（股份代號：1919) 臨時股東會通告 茲通告中遠海運控股股份有限公司（「本公司」）謹訂於二零二五年十月三十一日 （星期五）下午二時三十分假座香港皇后大道中183號中遠大廈47樓會議室及中國上海 市東大名路1171號上海遠洋賓館5樓遠洋廳舉行臨時股東會（「臨時股東會」），以審議 及酌情通過（無論有否修訂）以下本公司決議案。 除另行界定者外，本通告所用詞彙與本公司日期為二零二五年十月十三日的通函 （「通函」）所界定者具相同涵義。 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本通告的內容概不負 責，對其準確性或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本通告全部或任 何部分內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 中遠海運控股股份有限公司 COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.* （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） 中華人民共和國，上海 二零二五年十月十三日 1. 審議及批准金融服務總協議項下的持續關連交易及其項下的建議年度上限。 2. 審議及批准中遠海運總協議項下的持續關連交易及其項下的建議年度上 限： 2.1 審議及批准綜合服務總協議項下的持續關連交 ...

臨時股東會之代表委任表格 本人╱吾等 （附註1） 地址為 為中遠海運控股股份有限公司（「本公司」）股本中每股面值人民幣1.00元合共 股股份 （附註2） 的登記持有人，茲委任大會主席或 （附註3） 為本人╱吾等之代表，以代表本人╱吾等出席本公司於二零二五年十月三十一日（星期五）下午二時三十分假座香港皇后大道中183 號中遠大廈47樓會議室及中國上海市東大名路1171號上海遠洋賓館5樓遠洋廳舉行臨時股東會（「大會」）（及其任何續會），以審議及 酌情通過日期為二零二五年十月十三日的大會通告（「大會通告」）並於大會（及其任何續會）按以下指示為本人╱吾等及以本人╱吾 等名義就下列決議案投票。除非另有所指，否則大會通告所用的詞彙應與本代表委任表格所界定者具有相同涵義。 | | 普通決議案 | （附註4） 贊成 | （附註4） 反對 | （附註4） 棄權 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1. | 審議及批准金融服務總協議項下的持續關連交易及其項下的建議年度上 | | | | | | 限。 | | | | | 2. | 審議及批准中遠海運總協議項下的持續關連交易及其項下的建議年度上 ...

此乃要件 請即處理 閣下如對本通函任何部份或應採取之行動有任何疑問，應諮詢 閣下之股票經紀或其他註冊證券商、銀行 經理、律師、專業會計師或其他專業顧問。 閣下如已售出或轉讓名下所有中遠海運控股股份有限公司的股份，應立即將本通函及隨附之代表委任表格 轉交買主或承讓人，或經手買賣或轉讓的銀行、股票經紀或其他代理，以便轉交買主或承讓人。 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本通函的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完整性亦 不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本通函全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任 何損失承擔任何責任。 中遠海運控股股份有限公司 COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.* （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） （股份代號：1919) (1) 主要交易及持續關連交易及 (2) 臨時股東會通告 獨立董事委員會及獨立股東的獨立財務顧問 本封面頁所用詞彙與本通函「釋義」一節所界定者具有相同涵義。 董事會函件載於本通函第7至50頁。獨立董事委員會致獨立股東的函件載於本通函第51頁。載有嘉林資本 致獨立董事委員會及獨立股東意見的函件載於本通函第52至75頁 ...

