessels and is committed to fleet renewal and new technology, with 11 vessels now capable of operating on LNG fuel [7][12] - The company aims to enhance its fleet to position itself for organic growth and comply with strict regulatory demands aimed at reducing shipping emissions [13][14] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about finding new employment for the idle drilling rig Hercules, despite current market volatility and oil price fluctuations [8][9] - The decision to adjust the dividend to $0.20 per share was made to ensure that distributions are not subsidized by idle assets, particularly the Hercules rig [10][36] - The company has a strong liquidity position, including undrawn credit lines and unencumbered vessels, which will enable continued investment in new assets [11][27] Other Important Information - The company has returned nearly $2.9 billion to shareholders over 86 consecutive quarters [10] - The average age of the vessels sold was about 18 years, reducing the fleet average by about two years [12] Q&A Session Summary Question: What’s the status with the lawsuit with Seadrill? - The company is involved in two lawsuits, with the larger one regarding the redelivery of the Hercules scheduled for 2026, and a guarantee for an adjustment amounting to approximately $45 million to $50 million has been received from Seadrill [30] Question: Can you walk us through your thought process on the decision to lower the dividend? - Management acknowledged disappointment regarding the dividend adjustment, attributing it to the idle status of the Hercules rig and the need to ensure that distributions are not subsidized by non-operational assets [34][36] Question: What are the expected costs for dry docking in the second half of the year? - Management expects dry docking costs to be significantly lower in Q3 and Q4 compared to Q2, with estimates around $3 million to $3.5 million for Q3 and $1 million to $2 million for Q4 [42][44] Question: How is the company viewing opportunities for potential acquisitions? - The company continues to look for acquisition opportunities, although the market has been slower due to general uncertainty. They have significant investment capacity following recent divestitures [46][47] Question: What should be expected for the organic EBITDA contribution from the energy side? - The energy segment is expected to have a negative drag going forward, but the shipping fleet is generating solid contributions and cash flow [50][54]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Consolidated adjusted EBITDA for Q2 2025 reached $55 million, with year-to-date EBITDA amounting to $91 million, reflecting a 60% year-over-year decline in both periods [10][11][12] - Sales totaled $392 million during Q2, with year-to-date sales reaching $716 million, driven by higher volumes sold across operations despite lower prices [10][11] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - In the Sugar, Ethanol, and Energy business, crushing volume was 20% lower year-over-year due to fewer effective milling days and a selective slower milling pace [12][13] - Farming business reported a 12% year-over-year increase in total production, attributed to higher planted area and record productivity in rice operations [12][20] - Adjusted EBITDA for the Farming business totaled $1 million during the quarter, with year-to-date EBITDA at $18 million, impacted by lower international prices and higher costs [21][23] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Rice prices have significantly decreased, but customized rice varieties at premium prices are being offered to offset global price drops [7] - Dairy processing volumes are increasing due to a growing market presence, while efforts are ongoing to expand the product portfolio [7][20] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to be the lowest cost producer while diversifying operations across geographies and products, which serves as a natural hedge against commodity price fluctuations and weather risks [5][6] - A memorandum of understanding was signed with Tether to explore using a portion of energy production for bitcoin mining, indicating a potential innovative project [8] - The company is focusing on improving margins by reducing leased area by approximately 30% in response to challenging price and cost conditions [7][21] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about reaching similar crushing levels to the previous year despite a difficult start to the season, citing improved crushing rates in July and August [31][32] - The company is constructive about sugar and ethanol prices, anticipating a potential increase due to lower sugarcane yields and strong ethanol demand [35][36] - Management acknowledged the need to maintain a net leverage ratio below 2.0 times EBITDA while exploring both organic and inorganic growth opportunities [67][68] Other Important Information - Net debt increased to $699 million, 11% higher year-over-year, primarily due to higher short-term borrowings for working capital [23][24] - The company has committed $45 million to shareholder distribution, including dividends and share repurchases [27] Q&A Session Summary Question: Expectations for crushing figures and sugar prices - Management indicated that despite a challenging first quarter, they expect to crush similar amounts of sugarcane as last year, driven by improved performance in July and August [31][32] - They anticipate sugar prices to react positively due to lower sugarcane yields and strong ethanol demand [35][36] Question: Quality of cane and yield expectations - Management expects yields to be flat year-over-year, with a slight decrease in TRS content due to frost affecting sugarcane [41][45] Question: Triggers for hedging next season - Management believes sugar prices could react in the short term based on Brazilian crop impacts, with plans to accelerate hedging once market conditions clarify [54][55] Question: Partnership with Tether and its impact - The partnership is seen as a potential opportunity to sell energy at attractive prices, with ongoing evaluations to determine feasibility [74]