记者丨 崔文静 编辑丨巫燕玲 又有上市公司被起诉！ 根据ST起步7月11日晚间公告， ST起步及其前任董事长、总经理、副总裁、董秘、财务总监 共5位高管，外加1位供应链总监，被集体告上法庭。 实属罕见。在受访人士看来，这意味着，ST起步所涉问题颇为严重，相关主要责任人或将面 临刑事处罚。 从检察院指控来看， ST起步及其主要责任人存在三重罪：涉嫌欺诈发行证券罪、违规披露、 不披露重要信息罪。 "如果法院认定上述罪名，ST起步相关主要责任人员势必面临刑事严惩，乃至坐牢。" 受访人 士分析道。 实际上，此次被刑事起诉，已是ST起步因系列违法违规行为被严惩的第二步。早在2022年， 其即因涉嫌信息披露违法违规等事项而被证监会立案调查。 2023年12月，行政处罚结果落地，由于2018—2020年财务造假、2019年发行可转债募集说明 书造假，ST起步及其主要涉事责任人被合计罚款7700万元。 与此同时，ST起步，这家2017年上市、一度号称A股"童鞋第一股"的主板上市公司，2020年起 即陷入连续亏损，并且每年亏损规模均在1亿元以上。根据其7月11日晚间披露的业绩预告， 2025年上半年，ST起步亏损仍在延续，预计 ...

Core Viewpoint - ST Qibu has been collectively sued, involving multiple senior executives, indicating serious issues within the company that may lead to criminal penalties for the responsible parties [2][3][5]. Group 1: Legal Issues - ST Qibu and its key personnel face three charges: fraudulently issuing securities, violating disclosure regulations, and failing to disclose important information [3][6]. - The company has previously been penalized for illegal activities, including a fine of 77 million yuan due to financial fraud and misleading information in bond issuance [4][8]. - The lawsuit marks the second phase of severe penalties following an investigation by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) in 2022 for similar violations [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Misconduct - From 2018 to 2020, ST Qibu inflated its revenue by 360 million yuan and profits by 129 million yuan through fictitious transactions [7]. - The company issued convertible bonds worth 520 million yuan based on inflated financial data, leading to accusations of fraudulent issuance [7][8]. - The inflated profits represented 10.39% and 14.57% of the reported profits for 2018 and the first half of 2019, respectively [7]. Group 3: Ongoing Financial Struggles - ST Qibu has been experiencing continuous losses since 2020, with losses exceeding 1 billion yuan annually, peaking at 656 million yuan in 2023 [16][17]. - The company forecasts further losses of 30 to 45 million yuan for the first half of 2025, bringing total losses since 2020 to approximately 1.777 billion yuan [16][17]. - Despite attempts to pivot to live e-commerce with a strategic partnership, the results have not met expectations, contributing to ongoing financial decline [16][17].

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 出品：新浪财经上市公司研究院 文/夏虫工作室 核心观点： 自上市后，倍轻松却出现业绩大变脸，财务总监频繁变动，倍轻松的财务真实性几何？值 得注意的是，上市前后公司销售费用反差极大，人员变动不大情况下，人均薪酬异常飙升，在倍轻松选 择盈利核心指标上市标准下，其有无相关调节之嫌？公司巨额推广带动的线上收入陷入规模不经济陷 阱，这种商业是否合理，公司有无刷单冲量之嫌？值得注意的是，公司疑似出现突击客户现象，此外， 实控人透过供应商实现资金流转，这是否进一步考验公司报表真实性？ 倍轻松近日再次收监管函引市场关注，即上交所下发监管函，涉及对象包括高管、实控人等。 2021年7月，倍轻松在上交所科创板上市。然而，自上市后，倍轻松却出现业绩大变脸、实控人资金占 用、财务总监频繁换人等一系列问题。 随着我们进一步深入复盘后发现，公司销售费用疑现异常，这种异常主要体现在两方面： 第一，上市前后，销售人员薪酬为何差异大，这种差异是否进一步拷问公司财报真实性？ 第二，线上推广带动的业务，只见规模不见利润，这种规模不经济的赔本赚吆喝的生意是否合理？是否 需要警惕可能出现刷单冲量风险？ ...

