Core Insights - The article highlights the efforts of the Henan Provincial Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission in overseeing the construction of high-standard farmland, emphasizing the importance of integrity and compliance in project management [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Supervision and Compliance - The Henan Provincial Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission discovered that a construction unit replaced gravel layers with soil without proper reporting, prompting a corrective action to reassess the project [1] - The commission has implemented a comprehensive supervision plan focusing on key areas such as bidding, fund usage, and project management to ensure compliance and integrity in high-standard farmland construction [1][2] - A total of 457 issues have been identified in high-standard farmland projects since 2020, with 330 of these issues rectified immediately [2] Group 2: Financial Oversight and Risk Management - The construction of high-standard farmland involves significant financial investment and presents multiple integrity risks, leading to the creation of a risk prevention checklist by the local authorities [3] - Local authorities are actively auditing and tracking fund flows to prevent misappropriation and ensure proper financial management in high-standard farmland projects [3][4] - The article mentions the establishment of a mechanism for comprehensive oversight of the entire project lifecycle, from initiation to maintenance, to enhance accountability [4] Group 3: Community Impact and Feedback - The article includes positive feedback from local farmers regarding improvements in irrigation and agricultural productivity due to the high-standard farmland initiatives [3] - The commission is committed to ensuring that high-standard farmland projects serve as beneficial and transparent initiatives for the community, reinforcing the importance of these projects in food security [4]

湖北省黄石市纪委监委牢固树立案件质量共同体意识，持续优化案件质量评查、业务指引、培训指导等 业务指导载体，多维度提升案件办理质效，以有力有效举措切实发挥案件审理部门在保障和提高案件质 量上的重要作用。 做细业务指引。一是出台取证指引。聚焦日常案件审核和案件质量评查中发现的证据收集不全面、程序 手续不健全、定性量纪不精准等问题，先后编撰黄石市纪委监委《常见职务犯罪案件证据收集指引》 《违纪违法问题证据收集指引》《办理违反政治纪律案件的行为认定及量纪分析参考》等，采取对违纪 违法犯罪行为构成要件释义、取证指引、定性量纪、典型案例剖析等形式，为审查调查部门收集证据、 案件审理部门审核证据、案件定性处理等提供准确的类型化依据指引。二是发布典型案例。统筹调度全 市各级纪检监察机关挖掘典型案例并定期发布，为全市纪委监委案件审理部门提供规范指导。三是开 设"业务微课堂"。聚焦案件查办中的常见问题，从小角度、小切口入手，以"内容精准、实战性强"为原 则开设"业务微课堂"，增强业务指导针对性实效性，补齐执纪执法人员业务短板，提升工作能力水平。 做深培训指导。一是开展"以案代训"。选调基层案件审理干部上挂锻炼，通过以案代训、面对 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of maintaining a coordinated and unified system of disciplinary inspection and supervision regulations to enhance their authority and effectiveness, which is essential for the standardization and legalization of disciplinary inspection work [1] - Guizhou Province's Discipline Inspection Commission and Supervision Commission is guided by Xi Jinping's thoughts on party building and self-revolution, focusing on strengthening the construction of disciplinary inspection systems and continuously improving governance effectiveness [1][2] Group 2 - The five-year plan (2023-2027) for the formulation of normative documents by Guizhou's Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission aims to cover various aspects such as supervision, law enforcement, and internal operations, with 45 out of 57 planned systems already established [2] - The approach includes a phased implementation strategy, with annual plans developed based on practical work, ensuring timely and quality completion of objectives [2] Group 3 - Research and investigation are integral to the drafting of normative documents, with a focus on identifying issues through practical supervision and soliciting opinions from various stakeholders [3] - The process includes a mandatory feedback phase where initial drafts are reviewed by relevant departments, ensuring comprehensive input and quality in the final documents [3] Group 4 - A pre-approval process is established to ensure that all normative documents align with main regulations, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance before submission for review [4][5] - The review process includes a thorough examination of political, legal, and normative aspects of the documents, with 86 suggestions provided for 27 systems since 2024 [5] Group 5 - A system of filing and review is implemented to ensure that all normative documents are reported within 30 days of issuance, with penalties for non-compliance [6] - A cross-departmental consultation mechanism is established for complex documents, ensuring thorough feedback and consensus on issues [6] Group 6 - The execution and assessment of normative documents are reinforced through supervision checks and evaluations, with 19 documents reviewed for implementation quality in 2023 and 2024 [7] - A systematic approach to cleaning up outdated and redundant documents has been initiated, with 182 documents reviewed to ensure relevance and effectiveness [7]

