Core Viewpoint - The case of Dr. Li Jianhua from Guangzhou Aier Eye Hospital against online influencer Chen Mou for defamation highlights the importance of protecting citizens' reputation rights and reflects the government's ongoing efforts to strengthen online governance and punish cyber crimes [1][5]. Group 1: Case Background - Dr. Li Jianhua was subjected to online harassment by Chen Mou, who began spreading defamatory statements about him on social media after a medical dispute involving another party [1]. - Chen Mou published hundreds to thousands of defamatory posts from July 2021, falsely accusing Dr. Li of "academic fraud" and "practicing medicine without a license," leading to severe personal and professional consequences for Dr. Li [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - After unsuccessful attempts to resolve the issue amicably, Dr. Li filed a civil lawsuit in November 2021, which resulted in court rulings against Chen Mou for infringing on Dr. Li's reputation and image rights [2][3]. - Despite the civil court's decisions, Chen Mou continued to spread false information, further damaging Dr. Li's reputation and undermining public trust in the judicial system [2]. Group 3: Criminal Charges and Sentencing - Dr. Li decided to pursue criminal charges against Chen Mou, leading to a conviction for defamation, with the court finding that Chen Mou's actions met the criteria for serious defamation as defined by legal standards [4][5]. - The court sentenced Chen Mou to one and a half years in prison, emphasizing the severity of his actions and the need for accountability in online spaces [5]. Group 4: Implications for Online Governance - This case serves as a significant precedent in combating online defamation and reinforces the message that the internet is not a lawless space, urging citizens to respect the legal boundaries of free speech [6]. - The Chinese government has been actively enhancing online governance through various laws and regulations aimed at curbing online infringement and violence, with new laws set to take effect in 2026 to further address these issues [5][6].

供货厂家剪破了退货羽绒服（视频截图） 近段时间，买衣服不摘吊牌、滥用网购7天无理由退换规则，硬薅商家羊毛，引发了舆论的热烈讨论。 绝大多数网民秉持着朴素的正义观、诚信精神：明明不想买衣服，却穿着衣服满街跑，甚至是坐飞机去 旅游、去打卡，弄得一身脏、一身臭，再去退货，这是丧失了基本的诚信原则。而一些厂家就想出把吊 牌越做越大的手段来反制。 恶意蹭穿者当然应该被谴责，但是还要看到，"赛博执法""网络审判"本身就存在合法性问题，特别"看 图审案"还容易反转、误伤。比如，之前就有女生因为没有摘掉衣服上"走失儿童寻亲"的吊牌，被误认 智通财经主笔 沈彬 一件油渍颇多的退货羽绒服口袋里面，居然有一张海南三亚到哈尔滨的登机牌。商家一怒之下，将这事 拍成视频，曝上网络，怒斥"白嫖半个月"，还曝光了含有退货人苏女士全名的登机牌。 这个新闻有了新的进展。苏女士称，已就泄露隐私报警。她还对退货做出了解释：自己花633元在淘宝 某商家处购买羽绒服，12月16日收货，她发现羽绒服吊牌有打结，疑似是退换货商品二次销售，才要求 退货。因为在海南来不及退货，到了哈尔滨"只穿过一次，是从机场到酒店路上"，之后登机牌被塞到了 羽绒服口袋里。 而 ...

智通财经记者 蒲垚磊 一个星期前，中国跳水名将陈芋汐收获了世界泳联2025年度最佳女子跳水运动员的荣誉，为自己的2025 年画上了一个圆满的句号。 然而在国际赛场不断取得荣誉的背后，是陈芋汐长久以来与"网暴"黑手的对抗。 近日接受水均益专访时，陈芋汐就透露了自己一次印象深刻的经历，"在我单人决赛的前一天晚上，有 人给我发了一条短信，里面是我的所有身份信息，包括身份证号、电话。" 料图 对于持续的网络暴力，执法机关已经果断出手。今年9月，公安部网安局公布了10起打击整治网络违法 犯罪典型案例，其中就有"上海公安机关侦破跳水运动员被实施网络暴力案"，王某、韩某、马某某被采 取刑事强制措施。 对于遭受网络暴力与骚扰的运动员来说，这无疑是好消息。若放任此类行为，将会对运动员的心理健康 造成负面影响，也间接为运动员在竞赛场上为国争光制造阻碍。 "我不知道这是什么意思，很害怕，就第一时间反映给了队里。" 长久以来，部分"网暴"黑手持续在网络上编造谣言诋毁运动员，陈芋汐也是受害者之一，"他们一直说 得比较多的就是我有后台，觉得我的家庭条件好，就是因为我的父母是教练。" 这也导致陈芋汐关闭了自己的账号评论区，"不要在我的地盘 ...

