5月12日深夜，长和（0001.HK）发布公告称，原本计划在5月22日股东周年大会上讲述港口交易的情况，但鉴 于近日不断有股东及传媒查询，集团现作出以下回应： 长江和记实业有限公司特此声明，此交易绝不可能在任何不合法或不合规的情况下进行。有关条文已于2025年 3月4日的公告中说明："交易之完成取决于一系列条件的达成，包括法律和监管部门之同意及批准、不存在违 法或法律禁止的情况、获得公司股东的必要批准以及最终文件中约定的其他适当及常规条件。" 市场监管总局新闻发言人回应表示，我们高度关注有关交易，将依法进行审查。交易各方不得采取任何方式规 避审查，未获批准前，不得实施集中，否则将承担法律责任。 综合自：长和公告、国家市场监督管理总局 责编：罗晓霞 4月27日，国家市场监督管理总局发布消息称，长和港口交易各方不得采取任何方式规避反垄断审查。 日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月16日报 道，长和出售海外港口将分拆为两个交易继续进行，国家市场监督管理总局对此有何评论？ 邮箱：bwb@stcn.com 校对：祝甜婷 百万用户都在看 巴基斯坦， 重大突发！ 刚刚！ ...

Core Viewpoint - The transaction between Cheung Kong Holdings and BlackRock regarding port assets has faced significant regulatory scrutiny from China's State Administration for Market Regulation, indicating a strong stance on antitrust enforcement and jurisdiction over offshore transactions [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Response - The State Administration for Market Regulation has issued a clear warning that all parties involved in the transaction must not circumvent regulatory review without approval, or they will face legal consequences [3][5]. - This situation marks the first instance of China's antitrust mechanism exercising extraterritorial jurisdiction over offshore registered companies, signaling a robust regulatory environment [3][5]. Group 2: Transaction Details - Cheung Kong Holdings plans to sell 43 port assets located in 23 countries to BlackRock, with two ports in the Panama Canal being particularly significant due to their strategic importance in Sino-U.S. maritime trade [3][5]. - Chinese merchant vessels account for 21% of the cargo volume in the Panama Canal, highlighting the potential impact of this transaction on global trade dynamics [3]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The proposed transaction has raised concerns that it could grant BlackRock control over shipping pricing from the Pacific to the Atlantic, potentially threatening the security of $2.3 trillion in maritime trade [5][10]. - The Chinese regulatory stance reflects a broader strategy to safeguard national interests and supply chain security, emphasizing a "zero tolerance" policy towards transactions that pose risks to these areas [10][12]. Group 4: Market Reactions - The ongoing regulatory scrutiny has led to delays in the approval of BlackRock's 23 investment projects in China, prompting multinational companies to reassess their compliance costs in the Chinese market [8][10]. - The situation has also attracted interest from other potential buyers, such as the Italian MSC Group, indicating a shifting landscape in the port asset market [8][10].

Core Viewpoint - The potential sale of port assets by Li Ka-shing to BlackRock has raised significant concerns regarding geopolitical implications, particularly in the context of U.S.-China relations and the control of global shipping routes [3][6][12]. Group 1: Transaction Details - Li Ka-shing plans to sell 34 ports, with 21 located in Asia and Oceania, and 13 in Europe, including critical ports like Rotterdam, which handles over 13.8 million containers annually, accounting for 42% of the European market [5]. - The transaction has not undergone a global public bidding process, leading to criticism and concerns about national interests and strategic assets [6][19]. - BlackRock's involvement is framed as enhancing infrastructure control, but this raises alarms about U.S. geopolitical strategies that could undermine China's Belt and Road Initiative [11][12]. Group 2: Regulatory and Political Reactions - The Chinese government has initiated an antitrust investigation into the transaction, emphasizing the need for regulatory approval before any sale can proceed [6][17]. - There are strict regulations in place regarding large transactions involving national security, with China requiring notification for deals exceeding 12 billion RMB [17][18]. - The Chinese authorities have made it clear that any attempts to circumvent regulatory scrutiny will not be tolerated, and legal consequences will follow for violations [18][21]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The sale of these ports could significantly impact China's foreign trade framework, particularly its Belt and Road Initiative, by potentially constraining access to key shipping routes [12][21]. - The situation highlights a broader concern regarding the lack of national sentiment in business decisions, as Li Ka-shing's willingness to sell to U.S. interests has drawn public and governmental backlash [19][21]. - The ongoing geopolitical tensions and trade wars further complicate the landscape, with the potential for increased scrutiny on foreign investments in critical infrastructure [10][21].

