根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》，我部发布《关于对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费的公告》，决定 将于10月14日起对涉美船舶收取船舶特别港务费，这是我们维护中国海运企业合法权益的正当举措。我 们敦促美方立即纠正错误做法，停止对中国海运业的无理打压。 问：中方宣布将对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费，有何考虑？ 答：2025年4月，美国贸易代表办公室宣布了对中国海事、物流和造船领域301调查最终措施，10月14日 起，对中国公司拥有或运营的船舶、中国造船舶、中国籍船舶加收港口服务费。美国的做法罔顾事实， 充分暴露出其单边主义、保护主义本质，具有明显的歧视性色彩，严重损害中国海运业的正当利益，严 重扰乱全球供应链稳定，严重破坏国际经贸秩序。中方将对美国错误做法依法坚决采取反制措施，推动 构建公平正义的国际海运市场秩序，维护国际物流供应链安全稳定。 人民财讯10月10日电，交通运输部新闻发言人就拟对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费答记者问。 ...

交通运输部就拟对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费答记者问 编辑：付健青 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 中新网10月10日电 据交通运输部网站消息，交通运输部新闻发言人就拟对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费 答记者问。 问：中方宣布将对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费，有何考虑？ 答：2025年4月，美国贸易代表办公室宣布了对中国海事、物流和造船领域301调查最终措施，10月14日 起，对中国公司拥有或运营的船舶、中国造船舶、中国籍船舶加收港口服务费。美国的做法罔顾事实， 充分暴露出其单边主义、保护主义本质，具有明显的歧视性色彩，严重损害中国海运业的正当利益，严 重扰乱全球供应链稳定，严重破坏国际经贸秩序。中方将对美国错误做法依法坚决采取反制措施，推动 构建公平正义的国际海运市场秩序，维护国际物流供应链安全稳定。 根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》，我部发布《关于对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费的公告》，决定 将于10月14日起对涉美船 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strategic countermeasures against the impending U.S. tariffs on Chinese shipping vessels, highlighting the necessity and effectiveness of these actions in the context of U.S.-China trade relations. Group 1: China's Countermeasures - China has placed three U.S. military shipbuilding companies under control, halting the supply of high-precision CNC machines and special welding materials, which complicates U.S. naval shipbuilding and aircraft carrier maintenance [3] - China amended its "International Maritime Shipping Regulations" to allow for necessary countermeasures against discriminatory actions by other countries, signaling a legal basis for retaliation against U.S. tariffs [3][4] - Initial effects of China's counteractions are evident, with 12 U.S. states suing the Trump administration over "overreaching taxation," and a significant majority of U.S. businesses opposing the tariffs [3] Group 2: Necessity of China's Response - The U.S. is characterized as a unilateral hegemonic power, employing aggressive tactics to suppress China, necessitating a robust response to prevent further escalation of trade hostilities [4] - China's trade with the U.S. has significantly decreased from nearly 30% to below 10% of its total foreign trade, demonstrating resilience and a shift towards trade diversification [4] - The interdependence between the U.S. and China, particularly in sectors like agriculture and rare earth minerals, creates a leverage point for China in the ongoing trade conflict [4] Group 3: Strategic Advantages for China - China holds significant leverage, including the potential to require all imports and exports to be settled in RMB, which could undermine the dollar's dominance in global trade [5] - The article suggests that China may impose landing fees on Boeing aircraft and restrict exports of rare earth materials, among other retaliatory measures, to maintain competitiveness in the shipbuilding industry [6][8] - There are indications of potential large orders from Boeing and the U.S. agricultural sector, which could be influenced by the outcome of the ongoing negotiations [8][9]

Group 1 - The US-China trade friction has entered a new phase of confrontation, with US officials stating that the current tariff levels on Chinese goods are "acceptable," indicating a shift from covert tactics to open strategic competition [1][5] - Since 2018, the US has continuously imposed tariffs, culminating in a significant strategic escalation with a 10% tariff on a wide range of Chinese imports announced in early 2025, marking a transition from temporary measures to a stable policy foundation [3][10] - The US has integrated previous scattered tariff measures into a systematic policy, affecting nearly all industries, from high-tech to consumer goods, demonstrating a comprehensive approach to trade policy [3][10] Group 2 - In September 2025, US trade officials publicly declared that the current 55% tariff on Chinese goods is in a "good state," narrowing the negotiation space and indicating a clear stance on tariff reduction [5][10] - The deadline for a tariff ceasefire is approaching on November 10, 2025, with the potential for tariffs to revert to higher levels if no new agreement is reached, which the US views as a pressure tactic [5][10] Group 3 - China has actively responded to the US tariffs by initiating a dispute request with the World Trade Organization (WTO) in February 2025, indicating a shift from bilateral negotiations to a multilateral framework [7][13] - In April 2025, China imposed additional tariffs on certain US products and criticized the US for unilateralism and protectionism, emphasizing the negative impact of tariffs on global trade rules [9][13] Group 4 - The US has expanded its tariff measures to include heavy-duty truck imports, further broadening the scope of its trade policy to cover various sectors, including basic industries and transportation [12][18] - China's export structure is shifting towards Europe and Southeast Asia, indicating a diversification strategy in response to high tariffs from the US [15][18] Group 5 - The US is experiencing increased import costs and inflation due to higher tariffs, which is suppressing consumer spending, particularly in agriculture and machinery sectors [17][18] - The ongoing trade conflict is evolving into a long-term structural confrontation, with both countries adopting clear and strategic paths in their trade policies [20]

