据埃及开罗新闻电视台、卡塔尔半岛电视台18日各自以知情人士为消息源报道，新提议包含一份通往全 面停火的路线图，从停火第一天起即启动关于全面协议或永久停火的谈判。60天停火期间，哈马斯释放 一半、即10名仍活着的以色列被扣押人员，并交还一半、即18具被扣押人员遗体，以换取以方释放巴勒 斯坦囚犯。 新华财经开罗8月19日电（记者董修竹汪强）知情人士18日向埃及、卡塔尔媒体披露，巴勒斯坦伊斯兰 抵抗运动（哈马斯）当天确认同意的加沙地带停火方案最新提议，其内容包括停火60天和释放一半被扣 押人员。 哈马斯当晚发表简短声明，确认哈马斯及多个巴勒斯坦派别接受调解方埃及和卡塔尔关于停火方案的最 新提议。声明未提及提议具体内容。 据埃及媒体报道，新提议还包括，停火协议生效后，以色列立即允许向加沙地带运入紧急人道援助物 资，包括燃料、水和电力，并允许修复加沙地带的医院和面包房，允许为清理废墟提供必要设备。联合 国及其机构以及在加沙地带开展工作的其他国际组织将负责接收和分发相关援助物资。 哈马斯消息人士告诉新华社记者，埃及和卡塔尔将联系美国中东问题特使威特科夫，以推动停火谈判恢 复，争取达成协议。 （文章来源：新华社） 巴勒斯坦 ...

【环球时报驻俄罗斯、美国特派特约记者 肖新新 李勇 环球时报特约记者 裴茗】"普特会"将于8月15日在美国阿 拉斯加州举行的消息引发国际社会强烈关注。这将是2021年6月以来俄美领导人首次面对面会晤，也是2019年在 二十国集团峰会期间见面后，特朗普和普京再次面对面会晤，同时是普京10年来首次赴美。消息人士对美国有 线电视新闻网（CNN）称，白宫并未完全排除乌克兰总统泽连斯基前往阿拉斯加州参与某些会谈的可能性，但 他出席的活动很可能是在"普特会"之后举行。报道说，一场"外交争夺战"正在展开，欧洲领导人急于确保乌克兰 不被排除在停火谈判之外。9日，6个欧洲国家领导人和欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩发表声明，呼吁任何有关乌克 兰危机的外交解决方案都必须保护欧洲和乌克兰的重大安全利益。《纽约时报》披露，莫斯科提出的停火条件 是承认其对克里米亚及乌克兰整个顿巴斯地区的控制。泽连斯基9日称，不会将土地"拱手让人"。莫斯科与基辅 的立场似乎仍然难以调和。15日的俄美峰会结束后，俄乌冲突的走向究竟能否更加明朗？全世界都在等待这一 答案的揭晓。 " 非常严肃的尝试 " 特朗普8日下午宣布与普京会晤的时间和地点。当天早些时候，他在白宫 ...

Core Viewpoint - Hamas expressed surprise at U.S. envoy Vitkov's comments regarding Hamas's position in ceasefire negotiations, indicating that mediators support Hamas's "constructive and positive" stance in the ongoing ceasefire talks in Gaza [1] Group 1 - Hamas's reaction to U.S. envoy's statements highlights the complexities of the ceasefire negotiations [1] - The support from mediators for Hamas's position suggests a potential shift in the dynamics of the negotiations [1] - Continued discussions on the ceasefire indicate ongoing efforts to stabilize the situation in Gaza [1]

Core Viewpoint - Israeli officials state that Hamas's response to ceasefire negotiations prevents any progress until Hamas makes concessions [1] Group 1 - The current situation indicates a stalemate in negotiations due to Hamas's unwillingness to compromise [1] - Israeli officials emphasize the need for Hamas to make concessions for any advancement in talks [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent ceasefire proposal indicates that while the exchange of hostages is a priority, no negotiations are currently taking place between the parties involved [1] Group 1 - Hostage exchange remains a top priority for both parties, but no negotiations have commenced [1] - After a 60-day period, discussions should continue regardless of whether an agreement is reached, and there should be no return to combat [1]