Core Insights - The top three companies with the highest short positions as of October 3 are COSCO Shipping Holdings (01919), Ganfeng Lithium (01772), and ZTE Corporation (00763), with short ratios of 15.66%, 15.25%, and 15.16% respectively [1][2] - Ganfeng Lithium (01772) saw the largest absolute increase in short positions, rising by 1.20%, followed by Minmetals Resources (01208) with an increase of 0.96%, and Yuexiu Transport Infrastructure (01052) with an increase of 0.76% [1][2] - The companies with the largest decreases in short positions include GCL-Poly Energy (03800), which decreased by 3.16%, followed by Dongfang Electric (01072) with a decrease of 2.03%, and Jinxin Fertility (01951) with a decrease of 0.76% [1][3] Summary of Short Positions - **Top 10 Companies by Short Ratio** - COSCO Shipping Holdings (01919): 15.66% (from 437 million shares to 451 million shares) - Ganfeng Lithium (01772): 15.25% (from 62.30 million shares to 67.64 million shares) - ZTE Corporation (00763): 15.16% (from 113 million shares to 115 million shares) - CATL (03750): 13.83% (from 21.12 million shares to 21.57 million shares) - Vanke (02202): 12.63% (from 268 million shares to 279 million shares) - Ping An Insurance (02318): 12.59% (from 959 million shares to 938 million shares) - Zijin Mining (02899): 12.58% (from 750 million shares to 754 million shares) - MicroPort Medical (00853): 11.10% (from 213 million shares to 212 million shares) - Hansoh Pharmaceutical (01276): 11.01% (from 28.01 million shares to 28.43 million shares) - Fuyao Glass (06865): 10.85% (from 49.22 million shares to 47.94 million shares) [2] - **Top 10 Companies with Increased Short Positions** - Ganfeng Lithium (01772): Increased by 1.20% (from 14.05% to 15.25%) - Minmetals Resources (01208): Increased by 0.96% (from 1.96% to 2.93%) - Yuexiu Transport Infrastructure (01052): Increased by 0.76% (from 1.08% to 1.84%) - Jinli Permanent Magnet (06680): Increased by 0.66% (from 7.76% to 8.42%) - China Civil Aviation Information Network (00696): Increased by 0.58% (from 6.63% to 7.21%) [2] - **Top 10 Companies with Decreased Short Positions** - GCL-Poly Energy (03800): Decreased by 3.16% (from 11.76% to 8.59%) - Dongfang Electric (01072): Decreased by 2.03% (from 6.78% to 4.75%) - Jinxin Fertility (01951): Decreased by 0.76% (from 10.61% to 9.85%) - Yangtze Optical Fibre and Cable (06869): Decreased by 0.75% (from 7.03% to 6.28%) - Shanghai Electric (02727): Decreased by 0.72% (from 2.25% to 1.52%) [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The recent U.S. measures to impose new port service fees on Chinese-owned, operated, or built vessels are expected to significantly impact the operational costs of Chinese shipping companies and shipyards, but the overall situation may not be as dire as anticipated [1][2][3] Impact on Shipping Costs and Rates - The new fee structure includes three categories: $50 per net ton for Chinese-owned or operated vessels, a minimum of $18 per net ton or $120 per container for Chinese-built vessels, and $14 per net ton for car carriers [2] - If strictly enforced, the measures could lead to substantial cost increases for Chinese shipping companies and may prompt some international shipping firms to relocate their headquarters away from regions like Hong Kong and Macau [2][3] - Alphaliner estimates that the U.S. measures could add $3.2 billion in costs for the top ten global shipping companies by 2026, with COSCO and OOCL bearing nearly half of this burden [3] Global Shipping Landscape - China's shipbuilding industry continues to dominate globally, holding over 40% of the market share, while the U.S. accounts for less than 1% [6] - The U.S. actions may inadvertently benefit shipyards in Japan and South Korea, as they could attract orders that might have gone to Chinese shipbuilders [6][7] - Despite concerns about new orders, China's strong supply chain and technological advantages are expected to maintain its leading position in shipbuilding [7] China's Response Strategies - China has enacted a revised International Shipping Regulations that allows for reciprocal measures against countries implementing discriminatory practices [8] - The Ministry of Commerce plans to collaborate with the EU, Japan, and South Korea to challenge the U.S. measures at the WTO, while the China Shipowners Association is working to establish an "International Shipping Fairness Alliance" [9] Industry Adjustments - Shipping companies are optimizing their fleets to mitigate the impact of the new fees, with some already implementing additional charges to offset rising costs [10][11] - The industry is also focusing on green ship technology development and expanding into markets along the Belt and Road Initiative to counterbalance the effects of reduced exports to the U.S. [11]

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚 賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 中遠海運控股股份有限公司 COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.* （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） （股份代號：1919） 海外監管公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 本公告乃根據《香港聯合交易所有限公司證券上市規則》第13.10B條而作出。 以中文隨附之海外監管公告乃本公司於二零二五年十月九日在上海證券交易所的 網站( www.sse.com.cn )上以中文發佈的《中遠海運控股股份有限公司股票期權激勵 計劃2025年第三季度自主行權結果暨股份變動公告》。 承董事會命 中遠海運控股股份有限公司 公司秘書 肖俊光 中華人民共和國，上海 二零二五年十月九日 於本公告日期，本公司董事為萬敏先生（董事長）、張峰先生 1 （副董事長）、 1 陶衛東先生 1 、朱濤先生 1 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the top and bottom AH premium rates for various stocks as of October 9, with Northeast Electric (00042) leading at a premium of 743.75% [1][2]. AH Premium Rate Rankings - The top three stocks with the highest AH premium rates are: - Northeast Electric (00042): 743.75% - Andeli Juice (02218): 235.25% - Zhejiang Shibao (01057): 227.36% [1][2] - The bottom three stocks with the lowest AH premium rates are: - Contemporary Amperex Technology (03750): -16.12% - Heng Rui Medicine (01276): -2.39% - China Merchants Bank (03968): 3.49% [1][2] Deviation Values - The stocks with the highest deviation values are: - Changfei Optical Fiber (06869): 28.93% - Zhejiang Shibao (01057): 12.23% - Red Star Macalline (01528): 11.20% [1][2] - The stocks with the lowest deviation values are: - Northeast Electric (00042): -72.24% - Shanghai Electric (02727): -54.73% - Dazhong Public Utilities (01635): -29.80% [1][2]

