今年前9个月中国法院受理涉外民商事一审案件同比上升近六成 中新社北京10月21日电 (记者 张素)记者21日从中国最高人民法院获悉，今年1月至9月，各地法院受理 涉外民商事一审案件3.5万件，同比上升59.73%。 在此期间，最高人民法院发布第五批涉"一带一路"建设典型案例，进一步统一裁判尺度，让中外当事人 切身感到中国司法的公正、高效，为扩大高水平对外开放提供有力的司法保障和服务。 今年前9个月，全国法院受理各类审判执行案件3225.7万件(刑事案件117.9万件，民商事案件2117.4万 件，行政案件57.4万件，执行案件854.5万件)。 具体来看，全国法院受理刑事一审案件80.4万件，同比下降11.61%；判处生效被告人104.8万人，同比 下降10.22%；判处有期徒刑五年以上刑罚的罪犯7.7万人，同比下降4.86%。 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 记者从最高人民检察院获悉，今年前三季度，全国检察机关共起诉侵犯公民个人信息 ...

Core Insights - The Supreme People's Procuratorate reported that over 2,100 cases of crimes infringing on citizens' personal information were prosecuted in the first three quarters of 2025, involving more than 4,400 individuals [1] Group 1: Trends in Personal Information Crimes - Criminals are closely tracking the "black and gray market" demand for personal information, providing customized services to downstream criminal activities [2] - The use of advanced hacking techniques, such as web crawlers and Trojan viruses, has become prevalent, allowing criminals to infiltrate systems and illegally obtain personal information for profit [3] Group 2: Impact of Cyberbullying and Information Abuse - The behavior known as "opening boxes" has escalated online violence, where individuals illegally obtain and disseminate personal information, leading to severe harm to victims' social and personal lives [4] Group 3: Future Actions by Legal Authorities - The procuratorial authorities plan to strengthen the crackdown on crimes related to personal information infringement, enhance the investigation of data leak sources, and ensure a comprehensive approach to combat the black and gray industrial chain [5]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has defined the illegal behavior of "opening boxes" online, which involves selling personal information and infringing on individual privacy, establishing legal responsibilities for such actions [2][3]. Group 1: Case Summary - The case involves defendants Wu Mouhui and Chen Mouqiang, who illegally obtained personal information to defame a third party, leading to significant distress for the victim [2][3]. - Wu Mouhui provided the victim's wife's ID information, while Chen Mouqiang purchased 1,442 records, including 299 related to the victim, for 13,150 yuan [2]. - The online posts created from this information garnered over 2 million views, resulting in investigations and psychological counseling for students [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The Jiangsu Suzhou Gusu District People's Court sentenced Wu Mouhui to 11 months in prison and a fine of 2,000 yuan, while Chen Mouqiang received a one-year sentence and the same fine [3]. - The court clarified the standards for recognizing "serious circumstances" in the illegal acquisition of personal information, providing guidance for future cases [3]. - The definition of "opening boxes" includes various methods of obtaining personal information and publicly exposing it, which can lead to harassment and significant psychological harm to victims [3]. Group 3: Industry Impact - The Supreme Court's ruling is expected to enhance industry standards, protect victims' rights, and encourage collaboration between platforms and regulatory bodies to combat the "opening boxes" issue [4]. - The ruling aims to deter illegal activities related to personal information trading and emphasizes the importance of user data protection by data-holding institutions [4]. - The legal framework established by this case provides enforcement support for regulatory agencies and sends a clear message about the illegality of "opening boxes" [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese internet is facing significant challenges from the "open box" black and gray industry, which has evolved from "human flesh search" in the era of big data, prompting the Central Cyberspace Administration to implement a comprehensive strategy to combat this issue. Group 1: Regulatory Measures - The Central Cyberspace Administration has issued a notice to block the spread of "open box" information, improve early warning mechanisms, increase punitive measures, optimize protective measures, and enhance public awareness [1] - Platforms are urged to abandon the "traffic is king" mentality and eliminate toxic traffic, as their ambiguous positioning has contributed to the problem [2] Group 2: Platform Responsibilities - Platforms must take responsibility for regulating the dissemination of personal information, as many incidents of "open box" occur on foreign social media platforms, highlighting the need for domestic platforms to close loopholes [3] - Transparency in personal information protection practices among platform companies needs to be improved, as many leading apps have not published dedicated reports on personal information protection [3] Group 3: Enforcement and Accountability - The current approach of platforms, which focuses on limiting traffic and banning IDs rather than holding actual users accountable, is insufficient [4] - Regulatory bodies are committed to enhancing the enforcement of laws against the leakage, theft, and sale of personal information, utilizing technology to ensure that such activities are effectively addressed [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has announced measures to strengthen the regulation of "open box" issues, including enhancing protective measures on platforms and establishing quick reporting channels for related complaints [1][17]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Central Cyberspace Administration will guide platforms to upgrade protective measures and increase risk warnings related to "open box" activities [1][17]. - Platforms are required to set up quick reporting channels for "open box" issues and verify user complaints promptly [1][17]. - The administration emphasizes the need for a multi-faceted approach to combat "open box" activities, including blocking the spread of related information and optimizing protective measures [17][18]. Group 2: Platform Responses - Among the tested apps, Weibo and Douban have established dedicated reporting channels for "open box" activities, which aids in precise targeting of such behaviors [1][18]. - Other platforms like QQ, WeChat, and Douyin have also implemented reporting mechanisms for related violations, including privacy infringement and network violence [7][8][14]. - The testing revealed that the reporting processes across the 10 apps are generally straightforward, involving a few steps to submit complaints [1][8]. Group 3: Specific Reporting Mechanisms - Weibo's complaint categories include "open box" behavior, which is prioritized for processing when it involves real identity information leakage and incitement of network violence [7][17]. - Douyin has introduced a tiered mechanism for tracking and addressing controversial information, including "open box" incidents [8]. - Other platforms like Zhihu and Bilibili have specific guidelines against the publication of personal information and "open box" tutorials, reinforcing their commitment to user privacy [14][17].