Group 1 - *ST亚太 announced the resignation of Mr. 贾明琪 as Vice Chairman and Mr. 赵勇 as a board member, with both no longer holding any positions in the company or its subsidiaries after their resignations [1] - For the first half of 2025, *ST亚太's revenue composition is entirely from the chemical industry, accounting for 100.0% [1] - As of the report date, *ST亚太 has a market capitalization of 3.8 billion yuan [1] Group 2 - The competition between农夫 and 怡宝 has intensified, with 农夫's green bottle launch leading to a significant market share decline for 怡宝, dropping nearly 5 percentage points [1]

证券代码：000691 证券简称：*ST亚太 公告编号：2025-094 甘肃亚太实业发展股份有限公司 股票交易异常波动公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、股票交易异常波动的情况介绍 甘肃亚太实业发展股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）的股票（证券简称： *ST 亚太 ，证券代码：000691）连续 3 个交易日（2025 年 9 月 25 日、2025 年 9 月 26 日、2025 年 9 月 29 日）收盘价格涨幅偏离值累计超过 12%。根据《深 圳证券交易所交易规则》的规定，属于股票交易异常波动的情形。 二、公司关注并核实情况说明 针对公司股票价格异常波动情况，公司进行了全面自查，并书面函询了公 司控股股东及实际控制人，现将有关情况说明如下： 1、公司于 2025 年 8 月 5 日在巨潮资讯网（www.cninfo.com.cn）披露了 《2025 年半年度业绩预告修正公告》（公告编号：2025-070），公司对前期披 露的 2025 年半年度业绩预告相关区间数据进行了修正。除此之外，公司前期披 露的其他信息不存在需要更正、补充之处 ...

甘肃亚太实业发展股份有限公司 简式权益变动报告书 信息披露义务人：兰州亚太矿业集团有限公司 住所：甘肃省兰州市兰州新区纬十八路以南、纬十六路以北、经十四路以东、 东绕城以西 信息披露义务人之一致行动人：兰州太华投资控股有限公司 住所：甘肃省兰州市城关区张掖路 219 号 二、信息披露义务人及其一致行动人签署本报告书已获得必要的授权和批准， 其履行亦不违反信息披露义务人章程或内部规则中的任何条款，或与之相冲突。 三、依据《中华人民共和国证券法》、《上市公司收购管理办法》的规定， 本报告书已全面披露信息披露义务人及其一致行动人在甘肃亚太实业发展股份 有限公司拥有权益的股份变动情况。截至本报告书签署日，除本报告书披露的持 股信息外，信息披露义务人及其一致行动人没有通过任何其他方式增加或减少其 在甘肃亚太实业发展股份有限公司中拥有权益的股份。 四、本次权益变动系根据本报告书所载明的资料进行。信息披露义务人及其 一致行动人没有委托或者授权任何其他人提供未在本报告书中列载的信息和对 本报告书做出任何解释或者说明。 五、信息披露义务人及其一致行动人承诺本报告书不存在虚假记载、误导性 陈述或重大遗漏，并对其真实性、准确性、完 ...

甘肃亚太实业发展股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）董事会近日收到公 司董事、副董事长贾明琪先生及董事赵勇先生的书面辞职报告。贾明琪先生自 愿申请辞去公司第九届董事会副董事长及董事职务，赵勇先生自愿申请辞去公 司第九届董事会董事职务。贾明琪先生及赵勇先生原定任期届满之日为 2026 年 12 月 27 日。辞职后，贾明琪先生及赵勇先生不再担任公司及公司下属子公司 任何职务。 贾明琪先生及赵勇先生离任不会导致公司董事会成员低于法定人数，不会 影响公司董事会和日常经营正常运作。根据《公司法》和《公司章程》的规定， 其辞职报告自送达公司董事会之日起生效。公司将按照法定程序尽快完成副董 事长、董事的补选工作。 截至本公告日，贾明琪先生及赵勇先生未持有公司股票，不存在应履行而 未履行的承诺事项。辞职后，贾明琪先生及赵勇先生在离职后六个月内、原定 任期内和原定任期届满后六个月内仍需继续严格遵守《上市公司股东减持股份 管理暂行办法》、《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 18 号——股东及 董事、监事、高级管理人员减持股份》等法律法规中对离任董监高股份转让的 相关规定。 公司董事会对贾明琪先生及赵勇先生在任职公司董事期间为公 ...

特别提示： 证券代码：000691 证券简称：*ST亚太 公告编号：2025-095 甘肃亚太实业发展股份有限公司 关于持股5%以上股东权益变动触及1%、5%整数倍暨部分股份解除质押、 解除司法标记的提示性公告 股东兰州亚太矿业集团有限公司及其一致行动人兰州太华投资控股有限公司 保证向本公司提供的信息内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或 重大遗漏。 本公司及董事会全体成员保证公告内容与信息披露义务人提供的信息一致。 1、本次权益变动系法院司法强制执行所致，公司已按照相关规定进行了预先 披露；本次权益变动未违反此前已披露的司法强制执行计划，也不存在违规情 形。 2、本次权益变动导致亚太矿业及其一致行动人的持股比例降低，进而导致控 股股东广州万顺持有的表决权比例降低，但不会导致公司控制权发生变更，不会 对公司治理结构及持续经营产生重大影响。 一、本次权益变动情况 甘肃亚太实业发展股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于2025年9月10日在巨潮 资讯网（www.cninfo.com.cn）披露了《关于持股5%以上股东部分股份将被法院强 制变卖、变现的提示公告》（公告编号：2025-082），兰州市城关区人民 ...