证券代码：601919 证券简称：中远海控 公告编号：2025-047 中远海运控股股份有限公司 股票期权激励计划2025年第三季度自主行权结果 暨股份变动公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 1、本次行权股票数量：2025年第三季度，公司股票期权激励计 划无激励对象行权，激励对象行权且完成股份过户登记的行权股票 数量合计为0股。 2、本次行权股票上市流通时间：2025年第三季度，公司股票期 权激励计划无激励对象行权，不涉及行权股票上市流通事项。 2025 年第三季度，中远海运控股股份有限公司（简称"公 司"）股票期权激励计划无激励对象行权，激励对象行权且完 成股份过户登记的行权股票数量合计为 0 股。具体说明如下： 一、股票期权激励计划已履行的决策程序及相关信息披露 2018年12月至2020年7月期间，按照《中华人民共和国公司法》、 《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》等法律法规的有关规定，公司董 事会、监事会及股东大会分别审议通过了公司《股票期权激励计划》 并实施了股票期权激励计划首次授予及预留 ...

FF301 股份發行人及根據《上市規則》第十九B章上市的香港預託證券發行人的證券變動月報表 截至月份: 2025年9月30日 狀態: 新提交 致：香港交易及結算所有限公司 公司名稱: 中遠海運控股股份有限公司 呈交日期: 2025年10月2日 I. 法定/註冊股本變動 | 1. 股份分類 | 普通股 | 股份類別 | H | | | 於香港聯交所上市 (註1) | | 是 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 01919 | 說明 | | | | | | | | | | | 法定/註冊股份數目 | | | 面值 | | | 法定/註冊股本 | | | 上月底結存 | | | 2,971,819,500 | RMB | | | 1 RMB | | 2,971,819,500 | | 增加 / 減少 (-) | | | | | | | RMB | | | | 本月底結存 | | | 2,971,819,500 | RMB | | | 1 RMB | | 2,971,819,500 | | 2 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the contrasting performances of two major shipping companies, Evergreen Marine from Taiwan and COSCO Shipping from mainland China, in terms of revenue growth and operational efficiency in the shipping industry for 2024. Group 1: Evergreen Marine - Evergreen Marine's consolidated revenue for 2024 is projected to reach approximately $14 billion, nearly doubling from $9 billion in 2023, with a growth rate of 67.53% [3][5] - The revenue increase is attributed to a rebound in global container shipping rates and strategic operational decisions, including a focus on reliable routes and high customer retention [3][5] - The company operates a fleet of 221 vessels with a total capacity of 1.74 million TEUs, ranking seventh globally, and has a net profit of approximately $4.2 billion for 2024 [3][5] - Employee benefits are substantial, with an average year-end bonus equivalent to 20 months' salary, reflecting the company's strong financial performance [3][5] - Evergreen's strategy emphasizes maintaining operational efficiency and flexibility, with a focus on younger vessels and a commitment to customer service [5][12] Group 2: COSCO Shipping - COSCO Shipping's revenue for 2024 is expected to exceed 230 billion RMB (approximately $33 billion), representing a year-on-year growth of 33.29% [7][9] - The company operates nearly 500 vessels and has a significant presence in global port investments, managing 36 ports and 46 terminals [7][9] - COSCO's net profit for 2024 is projected at approximately 491 billion RMB, with a strong cash flow and substantial dividends for shareholders [7][9] - The company benefits from its large scale, which provides strong bargaining power and resilience against market fluctuations [10][12] - COSCO is also focusing on expanding its LNG fleet in response to environmental pressures and aims for long-term sustainability [10][14] Group 3: Comparative Analysis - In terms of revenue, COSCO Shipping significantly outperforms Evergreen Marine, with a revenue of approximately $33 billion compared to Evergreen's $14 billion [12][14] - Evergreen Marine boasts higher profit margins, with a net profit margin close to 30%, while COSCO's is around 10% due to its larger operational scale [12][14] - Both companies face similar challenges, including high fuel prices and environmental regulations, but they have different strategies to mitigate these risks [14][16] - Evergreen's growth rate of 67% is impressive compared to COSCO's 33%, but COSCO's larger base provides a more substantial absolute revenue figure [14][16]