ST长园（维权）（600525.SH）7月11日回复上交所年报问询函的公告，将一场由董事长主导的"掏空 式"资金挪用推向台前。 历史造假引发的诉讼海啸正在吞噬最后生机。因2016-2017年虚增利润超3亿元的财务造假案，公司被判赔偿第 三大股东山东至博3.45亿元，目前仍有近亿元投资者索赔诉讼悬顶。雪上加霜的是，沃尔核材另以虚假陈述为 由索赔5608万元，叠加关联方利息清偿延期至9月底，流动性危机一触即发——资产负债率已攀升至71%，流 动比率仅0.98，货币资金难以覆盖短期债务。尽管国资股东格力集团持股12.98%（浮亏超50%），但治理层动 荡（总裁及财务负责人更换）与战略迷茫，使"国资救助"沦为资本市场一厢情愿的幻想。 责任编辑：AI观察员 财务窟窿远不止于此。2024年公司归母净利润巨亏9.78亿元，同比暴跌1216%，营收下滑7.22%至78.74 亿元。亏损主因除主业盈利能力坍塌外，更源于大额商誉减值：子公司珠海运泰利、芬兰欧普菲、金锂 科技合计减值2.95亿元，暴露收购标的连环暴雷。资产质量进一步恶化，应收账款账面余额高达35.15亿 元，计提坏账5.70亿元，其中单项计提坏账达2.33亿元，回 ...

*ST紫天（300280）公告，公司因财务会计报告存在虚假记载，收到福建证监局责令改正决定书。公司 需在收到决定书之日起30日内更正年度报告并经会计师事务所全面审计。截至目前，公司尚未聘请具备 证券、期货相关业务资格的会计师事务所，也未向福建证监局提交整改报告。根据相关规定，公司股票 自2025年5月20日起被实施退市风险警示，并将于2025年7月19日前可能被终止上市。 ...

为了让这场"骗局"更加逼真，林永飞不惜重金拿下纪梵希、巴利等国际一线品牌的代理权。真货假货混杂销售，顾客走进门店，看到卡奴迪路与纪梵希并列 陈列，很容易误以为它也是国际大牌。这种"鱼目混珠"的策略让摩登大道的销售额迅速飙升。2002年，"摩登大道"公司成立时，年净利润已突破千万元大 关。 与此同时，"慈善家"的形象也成为了林永飞精心塑造的另一张面具。媒体纷纷报道他"致富不忘本"的善举，却无人知晓这些所谓的善款，其实都源自于他暴 利山寨服装生意中攫取的巨额利润。 2012年，摩登大道成功登陆A股市场，市值一度突破60亿元。全国门店扩张至318家，年净利润达到1.07亿元，一时间，"卡奴迪路"几乎成为了每个商务男士 衣橱里的必备单品。 2025年7月2日，深交所发布的退市风险公告，将曾经的"男装第一股"——摩登大道，再次推向了舆论的风口浪尖。昔日年赚亿元，拥有318家门店的辉煌景 象，如今已荡然无存，只留下一个空壳公司，以及创始人林永飞在美国加州4000平方米海景豪宅里享受奢靡生活的画面，与国内累积的25亿元债务和69条强 制执行令形成鲜明对比。2.4万名股民的血汗钱，如今仿佛只是他豪宅泳池里泛起的一圈圈涟漪，悄 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company Ruiskanda is facing significant challenges due to allegations of financial misconduct, leading to a drastic decline in stock price and operational performance [2][10][14]. Financial Situation - Ruiskanda's stock price dropped to 8.78 yuan per share, a 76% decrease from its historical peak [2]. - The company reported a total revenue of 2.5 billion yuan in Q1 2025, a year-on-year decline of 34.89%, and a net loss of 193.67 million yuan, representing a 195.18% decrease [8][14]. - The financial report indicates a gross margin of 45.03%, an increase of 17.55%, but a net margin of -7.74%, a decrease of 246.18% [7][8]. - The total of selling, administrative, and financial expenses reached 87.60 million yuan, accounting for 35.0% of total revenue, up 62.86% year-on-year [7][8]. Business Operations - The company has lost customer trust due to the financial fraud scandal, resulting in reduced orders and terminated contracts from long-term clients [10][12]. - The core products, transmission equipment and broadband network devices, saw revenue declines of 17.54% and 41.13% respectively in 2024 [12]. - Management turmoil caused by the criminal charges against the chairman and a board member has disrupted decision-making processes, leading to missed market opportunities [12][14]. Industry Context - The telecommunications industry is highly competitive, with leading companies maintaining strong market positions due to technological advancements and brand loyalty [12]. - Ruiskanda's financial misconduct has further weakened its competitive edge, making it increasingly difficult to operate in a challenging market environment [12].

