如果牟女士的自述情节属实，那么这就是一起涉及多人、多类侵权甚至违法犯罪行为的综合性案件。比 如，用AI合成相关不雅视频，涉嫌侵犯肖像权、名誉权；泄露其电话和微信号等个人信息，侵犯隐私 权；给牟女士发送言语、文字、图像等相关私信，还可能构成性骚扰。 10月10日，青岛保时捷销售中心牟女士通过社交平台发文称，近期发现由AI恶意合成的虚假视频和不 良视频，"这些视频是百分之百伪造的"，并表示"对造谣者宣战"。据牟女士向媒体记者表示，此外，她 还遭遇了骚扰电话"轰炸"，微信也收到许多不明的添加好友申请。 公开报道显示，牟女士今年34岁，曾于2023年、2024年连续两年卖出170台保时捷，两次成为保时捷年 度销冠。今年9月，她再度成为保时捷月度销冠，登上热搜第一。 其实在今年2月，牟女士就表示，其照片遭盗用并被恶意剪辑拼接成不雅视频发在外网，说她"卖车就是 陪睡"。一名汽车销售人员，仅仅因为工作业绩突出，就被网络谣言盯上，被好事者恶意泼脏水，甚至 被人AI恶意合成虚假视频……背后的恶意令人不寒而栗。 2023年9月，最高法、最高检、公安部联合发布的《关于依法惩治网络暴力违法犯罪的指导意见》强 调，编造"涉性"话题侵害 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent actions taken by the Ministry of Public Security and the Shanghai Sports Bureau highlight a strong commitment to combatting online violence and the unhealthy culture surrounding sports fandoms, particularly in the context of diving athletes [1][2]. Group 1: Government Actions - The Ministry of Public Security's Cybersecurity Bureau announced ten typical cases of combating online illegal activities, including cases of online violence against athletes [1]. - The Shanghai Sports Bureau issued a call to resist the distorted culture of sports fandoms, indicating a proactive approach to purifying the sports environment [1]. Group 2: Nature of Online Violence - Several cases involved severe actions such as spreading rumors about athletes being banned, using AI to fabricate videos of athletes bribing referees, and consistently posting insulting content, which harms athletes' rights and pollutes the online ecosystem [1]. - The phenomenon of online violence against athletes is not isolated, as there have been previous instances of netizens being criminally detained for defaming table tennis players and coaches [1]. Group 3: Cultural Implications - The "fandom culture" in sports has evolved from excessive adoration to organized defamation and personal attacks, disrupting the normal order of sports events and undermining the foundational spirit of sports [1][2]. - The logic of "black and white" and "us versus them" prevalent in fandoms contradicts the values of fair competition and respect for rules in sports [2]. Group 4: Legal and Collaborative Measures - The necessity for legal action against online violence is emphasized, asserting that the online space is not lawless and that any form of defamation or invasion of privacy will face legal consequences [2]. - Collaboration among various stakeholders, including platforms, sports organizations, and fans, is essential to eliminate the unhealthy fandom culture and promote positive sportsmanship [2].