@警民直通车-黄浦 12月20日， 上海市公安局黄浦分局官方微博发布一则通报： 2025年12月11日10时30分许，来沪人员袁某（男，32岁）身着网上购得的快递员工作服，在外滩江堤网 络直播时占用公共区域影响游客通行秩序，外滩风景区保安员对其开展劝阻时，袁某拒不配合管理，进 行言语挑衅并煽动直播间观众"人肉"保安员，造成恶劣社会影响。目前，袁某已被警方依法处以行政拘 留。 智通财经此前报道 ，近日，网红博主"帧十八"穿着淘宝闪购外卖工服，在上海外滩观景平台上直播， 直播期间被保安劝阻，喊话粉丝"人肉"保安。相关视频在网络上传播。 警方提醒：在公共区域开展网络直播活动要自觉遵守相关规定，不得扰乱正常公共秩序。同时，对在网 上煽动他人实施"人肉"等网暴行为的，警方将严格依法进行查处。 账号已被封禁 由于违反《快手社区管理规范》的相关规定,该账号已被封 禁,违规原因:内容违反法律法规 另据中国青年报报道，17日上午，记者注意到， 涉事 博主抖音账号也已被封禁。 本 期资深 编 辑 周玉华 12月16日下午，涉事博主的快手账号已被封禁。主页显示："由于违反《快手社区管理规范》的相关规 定，该账号已被封禁。" ( i ...

警方提醒：在公共区域开展网络直播活动要自觉遵守相关规定，不得扰乱正常公共秩序。同时，对在网 上煽动他人实施"人肉"等网暴行为的，警方将严格依法进行查处。 本文转自【警民直通车-黄浦】； 2025年12月11日10时30分许，来沪人员袁某（男，32岁）身着网上购得的快递员工作服，在外滩江堤网 络直播时占用公共区域影响游客通行秩序，外滩风景区保安员对其开展劝阻时，袁某拒不配合管理，进 行言语挑衅并煽动直播间观众"人肉"保安员，造成恶劣社会影响。目前，袁某已被警方依法处以行政拘 留。 ...

知情者向经济观察报记者介绍，在法院宣判前两日，即2025 年11月25日，经海淀法院决定，将马大明逮捕，并羁押在看 守所内。而在被羁押前，马大明在社交平台上，连续6天每天 发数条道歉视频。不过在11月27日宣判后，他又当庭表示要 上诉。 作者：李微敖 封图：经观智创 尽管在被收押前，连续6天每天发数条道歉视频，并曾自称"认罪认罚"，45岁的网络博主、南京 仙女棋圣办公用品有限公司（下称"仙女棋圣公司"）法定代表人马大明，因为对两位中国象棋名 家进行了长时间的持续"网暴"，近日被法院一审判犯有侮辱罪、诽谤罪两桩罪行，合并共处有期 徒刑6个月。 2025年12月，数位消息人士告诉了经济观察报记者上述信息。 他们介绍，在宣判前两日，马大明已被逮捕并被羁押于看守所内。宣判后，马大明当庭提出上诉。 至2025年12月16日，该案二审尚未有结果。 缘起中国象棋"录音门"事件 这起案件的源头之一，始于2023年的中国象棋"录音门"事件。 2023年4月前后，两位中国象棋特级大师王跃飞与郝继超的一段通话录音，在网络上开始传播。 这段录音中，两人提及王天一，并谈到王跃飞、王天一参与"买棋"，操纵象棋比赛之事，并疑似 提到使用" ...

萱账号内容截图 12岁，萱萱不懂"自媒体"却意外走红 近日，"用一篇长文来介绍我自己"在网络中成为热点话题。12月3日，萱萱通过个人社交媒体账 号"Angel萱萱ia"以《一个初代网红上岸北大的自述》为题，讲述了她从12岁成为初代网红到21岁保研 北大接近十年的成长经历。12月4日，萱萱告诉记者，她在这接近十年的时间里，一直在打破世俗意义 中的"刻板印象"，也一直在做证明题。 2004年，萱萱出生在宁夏银川。12岁那年，"因为新奇，我把视频发到网上，有人回应我，有人陪我 玩，我第一次感觉到，自己的声音可以被听见和被重视。那种感觉，真好。"萱萱告诉记者，刚开始"入 萱 坑"自媒体的时候没想过会受到这么多关注，只是看很多同龄人在模仿，自己觉得很有意思。 于是，萱萱拍摄了第一条视频。"当时拍短视频的没有那么多，加上话题本身的热度很高，第一条视频 就收获了五千多个赞。"就这样，从模仿秀开始，萱萱走上了创作短视频的道路。 萱的第一条视频截图 "一开始拍一些模仿秀、唱歌、挑战类，再到后来拍一些vlog、学习日常、购物分享……"萱萱说，自 己"入坑"时没有给自己规定现在所谓的"赛道"，而是想到什么就发什么，完全凭自己的心情 ...

