证券代码：002397 证券简称：梦洁股份 公告编号：2025-050 湖南梦洁家纺股份有限公司 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 关于召开 2026 年第一次临时股东会的通知 一、召开会议的基本情况 1、股东会届次：2026年第一次临时股东会 2、股东会的召集人：董事会 3、本次会议的召集、召开符合《中华人民共和国公司法》《深圳证券交易 所股票上市规则》《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第1号——主板上市 公司规范运作》等法律、行政法规、部门规章、规范性文件及《公司章程》的有 关规定。 4、会议时间： （1） 现场会议时间：2026年1月8日15:00 （2） 网络投票时间：通过深圳证券交易所系统进行网络投票的具体时间为 2026年1月8日9:15-9:25，9:30-11:30，13:00-15:00；通过深圳证券交易所互联网 投票系统投票的具体时间为2026年1月8日9:15至15:00的任意时间。 5、会议的召开方式：现场表决与网络投票相结合。 6、会议的股权登记日：2025年12月31日 7、出席对象： （1）于2025年12月31日 ...

证券代码：002397 证券简称：梦洁股份 公告编号：2025-047 湖南梦洁家纺股份有限公司 第七届董事会第十五次（临时）会议决议公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 湖南梦洁家纺股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第七届董事会第十五次（临 时）会议于 2025 年 12 月 22 日在湖南省长沙市高新技术产业开发区麓谷产业基 地谷苑路 168 号梦洁工业园 3 楼综合会议室召开，会议通知于 2025 年 12 月 16 日以专人递送、传真、电子邮件等方式送达。本次会议由董事长姜天武先生主持， 采取现场表决与通讯表决相结合的方式召开，应出席会议董事 8 人，实际出席会 议董事 8 人，其中独立董事秦拯先生以通讯表决的方式出席。本次会议的召集、 召开符合《中华人民共和国公司法》及《公司章程》的规定。 经与会董事认真讨论审议，本次会议以记名投票表决方式通过如下决议： 一、以 7 票赞成、1 票反对、0 票弃权的表决结果审议通过了《关于修订< 公司章程>的议案》。 《关于修订<公司章程>及其附件的公告》（公告编号：2025-048）详见《证 券时报》 ...

每经AI快讯，梦洁股份（SZ 002397，收盘价：4.12元）12月23日晚间发布公告称，公司第七届第十五 次董事会临时会议于2025年12月22日在湖南省长沙市高新技术产业开发区麓谷产业基地谷苑路168号梦 洁工业园3楼综合会议室召开。会议审议了《关于董事会换届选举暨提名第八届董事会非独立董事候选 人的议案》等文件。 2025年1至6月份，梦洁股份的营业收入构成为：家纺行业占比100.0%。 截至发稿，梦洁股份市值为31亿元。 每经头条（nbdtoutiao）——地产"优等生"受困20亿元到期债务，首次债务展期仍在博弈，明年还有超 百亿元公开债到期 （记者 曾健辉） ...

A股市场婴童概念股全线上涨，乳业方向领涨。其中，皇氏集团、均瑶健康、孚日股份、阳光乳业涨 停，梦洁股份、孩子王涨超9%，嘉亨家化涨超7%，海马汽车涨近7%，爱婴室、贝因美涨超5%。 | | | | | 婴童概念板块个股 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 序号 | 代码 | 名称 | . | 涨幅%↓ | 总市值 | 年初至今涨幅% | | 1 | 002329 | 皇氏集团 | 3 | 10.05 | 34.63亿 | 14.60 | | 2 | 605388 | 均瑶健康 | 第一届 | 10.04 | 47.38亿 | 26.68 | | 3 | 002083 | 李日股份 | ਡੇ | 10.03 | 107亿 | 138.01 | | ব | 001318 | 阳光乳业 | | 9.97 | 45.82亿 | 44.60 | | 5 | 002397 | 梦洁股份 | | 9.25 | 31.78亿 | 44.56 | | 6 | 301078 | 孩子王 | 1 | 9.22 | 133亿 | -6.91 | | 7 | 3009 ...

