*ST金泰（SZ 300225，收盘价：4.72元）8月21日晚间发布公告称，公司第八届第六十一次董事会临时 会议于2025年8月21日以现场结合通讯方式召开。会议审议了《关于聘任公司总裁的议案》等文件。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 2024年1至12月份，*ST金泰的营业收入构成为：非主机厂占比68.8%，主机厂占比31.2%。 ...

Core Viewpoint - *ST Jintai is undergoing a leadership change with the resignation of its president, while the chairman will focus on long-term strategic planning and management efficiency [3]. Group 1: Company Structure and Leadership - In 2024, *ST Jintai's revenue composition is expected to be 68.8% from non-main engine manufacturers and 31.2% from main engine manufacturers [1]. - Chairman and President Hao Daqing will resign from the president position to concentrate on his role as chairman, focusing on the company's macro strategic planning and operational management [3]. - Wu Chunchao has been appointed as the new president of *ST Jintai following the board's approval [3].

证券代码：300225 证券简称：*ST金泰 公告编号：2025-085 上海金力泰化工股份有限公司 本次会议与会董事经过认真审议，通过如下决议： 1、审议通过《关于聘任公司总裁的议案》 公司董事长兼总裁郝大庆先生为集中精力履行董事长职责，致力于公司长远 战略布局与核心发展战略的推进，申请卸任公司总裁职务。郝大庆先生卸任总裁 职务后仍担任董事长、法定代表人及董事会相关专门委员会的职务。未来，郝大 庆先生将全力投入董事长角色，专注于公司宏观战略规划与经营管理效能提升。 第八届董事会第六十一次（临时）会议决议公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、董事会会议召开情况 1、上海金力泰化工股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于2025年8月20日以 电子邮件的方式发出了召开第八届董事会第六十一次（临时）会议的紧急通知， 定于2025年8月21日召开第八届董事会第六十一次（临时）会议。 2、本次董事会会议应出席董事9名，实际出席董事9名；本次董事会会议于 2025年8月21日下午16点以现场结合通讯方式召开并表决。董事郝大庆先生、董 事孙策先生以现场方式出 ...

上海金力泰化工股份有限公司 信息披露事务管理制度 上海金力泰化工股份有限公司 信息披露事务管理制度 第一章 总 则 第一条 为规范上海金力泰化工股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）及相关信息 披露义务人的信息披露工作，加强信息披露事务管理，保护投资者合法权益，根据 《中华人民共和国证券法》（以下简称"《证券法》"）、《上市公司信息披露管 理办法》《深圳证券交易所创业板股票上市规则》（以下简称"《上市规则》"）、 《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第2号——创业板上市公司规范运作》（以 下简称"《规范运作指引》"）、《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第5号— —信息披露事务管理》等有关法律、法规及《上海金力泰化工股份有限公司章程》 （以下简称"《公司章程》"）的规定，制定本制度。 第二条 本制度所称"信息披露义务人"除公司本身外还包括： （一）公司董事会秘书和信息披露事务管理部门； （二）公司董事和董事会； （三）公司监事和监事会； （四）公司高级管理人员； （五）公司各部门以及各子公司的负责人； （六）公司持股百分之五以上的股东、控股股东及实际控制人； （七）其他负有信息披露职责的公司人员和部门。 第三条 信 ...

证券代码：300225 证券简称：*ST金泰 公告编号：2025-086 上海金力泰化工股份有限公司 关于变更公司总裁的公告 为推进公司各项业务的有序开展，不断提高管理效率，同时保证董事会的正 常运作，经公司第八届董事会提名委员会提名审议，第八届董事会第六十一次（临 时）会议审议，董事会同意聘任吴纯超先生担任公司总裁。吴纯超先生担任公司 总裁后，不再担任公司执行总裁职务。 1 吴纯超，1984年7月出生，中国国籍，无境外永久居留权，毕业于清华大学， 获得土木工程专业硕士学位。历任上海艾仕得金力泰涂料有限公司技术经理、上 海金力泰化工股份有限公司技术中心总监、副总裁。现任公司董事、执行总裁、 董事会秘书。 截至目前，吴纯超先生持有公司股份150,000股，占公司总股本的0.03%，与 公司控股股东、实际控制人、持股5%以上的股东及公司董事、监事、其他高级 管理人员之间不存在关联关系；不存在《公司法》规定不得担任董事、监事、高 级管理人员的情形；未被中国证监会采取证券市场禁入措施；未被证券交易所公 开认定为不适合担任上市公司董事、监事和高级管理人员；最近三年内未受到中 国证监会行政处罚；最近三年内未受到证券交易所 ...

