Core Viewpoint - China has suspended the import of Japanese seafood due to Japan's failure to provide promised technical materials ensuring product safety, which is a prerequisite for such exports [2][3]. Group 1: Diplomatic Relations - The recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo linking Taiwan issues to Japan's survival crisis have provoked strong public outrage in China, indicating a potential market rejection of Japanese seafood even if exports were allowed [2][3]. - The spokesperson emphasized that Japan's historical use of "self-defense" as a pretext for military aggression raises concerns about the revival of militarism, which must be vigilantly opposed by the international community [3]. Group 2: Historical Context - Historical precedents show that Japan has previously invoked "survival threats" to justify military actions, such as the invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and the broader conflicts during World War II [3]. - The spokesperson called for heightened vigilance against any attempts to revive militarism, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist struggle [3]. Group 3: Future Implications - The spokesperson warned that if Japan does not retract its controversial statements regarding Taiwan, China will have to take severe countermeasures, with all consequences falling on Japan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The statement by Japan's former Prime Minister Sanna Takagi linking "Taiwan's situation" to Japan's "survival crisis" raises concerns about Japan potentially exercising collective self-defense, which could lead to military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, violating China's bottom line [1][2]. Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, emphasized that the concept of "collective self-defense" as defined by the UN Charter was created to maintain international security and prevent the resurgence of fascism, and Japan has been restricted from exercising this right post-World War II [1]. - Historical context was provided, highlighting that Japan's past justifications for military aggression, such as the 1931 invasion of Northeast China under the guise of "survival crisis," reflect a pattern of militaristic behavior [1]. - Mao Ning warned against the revival of militarism, urging the international community to remain vigilant and prevent any attempts to undermine the post-war international order [2].

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mao Ning, emphasized that Japan's potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, under the guise of "collective self-defense," violates China's bottom line and recalls historical precedents of Japanese militarism [1][2]. Group 1 - Mao Ning highlighted that the concept of "collective self-defense" was established to maintain international security and prevent the resurgence of fascism, and Japan has been historically restricted from exercising this right post-World War II [1]. - The Potsdam Declaration explicitly prohibited Japan from rearming, and Japan's constitution commits to renouncing war and the use of force to resolve international disputes, establishing a principle of "defensive defense" [1]. - Historical examples were cited where Japan invoked "survival crisis" as a pretext for military aggression, including the 1931 invasion of Northeast China and the justification for the Pacific War [1]. Group 2 - Mao Ning warned that the international community must remain vigilant to prevent the resurgence of militarism, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist war [2].

Group 1 - The article highlights the alarming increase in bear attacks in Japan, with 88 reported incidents in October alone, resulting in 7 fatalities, primarily occurring in urban areas [1][2] - The rise in bear encounters is attributed to factors such as global warming affecting food sources for bears and the encroachment of human habitats into bear territories [2][3] Group 2 - The article discusses the resurgence of historical revisionism and militarism in Japan, exemplified by Prime Minister Sannae Takagi's controversial statements regarding Taiwan and territorial claims, which have drawn strong protests from China and South Korea [1][2] - The narrative suggests that Japan's historical education has been skewed, leading to a shift towards a more aggressive national identity, influenced by political figures like Shinzo Abe and the current administration [3][4] - The article indicates that the political climate in Japan is increasingly leaning towards right-wing nationalism, with public support for hardline policies growing among politicians [3][4]

Core Points - The article discusses the increasing frequency of bear attacks in Japan, with 88 reported incidents in October alone, resulting in 7 fatalities, primarily occurring in urban areas [1] - It also highlights the rise of historical revisionism and militarism in Japan, exemplified by controversial statements from Prime Minister Sanna Takashi and actions that provoke neighboring countries [1][2] - The article connects the environmental issues leading to bear attacks with the political climate in Japan, suggesting that both phenomena are influenced by deeper societal and historical factors [3] Group 1: Bear Attacks - In October, Japan experienced 88 bear attacks, with 7 resulting in death, indicating a significant increase in incidents [1] - Over 70% of these attacks occurred in urban or residential areas, causing public concern [1] - Experts attribute the rise in bear encounters to global warming affecting food sources and the encroachment of human habitats [2] Group 2: Political Climate - Prime Minister Sanna Takashi's remarks on Taiwan and territorial claims have drawn strong criticism from China and South Korea, highlighting Japan's contentious political stance [1][2] - The Japanese government has faced backlash for its historical revisionism, particularly regarding its military past, which has strained relations with neighboring countries [2][3] - The article suggests that the current political climate is a result of long-standing historical education biases and the influence of right-wing politics in Japan [3]