Core Viewpoint - China has gained unanimous support to become an observer state in the Andean Community (CAN), a significant diplomatic achievement that contrasts with the recent unilateral actions of the United States in Latin America [3][21]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Their Impact - The U.S. imposed tariffs of 10%-15% on exports from Latin America, which increased the effective average tariff to 13% and planned to raise copper tariffs to 50% [5][7]. - This led to severe economic consequences for Latin American countries, including a 30% drop in orders for a Peruvian copper mining company and a 20% increase in costs for Colombian flower exporters [7][9]. - The U.S. also cut aid by 37%, exacerbating the economic struggles of countries reliant on American assistance, with Brazil projected to lose 52 billion reais in exports and 100,000 jobs due to increased tariffs [7][9]. Group 2: China's Strategic Positioning - China has been building relationships with the Andean Community since 1999, establishing a consultation mechanism and gradually increasing its engagement [11][13]. - The shift from bilateral trade to regional cooperation has allowed China to provide tangible benefits to Latin American countries, such as stable orders for minerals without political conditions [11][13]. - China's participation as an observer will enable it to influence trade rules and standards, enhancing resource security for its industries, particularly in AI and electric vehicles [17]. Group 3: Geopolitical Implications - China's acceptance as the first Asian observer in the Andean Community breaks the U.S. monopoly in the region, allowing Latin American countries to diversify their economic partnerships [19][21]. - The cooperation between China and the Andean Community is seen as a response to U.S. unilateralism, with China offering investment and market opportunities in contrast to U.S. tariffs and sanctions [21][23]. - The Andean Community's decision to support China reflects a broader rejection of U.S. dominance and an embrace of multilateral cooperation [23].

在全球化日益加深的今天，贸易和经济政策的变化往往成为国际博弈的风向标。特朗普政府宣布自8月1 日起对部分商品加征高额关税的决定，毫无疑问引发了全球市场的震荡。这一举措不仅对美国本土经济 构成压力，更令与中国有着深厚经贸关系的东盟国家陷入了进退两难的境地。中美博弈的加剧，不仅使 全球经济形势更加复杂化，也将国际力量对比推向了一个关键节点。在此背景下，中国外交团队，尤其 是中国外交部长，凭借坚定而智慧的应对方式，成功化解了来自美国方面的压力，展现了中国在全球经 济治理中的领导力。 今年7月，在马来西亚吉隆坡举行的东盟外长会议上，美国国务卿鲁比奥的"印太经济框架"倡议，企图 通过拉拢东盟国家，共同对抗中国。然而，特朗普政府的高额关税政策却暴露了这一倡议的内在矛盾。 美国单方面加税的行为不仅损害了美国本土企业的利益，更令东盟国家陷入了贸易成本上升的困境。尤 其是对于东盟这些依赖对华贸易的国家来说，美国的政策几乎成了"口惠而实不至"的空头支票。相比之 下，中国凭借稳定的经济合作关系，展现了更多的诚意和行动，这使得东盟各国对于鲁比奥的倡议反应 冷淡，选择站在中国一边。 与美国的单边主义形成鲜明对比，中国则秉持平等互利的原 ...

