普京表示，俄罗斯看到了乌克兰方面释放的一些信号，表明乌方愿意进行对话，但俄方目前没有看到乌克兰讨论领土问题的意愿。俄罗斯愿意基于去年六月 提出的原则，在消除冲突根源的情况下结束冲突。普京称，在2022年俄乌双方在土耳其伊斯坦布尔的会谈中，乌克兰方面最初同意并草拟了协议，随后又拒 绝并将所有协议扔进垃圾桶，现在，乌方实质上拒绝以和平手段结束这场冲突。 "俄军正在接触线全线展开攻势" 普京还介绍了俄乌冲突前线部分情况。他表示，俄军正在接触线全线展开攻势。俄军不久后将控制交通枢纽城市红利曼，并继续向斯拉维扬斯克推进。斯拉 维扬斯克是乌军在顿涅茨克地区的防御重地。 当地时间12月19日，俄罗斯总统普京在莫斯科举行2025年度记者会。 "俄方尚未看到乌克兰准备讨论领土问题" 普京还表示，乌克兰哈尔科夫州的库皮扬斯克也处于俄军控制之下，有3500名乌克兰士兵在库皮扬斯克附近被俄军包围。 普京表示，对俄军在2025年年底前取得更多成果充满信心。 "乌军已耗尽战略储备" 普京还说，乌克兰武装部队实际上已经耗尽战略储备，"我希望这能够促使乌方解决所有争议问题，和平结束这场冲突"。 "今年俄罗斯经济增长1%" 谈及经济问题，普京 ...

普京说，曾有过俄罗斯加入北约的讨论，但俄方意识到俄罗斯加入北约"并不被期待"。他还说，欧洲有必要建立新的安全体系，任何国家选择的自卫方式 不应该对其他国家构成威胁。 普京说，北约军事基础设施在向俄边境移动，这引发了俄方的合理担忧。 普京：俄在北约东扩问题上"多次受骗" 俄罗斯总统普京19日在莫斯科举行的"年度盘点"活动上表示，俄罗斯曾在北约东扩问题上"多次受骗"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that the U.S. has promised Russia that Ukraine will cede some territories as part of a peace resolution, specifically mentioning Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, and Crimea [1] Group 1: U.S. and Ukraine Negotiations - U.S. officials held talks in Berlin with Ukrainian and European leaders regarding a potential peace agreement with Russia, proposing security guarantees in exchange for territorial concessions from Ukraine [1] - Ukrainian President Zelensky indicated readiness to abandon Ukraine's NATO membership aspirations in exchange for U.S. and European security assurances [1][2] Group 2: Russian Stance on NATO and Territorial Issues - Lavrov emphasized that Russia's position is clear: the root causes of the conflict must be addressed, including NATO's eastward expansion and the threat it poses to Russia [1] - Russia insists on preventing Ukraine from joining NATO, a stance that the U.S. reportedly understands [1] Group 3: Peace Agreement and Military Support - The details of the U.S. security guarantees remain unclear but are believed to be similar to NATO's Article 5 commitments, suggesting potential direct military support for Ukraine in the event of future Russian aggression [2][3] - U.S. officials warned that these guarantees may not be available indefinitely, indicating a sense of urgency for Zelensky to agree to the proposed conditions [3] Group 4: Russian Government's Position - Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov expressed hope that the U.S. would inform Russia of the outcomes of the U.S.-Ukraine-Europe talks once ready, emphasizing the need for formal documentation to assess Ukraine's intentions for peace [4] - Peskov stated that Russia seeks a comprehensive and lasting peace agreement, rejecting any short-term solutions that could allow Ukraine to regroup for further conflict [5][6] - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov asserted that Russia will not make concessions regarding Donbas and Crimea, and will not agree to any Western military presence in Ukraine [6]

