Workflow
13个精算师
icon
Search documents
2025一季度财险公司保费排名榜:平安超市场,紫金、中原、大家等增速超20%,比亚迪、长江、众惠、三星排名飙升!
13个精算师· 2025-06-09 14:03
Core Viewpoint - The property insurance industry has achieved record highs in both profits and premiums in Q1 2025, with significant contributions from both auto and non-auto insurance segments [1][16][18]. Group 1: Premium Rankings and Growth - In Q1 2025, the total premium income for property insurance companies reached 515.5 billion, marking a year-on-year growth of 5.1% [16][18]. - The top three companies by premium income are: 1. People's Insurance Company: 180.85 billion, 4.0% growth 2. Ping An Property & Casualty: 89.31 billion, 7.4% growth 3. Taiping Property & Casualty: 63.32 billion, 0.9% growth [3][4]. - The growth in premiums is driven by both auto and non-auto insurance, with auto insurance premiums contributing significantly to the overall growth [20][23]. Group 2: Performance of Major Companies - Ping An Property & Casualty has shown strong performance with a premium income of 56.95 billion from auto insurance, growing by 3.7%, and 32.36 billion from non-auto insurance, growing by 14.4% [28][29]. - Other companies like Dadi and Zhong An have also outperformed the market, with significant growth in their premium income [31][35]. - Companies such as Zijin and Taikang have seen their rankings improve due to their strong growth rates [31][35]. Group 3: Trends in Insurance Segments - The property insurance industry is experiencing a shift towards non-auto insurance, with health insurance leading the growth in this segment, achieving a premium growth rate of 7.65% [25][26]. - The growth in non-auto insurance is becoming increasingly important for companies, as evidenced by the performance of smaller firms that have capitalized on this trend [41][42]. - The overall market is seeing a diversification in insurance offerings, with companies adapting to changing consumer demands and regulatory environments [10][12].
【保险学术前沿】文章推荐:竞争性保险市场中的均衡:论信息不完全经济
13个精算师· 2025-06-06 14:00
作者: Michael Rothschild(威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校),Joseph Stiglitz(斯坦福大学和牛津万灵学院) 原文链接: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1885326 本期看点: ●即使存在少量信息不完全也可能对竞争市场产生重大影响,传统竞争分析中的 单一价格均衡不可 行 ,而市场均衡若存在,则是由同时规定 价格与数量的合同 构成。 声明:本系列文章基于原期刊目录和摘要内容整理而得,仅限于读者交流学习。如有侵权,请联系 删除。 本文基于以下论文整理而得: Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. (1976). Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: an Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 629–649. ●高风险个体的存在对低风险个体产生了负外部性,即它导致低风险客户受损,但高风险客户并未 因此而变得更富有。 ●若个体能自愿或被强制披露信 ...