Core Viewpoint - The articles highlight the dedication and exemplary service of law enforcement personnel in Liaoning, showcasing their commitment to public safety and justice, which serves as an inspiration for others in the field [1][5][6]. Group 1: Exemplary Figures in Law Enforcement - A total of 53 collectives and 52 individuals from Liaoning have received provincial and ministerial level commendations, reflecting the recognition of their contributions to public safety [1]. - Chen Shuai, a police officer, exemplifies bravery by engaging in life-threatening situations, sustaining injuries while apprehending criminals, which illustrates the personal sacrifices made by law enforcement [2]. - Li Chunhe, a police officer nearing retirement, continues to mentor younger officers, emphasizing the importance of community service and the ongoing commitment to public safety [3]. Group 2: Commitment to Justice - The spirit of loyalty and dedication is evident in the actions of judges and prosecutors, such as Teng Qigang and Pan Feiqiong, who have made significant impacts in their communities through their work [4][5]. - The phrase "the judicial emblem is the sun and strength" reflects the ethos of prosecutors who strive to ensure fairness and justice in their work, as demonstrated by innovative approaches to resolving cases [5]. - The provincial justice system has recognized 254 outstanding individuals and collectives, awarding 10 the title of "Most Beautiful Law Enforcement Officers," which highlights the collective effort to uphold justice [5]. Group 3: Community Engagement and Support - Community policing efforts are emphasized through the work of officers like Li Huarui, who actively engage with residents to address their concerns, demonstrating a commitment to making public safety a personal responsibility [6]. - The establishment of a "one-stop" dispute resolution center in Dalian illustrates the proactive measures taken to address community conflicts and enhance public trust in the legal system [6]. - The Liaoning provincial legal system is actively working to improve the business environment by addressing safety concerns raised by local businesses, showcasing the integration of law enforcement with community needs [7].

Group 1 - The incident involving the Mercedes driver demanding to be let through has sparked significant public outrage due to its implications of privilege and inequality in society [1][6] - The event highlights the growing sensitivity of the public towards privilege and the diminishing tolerance for such behaviors, especially in the context of ongoing efforts to promote equality and fairness [1][6] - The local authorities acknowledged that the situation escalated from a minor traffic dispute to a major public relations issue due to inadequate handling [1][6] Group 2 - Grassroots privilege often ignites public anger because it directly affects individuals in their daily lives, contrasting with the more distant nature of high-level corruption [2][3] - The perception that local officials should embody fairness and justice is undermined when they engage in self-serving behaviors, leading to a loss of trust in public institutions [3][4] - The psychological and cultural factors contributing to grassroots privilege include role conflicts, low oversight, and a tendency to rationalize unethical behavior [4][5] Group 3 - The persistence of privilege undermines social trust and can destabilize the foundations of governance, as seen in the public's reaction to the incident [6][7] - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations aims to curb privilege and promote accountability among officials, reflecting a societal demand for equality [6][7] - Effective measures against privilege must focus on daily practices, transparency, and accountability to prevent the normalization of such behaviors [7]