近日，新修订的《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》中违法记录封存制度引发社会关注。新法规 定，违反治安管理的记录应当予以封存，不得向任何单位和个人提供或者公开。这项制度旨在为轻微过 错者"松绑"。 公共话题引发多元议论十分正常，让人诧异的是，多位长期推动相关立法的专业人士却因其建言陷 入了网络谣言的漩涡。 近日，一位曾多次呼吁建立轻罪前科记录封存制度的全国人大代表，因遭遇造谣诽谤向公安机关报 案，并委托律师向法院提起侵权民事诉讼。媒体披露，大量网传消息称，这位人大代表的儿子因涉嫌容 留他人吸毒罪被刑事拘留，还有更夸张的传言称其全家涉毒，质疑其提轻罪前科记录封存制度建议是为 家人考虑。 从专业人士的视角，当前许多人因危险驾驶、小额盗窃等留下违法记录后，不仅自身就业受限、生 活受困，其亲属也可能受到牵连，这种"终身烙印"超出了惩戒的必要限度，可能将边缘群体推向社会对 立面。而违法记录封存制度的本义就是要在惩戒与挽救之间寻求平衡，为真心悔改者提供回归社会的路 径。 真正让人吃惊的是种种阴谋论的登场。一些网民不去探讨制度本身是否具有价值，不惜造谣诽谤、 煽动舆论，不仅是对个人的严重中伤，更是公共讨论失范的一个典型样本。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident involving online gaming live streaming has highlighted deep-rooted issues in the current governance of the online ecosystem in China, particularly regarding the emergence of organized online violence that transcends commercial contracts and legal boundaries [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The controversy began when a well-known creator, "Xiaoyao Sanren," faced backlash for playing a new game with a legal license, leading to a wave of online violence against unrelated brands like vivo [1][5]. - The online violence escalated from individual disputes to a systematic attack on companies such as miHoYo and NetEase, indicating a standardized chain of malicious activities that exploit social issues for commercial gain [2][10]. Group 2: Nature of Online Violence - The attacks have evolved into a form of "collective punishment," where individuals and brands are targeted indiscriminately, undermining normal consumer expression and posing a substantial threat to public order [2][9]. - The online violence is characterized by organized efforts, including detailed "violence strategies" that instruct participants on how to disrupt live streams and spread false rumors [8][9]. Group 3: Impact on Companies - Companies like vivo, which had no commercial ties to the incident, faced extreme and irrational attacks, including large-scale disruptions of their live streaming activities and personal attacks on their executives [5][6]. - The situation has created an environment where businesses are not only pressured by market competition but also face unpredictable "public opinion disasters," significantly increasing compliance costs and harming the innovation landscape [11]. Group 4: Regulatory Response - The Chinese government has initiated a series of measures to address these online issues, including a special campaign targeting the provocation of extreme group emotions and the legal consequences for malicious marketing practices [14][15]. - There is a call for platforms to take responsibility for their algorithms and to implement measures against organized harassment and misinformation [17][18]. Group 5: Future Considerations - The ongoing situation emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to governance in the online space, where legal frameworks, platform responsibilities, and societal consensus must align to restore a healthy online environment [16][19].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the necessity of adhering to the rule of law in online governance to eliminate malicious provocations and restore a healthy discourse environment for economic and social development [1][26]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A recent controversy arose from a well-known creator's live stream, which led to a wave of online violence against brands like vivo, despite no commercial ties to the creator [1][6]. - The incident reflects a broader issue where individual disputes escalate into systematic attacks on companies, driven by malicious narratives and organized online violence [2][3]. Group 2: Nature of Online Violence - The online violence has evolved into a form of collective punishment, where brands are targeted based on individual controversies, leading to significant disruptions in their operations [6][11]. - There is a notable shift from mere opinion disputes to malicious framing, where companies are unjustly associated with unrelated negative events [4][5]. Group 3: Organized Tactics - The article highlights the emergence of organized tactics among online attackers, including detailed "guides" on how to conduct online harassment against companies and individuals [10][9]. - This organized behavior is characterized by a lack of concern for factual accuracy, focusing instead on creating psychological pressure on businesses through extreme measures [11][12]. Group 4: Implications for Businesses - Companies are increasingly facing not just market competition but also the threat of sudden and unprovoked public backlash, which raises compliance costs and complicates the business environment [14][15]. - The normalization of such online violence poses a risk to the foundational trust within society, potentially harming the overall economic landscape [15][26]. Group 5: Regulatory Response - The article discusses recent regulatory measures aimed at curbing online violence, including actions by the Central Internet Information Office to address the provocation of extreme group sentiments [18][20]. - Legal frameworks are being strengthened to punish organized online harassment and malicious marketing practices, signaling a zero-tolerance approach to such behaviors [21][22]. Group 6: Recommendations for Improvement - Platforms are urged to take responsibility for their algorithms and implement measures to identify and mitigate organized harassment [23][24]. - A call for a return to rational discourse among internet users is made, encouraging independent thought and resistance to emotional manipulation [24][25].