Core Viewpoint - The resignation of two key executives, Vice Chairman Jia Mingqi and Director Zhao Yong, will not impact the company's normal operations or board functionality [1] Group 1: Executive Changes - Jia Mingqi and Zhao Yong have resigned due to personal reasons, effective immediately upon delivery of their resignation letters to the board [1] - Following their resignation, both individuals will no longer hold any positions within the company or its subsidiaries [1] - The company plans to expedite the process of selecting replacements for the Vice Chairman and Director positions [1] Group 2: Impact on Company Operations - The resignations of Jia Mingqi and Zhao Yong will not affect the company's stock ownership, as neither held shares in the company [1] - The company's board and daily operations are expected to continue functioning normally despite these changes [1]

Core Points - The announcement indicates that on September 29, 2025, the shares held by Lanzhou Asia-Pacific Mining Group Co., Ltd. in the listed company were subject to judicial enforcement, totaling 70,400 shares, which represents 0.02% of the total share capital of the listed company [1] - Prior to this equity change, Asia-Pacific Mining held 28,977,300 shares, accounting for 8.96% of the total share capital of the listed company; after the change, it holds 28,906,900 shares, which is 8.94% of the total share capital [1]

Market Overview - On September 29, the chemical raw materials sector rose by 1.58%, with Shilong Industrial leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3862.53, up 0.9%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13479.43, up 2.05% [1] Stock Performance - Shilong Industrial (002748) closed at 10.16, with a gain of 9.96% and a trading volume of 129,000 shares, amounting to a turnover of 127 million yuan [1] - Sanxiang New Materials (603663) closed at 28.90, up 7.20%, with a trading volume of 207,400 shares and a turnover of 581 million yuan [1] - Other notable performers include: - Shanshui Technology (301190) at 66.99, up 5.04% [1] - ST Yatai (000691) at 11.82, up 4.97% [1] - Aok Holdings (300082) at 7.83, up 4.96% [1] Fund Flow Analysis - The chemical raw materials sector experienced a net outflow of 116 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 143 million yuan [2] - The detailed fund flow for key stocks includes: - Shilong Industrial: Net inflow of 48.34 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - Sanxiang New Materials: Net inflow of 31.95 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - Zhongke Titanium White (002145): Net inflow of 31.74 million yuan from institutional investors [3]

Group 1 - The article highlights the emergence of two tenfold stocks this year, namely Shouwen New Materials and *ST Yushun, driven by themes related to intelligent robotics and advancements in artificial intelligence computing power respectively [1] - The overall performance of the ST sector has rebounded this year, with a cumulative increase of over 22%, and nine stocks have doubled in value, including *ST Yushun, *ST Yazhen, ST Huatong, ST Xintong, and *ST Yatai, primarily due to transformation expectations and strong performance [1] - ST Huatong reported a net profit of nearly 2.7 billion yuan in the first half of the year, a year-on-year increase of over 129%, and has potential for delisting from the ST category [1] Group 2 - ST Guangwang has a low price-to-book ratio of 2, and it is the only state-owned enterprise among the listed companies, focusing on cable television network operations, advertising agency, and film production [2] - The company is transitioning from a traditional cable television operator to a converged media operator, developing a comprehensive business system that includes high-definition digital television and various interactive value-added services [2] - ST Guangwang plans to apply for the removal of risk warnings according to the Shanghai Stock Exchange regulations and has strong transformation expectations, focusing on core competencies and engaging in mergers and acquisitions in related fields [3]

Group 1 - The company held its 15th meeting of the 9th Board of Directors on September 26, 2025, with all 9 directors present, and the meeting was chaired by Chairman Chen Zhijian [2][3] - The board approved a proposal regarding the acceptance of a gratuitous guarantee from related parties for its subsidiary, Cangzhou Lingang Yanuo Chemical Co., Ltd., with a voting result of 7 in favor and 0 against [2][8] - The guarantee provided by the controlling shareholder, Guangzhou Wanshun Technology Co., Ltd., and related party Guangdong Wanjia Tong Holdings Co., Ltd., amounts to a maximum of RMB 49.47 million [7][13] Group 2 - The guarantee is gratuitous, meaning no fees will be charged, and no counter-guarantee is required [7][21] - The guarantee will terminate if the company successfully completes its restructuring and meets specific conditions, including maintaining an asset-liability ratio below 60% [7][20] - The independent directors unanimously agreed that the guarantee is beneficial for the subsidiary's stable development and does not harm the interests of the company or its minority shareholders [25][23] Group 3 - The company received a decision from the Beijing Arbitration Commission to withdraw a case involving disputes with its shareholders, which will not affect the company's control or financial performance [28][29] - The arbitration case was initiated due to disagreements over a cooperation agreement and a voting rights entrustment agreement [32][34] - The withdrawal of the arbitration request was made by the applicants, and the arbitration fee was partially refunded [34][35]