根据 2 月 16 日提交的文件，贝莱德公司将其在思爱普的总投票权比例提升至6.50%，此前持股比例为 6.49%。 总持股结构明细 责任编辑：郭明煜 根据 2 月 16 日提交的文件，贝莱德公司将其在思爱普的总投票权比例提升至6.50%，此前持股比例为 6.49%。 总持股结构明细 持股比例触发 / 达到该阈值的日期：2 月 11 日 责任编辑：郭明煜 披露原因： 持股比例触发 / 达到该阈值的日期：2 月 11 日 披露原因： 直接持股对应的投票权：6.44%（此前为 6.35%） 通过金融工具持有的投票权：0.05%（此前为 0.14%） 购入 / 处置带有投票权的股份 因子公司层面触发阈值而进行的自愿集团披露 直接持股对应的投票权：6.44%（此前为 6.35%） 通过金融工具持有的投票权：0.05%（此前为 0.14%） 购入 / 处置带有投票权的股份 因子公司层面触发阈值而进行的自愿集团披露 ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. securities during the specified Class Period, indicating potential legal issues surrounding the company's disclosures and valuations [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to securities purchased between November 6, 2024, and January 23, 2026 [1]. - Defendants allegedly made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about BlackRock TCP's business, including issues with investment valuations and portfolio restructuring [5]. - The lawsuit claims that BlackRock TCP's unrealized losses were understated and its net asset value (NAV) was overstated, leading to misleading positive statements about the company's prospects [5]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who purchased BlackRock TCP securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by April 6, 2026, to represent other class members in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. securities, alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and operations during the specified class period from November 6, 2024, to January 23, 2026 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit claims that BlackRock TCP's investments were not being timely and appropriately valued, and that efforts at portfolio restructuring were ineffective [5]. - The lawsuit alleges that BlackRock TCP's unrealized losses were understated and its net asset value (NAV) was overstated, leading to materially misleading statements about the company's business prospects [5]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who purchased BlackRock TCP securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6].

Core Insights - A national retirement survey indicates strong bipartisan support for expanding retirement investment options in the U.S. [3] Group 1: Survey Findings - 30% of registered voters have no retirement savings, and 63% have less than $150,000 saved for retirement, highlighting a significant gap in retirement preparedness [2] - The survey reveals a need for modernization of the retirement platform in America, which is one of the few areas with bipartisan support [3] Group 2: Retirement System Evolution - The retirement landscape has evolved from pension plans, where companies saved and invested for employees, to 401(k) plans, placing the responsibility on individuals [4] - Americans are living longer, with an average retirement duration of 20 to 30 years, compared to 10 to 15 years previously, increasing the need for adequate retirement savings [4] Group 3: Proposed Solutions - Modernizing the retirement system involves creating better products to encourage individuals to save more for retirement [5] - Auto-enrollment in 401(k) plans is suggested as a way to increase participation, where employees are automatically enrolled unless they opt out [5][6] - Approximately 60% of Americans have access to a 401(k) plan, but 40% do not, indicating a need for equal access to retirement savings options [6] Group 4: Investment Access - There is a disparity in access to investment options between those in pension plans and those in 401(k) plans, with a call for equal access to professional management across both types [7] - The introduction of child savings accounts is viewed as a beneficial investment in American capitalism, providing children with early access to capital markets [8]

Core Insights - The Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF has emerged as a top-performing ETF in the emerging markets sector, challenging the dominance of major players like Vanguard, State Street, and BlackRock [1][3]. Investment Strategy - The ETF is based on the Freedom 100 EM Index, which evaluates emerging market countries based on 87 freedom variables, including crime rates, corruption, and legal system quality [5][8]. - State-owned enterprises are excluded from the ETF to focus on companies where profit is a primary objective, enhancing the quality of the portfolio [6]. Performance Metrics - The Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF has achieved a total return of 99% over the past five years, significantly outperforming the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, which has a return nearly five times lower [9][11]. - The fund has grown to approximately $2.5 billion in assets under management, showcasing its strong performance despite not competing in size with larger ETFs [12].

