Core Viewpoint - The company, Jiao Da Ang Li, is involved in a legal case against five former executives for allegedly harming the company's interests through illegal insurance purchases and tax evasion practices [2][10]. Group 1: Case Details - The company discovered irregularities in insurance payments totaling 12.84 million yuan (approximately 1.28 billion) made in 2018, which lacked the required insurance contracts [2]. - The former executives, including Yang Guoping and others, are accused of purchasing large insurance policies and subsequently cashing out through refunds to their personal accounts [4][10]. - The company reported that similar practices occurred in 2016, with insurance payments amounting to 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.38 billion) [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The company filed a criminal report with the Shanghai police, which was not accepted for further investigation, prompting the company to seek administrative review [3]. - Legal opinions suggest that the actions of the former executives may constitute embezzlement and violate company laws, as the insurance purchases were not approved by the board or shareholders [10][11]. Group 3: Financial Transactions - The first insurance contract was established in October 2016 with a total premium of 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.38 billion), and the executives received refunds totaling 3.79 million yuan (approximately 0.38 billion) after cancellation [5][7]. - In 2018, the company made additional insurance payments exceeding 10 million yuan (approximately 1 billion) to another insurance provider, with subsequent refunds being funneled back to the executives [8][9]. Group 4: Governance and Compliance Issues - The company failed to disclose these significant transactions in its annual reports, which is a violation of disclosure regulations for publicly listed companies [11]. - The case highlights potential governance failures within the company, as the former executives allegedly exploited their positions to benefit personally without proper oversight [12].

Core Viewpoint - The company is facing legal issues related to former executives who allegedly misappropriated company funds for personal insurance policies, leading to significant financial implications and potential criminal charges against those involved [2][5][12]. Group 1: Legal Issues and Developments - The company reported that the police decided not to file a case against the former executives involved in the alleged misconduct, prompting the company to apply for administrative review [2]. - The company has submitted new evidence, including a legal opinion from a law firm, indicating that the actions of the former executives may constitute embezzlement and violate laws regarding the misappropriation of company assets [2][12]. - The company filed a criminal report with the police on June 24, 2023, against five former executives for damaging company interests, which was accepted by the authorities [2][5]. Group 2: Background of the Company - Founded in December 1997, the company is a well-known player in China's health food industry and went public in 2021, focusing on health products and elderly care services [4]. - The company has undergone multiple changes in its controlling shareholders, with the latest change occurring in August 2022, when the controlling shareholder shifted to Shanghai Yunjian Industrial Development Co., Ltd. [4]. Group 3: Details of the Alleged Misconduct - Between 2016 and 2019, the former executives purchased group insurance policies using company funds and subsequently received refunds to their personal accounts, totaling approximately 16.93 million yuan [6][8]. - The first insurance contract was initiated in October 2016, with a payment of 3.8 million yuan made to Tianan Life Insurance, covering six individuals, including the former chairman and other key executives [6][8]. - The company discovered that there were no formal approval processes or documentation supporting the insurance purchases, raising significant compliance concerns [7][12]. Group 4: Evidence and Findings - The company conducted an internal review following a request from the tax bureau, which led to the discovery of irregularities in the insurance payments made in 2018 [10][11]. - Independent third-party reports have indicated that the actions of the former executives violated company regulations and relevant laws, further supporting the company's claims against them [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The management of Jiaoda Onlly (交大昂立) has accused five former executives of illegal insurance purchases and refunds, leading to significant financial implications for the company [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against Former Executives - The company purchased a total of 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.54 million USD) in group annuity insurance from Tianan Life in October 2016 and paid 12.84 million yuan (approximately 1.8 million USD) in insurance premiums to Pacific Life from January to June 2018, with the insured being the five former executives [2]. - The five former executives refunded a total of 3.79 million yuan (approximately 0.53 million USD) from Tianan Life and 13.145 million yuan (approximately 1.83 million USD) from Pacific Life, totaling 16.937 million yuan (approximately 2.36 million USD) in refunds [2]. - The company’s assistant president stated that the approval process for these insurance payments lacked necessary documentation, suggesting potential illegalities in the refund process [2]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Financial Impact - In December 2024, the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning regarding the company’s inaccurate disclosure of executive compensation in its annual reports for 2016 and 2018 [3]. - The company filed a civil lawsuit against the five former executives for damages amounting to approximately 21.04 million yuan (approximately 2.9 million USD) but later withdrew the lawsuit before the court hearing [3]. - The chairman indicated that the actions of the former executives resulted in a loss of approximately 21 million yuan (approximately 2.9 million USD) to the company, leading to a criminal report filed with the local police [3][4]. Group 3: Business Operations and Client Relationships - The company disclosed that it had significant sales to Hefei Sanzi Yang, totaling 5.1575 million yuan (approximately 0.72 million USD) and 3.1611 million yuan (approximately 0.44 million USD) in the second and third quarters of 2024, respectively, making it the largest customer during that period [5]. - However, by the fourth quarter of 2024, Hefei Sanzi Yang was no longer listed among the top ten customers, and the CEO of Sanzi Yang resigned from the board of Jiaoda Onlly [5][6]. - The chairman mentioned that the company has identified better business opportunities, leading to the cessation of collaboration with Sanzi Yang [6].