这回，李嘉诚是真的栽了。 市监总局直接放狠话：交易各方不得规避审查，未经批准，集中交易一律暂停，谁敢乱来，依法办！什 么意思？很简单：李嘉诚也好，贝莱德也罢，地中海航运集团也好——一个都别想玩垄断！ 李嘉诚想一次性甩卖全球43个海外港口，换一大笔现金走人，彻底跑路？想得美！ 市监总局这个动作，直接把李嘉诚最后一点侥幸心理敲碎了。因为李嘉诚这边，还在不停地暗搓搓搞小 动作，想搞"金蝉脱壳"——把旗下的长和集团拆成小块，企图蒙混过关。 怎么个拆法？把长子李泽钜名下的电讯盈科等产业，一分为二，直接打包送去英国伦敦上市。 一边做拆分，一边转资产。拆出来的公司名字一换，股权一分，反垄断的帽子就想摘掉。反正，留在李 嘉诚名下的是"合法"的，搬到李泽钜名下的，又是"独立"的——想得太美了！ 更绝的是，李泽钜本身还不是中国国籍，弄走的大多是海外资产。尤其是欧洲的电信资产，比如英国最 大的电信公司，都被李家收割到手。一操作下来，大量财富可以偷偷转移，反垄断审查直接被架空。 但很遗憾，国家早看穿了。 北美、拉美、欧洲、中东、东南亚、澳洲……只要是重要节点，几乎都有他的码头。 李嘉诚的盘子有多大？ 一是房地产，遍地开花，从内地到香 ...

以下文章来源于牲产队 ，作者牲产队长 牲产队 . 挣工分，磨洋工，舒服一会儿是一会儿 作者：牲产队长 来源：牲产队（ID：gh 9adbf3261554） 这一次，李嘉诚的港口交易真要黄了。 市监总局直接要求，交易各方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获批准前，不得实施集中，否则将 承担法律责任。啥意思呢？这就是打明牌了。李嘉诚也好，贝莱德也罢，还是新引入的地中海航 运集团，都不得垄断全球航运权。李嘉诚想一次性甩卖 43 个海外港口，套现跑路，是彻底搞不 成了。 这时候，为什么市监总局要发出这个信号？主要就在于，李嘉诚不甘心，始终还是想卖。而且， 长和集团在想办法，对抗反垄断审查，想玩一招 " 金蝉脱壳 " 之计。就在市监总局对长和集团 发起反垄断调查后，长和集团就宣布，要对旗下资产进行拆分。怎么拆分呢？把长子李泽钜旗下 的电讯盈科等产业，独立拆分，远赴英国伦敦上市。 为什么要拆分？一个是，规避反垄断调查。你说它垄断了，它马上拆分，变成一个个小公司。家 族产业一部分留在李嘉诚旗下，另一部分就转移给长子李泽钜。而李泽钜呢？既不是中国人，带 走的也不是中国资产，而是长和旗下的海外资产。尤其是电信产业，主要都位于欧洲。像 ...

昨天，当我们"调休"五一假期而周日加班"摸鱼"的时候，相关监管部门却一点都没闲着！ 近日，国家市场监督管理总局就长和集团出售海外港口交易连续发声，明确要求交易各方不得采取任何方式规避反垄断审查，否则将承 担法律责任。 上述相关部门官网于当天（4月27日）下午17时整，公布了有关"李嘉诚卖港口"的最新消息。 针对"李嘉诚卖港口"，市场监管总局第二次表态！ 下面，我们可以从全国唯一一份以"中国"冠名的资产管理行业专业媒体（中国基金报），在昨天发布的相关报道（10W+）中，援引了外 媒的上述相关报道。 记者援引外媒从知情人士称处获悉的消息：控制地中海航运的意大利阿庞特家族，考虑将与贝莱德合作，从43个港口中剥离出其中的巴 拿马港口，分别为巴尔博亚和克里斯托瓦尔2个港口。 值得一提的是，这已经是该相关部门近期第二次就此交易表态。 就在1个月之前（3月28日），上述相关部门反垄断二司负责人在回复港媒（大公文汇全媒体）记者关于"长和拟售巴拿马港口"的提问 时，就明确表示将依法审查，以"保护市场公平竞争，维护社会公共利益"。 据上述信息显示：在日前的一次答记者问环节，有记者提到了外媒（华尔街日报）于早前（4月16日）关于" ...