7月29日，国务院新闻办举行"新征程上的奋斗者"中外记者见面会，邀请5名检察系统代表围绕"高质效 办好每一个案件 让公平正义可感可触可见"与中外记者交流。 为人民司法，就是要始终把屁股端端地坐在老百姓的这一面，通过精准监督让群众感受到司法的温度与 力量。 "检察机关作为国家法律监督机关，司法办案从来都不是对法条的机械执行，而是充满温情的民生守 护。"山东省滕州市人民检察院一级检察官刘玲的这番话，道出她23年先后在刑事、民事、行政、公益 诉讼检察等多岗位工作，累计办理各类案件2000余件的坚守。 "我们办理的每一个案件，背后都承载着群众的急难愁盼。每一个案件，都连着民心。"刘玲分享了一个 让她至今难忘的场景：通过依法抗诉，刘玲曾帮助一位67岁老人拿到拖欠已久的12万元，老人深深向她 鞠了一躬说："法律确实管用！" 聚焦群众急难愁盼，刘玲和同事对劳动争议、民间借贷等常发案件，建立"绿色通道"，优先受理、快速 办理，让司法救济更可及；案件判决后，通过"支持起诉+执行监督"全流程机制跟进监督，帮助追回欠 薪。近3年，滕州市人民检察院依法支持了84名农民工起诉维权，追回欠薪190余万元。 云南省临沧市云县地处滇西高原， ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the dedication and effectiveness of Chen Qingluo in her role at the disciplinary inspection and supervision agency, showcasing her strong theoretical foundation and practical skills [1][2][3] - Chen Qingluo has been recognized for her ability to handle complex cases and has received multiple awards for her outstanding work, including being included in the talent pool for case review by the municipal disciplinary inspection and supervision agency [1][2] - The article highlights her commitment to thorough investigation and research, which has led to significant improvements in handling disciplinary cases and ensuring justice [3][4] Group 2 - Chen Qingluo's approach involves strict review and interaction with investigation teams, ensuring that the quality of case handling is maintained and that all evidence is thoroughly examined [4][5] - She has successfully identified and addressed regulatory gaps in the disciplinary process, leading to the implementation of new guidelines that enhance the management of disciplinary actions for grassroots organization personnel [3][6] - The article illustrates her ability to balance strict enforcement of regulations with a compassionate approach, aiming to educate and rehabilitate rather than merely punish [7][9] Group 3 - Chen Qingluo's work has resulted in significant case outcomes, such as the successful prosecution of individuals involved in corruption and misconduct, demonstrating her effectiveness in upholding the law [5][6] - The article discusses her efforts in providing support and guidance to individuals facing disciplinary actions, emphasizing the importance of understanding and addressing the underlying issues rather than solely focusing on punishment [8][9] - Overall, the narrative portrays Chen Qingluo as a key figure in promoting integrity and accountability within the organization, contributing to a culture of ethical governance [2][3][9]

Core Viewpoint - The resolution of the South China Sea issue requires patience and restraint from all parties involved, emphasizing the importance of international law and cooperation to maintain peace and stability in the region [1][3]. Group 1: Arbitration and International Law - The so-called "arbitration ruling" undermines the principles of international law and the credibility of dispute resolution mechanisms, as it was established without the consent of all parties involved [2][3]. - The arbitration tribunal disregarded the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) by making decisions on territorial sovereignty, which is not within its jurisdiction [2]. Group 2: Geopolitical Influences - The establishment of the arbitration tribunal was influenced by geopolitical motives, particularly by external powers aiming to strengthen alliances and influence regional dynamics [2]. - The tribunal's actions, including allowing the Philippines to submit additional evidence beyond reasonable time limits, reflect a bias that deviates from standard international legal practices [2]. Group 3: Implications for Future Resolutions - The South China Sea issue is complex, involving multiple countries and intertwined territorial and maritime disputes, which cannot be resolved by a single arbitration ruling [3]. - China's rejection of the arbitration ruling is aimed at preserving the integrity and authority of international law, and it calls for a collaborative approach to address the South China Sea disputes [3].