12月15日，A股市场婴童概念股全线上涨，乳业方向领涨。其中，皇氏集团、均瑶健康、孚日股份、阳光 乳业涨停，梦洁股份、孩子王涨超9%，嘉亨家化涨超7%，海马汽车涨近7%，爱婴室、贝因美涨超5%。 消息面上，有媒体从全国医疗保障工作会议上获悉，为积极适应人口发展战略，推动生育保险发展，将 根据医保基金可承受能力，合理提升产前检查医疗费用保障水平，力争明年全国基本实现政策范围内分 娩个人"无自付"。目前，吉林、江苏、山东等7个省份实现政策范围内住院分娩医疗费用全额保障。 股票频道更多独家策划、专家专栏，免费查阅>> 责任编辑：栎树 | | | | | 婴童概念板块个股 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 序号 | 代码 | 名称 | ● | 涨幅%↓ | 总面值 | 年初至今涨幅% | | 1 | 002329 | 皇氏集团 | 1 | 10.05 | 34.63亿 | 14.60 | | 2 | 605388 | 均瑶健康 | 澳 | 10.04 | 47.38 Z | 26.68 | | 3 | 002083 | 孚日股份 | 1 | 10. ...

Core Viewpoint - The chairman of Dream Jier Co., Ltd. has been publicly accused of illegal activities, including fund misappropriation and manipulation of information disclosure, by a former non-independent director, Chen Jie [1][2][3] Group 1: Allegations and Responses - Chen Jie claims to have witnessed various violations during her tenure, including fund misappropriation and infringement of minority investors' rights, and has published multiple articles detailing these allegations [2][3] - Dream Jier has issued a statement denying all allegations made by Chen Jie, asserting that they are baseless and have reported her to law enforcement for spreading false information [2][3][4] - The company emphasizes the importance of verifying information before spreading it and encourages stakeholders to rely on official channels for accurate updates [4] Group 2: Background of the Allegations - The allegations center around a 2022 equity transaction where Chen Jie claims that the chairman and secretary manipulated the acquisition process, leading to significant control changes within the company [9][10] - Chen Jie highlights that the new controlling shareholder, Jin Sen New Energy, acquired a 10.17% stake in Dream Jier for 385 million yuan, with the deal being orchestrated shortly after the company's formation [9][10] - The company faced significant financial losses, including a 476 million yuan loss attributed to bad debt provisions, which Chen Jie argues were mishandled by the management [11][12][14] Group 3: Financial Performance and Market Position - Dream Jier has shown declining financial performance, with a reported net profit of only 0.25 billion yuan for the year 2024, indicating minimal profit contribution in the second half of the year [17] - The company has experienced a drop in revenue across its main product lines, with significant year-on-year declines in sales for bedding products [18] - Despite a slight increase in net profit in the third quarter of 2025, the overall revenue has decreased by 14.83% compared to the previous year [17][18]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing internal conflict at Mengjie Co., Ltd. has escalated, with board member Chen Jie publicly accusing Chairman Jiang Tianwu of various misconducts, including contract fraud and fund misappropriation, which has raised concerns among minority shareholders [1][3][17]. Group 1: Internal Conflict and Allegations - Chen Jie has publicly accused Jiang Tianwu and Secretary Li Jun of multiple issues, including contract fraud and fund misappropriation, which she claims harm the rights of minority shareholders [3][12]. - Since November, Chen Jie has released six lengthy articles detailing her allegations against the management team, including audio recordings and chat screenshots [3][6]. - Chen Jie has consistently voted against the company's financial reports and other proposals, citing concerns over the authenticity of financial data and fund usage [5][6]. Group 2: Financial Concerns and Mismanagement - Chen Jie raised questions about the reasonableness of certain expenditures, such as the significant increase in terminal construction costs from 40 million to 150 million per store, which she believes lacks justification [6][12]. - The company reported a revenue of 2.463 billion and a net loss of 156 million in 2021, raising alarms about its financial health [6]. - Regulatory scrutiny has increased, with the Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau issuing corrective measures against Mengjie Co., Ltd. for financial mismanagement and lack of internal controls [7][12]. Group 3: Shareholding and Control Issues - In 2022, Changsha Jinsen invested 385 million to become the largest shareholder of Mengjie Co., Ltd., but has since struggled to gain actual control [1][8]. - The share transfer agreement allowed Changsha Jinsen to hold 19.77% of voting rights, but this control was lost in 2025 when the agreement expired, leading to a fragmented ownership structure [9][11]. - Chen Jie claims that the original agreement was manipulated by Jiang Tianwu to prevent Changsha Jinsen from exercising its shareholder rights, resulting in significant financial losses for the investor [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market shows a mixed performance with a slight increase in the Shanghai Composite Index, while several stocks are experiencing a death cross between their 5-day and 10-day moving averages, indicating potential bearish trends [1] Group 1: Market Overview - As of 10:30 AM, the Shanghai Composite Index is at 3921.77 points, with a change of 0.49% [1] - The total trading volume of A-shares today is 981.369 billion yuan [1] Group 2: Stocks with Death Cross - A total of 315 A-shares have seen their 5-day moving averages cross below their 10-day moving averages [1] - Notable stocks with significant distance between their 5-day and 10-day moving averages include: - China Merchants Energy (招商轮船) with a distance of -2.04% [1] - Chlor-alkali Chemical (氯碱化工) at -1.69% [1] - Tianci Materials (天赐材料) at -1.47% [1] Group 3: Individual Stock Performance - China Merchants Energy (601872) is down 1.20% with a latest price of 8.22 yuan, which is 6.01% below its 10-day moving average [1] - Chlor-alkali Chemical (600618) has decreased by 2.61%, with a latest price of 12.29 yuan, 4.09% below its 10-day moving average [1] - Tianci Materials (002709) increased by 1.74%, with a latest price of 39.26 yuan, 2.37% below its 10-day moving average [1]

