Group 1 - Tencent Games launched the "2025 Summer Minor Protection Special Action" on July 3, focusing on family account management and introducing features like "Game Temporary Switch" and "Parent Self-Service Facial Recognition" to meet parents' multi-scenario management needs [1] - The initiative aims to provide parents with a comprehensive set of game management tools to help address current challenges in family digital management [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent court ruling on the Liu Xuezhou cyberbullying case highlights the legal accountability of online influencers for their harmful comments, particularly regarding the protection of minors and the consequences of online violence [1][3][4] Group 1: Case Background - Liu Xuezhou gained public attention after posting a video seeking his biological parents in December 2021, but tragically took his own life in January 2022 due to severe online bullying [1] - The court ruled on June 9, 2023, that two prominent online figures were liable for defamation and ordered them to apologize and pay a total of 57,000 yuan (approximately 8,000 USD) for mental damages and legal fees [1][2] Group 2: Legal Implications - The court recognized the difficulty in establishing a direct causal link between individual comments and Liu's suicide, but emphasized that the cumulative effect of the online harassment significantly impacted his mental health [2][3] - The ruling serves as a precedent, indicating that both influential figures and anonymous participants in online bullying can be held accountable for their actions, countering the "law does not punish the crowd" mentality [3][4] Group 3: Legislative Context - Recent legal frameworks, including the "Guiding Opinions on Punishing Cyber Violence" and the "Regulations on the Protection of Minors Online," aim to strengthen protections against online bullying and ensure that individuals and organizations cannot harm minors through digital platforms [4]

Core Viewpoint - Generative AI is rapidly integrating into the digital lives of minors, providing learning assistance and social companionship, but it also raises significant concerns regarding the potential harm to minors, including exposure to inappropriate content and over-reliance on AI tools [1][2][4]. Group 1: Current Usage and Statistics - According to the 55th CNNIC report, 21.1% of internet users aged 6-19 are utilizing generative AI products, with many minors engaging in activities such as using AI for problem-solving, writing, and social chatting [2]. - The South Data Research Institute has observed that applications like "smart Q&A," "creative generation," and "virtual social interaction" are among the most commonly used generative AI services by minors [4]. Group 2: Guidelines and Frameworks - The "Guidelines for Providing Generative AI Services to Minors" was released on June 10, establishing a comprehensive safety management framework covering the entire lifecycle from training data to service operation [2][3]. - The guidelines emphasize the need for a protective framework that includes measures to prevent over-reliance, exposure to harmful information, and privacy breaches [3][4]. Group 3: Expert Recommendations - Experts suggest that generative AI applications should incorporate a "minor mode" that includes features such as age-appropriate content filtering, identity verification, and parental controls to enhance safety [5][6]. - Recommendations for the design of the "minor mode" include easy-to-use features, age-based content recommendations, and mechanisms for reporting harmful content [6][7]. Group 4: Regulatory and Compliance Measures - Existing regulations, such as the "Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services," outline the responsibilities of service providers to protect minors from excessive reliance on AI [3]. - The establishment of a comprehensive evaluation index system for the protection and development of minors in the context of generative AI has been initiated, focusing on areas such as information security and emergency response mechanisms [3].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the "Seven Color Mailbox" in Jixian No. 3 Middle School serves as a vital tool for protecting minors, facilitating communication between students and authorities, and addressing issues such as bullying and mental health concerns [1][2][3]. Group 1: Implementation of the "Seven Color Mailbox" - The "Seven Color Mailbox" has received over 90 letters in more than a year, leading to the identification and resolution of issues like campus bullying and harassment [1]. - The mailbox acts as a bridge for collaboration among various local resources, including civil affairs, education, and community support teams, to provide comprehensive protection for children's growth [1][8]. Group 2: Case Studies of Intervention - A student named Xiaowen reached out for help regarding bullying and emotional distress, prompting the school to engage with her family and provide psychological support [2]. - The school implemented measures to enhance safety in dormitories and bathrooms, including alarm systems to alert teachers of any unusual behavior [3]. Group 3: Feedback and Improvements - The mailbox has also highlighted issues with the school cafeteria, leading to improvements in food quality and variety based on student feedback [4][5]. - The school has actively responded to concerns raised through the mailbox, fostering a culture of open communication and continuous improvement [5]. Group 4: Broader Community Support - The local court has initiated a "Love Mom" team to provide academic and psychological support to underprivileged students, integrating various community resources for comprehensive assistance [8]. - A partnership was formed among the local court, judicial bureau, and women's federation to enhance the protection of minors through collaborative efforts [8].

Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology presents both opportunities and challenges for the protection of minors in the digital space, necessitating new governance models to ensure their mental and physical well-being [1][3]. Group 1: Challenges in Protecting Minors - The interaction between minors and AI tools occurs in a private context, making it difficult for parents and regulators to detect harmful content and assess the risks associated with AI usage [1][2]. - Minors are not only consumers of content but also active creators, sometimes producing low-quality or inappropriate content, which highlights the need for positive guidance and digital literacy [2][3]. - The evolution of harmful information on the internet complicates regulatory efforts, as such content can easily change form to evade detection, necessitating ongoing monitoring and targeted actions [3][4]. Group 2: Proposed Solutions - There is a need to embed the concept of minor protection throughout the development of AI models and applications, ensuring compliance at all stages from data training to service operation [4]. - The protection model should shift from isolation and control to active cultivation and the creation of a safe digital ecosystem, promoting positive influences while preventing harm [4].

