央视网消息：每天8点，央视网为您梳理24小时内发生在咱们身边的大小事儿。 ·民进党当局推动新台币纸钞"去孙中山化"，国台办回应：包藏祸心，数典忘祖，令人不齿。 ·云南楚雄发现蜥脚类恐龙的新属种——林氏雁塔龙。 ·海南省人大常委 会原党组成员、副主任肖杰接受审查调查。 ·2025年市场监管"成绩单"出炉，将1.49万户失信企业列入"黑名单"。 ·2025年农村网络零售额首次突破3万亿元，同比增长6.7%。 ·我国网民规模达11.25亿人，互联网普及率突破80％。 ·最高检：对网络"开盒"等侵犯公民个人信息犯罪加大打击力度。 "新国补"实施首月带动产销两旺，惠及1613万人次。 ·2025年我国金条、金币消费量首超金饰。 ·2月5日至7日，寒潮将给中东部带来明显降温，东北地区东部、江南东部降温可超12℃。 ·嫦娥六号月背样品最新研究成果，改写月球撞击史。 ·俄美乌阿布扎比会谈结束，领土等核心分歧仍未解。 ·爱泼斯坦案新文件公开后，英王之弟安德鲁连夜搬家。 ·企图在高尔夫球场刺杀特朗普的瑞安·劳斯被判终身监禁。 ·美俄唯一军控条约——《新削减战略武器条约》2月5日失效。 ·马杜罗一名亲信被曝在委被捕，其律师否认。 ...

【#开盒曝光1200余条明星网红信息#，6人被判赔偿10万赔偿金】1月22日，最高人民检察院公布了一起 涉"网络开盒"的案例，该案例被作为个人信息保护检察公益诉讼典型案例发布。2023年7月至2024年3月 期间，周某某等6人（含部分未成年人）在某境外软件上创建三个"开盒"频道。6人通过共享、购买及利 用"社工库"机器人搜索等途径非法收集公民个人信息，发布1200余条包含明星、"网红"、社会热点事件 当事人等个人信息，浏览量超过400万次。2024年4月，浙江省杭州市临安区检察院在履职中发现该案线 索，并于2024年6月以民事公益诉讼立案。经该院提起民事公益诉讼，周某某等人及部分监护人被判支 付10万元公益损害赔偿金，并在国家级媒体上公开赔礼道歉。判决生效后，各被告已支付上述公益损害 赔偿金并公开赔礼道歉。详情↓ ...

1月22日，最高人民检察院发布了一批个人信息保护检察公益诉讼典型案例，其中包括浙江省杭州市临 安区人民检察院诉周某某等人"网络开盒"侵害公民个人信息民事公益诉讼案。南都N视频此前曾推出 《"人肉开盒"再调查》，起底外泄个人隐私的黑灰产链条。 2023年7月至2024年3月期间，周某某等六人（含部分未成年人）在某境外软件上创建、管理专门用 于"开盒"的三个频道。六人通过共享、购买及利用"社工库"机器人搜索等途径非法收集公民个人信息， 并先后在上述频道内发布1200余条包含明星、"网红"、社会热点事件当事人等不特定自然人的个人信 息，浏览量超过400万次。六人通过在频道内发布广告、互相推荐等方式，增加频道热度，并吸引他人 付费查询、购买个人信息，从中非法牟利。 最高检指出，"网络开盒"严重侵害公民个人信息权益，不仅冲击个人信息保护防线，更对公共信息安全 构成系统性威胁。 去年3月，南都重磅推出《"人肉开盒"再调查：网络灰产隐秘升级，记者买到自己的秘密》。调查中， 南都调查团队经授权分别花费300元、320元从两名"社工库"客服手中，买到了同事准确的个人信息，从 身份证号码、出生地，再到家庭所在楼栋号，甚至连QQ头 ...

因该案可查证的侵权行为人的获利较少，获利金额不能真实反映该案公共利益受损情况，检察官认为以 此认定公益损害赔偿金不足以体现司法惩戒功能。对此，临安区检察院组织召开专家论证会，邀请法学 高校、消费者协会、网信办等单位的专家开展论证。综合考虑"开盒"的信息数量、种类、造成的社会危 害、治理修复成本、侵权行为人经济能力、刑事罚金等因素，酌情确定该案侵权行为人共同承担公益损 害赔偿金10万元。 2025年8月28日，杭州市临安区院检察官参加本案线上庭审。 公告后，没有法律规定的机关和有关组织提起诉讼。2025年4月11日，临安区检察院依法向杭州互联网 法院提起民事公益诉讼，诉请周某某等人停止侵权，删除相关个人信息；周某某等人及部分监护人共同 承担10万元公益损害赔偿金，并在国家级媒体上公开赔礼道歉。检察机关起诉后，鉴于各被告已在开庭 审理前自行删除涉案的相关个人信息、注销相关账号，故撤回关于停止侵权的诉讼请求。同年8月28 日，杭州互联网法院开庭审理该案并当庭作出判决，支持检察机关的全部诉讼请求。判决生效后，各被 告已支付上述公益损害赔偿金并公开赔礼道歉。 1200余条包含明星、"网红"、社会热点事件当事人等不特定自 ...