Group 1 - The article discusses the legal distinctions and similarities between bribery and embezzlement in the context of a specific case involving a hospital department head and a drug dealer [1][3] - The case highlights the complexities of determining whether certain funds should be classified as unit bribery or personal embezzlement, particularly regarding the payment of 180,000 yuan for the head's daughter's salary and social insurance [2][4][6] - Different viewpoints exist on how to classify the 180,000 yuan payment, with one perspective arguing it should be considered as part of unit bribery, while another suggests it constitutes embezzlement due to the misappropriation of unit funds [3][5][7] Group 2 - The article emphasizes that for a crime to be classified as unit bribery, the funds must be controlled and owned by the unit, which was not the case in this instance [4][5] - It is argued that the 180,000 yuan payment does not qualify as embezzlement since the funds were never under the unit's control or ownership, thus not infringing on public property rights [6] - Ultimately, the article concludes that the 180,000 yuan should be classified as personal bribery for the department head, as the transaction was a result of a new agreement between him and the drug dealer [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the procedures and opinions regarding the handling of "self-laundering" issues discovered during the investigation of职务犯罪 (职务犯罪) cases by supervisory and prosecutorial authorities, emphasizing the need for coordination between these entities in both the investigation and prosecution phases [1][5]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1 involves Zhang, who accepted bribes totaling 10 million yuan and subsequently laundered the money through multiple bank transfers and property purchases [2]. - Case 2 involves Liu, who accepted 3 million yuan in bribes and laundered part of it through transfers to family members' accounts and then to an overseas account, amounting to 1 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Divergent Opinions - The first opinion suggests that evidence collected during the investigation can be shared to save resources, allowing for simultaneous prosecution of both bribery and money laundering [3]. - The second opinion argues that since money laundering falls under police jurisdiction, evidence should be transferred to the police for further investigation before prosecution [4]. - The third opinion supports the idea that if evidence of money laundering is clear and sufficient, it can be included in the prosecution submission for both crimes [4]. Group 3: Evidence Collection and Use - Evidence related to "self-laundering" collected by supervisory authorities can be used in court as it meets criminal trial standards [10]. - If the prosecutorial authority finds the evidence from supervisory authorities insufficient, it can either supplement the evidence or transfer the case to the police for further investigation [11][12]. Group 4: Prosecution Procedures - If the supervisory authority has established the facts of "self-laundering" and believes it meets prosecution conditions, it can include these facts in the prosecution submission [13]. - The prosecutorial authority can directly add charges of money laundering if it finds sufficient evidence and has consulted with the supervisory and police authorities [14][15].

Core Points - The case involves three individuals (A, B, C) conspiring to falsely inflate seed procurement quantities, resulting in an overpayment of 120,000 yuan to Company C, which they later divided among themselves [5][9][10] - A, while serving as the head of the Agricultural Technology Promotion Station, engaged in corrupt practices, including embezzlement and bribery, totaling 2.08 million yuan in bribes and 460,000 yuan in collusion with another employee [6][12][14] - The investigation led to A being expelled from the party and public office, with subsequent criminal charges filed for embezzlement, bribery, and collusion [7][18][20] Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - A was responsible for a seed procurement contract, where he, along with B and C, conspired to create a false procurement quantity, leading to an illegal return of 120,000 yuan [4][5] - A's actions included receiving bribes from multiple suppliers, totaling 2.08 million yuan over a decade [6][12] Investigation Process - The investigation began on September 25, 2023, with A being placed under detention, followed by disciplinary actions and criminal charges [7][19] - A was convicted on April 30, 2025, receiving a combined sentence of seven years in prison and a fine of 550,000 yuan [7][18] Legal Interpretations - The actions of A, B, and C were classified as joint embezzlement rather than bribery, as they involved the illegal appropriation of public funds [8][9] - The court determined that A and another employee, D, engaged in joint bribery, with A being the principal actor and D playing a secondary role [15][16]