李嘉诚卖港口一事，有新消息。 市场监管总局：长和港口交易各方不得采取任何方式规避反垄断审查 最初的交易方案是，阿庞特家族现有的港口运营商Terminal Investment Limited（TiL）获得全球港口资产51%的股份，贝莱德旗下的一家实体获得 49%的股份。那部分占了该交易中涉及的大部分资产，包括位于荷兰、德国、马来西亚和其他地方的集装箱码头。 对于这两个巴拿马港口，所有权结构正好相反：TiL获得49%的股份，贝莱德最近收购的基础设施投资机构Global Infrastructure Partners获得51%的 股份。 3月4日深夜，李嘉诚旗下长江和记实业有限公司在港交所公告，宣布与贝莱德牵头的财团达成原则性协议，出售其全球港口业务核心资产。 标的资产覆盖亚欧美洲23个国家的43个港口，涵盖199个泊位及配套的智能码头管理系统、全球物流网络等核心资源。其中涉及巴拿马港口公司 90%股权。 如此一来，该公司运营的巴拿马巴尔博亚和克里斯托瓦尔两个港口将被美国企业控制。 4月27日消息，日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月16日报道，长和出售海外港 ...

日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月 16日报道， 长和出售海外港口将分拆为两个交易继续进行，国家市场监督管理总局对此有何评论？ 答：我们高度关注有关交易，将依法进行审查。交易各方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获批准前，不 得实施集中，否则将承担法律责任。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The $22.765 billion port business transaction between BlackRock and CK Hutchison is facing multiple challenges, including potential legal issues in Panama and regulatory scrutiny from Chinese authorities [1][6]. Group 1: Transaction Details - CK Hutchison announced on March 4 that it plans to sell 43 port businesses, including the Panama Canal, to a buyer consortium led by BlackRock, which also includes Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) and Terminal Investment Limited (TiL) [2]. - The transaction is expected to generate over $19 billion in cash for CK Hutchison, which is equivalent to the company's overall market value, making it the largest transaction in the company's history [2]. - CK Hutchison's port division operates 293 berths across 53 ports in 24 countries, handling a total throughput of 82.1 million standard containers in 2023 [2]. Group 2: BlackRock's Strategic Position - BlackRock, founded in 1988, is the world's largest asset management company, managing over $11.6 trillion in assets across various sectors, including equities, bonds, and real estate [4]. - Approximately 80% of BlackRock's managed assets come from institutional clients, including government and high-net-worth individuals [4]. - The acquisition of GIP, a company specializing in infrastructure, and TiL, which operates nearly 70 key ports globally, positions BlackRock to control about 10.4% of global container throughput if the transaction is completed [4]. Group 3: Regulatory Challenges - The transaction is under scrutiny from the Chinese National Market Supervision Administration, which is conducting a review to ensure fair competition and protect public interests [6]. - In Panama, the Office of the Comptroller General has identified multiple violations in the port concession agreements and plans to sue officials involved in the renewal of these agreements [7]. - The deal must also pass antitrust reviews in 12 jurisdictions, including the EU and the US, and requires approval from CK Hutchison's special shareholders' meeting [7].

Group 1 - CK Hutchison Holdings has accumulated losses nearing HKD 100 billion, prompting potential asset restructuring by Li Ka-shing, with significant stock price declines observed across its subsidiaries following the announcement of a port transaction with BlackRock [1][3] - On March 29, CK Hutchison's stock fell by 6.98%, and its subsidiary, Hutchison Whampoa, dropped by 7.95%, leading to a total market value loss of HKD 32.36 billion over 11 trading days, with the combined market value of its four major groups shrinking by over HKD 78.1 billion [1] - Morgan Stanley downgraded CK Hutchison's rating, citing a surge in political risk premium, while the National Market Regulatory Administration has begun reviewing the port transaction for potential antitrust issues, which could prevent Li Ka-shing from cashing out USD 19 billion [1][4] Group 2 - Despite the losses, CK Hutchison has not confirmed any decision regarding the sale of its telecommunications business, which has led to market speculation about asset restructuring, including a potential spin-off of the telecom unit [3] - Li Ka-shing has responded to criticism regarding the port transaction, asserting that he has not received any special privileges from the government and framing the deal as a necessary business move, although the economic benefits of the transaction are questionable given the significant asset depreciation [4] - The U.S. has expressed support for the port transaction, aiming to weaken China's control over the Panama Canal, while China's Foreign Ministry has reiterated its opposition to economic coercion, indicating a geopolitical struggle surrounding the logistics sector [6]