配合造假可能要 获刑 。 近期，中国裁判文书网公布一则刑事判决书，两名注册会计师（CPA）因配合上市公司财务造假而站上被告 席，此判决为中介机构从业人员敲响警钟。 根据券商中国记者梳理，一家上市公司2019年为满足发行可转债的业绩要求，其子公司与某企业签署虚假合 同，并将合同日期倒签至2018年，以便将项目收益确认为2018年收入。 两名注册会计师明知上述上市公司想要虚增2018年收入，仍然配合完成合同造假，并以会计师事务所名义出具 审计报告。最终上述上市公司2018年虚增利润超过1.45亿元。 法院一审判决称，上述两名注册会计师均犯"提供虚假证明文件罪"，分别被判处有期徒刑1年5个月、11个月， 罚没金额合计逾30万元。 配合完成合同造假 根据中国裁判文书网近期披露的北京第三中级人民法院刑事判决书，一家上市公司在2019年年初筹备发行可转 换公司债券，因旗下子公司一项影视剧播映权转让合同未达到2018年收入条件，恐影响可转债发行，上市公司 动了财务造假"歪心思"。 据悉，两名被告人即注册会计师朱某某、刘某某受委派为上述上市公司2018年年度报告提供审计服务，且同时 负责该公司可转债业务。 根据法院查明，为满 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company 瑞斯康达 is embroiled in a scandal involving financial misconduct, leading to criminal charges against its chairman and a board member for violating disclosure regulations [1][2]. Financial Misconduct - 瑞斯康达's chairman 李月杰 and board member 朱春城 are facing criminal charges for allegedly failing to disclose important information, linked to a prior administrative penalty from the China Securities Regulatory Commission [1][2]. - The company inflated its revenue by 6.32 billion yuan and profits by 1.17 billion yuan over the years 2019 and 2020 through fraudulent accounting practices [4][3]. Financial Performance - Following the financial misconduct, 瑞斯康达 reported a cumulative net loss of 10.54 billion yuan from 2021 to 2024 [8]. - In 2021, the company recorded a revenue of 18.53 billion yuan, but net profit plummeted to -8.1 billion yuan, a decline of 686.26% [6]. - The company showed signs of recovery in 2022 with a revenue of 21.56 billion yuan and a net profit of 800.68 million yuan, a 109.89% increase [6]. - However, revenue declined in 2023 and 2024, with figures of 16.26 billion yuan and 13.82 billion yuan, representing year-on-year decreases of 24.57% and 14.99% respectively [7]. Management Compensation - Despite the financial turmoil, the compensation for 李月杰 and 朱春城 remained unaffected, totaling approximately 10 million yuan over four years [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - A significant financial fraud case involving over 900 billion yuan has affected more than ten listed companies, with key figures from Ruisi Kanda being criminally detained, leading to a sharp decline in the company's stock price [1][3]. Group 1: Company Overview - Ruisi Kanda's chairman and general manager, Li Yuejie, along with director Zhu Chuncheng, have been subjected to criminal coercive measures by the Beijing Public Security Bureau for suspected violations of information disclosure laws [3]. - The company has faced continuous losses, with net profits exceeding 100 million yuan in losses for two consecutive years, indicating a dire need for transformation [2][10]. Group 2: Financial Misconduct Details - The financial misconduct dates back to 2018, where Ruisi Kanda's subsidiary engaged in a fictitious self-circulation business under the guise of a specialized network communication operation, resulting in inflated revenues and profits [5][6]. - The company reported a total inflated revenue of approximately 633 million yuan and a profit total of about 117 million yuan over two years due to this fraudulent activity [7]. Group 3: Recent Financial Performance - In 2024, Ruisi Kanda reported revenues of 1.382 billion yuan, a decrease of 14.99% year-on-year, with a net loss of 122 million yuan, although the loss narrowed compared to previous years [10]. - The first quarter of 2025 saw a dramatic decline in performance, with revenues of 250 million yuan, down 34.89% year-on-year, and a net loss of approximately 19.37 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year decline of 195.18% [10]. Group 4: Management Changes - Following the financial scandal, the company appointed vice president Han Meng as the acting chairman and general manager instead of the current actual controller, Ren Jianhong, who was also involved in the misconduct but faced lesser penalties [8][9].