Core Viewpoint - The company disclosed that five former executives, including Yang Guoping, engaged in illegal activities related to the purchase and cancellation of insurance policies, resulting in significant financial misconduct [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Discovery - The company discovered the misconduct during a self-inspection prompted by a notice from the tax bureau on November 23, 2022, regarding insurance fees and tax payments [2]. - A total of 12.84 million yuan (approximately 1.28 million) in insurance fees from 2018 was identified without corresponding insurance contracts, alongside an additional 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.38 million) from 2016 [2]. Group 2: Misconduct Details - From 2016 to 2019, the five former executives used company funds to purchase insurance policies and subsequently withdrew 16.9372 million yuan (approximately 1.69 million) to their personal accounts through policy cancellations [3]. - The actions of the executives were characterized as "dark box operations," lacking necessary approvals from the board and shareholders, which is a violation of company regulations [3]. Group 3: Legal Actions - The company filed a criminal report with the local police in June 2023, seeking accountability for the actions of the five former executives [4]. - Following the report, the police did not initiate a case, prompting the company to apply for administrative review and submit additional evidence [4]. Group 4: Company Commitment - The company expressed its commitment to pursue accountability for the former executives' illegal actions to protect the rights of the company and its shareholders [5].

Core Viewpoint - China's CPI turned positive in June, increasing by 0.1% year-on-year, which is better than the expected 0% and significantly improved from May's -0.1% [1] Group 1: CPI and Market Reaction - Food, tobacco, and alcohol prices rose by 0.1% year-on-year, contributing approximately 0.03 percentage points to the CPI increase [2] - The food and beverage sector experienced a collective rebound, with industry gains reaching 1.2% at one point, and significant net inflows into sub-sectors like liquor [2] - Notable stock movements included Jiaotong Angli (600530.SH) hitting the daily limit, while Babi Food (605338.SH) and Huangtai Liquor (000995.SH) saw maximum intraday gains exceeding 7% [2] Group 2: Investment Insights - Analysts from Citic Securities suggest that the "anti-involution" policy will benefit traditional industries, with a focus on consumer sectors like dairy, home goods, and feed [2] - Guangfa Securities believes that the liquor industry's dividend yield is significantly advantageous compared to the ten-year government bond yield, indicating strategic allocation value at this stage [2] - Ping An Securities highlights that liquor companies are innovating low-alcohol products to meet new consumer demands, while beverage consumption is shifting towards solution-oriented models [3] Group 3: Market Volatility and Opportunities - The food and beverage sector has experienced significant valuation volatility, with fluctuations reaching 25% due to factors like "consumption downgrade" and "new consumption" [3] - This volatility presents both risks and opportunities; understanding the fundamentals and market sentiment is crucial for investors [4] - The sector is expected to see a dual recovery in valuation and earnings, potentially leading to a "Davis Double" effect [6] Group 4: Future Outlook - The food and beverage sector is viewed as having substantial opportunities, with expectations of continued economic growth in China, particularly as it transitions to a consumption-driven economy [6] - The research institute emphasizes the importance of selecting stocks with high success probabilities and good holding experiences, utilizing a combination of subjective analysis and quantitative assessment [6] - Investors are encouraged to explore potential high-growth stocks within the food and beverage sector, such as Guizhou Moutai and Shanxi Fenjiu, and to consider new collaborations like that of Jiu Gui Jiu and Pang Dong Lai [7]

Core Viewpoint - The company received a regulatory letter from the Shanghai Stock Exchange regarding its 2024 annual report, prompting a detailed response concerning its small loan business and related financial disclosures [1][2]. Group 1: Small Loan Business and Debt Transfer - The company’s subsidiary, Shanghai Angli Jiuding Pawn Co., transferred a debt of 57 million yuan to its joint venture, Shanghai Xuhui Angli Small Loan Co., which has paid 40 million yuan, leaving a balance of 17 million yuan [1][2]. - The company reversed a loan impairment loss of 39.25 million yuan, significantly impacting its net profit attributable to shareholders [1][2]. - The debt transfer agreement was signed to fulfill obligations under a previous cooperation agreement, which aimed to mitigate risks associated with uncollectible loans [6][14]. Group 2: Financial Data and Impairment Losses - The company reported a total loan issuance and advance balance of 425,000 yuan at the end of 2024, with a loan loss provision of 2.0599 million yuan [16][18]. - The impairment loss for the loans to Shanghai Xuhui Angli Small Loan Co. was calculated at 1.275 million yuan, reflecting a 75% provision rate due to the company's financial difficulties [12][16]. - The company’s financial statements indicated a net profit loss of 23.14 million yuan for the year, with significant asset impairment losses recorded [16][18]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Compliance - The company’s audit firm confirmed that the accounting treatment for the impairment reversals and provisions complied with accounting standards [19]. - The company faced legal challenges regarding the collection of loans, which were complicated by ongoing litigation involving the borrowers [9][14]. - The Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court ruled in favor of the company in a related lawsuit, clarifying the debt relationship with the small loan company [15][16].