中央纪委国家监委驻中国联通纪检监察组按照规范化、法治化、正规化要求，创新构建案件质量评查体 系，坚持问题导向开展评查。2024年首次实现全系统案件评查全覆盖，案件质量实现整体提升。 创新评查模式，构建全流程质控体系。在覆盖范围上，系统总结既往抽检工作经验，对2024年度全系统 全量办结案件实施评查全覆盖。在方式方法上，推行"线上全量覆盖+线下靶向抽检"双轨模式，结合案 件类型、复杂程度等因素选取案件现场评查，着力发现深层次问题。在协作机制上，跨省级分公司组建 5个评查组，通过交叉互评、集中会审，打破区域壁垒，形成监督合力。在质量把控上，建立三审三校 机制，经背靠背初评、交叉复核、集体终审，确保定性精准、标准统一。在过程管理上，督导组全程指 导，统一评查表格，保证评查工作严谨规范，发布第二批《执纪审查文书模板》，推动文书标准化。 深化成果运用，健全长效机制。紧扣"三化"建设要求，今年持续以案件质量评查工作为抓手，推动监督 执纪质效再升级。开展案件质量"回头看"，对党的二十大以来省级分（子）公司纪委办结案件开展全覆 盖质量评查，重点核查事实证据、定性处理等关键环节，启动纪律处分执行情况检查。深化实战练兵， 通过以 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights the successful remediation of previously contaminated land in Jiangdu District, Yangzhou City, where illegal dumping of construction waste had occurred, leading to improved agricultural conditions with healthy wheat growth [1] - The local disciplinary inspection and supervision commission identified issues related to illegal solid waste disposal through public complaints and conducted thorough investigations in collaboration with various departments, including environmental protection and public security [1][2] - A total of 17 individuals were subjected to disciplinary and administrative investigations as a result of the findings from the inspections, which uncovered illegal waste disposal practices in five towns [1] Group 2 - The district's disciplinary commission has implemented a collaborative governance mechanism involving multiple departments to address environmental issues, focusing on areas with significant problems [2] - The commission has utilized public platforms to report on violations by officials, aiming to enhance accountability and transparency in environmental governance [2] - A dual supervision mechanism combining fixed monitoring and mobile inspections has been established to ensure effective management of waste disposal both within and outside the district [2]

"不能胜寸心，安能胜苍穹。"党性教育是共产党人修身养性的必修课，也是共产党人的"心学"。对共产 党员来说，党性修养不会随着党龄的增加而自然提高，也不会随着职务的升迁而自然提高。房间要经常 打扫，镜子要经常擦拭。要教育引导各级党组织和广大党员干部经常进行思想政治体检，同党中央要 求"对标"，拿党章党规"扫描"，用人民群众新期待"透视"，同先辈先烈、先进典型"对照"，不断叩问初 心、守护初心，不断坚守使命、担当使命，始终做到初心如磐、使命在肩。内心净化、志向高远便会力 量无穷，就会自觉保持优良作风。 衡量党性强弱的根本尺子是公、私二字。作风问题很多就是因为公私关系没有摆正，几顿饭、几杯酒、 几张卡都与公私问题有联系，都与公款、公权有关系。公款姓公，一分一厘都不能乱花；公权为民，一 丝一毫都不能私用。谷文昌一生公私分明，5个子女在工作、生活上没有得到过任何特殊照顾；焦裕禄 看戏从来都是自己排队买票，绝不准孩子"看白戏"；杨善洲从工作地回家，从来都是自己买车票，不占 公家的便宜……作为党的干部，就是要讲大公无私、公私分明、先公后私、公而忘私，只有一心为公、 事事出于公心，才能坦荡做人、谨慎用权，才能光明正大、堂堂正正 ...

1846年7月，伦敦共产主义通讯委员会在给布鲁塞尔共产主义通讯委员会的一封信中写道："我们共产主 义者虽有千百万，但我们却还没有建立起政党。从这一点也足以看出，这方面的必要性已成熟到了何等 地步。"信中指出，建党要"越快越好，任何拖延都孕育着危险"。 面对紧迫形势，马克思恩格斯强调，"无产阶级要在决定关头强大到足以取得胜利"，必须"组成一个不 同于其他所有政党并与它们对立的特殊政党，一个自觉的阶级政党"。 在马克思恩格斯的指导下，正义者同盟改组为共产主义者同盟，成为世界上第一个无产阶级政党。马克 思恩格斯认为，支部是构成党的组织体系的重要部分，不能放松"同中央委员会的联系"。他们积极参与 到支部建设工作中，扩大支部在工人阶级队伍中的影响力，"把工人阶级的力量组织并联合起来"。 1850年3月，马克思恩格斯在《共产主义者同盟中央委员会告同盟书》中强调，无产阶级政党"必须尽量 有组织地、尽量一致地和尽量独立地行动起来"，"使自己的每一个支部变成工人联合会的中心和核 心"，把"所有可用的力量都掌握在同盟的手里"。 马克思主义经典作家始终重视加强党的组织建设。俄国社会民主工党建立之初，列宁指出党必须有严密 的组织和统 ...