Core Viewpoint - The "Global South Media Consortium Initiative" was officially launched on March 28, 2025, aiming to enhance cooperation among media organizations in Global South countries and to establish a new international narrative order based on justice, equality, and mutual respect [1][3]. Principles of the Initiative - **Multilateralism Principle**: The initiative firmly opposes unilateralism and hegemony, advocating for the right of countries to choose their own development paths and rejecting any form of neo-colonial intervention and economic coercion [3]. - **World Peace and Development Principle**: It aims to promote mutual understanding among peoples and resolve conflicts peacefully, viewing the right to development as an inalienable human right [4]. - **Community of Shared Future for Mankind Principle**: The initiative believes in a community of nations based on unity, cultural respect, and civilizational dialogue, with information dissemination serving as a bridge for cooperation and mutual trust [5]. - **Fairness and Justice Principle**: It opposes algorithmic manipulation of public opinion and advocates for a decentralized, open, and human-centered news content system to promote global economic prosperity, technological responsibility, and social justice [6]. Areas of Practical Cooperation - **Consensus Issues and Joint Actions**: Participating media organizations will discuss core human issues affecting 6.3 billion people in the Global South and adopt a unified stance [8]. - **Building a Global South Media Network**: Establishing a media platform for exchange and cooperation to share resources and promote decolonization media projects [8]. - **Shaping Global South Value System**: Promoting the adoption of a new public value framework aligned with the interests of the Global South by the international community [8]. - **Defending Digital Sovereignty**: Global South media institutions will unite to resist misinformation and cyberattacks, creating a fair digital ecosystem that serves the interests of Southern peoples [9]. Call to Action - The initiative concludes with a call to action, inviting all media organizations that agree with its principles and goals to join. It emphasizes that those who control public narratives shape the world, marking a significant step for Global South media in seeking a more equitable and balanced international discourse [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article systematically explains the uniqueness of Chinese-style modernization within the context of the evolution of the Chinese economic system, revealing the institutional codes and theoretical innovations behind China's rapid economic development and long-term social stability [2][3]. Group 1: Historical Construction and Innovation of China's Modern Economic System - The construction of China's modern economic system is both a rational extension of global economic development logic and a revolutionary innovation, integrating the advantages of both market and planned economies [7][8]. - The transition from a planned economy to a socialist market economy has been a gradual process, marked by significant theoretical breakthroughs regarding the role of the market [10][9]. Group 2: Governance Structure and Comparative Advantages - China's modern economic system has created two rare miracles: rapid economic growth and long-term social stability, achieved through a comprehensive integration of various favorable elements into an organic and orderly system [12][13]. - The system's stability and vitality stem from a dominant public ownership structure combined with diverse forms of ownership, which aligns with the development needs of productive forces [13][14]. Group 3: Value Orientation and Justice System - The modern economic system emphasizes a people-centered approach, focusing on the comprehensive development of all individuals, including both affluent and disadvantaged groups [19][20]. - The system incorporates a four-dimensional justice framework, addressing premise justice, principle justice, procedural justice, and outcome justice, which collectively promote social equity and justice [21][22][23][24]. Group 4: Global Value and Civilizational Insights - China's modernization offers a new form of civilization that emphasizes inclusivity and mutual learning, challenging the narrative that equates modernization with Westernization [28][29]. - The system provides a governance model that balances fairness and efficiency, offering a practical example for global governance challenges [29][30].

外交部发言人毛宁5月21日主持例行记者会。在回答有关巴以冲突的问题时，毛宁表示， 在巴以冲突问 题上，中方始终站在公平正义一边。加沙冲突延宕超过一年半，造成严重的人道主义危机，冲突持续不 符合任何一方的利益。无论是以色列还是巴勒斯坦民众，都不应当成为武力袭击的目标，都不应成为集 体惩罚的对象，以暴易暴只会陷入冤冤相报的恶性循环，让双方的无辜民众付出更大代价，遭受更多苦 难。中方将继续同国际社会一道，为推动停火止战、缓解人道局势作出不懈努力。 ...

董某事件中，最无辜的受害者出现了。 据@微博管理员通报：近日，肖某、董某相关事件引发热议，国家卫生健康委也已成立调查组开展调查 工作。但站方发现，广大网友纷纷表达多元见解和真实观点的同时，在各互联网平台已衍生出各类无端 揣测、恶意关联、利用AI编造故事甚至攻击无关人士的内容。 尤为让人关注的是，"董某某是301医院董宝玮教授的孙女""董某某的外公为中国工程院外籍院士米耀荣 教授"为不实信息；"肖某胸腔镜下肺叶切除术手术经过"等内容为AI编造。 他们成了董某事件中最无辜的受害者，追求公义不容肆意造谣 追求公义不容肆意造谣。公共事件面前，似是而非的谣言里，受害者不是虚构的存在，他们有自己的情 绪，也有亲朋好友，如此恶意关联，不仅对查清事实无益，还会伤害无辜，甚至助长网络戾气和对立情 绪。 要明白，追求公义时伤害无辜，寻找真相时制造假象，其结果只能是南辕北辙。造谣不仅不能解决问 题，反而会模糊真假界限，让追问变得底气不足，甚至让真相大打折扣。 伤害无辜不是追求公义，肆意造谣无法抵达真相。越是事关公平正义的公共事件，越要小心谨慎，因为 任何对他人的指控，都可能形成巨大的声浪，造成难以估量的伤害。舆论场上，请保持理性克 ...

Group 1 - The BRICS Foreign Ministers' Meeting will be held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on April 28-29, 2025 [1] - The meeting will issue a chair statement outlining the common positions of BRICS countries on issues such as upholding multilateralism, defending fairness and justice, and promoting common development [1]