证券代码：600530 证券简称：交大昂立 公告编号：2025-040 上海交大昂立股份有限公司 关于上海证券交易所对公司 2024 年年度报告 信息披露监管工作函的回复公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证公告内容不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏， 并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担个别及连带责任。 上海交大昂立股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"、"股份公司"）于近日收到上海证 券交易所《关于上海交大昂立股份有限公司2024年年度报告的信息披露监管工作函》（上 证公函【2025】0867 号）（以下简称"《监管工作函》"）。公司高度重视，会同年审会 计师山东舜天信诚会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）（以下简称"年审会计师"）对监管工 作函提及的事项进行了认真核实，现将相关问题回复如下： 1、典当公司、小贷公司与公司的关系介绍 典当公司为公司的全资子公司，小贷公司为公司持股 50%的子公司。2019 年之前， 公司因与小贷公司股东上海怡阳园林绿化有限公司（以下简称"怡阳园林"）签订非关 联一致行动人协议，公司对小贷公司具有控制权，为公司的控股子公司，纳入公司合并 报表范围。2019 年，因公司与怡阳园林签订的非关联 ...

虽然交大昂立在2024年12月的媒体沟通会上提到五名前任高 管损害公司利益的行为主要是指通过公司资金购买团体险再退 保至个人账户，但外界尚不清楚此事的细节以及上述五名高管 如此操作的原因。 作者：黄一帆 封图：图虫创意 一周前，交大昂立（600530.SH）公告公司以"损害公司利益责任纠纷"为案由，针对杨国平、朱敏骏、娄健颖、李红、李康明等五名前任高管涉嫌损害 公司利益的行为向上海市公安局松江分局刑事报案，而之前公司对于前任高管的追责还处于民事阶段，由此公司备受资本市场关注。 虽然交大昂立在2024年12月的媒体沟通会上提到五名前任高管损害公司利益的行为主要是指通过公司资金购买团体险再退保至个人账户，但外界尚不 清楚此事的细节以及上述五名高管如此操作的原因。 6月30日，交大昂立实控人、总裁嵇霖独家回应了经济观察报，对相关情况进行了详细的介绍。同时，嵇霖向经济观察报出示了当时公司财务付款购买 保险的流程单据以及上市公司从保险公司处获得的相关资料。 在嵇霖看来，杨国平等 时任 高管通过公司资金购买团体保险再退保退费至个人账户的行为，在证监会关于规范关联方资金占用的文件里早有明确界 定，其实质是时任管理层滥用控制 ...

Group 1 - The company has reported a significant development in the ongoing equity dispute involving its former executives, with a criminal report filed against five individuals for alleged misconduct [2] - The five individuals, all former executives of the company, include the former chairman and other high-ranking officials who left the company after 2018 [2] - The company is currently operating normally, and the chairman continues to fulfill his duties despite the legal proceedings [3] Group 2 - The company received a warning from the Shanghai regulatory authority regarding inaccurate disclosures of executive compensation in its annual reports for 2016 and 2018 [3] - The company has initiated civil lawsuits against the former executives to recover funds allegedly misappropriated through improper insurance transactions [3] - The current management has previously raised concerns about potential violations of disclosure regulations by former executives during a corporate restructuring, which led to delays in financial reporting [3] Group 3 - The company's shareholding structure indicates that the largest shareholder is a consortium of entities controlled by Ji Lin, holding 30.062% of the shares, while the second-largest shareholder is Dazhong Transportation with a 19.89% stake [4] - Earlier this year, the company's controlling shareholders attempted a partial tender offer to increase their control but faced limited participation due to a rapid increase in the company's stock price [5]

证券代码：600530 证券简称：交大昂立 公告编号：2025-039 上海交大昂立股份有限公司 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重 大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 截至本公告披露日，杜刚先生未持有公司股份，不存在未履行完毕的公开承诺，并 已按照相关规定做好离任交接工作。公司及公司董事会对杜刚先生在任职期间为公司发 展做出的贡献表示衷心感谢！ 上海交大昂立股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）董事会于近日收到公司非独立董 事杜刚先生的书面辞职报告。因个人原因，杜刚先生申请辞去公司第九届董事会董事及 战略委员会委员职务，辞职后杜刚先生将不在公司担任任何职务。 特此公告。 一、董事离任情况 上海交大昂立股份有限公司董事会 (一) 提前离任的基本情况 | | | | | | | | 是否继续在上 | | 具体职 | 是否存在未 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | 原定任期 | | | 离任 | | | | | | 姓名 ...