Core Points - Ongoing negotiations in Doha regarding a ceasefire in Gaza have three main contentious issues that need resolution [1][2] - The primary dispute involves the Israeli military's withdrawal from Gaza during the proposed 60-day ceasefire [1] - The latest Israeli withdrawal plan indicates that the military will retreat from the "Morag Corridor" in southern Gaza, but will maintain control over approximately 20% of the territory due to a buffer zone exceeding 1 kilometer in some areas [1] - After resolving the withdrawal issue, discussions will shift to the exchange of detained individuals, including the list of Palestinian prisoners to be released by Israel and the exchange ratio [2] - Humanitarian aid terms for Gaza remain undetermined, with further negotiations required [2] - The negotiations began on July 6, focusing on ceasefire and prisoner exchange issues [3]

Core Viewpoint - Ongoing negotiations in Doha for a ceasefire in Gaza show positive momentum, but significant disagreements remain among the parties involved [1] Group 1: Negotiation Progress - Israel has submitted a new military withdrawal plan from Gaza, proposing to withdraw troops from the "Morag Corridor" during a proposed 60-day ceasefire [1] - An Arab diplomat indicated that Israel has agreed to significantly reduce its military presence in Gaza, including withdrawals from both the "Morag Corridor" and the Rafah area [1] Group 2: Remaining Disagreements - Despite progress, there are still unresolved issues regarding humanitarian aid mechanisms in Gaza and the number of Palestinian prisoners that Israel needs to release [1] - The indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas have been ongoing since July 6, focusing on ceasefire terms and prisoner exchanges [1]

Core Viewpoint - Ongoing ceasefire negotiations in Doha are at a critical juncture, with efforts to advance talks facing resistance from Israel, which accuses Hamas of rejecting the ceasefire agreement [1] Group 1: Negotiation Status - Ceasefire talks in Doha are described as entering a "critical moment," with the next few hours being crucial for the outcome [1] - The mediators are working hard to push the negotiations forward despite Israel's stubborn stance [1] Group 2: Israeli Position - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu claims that Hamas is the party refusing the ceasefire agreement [1] - Netanyahu asserts that Hamas aims to remain in Gaza to rearm and launch further attacks on Israel, which he will not accept [1] - The Israeli government emphasizes the need to rescue hostages and completely dismantle Hamas to eliminate threats from Gaza [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that the ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas in Doha have not made significant progress since September 9, with reports suggesting that talks are on the verge of collapse [1] - The indirect negotiations began on September 6, and under U.S. pressure, Israel has agreed to modify its military redeployment plan in Gaza during a proposed 60-day ceasefire, but the adjustments are insufficient to satisfy Hamas [1] - Israel aims to control approximately one-third of Gaza, establishing a 3-kilometer buffer zone in the southern city of Rafah, which would effectively create a "humanitarian city" to concentrate all Gaza residents, limiting their movement [1] Group 2 - Reports indicate that Israel is seeking to expand the buffer zone from 700 meters to 2 kilometers, while Hamas has only agreed to a 1-kilometer width [1] - As negotiations stall over the military withdrawal issue, the U.S. is pressuring Hamas to discuss other topics, while Hamas insists on resolving the withdrawal matter first [1] - A Palestinian official has expressed that Israel's partial withdrawal proposal is not a genuine withdrawal but a redeployment aimed at legitimizing its occupation of nearly half of Gaza and isolating the region into fragmented areas [1]

Core Viewpoint - The main point of contention in the ongoing ceasefire negotiations between Hamas and Israel is the Israeli military's proposed deployment plan during a potential 60-day ceasefire, which Hamas finds unsatisfactory [1] Group 1: Ceasefire Negotiations - Hamas is dissatisfied with Israel's military deployment plan submitted during the ceasefire negotiations, which is a significant point of disagreement [1] - Israel's initial proposal included maintaining military presence in various locations within the Gaza Strip, particularly in the southern "Morag Corridor" [1] - Under pressure from the U.S. and other parties, Israel submitted a revised deployment plan, but it still allows the military to control approximately one-third of the Gaza Strip during the ceasefire [1] Group 2: Morag Corridor - The "Morag Corridor," which Israel occupied and expanded in April, is approximately 12 kilometers long and 1 kilometer wide, extending from the Israel-Gaza border to the Mediterranean coast [1] - This corridor effectively separates the southern city of Rafah from other areas of Gaza, raising concerns for Hamas regarding territorial integrity [1]