Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has defined the illegal behavior of "opening boxes" online, which involves selling personal information and infringing on individual privacy, establishing legal responsibilities for such actions [2][3]. Group 1: Case Summary - The case involves defendants Wu Mouhui and Chen Mouqiang, who illegally obtained personal information to defame a third party, leading to significant distress for the victim [2][3]. - Wu Mouhui provided the victim's wife's ID information, while Chen Mouqiang purchased 1,442 records, including 299 related to the victim, for 13,150 yuan [2]. - The online posts created from this information garnered over 2 million views, resulting in investigations and psychological counseling for students [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The Jiangsu Suzhou Gusu District People's Court sentenced Wu Mouhui to 11 months in prison and a fine of 2,000 yuan, while Chen Mouqiang received a one-year sentence and the same fine [3]. - The court clarified the standards for recognizing "serious circumstances" in the illegal acquisition of personal information, providing guidance for future cases [3]. - The definition of "opening boxes" includes various methods of obtaining personal information and publicly exposing it, which can lead to harassment and significant psychological harm to victims [3]. Group 3: Industry Impact - The Supreme Court's ruling is expected to enhance industry standards, protect victims' rights, and encourage collaboration between platforms and regulatory bodies to combat the "opening boxes" issue [4]. - The ruling aims to deter illegal activities related to personal information trading and emphasizes the importance of user data protection by data-holding institutions [4]. - The legal framework established by this case provides enforcement support for regulatory agencies and sends a clear message about the illegality of "opening boxes" [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese internet is facing significant challenges from the "open box" black and gray industry, which has evolved from "human flesh search" in the era of big data, prompting the Central Cyberspace Administration to implement a comprehensive strategy to combat this issue. Group 1: Regulatory Measures - The Central Cyberspace Administration has issued a notice to block the spread of "open box" information, improve early warning mechanisms, increase punitive measures, optimize protective measures, and enhance public awareness [1] - Platforms are urged to abandon the "traffic is king" mentality and eliminate toxic traffic, as their ambiguous positioning has contributed to the problem [2] Group 2: Platform Responsibilities - Platforms must take responsibility for regulating the dissemination of personal information, as many incidents of "open box" occur on foreign social media platforms, highlighting the need for domestic platforms to close loopholes [3] - Transparency in personal information protection practices among platform companies needs to be improved, as many leading apps have not published dedicated reports on personal information protection [3] Group 3: Enforcement and Accountability - The current approach of platforms, which focuses on limiting traffic and banning IDs rather than holding actual users accountable, is insufficient [4] - Regulatory bodies are committed to enhancing the enforcement of laws against the leakage, theft, and sale of personal information, utilizing technology to ensure that such activities are effectively addressed [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has announced measures to strengthen the regulation of "open box" issues, including enhancing protective measures on platforms and establishing quick reporting channels for related complaints [1][17]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Central Cyberspace Administration will guide platforms to upgrade protective measures and increase risk warnings related to "open box" activities [1][17]. - Platforms are required to set up quick reporting channels for "open box" issues and verify user complaints promptly [1][17]. - The administration emphasizes the need for a multi-faceted approach to combat "open box" activities, including blocking the spread of related information and optimizing protective measures [17][18]. Group 2: Platform Responses - Among the tested apps, Weibo and Douban have established dedicated reporting channels for "open box" activities, which aids in precise targeting of such behaviors [1][18]. - Other platforms like QQ, WeChat, and Douyin have also implemented reporting mechanisms for related violations, including privacy infringement and network violence [7][8][14]. - The testing revealed that the reporting processes across the 10 apps are generally straightforward, involving a few steps to submit complaints [1][8]. Group 3: Specific Reporting Mechanisms - Weibo's complaint categories include "open box" behavior, which is prioritized for processing when it involves real identity information leakage and incitement of network violence [7][17]. - Douyin has introduced a tiered mechanism for tracking and addressing controversial information, including "open box" incidents [8]. - Other platforms like Zhihu and Bilibili have specific guidelines against the publication of personal information and "open box" tutorials, reinforcing their commitment to user privacy [14][17].