Group 1 - The chemical products sector increased by 0.71% on August 21, with Feilu Co., Ltd. leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3771.1, up 0.13%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 11919.76, down 0.06% [1] - Notable gainers in the chemical products sector included Feilu Co., Ltd. with a closing price of 12.85, up 10.40%, and Boyuan Co., Ltd. with a closing price of 44.84, up 10.25% [1] Group 2 - The chemical products sector experienced a net outflow of 449 million yuan from institutional funds, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 500 million yuan [2] - The top individual stock performers in terms of net inflow included Wanhua Chemical with a net inflow of 4.24 billion yuan, while retail investors showed significant outflows in several stocks [3] - The overall trading volume and turnover in the chemical products sector reflected mixed investor sentiment, with some stocks experiencing substantial declines [2][3]

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Financial Court and the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau have released ten cases related to securities false statements, providing clear guidelines for market participants regarding responsibilities and behaviors that may violate information disclosure regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Securities False Statement Cases - The five typical cases of securities false statement responsibility disputes focus on issues such as "deceptive" share buybacks, the identification of predictive information, and the application of "safe harbor" rules [2][3]. - In the case of *ST Jintai, executives were found liable for failing to fulfill share buyback commitments, resulting in a compensation of approximately 780,000 yuan to investors [2]. - Shanghai Electric was held responsible for not timely disclosing performance losses, leading to false records in its 2020 annual report, and was denied the "safe harbor" rule exemption [2][3]. - In the financial fraud case of Zhong An Ke, three internal directors were held liable for relying excessively on intermediaries, while three independent directors were exempted from liability [2][3]. Group 2: Regulatory Enforcement Cases - The five regulatory enforcement cases focus on frequent violations such as "shell-preserving" financial fraud, performance-related financial manipulation, and abuse of control rights [3][4]. - Specific cases include *ST Jintai's executives violating buyback commitments, financial fraud in subsidiaries of Shanghai Shiji, and illegal share reductions by the controlling shareholder of Feikai Materials [4]. Group 3: Legal Responsibility Clarification - Recent judicial practices have introduced new types of disputes, including the legal applicability of different market segments and the identification of responsibilities for aiding fraudsters [5]. - The cases emphasize that information disclosure obligations cannot be evaded under the guise of predictive information and clarify the legal responsibilities of public commitments made by listed companies [5]. Group 4: Strict Enforcement and Accountability - The regulatory approach emphasizes strict enforcement and increased penalties for violations, particularly targeting key individuals responsible for financial fraud [6]. - For instance, the former chairman of Delisted Fuxin was found guilty of violating important information disclosure laws, while penalties were imposed on the controlling shareholder of Feikai Materials for illegal share reductions [6]. - The Shanghai Financial Court has received a total of 18,040 securities false statement responsibility disputes, with a total amount in dispute of 7.646 billion yuan, involving 26,956 investors [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent release of ten cases related to securities false statements by the Shanghai Financial Court and the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau, providing clear guidelines for market participants regarding responsibilities and behaviors that may violate disclosure regulations [3][4]. Group 1: Case Summaries - The ten cases involve several listed companies, including *ST Jintai, Zhong An Ke, Shanghai Electric, and others, as well as delisted companies like退市富控 and *ST Ba'an [4]. - The five judicial cases focus on issues such as "deceptive" share buybacks, the identification of predictive information, and the application of "safe harbor" rules, with examples of both responsible and non-responsible parties [5]. - In the case of *ST Jintai, executives made false promises regarding share buybacks, leading to a court ruling that required them to compensate investors