Core Viewpoint - The lack of legal boundaries and rules in online supervision can lead to unintended consequences, potentially harming justice and triggering negative chain reactions [2][3] Group 1: Online Supervision and Its Impact - Online supervision serves as an extension of public expression, informed consent, and complaint reporting in the digital age, leveraging the effects of network platforms to monitor public behavior and corporate conduct [1][2] - The positive role of online supervision in addressing societal issues is acknowledged, but it must be balanced with the rights of individuals and businesses to prevent reputational harm [2][3] Group 2: Legal Risks of Online Supervision - The primary legal risks associated with online supervision include: - Infringement of individual and corporate rights, particularly regarding defamation and reputation [3][4] - Violation of privacy rights and personal information protections, as excessive scrutiny may lead to the disclosure of irrelevant personal details [4][5] - Disruption of market competition, where misleading information can be used as a tool for unfair competition [5][6] Group 3: Challenges to Social Order - Online violence can arise from the amplification of criticism, leading to harassment and toxic online environments [6][7] - The potential for public opinion to interfere with judicial authority, pressuring legal entities to act prematurely [7] Group 4: Risk Prevention Framework - A multi-layered legal framework is necessary to delineate boundaries for online supervision rather than simply restricting it [8][9] - Key principles for determining whether online supervision has overstepped include: - Distinguishing between fact and opinion, ensuring that criticisms are based on accurate information [9] - Ensuring that comments relate to public interest, focusing on issues that affect consumer rights [9] - Maintaining legitimate purposes for exercising supervisory rights, such as promoting public welfare [9] Group 5: Institutional Support for Risk Prevention - Strengthening the application and interpretation of existing laws to provide clearer guidelines for acceptable online behavior [10] - Enhancing the responsibilities of online platforms to manage content effectively and ensure timely responses to complaints [10] - Promoting legal literacy and awareness among online users to foster responsible behavior in online supervision [11] Group 6: Addressing Secondary Risks - The handling of online supervision must avoid excessive restrictions that could stifle legitimate public discourse [13] - Encouraging companies to respond rationally to criticism and to utilize legal avenues for protection against defamation [14][15] - Companies should avoid retaliatory actions that could lead to further rights abuses, maintaining a balance in their responses [15]

Core Viewpoint - Former Chinese national table tennis player Zhu Yuling has faced ongoing online harassment since the July competition in the United States, leading her to file a civil lawsuit in August to protect her legal rights [1][3][4]. Group 1: Background and Events - Zhu Yuling revealed on social media that she has been subjected to multiple rounds of online violence, including baseless accusations and malicious rumors, which have significantly impacted her training and competition [3]. - Initially, Zhu chose to endure the harassment silently, hoping to focus on her training and competitions, but the situation escalated, prompting her to take legal action [3][4]. - During the WTT Championship in Macau, incidents of personal harassment occurred, further disrupting her ability to compete and threatening her personal safety [3][10]. Group 2: Legal Actions - Zhu Yuling has officially filed a civil lawsuit to address the infringement of her rights, seeking to use legal means to uphold her dignity and justice [3][6]. - A lawyer's statement confirmed that false information regarding Zhu's alleged debts has circulated widely online, leading to negative comments and personal attacks against her [4][7]. - The lawyer's statement also indicated that the claims of Zhu owing money are entirely fabricated, and she has reported these incidents to law enforcement agencies [7][10]. Group 3: Public Support and Reactions - Zhu's statement has garnered significant support from fans and netizens, sparking widespread discussions on social media about the issues of online violence and harassment [3].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court will further promote the activation of the personality rights infringement injunction clause stipulated in Article 997 of the Civil Code [1] - This initiative aims to effectively address social issues such as online violence and false accusations, thereby protecting consumers' legitimate rights and interests [1] - The judicial service and guarantee provided by this measure will support the healthy development of the digital economy [1]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court will further promote the activation of the personality rights infringement injunction clause stipulated in Article 997 of the Civil Code [1] - This initiative aims to effectively address social issues such as online violence and false accusations, thereby protecting consumers' legitimate rights and interests [1] - The judicial service and guarantee provided will support the healthy development of the digital economy [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company has identified malicious online campaigns aimed at defaming its brand and products, which disrupt market order and harm consumer rights [1]. Group 1: Malicious Activities - A network technology company operates 13 MCN institutions with 332 accounts that spread false information to damage the company's product quality and operational status [1]. - Specific false claims about the upcoming Li Auto i6 model include fabricated complaints about customer service, exaggerated sales declines, and misleading pricing information [1]. - Certain self-media accounts have been identified as consistently publishing defamatory content against the company, distorting facts and misleading the public [1]. Group 2: Legal Actions - The company has gathered evidence and plans to pursue legal actions, including criminal reports, administrative complaints, and civil lawsuits against the perpetrators [1]. - The company emphasizes its commitment to welcome genuine and objective criticism while resisting malicious attacks and online violence [1]. Group 3: Industry Cooperation - The company will continue to cooperate with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and other departments to address online chaos in the automotive industry, aiming to create a healthier public opinion environment for the new energy vehicle market [1].