Group 1 - The number of foreign-related civil and commercial first-instance cases accepted by Chinese courts increased by 59.73% year-on-year, totaling 35,000 cases from January to September this year [1] - The Supreme People's Court released the fifth batch of typical cases related to the "Belt and Road" initiative, aiming to unify judgment standards and enhance the perception of judicial fairness and efficiency for both domestic and foreign parties [1] - A total of 32.257 million various types of trial and execution cases were accepted by courts nationwide, including 1.179 million criminal cases and 21.174 million civil and commercial cases [1] Group 2 - National procuratorial organs prosecuted over 2,100 cases involving the infringement of citizens' personal information, affecting more than 4,400 individuals in the first three quarters of the year [2] - Criminals are closely tracking the demand for personal information in the "black and gray market," leading to the creation of specialized data service providers that support downstream criminal activities [2] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasized the need to strengthen the crackdown on crimes related to personal information infringement and to address the sources of data leaks [2]

Core Insights - The Supreme People's Procuratorate reported that over 2,100 cases of crimes infringing on citizens' personal information were prosecuted in the first three quarters of 2025, involving more than 4,400 individuals [1] Group 1: Trends in Personal Information Crimes - Criminals are closely tracking the "black and gray market" demand for personal information, providing customized services to downstream criminal activities [2] - The use of advanced hacking techniques, such as web crawlers and Trojan viruses, has become prevalent, allowing criminals to infiltrate systems and illegally obtain personal information for profit [3] Group 2: Impact of Cyberbullying and Information Abuse - The behavior known as "opening boxes" has escalated online violence, where individuals illegally obtain and disseminate personal information, leading to severe harm to victims' social and personal lives [4] Group 3: Future Actions by Legal Authorities - The procuratorial authorities plan to strengthen the crackdown on crimes related to personal information infringement, enhance the investigation of data leak sources, and ensure a comprehensive approach to combat the black and gray industrial chain [5]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has defined the illegal behavior of "opening boxes" online, which involves selling personal information and infringing on individual privacy, establishing legal responsibilities for such actions [2][3]. Group 1: Case Summary - The case involves defendants Wu Mouhui and Chen Mouqiang, who illegally obtained personal information to defame a third party, leading to significant distress for the victim [2][3]. - Wu Mouhui provided the victim's wife's ID information, while Chen Mouqiang purchased 1,442 records, including 299 related to the victim, for 13,150 yuan [2]. - The online posts created from this information garnered over 2 million views, resulting in investigations and psychological counseling for students [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The Jiangsu Suzhou Gusu District People's Court sentenced Wu Mouhui to 11 months in prison and a fine of 2,000 yuan, while Chen Mouqiang received a one-year sentence and the same fine [3]. - The court clarified the standards for recognizing "serious circumstances" in the illegal acquisition of personal information, providing guidance for future cases [3]. - The definition of "opening boxes" includes various methods of obtaining personal information and publicly exposing it, which can lead to harassment and significant psychological harm to victims [3]. Group 3: Industry Impact - The Supreme Court's ruling is expected to enhance industry standards, protect victims' rights, and encourage collaboration between platforms and regulatory bodies to combat the "opening boxes" issue [4]. - The ruling aims to deter illegal activities related to personal information trading and emphasizes the importance of user data protection by data-holding institutions [4]. - The legal framework established by this case provides enforcement support for regulatory agencies and sends a clear message about the illegality of "opening boxes" [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese internet is facing significant challenges from the "open box" black and gray industry, which has evolved from "human flesh search" in the era of big data, prompting the Central Cyberspace Administration to implement a comprehensive strategy to combat this issue. Group 1: Regulatory Measures - The Central Cyberspace Administration has issued a notice to block the spread of "open box" information, improve early warning mechanisms, increase punitive measures, optimize protective measures, and enhance public awareness [1] - Platforms are urged to abandon the "traffic is king" mentality and eliminate toxic traffic, as their ambiguous positioning has contributed to the problem [2] Group 2: Platform Responsibilities - Platforms must take responsibility for regulating the dissemination of personal information, as many incidents of "open box" occur on foreign social media platforms, highlighting the need for domestic platforms to close loopholes [3] - Transparency in personal information protection practices among platform companies needs to be improved, as many leading apps have not published dedicated reports on personal information protection [3] Group 3: Enforcement and Accountability - The current approach of platforms, which focuses on limiting traffic and banning IDs rather than holding actual users accountable, is insufficient [4] - Regulatory bodies are committed to enhancing the enforcement of laws against the leakage, theft, and sale of personal information, utilizing technology to ensure that such activities are effectively addressed [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has announced measures to strengthen the regulation of "open box" issues, including enhancing protective measures on platforms and establishing quick reporting channels for related complaints [1][17]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Central Cyberspace Administration will guide platforms to upgrade protective measures and increase risk warnings related to "open box" activities [1][17]. - Platforms are required to set up quick reporting channels for "open box" issues and verify user complaints promptly [1][17]. - The administration emphasizes the need for a multi-faceted approach to combat "open box" activities, including blocking the spread of related information and optimizing protective measures [17][18]. Group 2: Platform Responses - Among the tested apps, Weibo and Douban have established dedicated reporting channels for "open box" activities, which aids in precise targeting of such behaviors [1][18]. - Other platforms like QQ, WeChat, and Douyin have also implemented reporting mechanisms for related violations, including privacy infringement and network violence [7][8][14]. - The testing revealed that the reporting processes across the 10 apps are generally straightforward, involving a few steps to submit complaints [1][8]. Group 3: Specific Reporting Mechanisms - Weibo's complaint categories include "open box" behavior, which is prioritized for processing when it involves real identity information leakage and incitement of network violence [7][17]. - Douyin has introduced a tiered mechanism for tracking and addressing controversial information, including "open box" incidents [8]. - Other platforms like Zhihu and Bilibili have specific guidelines against the publication of personal information and "open box" tutorials, reinforcing their commitment to user privacy [14][17].