本报（chinatimes.net.cn）记者李凯旋 北京报道 董事陈洁和湖南梦洁家纺股份有限公司（002397.SZ，下称"梦洁股份"）大有即将"对簿公堂"的趋势， 两者之间互不相让。近期，有多家媒体报道，陈洁在网络上公开举报梦洁股份的董事长姜天武、董秘李 军侵害中小投资者利益。12月3日，陈洁发文，并且公布了多条录音证据。 值得关注的是，此前，梦洁股份方面已经发布了声明，表示陈洁所述内容不实，且已经报案。但陈洁一 步都不让，立刻回应称可以与姜天武、李军等人公开对质。 实名举报再度引燃"战火" 《华夏时报》记者注意到，的确有一个名为"陈洁披露真相"的公众号自11月12日起便不断发表文章，举 报姜天武和李军存在违规行为，且用词十分激烈。 尽管陈洁一直"抨击"梦洁股份原阵营的姜天武和李军，但金森新能源在这笔股权交易中实际上也存 在"违规行为"。从股权上来看，李国富是金森新能源的控股股东和实际控制人。但在此之前，李国富与 刘必安签署了代持股协议，刘必安才是金森新能源真正的实控人，且金森新能源收购梦洁股份所花费的 3.85亿元中，有3.35亿元来自刘必安安排的相关方。 2023年11月份，股权交易"东窗事发"，金森 ...

Core Viewpoint - The internal conflict within Dream洁股份 has escalated, primarily driven by board member Chen Jie, who has raised serious allegations against the company's leadership, including fraud and misappropriation of funds, leading to a significant reputational crisis for the company [3][5][34]. Group 1: Internal Conflict and Allegations - Chen Jie has continuously opposed the financial reports of Dream洁股份, raising concerns about their authenticity and accuracy, particularly regarding the third-quarter report [4][8][10]. - Chen Jie has publicly accused the chairman and secretary of the board of serious misconduct, including contract fraud and embezzlement, and has stated her willingness to provide evidence to support her claims [4][12][34]. - The company has responded to Chen Jie's allegations by stating that her actions have severely damaged its reputation and has initiated legal proceedings against her for spreading false information [4][5][34]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Dream洁股份 reported a revenue of 1.099 billion yuan for the first three quarters of 2023, a year-on-year decrease of 7.97%, while the net profit attributable to shareholders increased by 28.69% to 26.52 million yuan [8]. - The third quarter showed a revenue of 366 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 9.76%, and a net profit of 1.10 million yuan, which is a significant increase of 131.11% compared to the previous year [8]. Group 3: Historical Context and Governance Issues - The internal strife may be traced back to the founder's personal issues, including a high-profile divorce in 2017, which led to significant changes in shareholding and control dynamics within the company [17][18][20]. - The company has faced governance challenges, including allegations of misappropriation of funds exceeding 100 million yuan by the chairman and other executives, which has raised concerns about the company's financial integrity [24][25][32]. Group 4: Future Implications - The ongoing internal conflict and the serious allegations could lead to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal consequences for the company, especially if the claims of financial misconduct are substantiated [41][42]. - The involvement of external investors, such as Wu Shichun, raises questions about the future direction of the company and whether it will lead to a resolution of the internal conflict or further complicate the power struggle [35][40][42].