Core Viewpoint - Gannan Medical University First Affiliated Hospital issued a statement urging individuals to stop online harassment following the dissemination of false information about the hospital on social media platforms [1][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A netizen utilized multiple accounts to post misleading videos about the hospital on platforms like Douyin, which attracted significant online attention [3]. - The hospital claims that the videos contain serious distortions of facts, fabricated scenarios, and malicious defamation, adversely affecting the hospital's reputation and the mental health of its medical staff [3]. Group 2: Patient Case Details - The individual behind the videos is a 46-year-old patient named Zhong, who was diagnosed with cervical squamous cell carcinoma and underwent surgery at the hospital in June 2020 [4]. - Following surgery, the patient received chemotherapy and radiotherapy as per the cervical cancer treatment guidelines, but later raised objections regarding her treatment after experiencing discomfort [4]. - A joint medical appraisal confirmed that the patient's cancer was a result of her own medical condition, and the hospital's treatment was appropriate and in line with medical standards [4]. Group 3: Investigation Findings - An investigation by health authorities concluded that the hospital's diagnosis and treatment were appropriate, and the claims made in the videos were found to be malicious fabrications [4]. - The investigation also highlighted that the patient was attempting to extort high compensation from the hospital without factual or legal basis [4]. Group 4: Hospital Profile - Gannan Medical University First Affiliated Hospital has two campuses and is a comprehensive tertiary hospital established in 1958, covering an area of 208 acres, providing medical, teaching, research, and preventive services [5].

Core Viewpoint - The hospital firmly denies the allegations made by a former patient regarding malpractice and defamation, asserting that the claims are fabricated and have negatively impacted the hospital's reputation and staff well-being [1][2][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A former patient, identified as Zhong, claimed that the hospital exaggerated her medical condition and performed unnecessary surgeries, leading to public misinformation [1][2]. - The hospital provided a detailed account of Zhong's treatment, confirming that she was diagnosed with cervical cancer and underwent appropriate surgical and post-operative care according to established medical guidelines [1][2]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Actions - A joint legal assessment was conducted by both parties, which concluded that the patient's cancer was a result of her own medical condition and not due to the hospital's actions [2]. - An investigation by health authorities found no violations of medical protocols during Zhong's treatment, reinforcing the hospital's position [2][3]. Group 3: Hospital's Response and Position - The hospital emphasizes its commitment to resolving disputes through legal channels and has encouraged the patient to pursue formal avenues for addressing her grievances [3][4]. - The institution has expressed concern over the impact of online misinformation on its medical staff and has vowed to take legal action against any form of online harassment [4][6]. Group 4: Call for Public Understanding - The hospital urges the public to discern truth from falsehood and to refrain from spreading unverified information that could harm its reputation and the well-being of its staff [10]. - It reiterates its dedication to patient care and the importance of maintaining trust in the doctor-patient relationship, highlighting the detrimental effects of public attacks on healthcare professionals [8][9].

Group 1 - The core issue of the article revolves around the tragic incident of a doctor in Henan Province who fell victim to online violence due to medical disputes, highlighting the need for a harmonious doctor-patient relationship and a supportive working environment for medical professionals [1] - The article discusses the historical context of frequent violent incidents against medical staff in China, leading to the implementation of various laws and regulations aimed at improving the medical environment and addressing disputes through legal channels [1][2] - It emphasizes the importance of addressing online violence, which has become a significant factor affecting doctor-patient relationships, and suggests proactive measures to mitigate risks and provide support for affected medical personnel [2] Group 2 - The article suggests that fostering trust between doctors and patients is essential, recommending practices such as visualizing consent processes and maintaining electronic medical records to reduce misunderstandings [2] - It highlights innovative approaches like role-reversal activities and VR experiences to enhance empathy and understanding between doctors and patients, promoting a collaborative rather than adversarial relationship [3] - The article calls for societal respect for medical professionals, emphasizing that a supportive environment is crucial for doctors to effectively meet the health needs of patients and improve public health outcomes [3]