Core Viewpoint - The rapid rise of blind boxes among children and teenagers has led to irrational consumption, with some children spending high amounts for rare cards, highlighting the commercial traps and impulsive buying behavior associated with these products [1] Group 1: Industry Trends - Blind boxes are increasingly popular among minors, becoming a form of social currency due to the element of "unknown surprise" [1] - The lack of strict identity verification in the industry poses challenges for the protection of minors, despite existing regulatory guidelines [1] Group 2: Regulatory and Expert Recommendations - Experts suggest improving legislation to implement strict identity verification and enhance joint law enforcement to protect the rights of minors [1] - Parents are encouraged to take action if they notice significant spending by their children, including providing evidence and actively defending their rights [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is the establishment of a collaborative mediation mechanism between the Tashkent Market Supervision Administration and the Tashkent People's Court to effectively resolve disputes and enhance the multi-faceted dispute resolution system [1][2] - On June 18, 2025, a complaint was received regarding a tattoo shop providing tattoos to minors, leading to immediate joint mediation by the market supervision and the court [1] - The mediation process involved educating the tattoo shop owner about the regulations on tattooing minors and the legal responsibilities under the Minor Protection Law and the Civil Code [1] Group 2 - The next steps include the Tashkent Market Supervision Administration and the Tashkent People's Court working together to build a "court + market supervision" collaborative mediation mechanism [2] - This initiative aims to streamline the multi-faceted dispute resolution channels and ensure effective coordination between administrative enforcement and judicial protection [2] - The goal is to provide robust judicial services and guarantees to achieve a law-based business environment [2]

必须多方协作、加强监管，让利用未成年人"擦边"的行为没有生存空间 近日，某动漫展上几名衣着暴露的儿童直播事件引发关注。漫展主办方工作人员马上联系了家长和摄影 工作室，及时予以制止。 平台要拿出办法。平台应从人员投入、内容审核等方面加强事前对未成年人"擦边"内容的监管，对相关 内容及时发现、及时屏蔽或删除，让这类图片或视频发不出、传不开。同时，加大事后处罚力度，对多 次违规、影响恶劣的账号和商家进行严厉处置，关停账户、下架产品，提高违规成本，起到警示作用。 保护未成年人身心健康，是全社会的责任。必须多方协作、加强监管，让利用未成年人"擦边"的行为没 有生存空间，为未成年人营造风清气正、健康积极的成长环境。 （文章来源：人民日报） 家长要担起责任。作为监护人，家长要树立正确的育儿观，还应提高警惕，甄别防范一些机构以"艺 术""培训""展示才艺"等理由将未成年人异化为商业工具。同时，多关注孩子的思想动态，陪伴孩子进 行一些健康、积极的娱乐活动，防止被不良内容影响。 机构要正视问题。演艺中介、模特公司、培训机构等要认识到未成年人保护的严肃性，在演出、展览等 活动中不能以涉嫌伤害未成年人的方式牟利，不能为了热度、流量不 ...

如今，新修订的未成年人保护法迎来实施四周年，强制报告制度入法也已四年。从检察机关的实践经 验来看，近年来，社会大众对强制报告制度的理解和认同不断增强，但距离全社会普遍接纳、自觉遵 守制度要求仍有差距，特别是相关组织和从业人员缺乏履行强制报告义务的责任感。 根据《意见》的规定，报告责任主体的"密切接触未成年人行业的各类组织"包括中小学校、幼儿 园、校外培训机构、医院、儿童福利机构、旅店、宾馆等，中国政法大学未成年人事务治理与法律研 究基地主任李红勃告诉第一财经记者，医院和学校及其从业人员都是履行强制报告义务的关键主体。 不过，"这项制度，还没有进入有些人的头脑，"李红勃指出，当前对于应履行强制报告义务的主要 责任主体的普法力度仍然不够，很多人不知道这项制度，或者没有意识到强制报告是一项法定责任。 2025.06. 02 本文字数：2342，阅读时长大约4分钟 六一儿童节之前，多个部门发布涉未成年人权益保护的典型案例，其中有几起案件事发源于医生或老 师的主动报告，凸显出侵害未成年人案件强制报告制度的作用。 5月29日，司法部发布一起未成年人法律援助典型案例：江苏省某小学老师发现学生胡某某身上有多 处新旧伤痕，询问 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implementation and challenges of the mandatory reporting system for cases of child abuse and neglect in China, emphasizing the need for broader societal awareness and effective intervention mechanisms [2][3][4]. Group 1: Mandatory Reporting System - The mandatory reporting system for child abuse was established in May 2020 by multiple departments, requiring organizations with close contact with minors to report suspected cases of abuse [2]. - The system was incorporated into the Minor Protection Law a year later, with the Supreme Prosecutor's Office initiating a mechanism to ensure every case is investigated [2][3]. - Despite some successes in uncovering abuse cases through this system, issues remain, such as bystander apathy and inadequate responses from local authorities [3]. Group 2: Societal Awareness and Engagement - There is a need for all individuals, not just institutions, to report suspected abuse, highlighting that everyone can seek law enforcement intervention [4]. - The misconception that domestic violence is a private matter continues to hinder effective reporting and intervention [3][4]. - Enhancing awareness among local authorities about the seriousness of domestic violence is crucial for improving response efficiency and accountability [4]. Group 3: Comprehensive Protection Mechanisms - Protecting minors requires a multi-faceted approach involving various departments and organizations, emphasizing the importance of collaboration and effective service delivery [5]. - Initiatives like the "Bright Star Program" in Guangzhou aim to promote positive parenting practices to prevent violence against children [5]. - Establishing a robust tracking and accountability mechanism for mandatory reports is essential to ensure that every report is addressed appropriately [5].