杨伯江 唐永亮 《人民日报》（2025年11月18日 第 02 版） 借炒作台湾问题实现强军扩武的政治企图、无视时代潮流与中国统一决心的军事冒险主义，必将遭到中 国人民的迎头痛击，必然遭到爱好和平的亚洲各国的共同反对 今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年、联合国成立80周年，也是日本战败80周年。 在这一历史节点，日本首相高市早苗发表涉台危险言论并拒绝撤回，这是对战后国际秩序的公然挑衅， 更是对中日关系的严重破坏、对中国核心利益的公然挑衅。 图谋武力干涉中国内政必遭迎头痛击（国际论坛） 恪守一个中国原则是日本必须履行的严肃政治承诺。1972年中日邦交正常化时签署的《中日联合声明》 明确规定，日本政府充分理解和尊重中国政府关于台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分的立场，坚持遵循 《波茨坦公告》第八条。1978年两国缔结《中日和平友好条约》，以法律形式确认了联合声明的各项原 则。1998年和2008年的中日第三、第四个政治文件，均重申坚持联合声明关于台湾问题的立场。《中日 关于建立致力于和平与发展的友好合作伙伴关系的联合宣言》重申"中国只有一个"，日方承诺只同台湾 维持民间和地区性往来，从而排除了日本对 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the provocative statements made by Takagi Sanae regarding Taiwan, suggesting that a "crisis situation" could justify Japan's collective self-defense, which is perceived as a potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait [3] - Takagi's remarks have sparked significant domestic backlash in Japan, with protests occurring outside the Prime Minister's residence, where demonstrators called for her resignation and criticized her understanding of diplomacy [3] - The article emphasizes that Japan's current stance under Takagi's leadership is seen as a misjudgment of the situation, with warnings issued that any military intervention in the Taiwan Strait would be viewed as an act of aggression by China [3]

Group 1 - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's recent statements in the Diet suggest that "Taiwan's situation" could trigger Japan's collective self-defense rights, indicating a potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait [1] - Kishi's remarks reflect a dangerous historical perspective and strategic outlook from Japan's right-wing forces, raising concerns among the international community, particularly Asian nations, about Japan's strategic direction [1] - The assertion that "Taiwan's situation is Japan's situation" aims to link China's national unification with Japan's security, highlighting a troubling trend in Japanese politics [1] Group 2 - Japan's historical responsibility regarding Taiwan is significant, as it occupied Taiwan for half a century following the First Sino-Japanese War, committing numerous atrocities [2] - The year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japan and Taiwan's recovery, emphasizing the importance of historical justice [2] - Japan's recent military ambitions, including increased defense budgets and the potential development of offensive weapons, indicate a significant shift in its security policy, challenging the post-World War II international order [2]

Group 1 - The newly appointed Japanese Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, has made provocative statements regarding Taiwan, suggesting potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which reflects the extreme stance of Japan's right-wing forces [1] - This year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the recovery of Taiwan, highlighting the need for Japan to learn from history and pursue a path of peaceful development [1] - Japan's recent aggressive military policies and rhetoric about intervening in neighboring countries' internal affairs have raised concerns among regional nations and the international community [1] Group 2 - China's third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, has been officially commissioned, and the successful return of the Shenzhou 20 astronaut crew demonstrates China's growing economic, technological, and military capabilities [2] - China emphasizes its commitment to safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, stating that there will be no compromise on core interests, and any challenges to China's bottom line will be met with strong resistance [2] - The historical trend towards the reunification of Taiwan with mainland China is deemed unstoppable, and any attempts to obstruct this process will ultimately fail against the resolve of the Chinese people [2]

Group 1 - The article discusses the provocative remarks made by Japan's Prime Minister, Kishi Suga, regarding Taiwan, suggesting potential military intervention, which reflects the extreme stance of Japan's right-wing forces [1][2] - It emphasizes that Japan should learn from its historical mistakes, particularly in the context of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and the liberation of Taiwan, and should pursue a path of peaceful development [2][3] - The article asserts that China has the strong will and capability to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity, dismissing any attempts by Japan to revive militaristic ambitions as futile [2][3] Group 2 - The article highlights recent developments in China's military capabilities, including the commissioning of the third aircraft carrier, Fujian, and the successful return of the Shenzhou 20 astronaut crew, showcasing China's economic and technological strength [2][3] - It reiterates that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that the unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an unstoppable historical trend [3]