Core Viewpoint - BlackRock is aggressively increasing its holdings in Chinese stocks, such as Haier Smart Home and WuXi Biologics, indicating a strategic move to capitalize on undervalued assets in China's technology and industrial digitalization sectors [1][3][5]. Group 1: Investment Strategy - BlackRock's recent actions include reducing its stakes in companies like Midea and BYD while simultaneously increasing its holdings in firms like WuXi Biologics and Bank of China, reflecting a focus on "low valuation" opportunities [3][5]. - The performance of BlackRock's funds, such as the Advanced Manufacturing Mixed A fund, which achieved a 63.34% annual increase in 2025, suggests a successful investment strategy despite some fourth-quarter pullbacks [3][5]. Group 2: Market Influence - BlackRock manages assets exceeding $14 trillion, making it one of the largest financial entities globally, comparable to the economies of major countries [5][12]. - The firm has strategically invested in key sectors, including renewable energy and biotechnology, and has stakes in major Chinese companies like CATL, BYD, Tencent, and state-owned enterprises [19][21]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - China is adopting a balanced approach to foreign investment, welcoming capital while ensuring regulatory oversight to prevent potential disruptions to its market [23][25]. - Recent regulatory changes, such as the reduction of the foreign investment negative list and the establishment of the National Financial Supervision Administration, aim to manage foreign capital while maintaining national security [25][27]. Group 4: Long-term Perspective - BlackRock's entry into the Chinese market is viewed as a strategic move for both parties, with China benefiting from foreign capital and technology while BlackRock seeks to leverage China's growth potential [27][29]. - The relationship between BlackRock and the Chinese market is characterized as a fair exchange of interests, emphasizing the importance of maintaining regulatory frameworks to ensure mutual benefits [27][29].

Core Insights - The article compares two bond ETFs, iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND), highlighting their differing portfolios and risk profiles [2][4]. Cost and Size - IGIB has an expense ratio of 0.04% and assets under management (AUM) of $18.11 billion, while BND has a lower expense ratio of 0.03% and a significantly larger AUM of $389.22 billion [3]. - The one-year return for IGIB is 5.55%, compared to BND's 4.19%, and IGIB offers a higher dividend yield of 4.57% versus BND's 3.83% [3]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, IGIB experienced a maximum drawdown of -20.61%, while BND had a drawdown of -17.91% [5]. - An investment of $1,000 in IGIB would have grown to $881, while the same investment in BND would have grown to $853 over five years [5]. Underlying Holdings - IGIB focuses on investment-grade corporate debt with maturities of 5 to 10 years, holding 2,979 assets, primarily A- and BBB-rated bonds [6]. - BND tracks the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market with a diverse portfolio of 15,000 securities, including Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities, with at least 72% of its weight in AAA-rated bonds [7][9]. Investment Implications - Investors must consider their volatility preference when choosing between IGIB and BND, as both have similar one-year returns and have experienced a decline of around 12% in the last five years [8]. - BND's allocation to higher-rated bonds makes it less risky, with half of its holdings in U.S. government bonds, while IGIB has less than one percent in AAA-rated bonds [10].

Group 1 - Avenir Group disclosed its latest Bitcoin ETF holdings, maintaining its position as the largest institutional holder of Bitcoin ETFs in Asia for seven consecutive quarters since Q2 2024 [1] - As of the end of Q4 2025, Avenir Group's holdings in BlackRock IBIT remain unchanged at 18,287,323 shares, with only a minor adjustment of approximately -0.053% due to trading friction compared to Q3 [1]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. securities, alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and operations during the specified class period from November 6, 2024, to January 23, 2026 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit claims that BlackRock TCP failed to disclose significant adverse facts about its investments, including improper valuation and ineffective portfolio restructuring, leading to understated unrealized losses and overstated net asset value (NAV) [5]. - Investors who purchased BlackRock TCP securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Participation Information - Interested parties can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly. A lead plaintiff must file a motion by April 6, 2026, to represent other class members [3][6]. - It is noted that no class has been certified yet, and investors are not represented by counsel unless they retain one [7]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company. The firm has consistently ranked highly in terms of the number of settlements [4].

Core Insights - BlackRock Canada and the Families & Allies at BlackRock Network celebrated Family Day by closing the market at the Toronto Stock Exchange, emphasizing the importance of financial inclusion and education [1][2]. Company Overview - BlackRock is a leading global asset manager that provides investment, advisory, and risk management solutions, aiming to enhance financial well-being for individuals [3]. - The company operates over 100 offices in more than 38 locations worldwide, allowing it to leverage global insights while maintaining local relationships [4].