Core Viewpoint - China actively raised the issue of global service trade stability and responsibility at the WTO meeting, criticizing the unilateral policies of the Trump administration and calling for adherence to WTO rules [2][12] Group 1: China's Position and Actions - China's criticism at the WTO was a response to the perceived insincerity of Trump's proposed meeting, as he continued to impose tariffs while suggesting dialogue [4][12] - The tariffs imposed by the U.S. have expanded from specific industries to essential consumer goods, indicating a broader escalation of trade tensions [4][10] - By voicing concerns at the WTO, China aimed to prevent the upcoming meeting from being used as a tool for the U.S. to pressure China into concessions [12][14] Group 2: International Support and Reactions - Several countries, including India, Brazil, Egypt, and Pakistan, supported China's stance at the WTO, highlighting the widespread discontent with U.S. tariff policies [8][10] - These nations have suffered significant economic losses due to U.S. tariffs, with India losing price advantages on 55% of its exports and Brazil facing severe impacts on its beef and coffee exports [8][10] Group 3: Implications for Global Trade - China's actions at the WTO are seen as a defense of global trade rules, emphasizing the need for multilateralism and fair trade practices [14][16] - If the U.S. continues its unilateral approach, it may face increasing collective opposition from other nations, as they do not wish to become the next victims of such policies [16]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shifting global trade dynamics due to the United States' unilateral trade policies, particularly its "reciprocal tariffs," which are criticized for promoting protectionism and negatively impacting global service trade [1][3][4]. Group 1: Impact of US Trade Policies - The US GDP experienced a quarter-on-quarter decline of 0.3% in Q1 2025, marking its first economic contraction in three years, largely attributed to the negative effects of its tariff policies [3]. - Net exports have significantly dragged down the US economy by 4.83 percentage points, highlighting the detrimental impact of the tariff measures [3]. - A study from Yale University indicates that if the US tariffs are fully implemented, consumer prices could rise by 2.3%, resulting in an additional annual expenditure of $3,800 per household [3]. Group 2: Global Reactions and Shifts - Countries like India, Brazil, Egypt, and Pakistan have shown support for China's stance against US trade practices, indicating a potential decline in US hegemony in global trade [1][4]. - Germany's Hamburg port saw a 11.3% increase in container throughput with China, while shipments to the US plummeted by 19%, reflecting a growing trade relationship with China [6]. - The UK has resumed its economic cooperation with China, signing a £3.2 billion deal, as it seeks to recover economically post-Brexit [6]. - Australia has shifted its stance, with Prime Minister Albanese stating that Australia will no longer pursue "decoupling" from China, given that nearly 40% of its exports are directed to the Chinese market [6]. Group 3: Broader Economic Context - Emerging economies now contribute over 60% of global economic growth, contrasting with the US's economic struggles, which include a national debt exceeding $45 trillion, accounting for 130% of its GDP [9]. - The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) covers 30% of the global population, further illustrating the shift in economic power dynamics away from the US [9]. - The article warns that continued reliance on tariff barriers by the US could lead to its isolation in the face of global cooperation trends [10][12].

Core Insights - The World Trade Organization (WTO) reported a resilient global trade outlook despite challenges from unilateral actions by the U.S. government, with a projected growth of 2.4% in global goods trade for the year, significantly higher than the previous forecast of 0.9% [1][2] Group 1: Global Trade Growth - The increase in global goods trade is attributed to U.S. importers placing advance orders to mitigate the impact of tariffs and a surge in demand for products related to the artificial intelligence industry, such as semiconductors and manufacturing equipment [1] - Trade among developing economies, referred to as South-South trade, is growing rapidly, with an expected year-on-year increase of 8% in the first half of 2025, compared to a 6% growth in total global trade during the same period [1] Group 2: Future Outlook and Risks - The WTO warns of a significant decline in global goods trade growth to 0.5% in 2026, influenced by weak global economic recovery and U.S. tariff policies [1] - There is considerable uncertainty regarding future trade policies and barriers, indicating that while the global trade system shows resilience, caution is warranted due to potential risks [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent WTO meeting in Geneva highlighted a significant shift in global trade dynamics, with countries openly criticizing the United States for its unilateral trade practices and rallying around China's proposals for reforming the multilateral trade system [1][3][25] Group 1: U.S. Trade Practices - The U.S. has been a major contributor to the current global trade chaos, primarily through its unilateral imposition of tariffs and pressure for bilateral agreements that disadvantage other nations [5][9] - The U.S. has utilized tariffs without consulting the WTO, leading to a breakdown in the established multilateral trade order [7][9] - Countries have expressed frustration over the U.S.'s "might makes right" approach, which undermines collective trade agreements and rules [5][10] Group 2: China's Proposals - China proposed three specific recommendations aimed at addressing the trade disorder: enhancing transparency and oversight, reaffirming commitment to a rules-based multilateral trade system, and taking concrete actions to ensure the WTO can effectively resolve trade disputes [10][12][14] - These proposals were well-received because they focus on the collective interests of all nations, rather than favoring any single country [16][25] Group 3: Global Response - Countries, including traditional U.S. allies like the EU, have begun to voice their concerns about the U.S.'s approach, indicating a shift towards supporting a rules-based system [17][19] - Nations such as Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea have expressed the need for oversight on unilateral tariffs and bilateral agreements to protect their interests [19][21] - Developing countries, particularly those affected by U.S. tariffs, have openly criticized U.S. practices and supported China's initiatives as a means to counteract U.S. pressure [22][23]