approximately 780,000 yuan [6]. - Shanghai Electric was found liable for failing to disclose performance losses in a timely manner, resulting in a false annual report, and was not granted exemption under the "predictive information safe harbor" rule [6]. - In the Zhong An Ke financial fraud case, three internal directors were held partially responsible for relying excessively on intermediaries, while three independent directors were exempted from liability [6]. - The case involving ST Xingyue highlighted that significant events affecting stock trading could sever the causal link for false statement claims, leading to the rejection of investor compensation requests [7]. Group 2: Regulatory Enforcement - The Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau's enforcement cases focus on frequent violations such as "shell protection" financial fraud, performance-related financial manipulation, and insider trading [7]. - Specific cases include violations by *ST Jintai executives regarding share buyback commitments, financial fraud by subsidiaries of Shanghai Shimao, and illegal share reductions by controlling shareholders of Feikai Materials [7]. - The regulatory approach emphasizes strict enforcement and increased penalties for key individuals involved in financial fraud, with notable penalties imposed on executives from退市富控 and *ST Ba'an [10]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Developments - Recent judicial practices have introduced new legal issues, including the application of laws across different market segments and the identification of predictive information [9]. - The article highlights the need for clarity in the legal responsibilities of public commitments made by company executives and the importance of not evading disclosure obligations under the guise of predictive information [10]. - The Shanghai Financial Court reported handling 18,040 securities false statement cases with a total amount of 7.646 billion yuan, indicating a significant number of investors involved [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Financial Court and the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau have released ten cases related to securities false statements, providing clear guidelines for market participants regarding responsibilities and behaviors that may violate information disclosure regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Key Cases and Responsibilities - The five typical cases of securities false statement responsibility disputes focus on issues such as "deceptive" share buybacks, the identification of predictive information, and the application of "safe harbor" rules [2][5]. - In the case of *ST Jintai, executives were found liable for false statements due to unfulfilled share buyback commitments, resulting in compensation of approximately 780,000 yuan to investors [2][4]. - Shanghai Electric was held responsible for failing to timely disclose performance losses and inaccurately measuring expected credit losses, leading to a false record in its 2020 annual report [2][3]. Group 2: Regulatory Enforcement and Penalties - The Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau has emphasized strict enforcement and increased penalties for frequent violations such as financial fraud and misuse of control rights [3][6]. - Notable penalties include a fine of 7.67 million yuan for the controlling shareholder of Feikai Materials for illegal share reductions and a 4 million yuan fine for the chairman of a subsidiary of Shanghai Shihua for financial fraud [6][4]. - The report indicates that as of December 2024, the Shanghai Financial Court has accepted 18,040 cases of securities false statement disputes, with a total amount in dispute of 7.646 billion yuan and 26,956 investors involved [6][7]. Group 3: Legal and Judicial Developments - New types of disputes have emerged in judicial practice, including the legal applicability of different market segments and the identification of responsibilities for predictive information [5][6]. - The report highlights the challenges in civil compensation cases related to false statements, particularly in the context of ongoing administrative investigations or criminal investigations [7]. - The need for improved coordination between civil lawsuits, administrative penalties, and criminal accountability is emphasized to enhance the effectiveness of investor protection [7].

格隆汇8月19日丨*ST金泰（维权）(300225.SZ)公布2025年半年度业绩预告，1-6月公司实现归属于上市 公司股东的净利润盈利700.00万元–1,000.00万元，比上年同期下降23%–46%；归属于上市公司股东的扣 除非经常性损益后的净利润盈利400.00万元–600.00万元，比上年同期下降49%–66%。 报告期内，公司与战略备库供应商终止合作，导致本期计提其他应收款坏账准备较上年同期增加700万 元；为提高公司产品的市场竞争力，公司持续加大产品研发力度，研发费用同比有所增长。综合上述原 因，导致公司净利润较上年同期有所减少。 ...