来源：参考消息 央视新闻 据英国《每日电讯报》网站12月16日报道，俄罗斯外长谢尔盖·拉夫罗夫称，美国已向俄罗 斯承诺，乌克兰将放弃部分领土，作为和平解决方案的一部分。 拉夫罗夫说，特朗普政府明白"俄罗斯人在那些领土上生活了长达几个世纪，那些领土应再次 成为俄罗斯的一部分"。拉夫罗夫指的是顿涅茨克、卢甘斯克、赫尔松、扎波罗热和克里米 亚。 报道提到，在拉夫罗夫发表以上言论之前，美国官员在柏林与乌克兰和欧洲国家领导人就俄 罗斯与乌克兰可能达成的和平协议举行了会谈。 美国要求乌克兰及其欧洲盟友接受其提出的安全保障提议，交换条件是乌克兰向俄罗斯割让 一些领土。 但美国官员也警告说，这样的保障"不会永远都可供考虑和讨论"，这显然是向泽连斯基发出 的最后通牒，要求他同意这些条件。 佩斯科夫：希望美方"准备就绪后"向俄通报美乌欧会谈结果 当地时间12月17日，俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫在当日简报会上表示， 克里姆林宫希望美 国在"准备就绪后"，向俄罗斯通报其与乌克兰及欧洲方面谈判的结果。 佩斯科夫认为，只有在收到欧盟和基辅的正式文件后，才能判断乌克兰总统泽连斯基是否真 的想要和平。此外，俄罗斯关于在乌克兰部署西方部队的立 ...

Core Points - The recent five-hour talks between Russian President Putin and U.S. special envoy Witkowski ended without a compromise on the Ukraine issue, with Putin accusing Europe of trying to shift blame for the stalled peace process [1][3] - Russia has claimed full control over key areas in the Donetsk region, including the city of Bakhmut (referred to as Red Army City), which is strategically significant for Ukraine's logistics [1][6][14] - The ongoing military actions by Russia contrast with its diplomatic stance, as it shows no urgency to negotiate while making territorial gains on the battlefield [5][6] Group 1: Russia's Strategy - Russia is adopting a "wait and see" approach in negotiations, with Foreign Minister Lavrov stating that there is no rush to pressure the U.S. on Ukraine [5] - The Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov has drawn a clear line, stating that no concessions will be made while military operations are ongoing [6] - Control of Bakhmut is seen as critical for further advances in the region, potentially opening pathways into Dnipropetrovsk [6] Group 2: Europe's Dilemma - Europe is caught in a strategic bind, facing increasing "hybrid attacks" from Russia while debating how to respond effectively [8] - There is a growing call within Europe for a more proactive stance against Russia, as highlighted by Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braze [8] - NATO is considering shifting from a passive defense to a more aggressive posture, particularly in cyberspace [8] Group 3: U.S. Role - The U.S. plays a complex role in the peace process, with its initial peace plan being perceived as biased towards Russia [10][11] - The modified plan proposed by Europe was rejected by Russia, indicating a lack of alignment on key issues [11] - Domestic political changes in the U.S. add uncertainty to its mediation role, as it seeks a balance between supporting Ukraine and negotiating with Russia [11] Group 4: Future Scenarios - Three potential future paths have been identified: U.S. pressure on Ukraine to accept the original plan, a long-term strategy of bargaining with Russia while applying political pressure on Ukraine, or new sanctions against Russia coupled with advanced military support for Ukraine [12] - Russia has made it clear that if Ukraine does not accept its conditions, it will continue to seize territory [12] - The evolving situation on the battlefield is likely to influence any future peace negotiations, as territorial realities change [12]

Group 1 - The core issue is the increasing divergence between Russia and Ukraine regarding Trump's peace plan, with the deadline for signing the agreement having passed without any results [1] - NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg's remarks indicate that Russia has no veto power over Ukraine's NATO membership application, which seems to reject the U.S. proposal or at least aims to secure a better negotiating position for Ukraine [1][2] - The U.S.-led proposal includes a key condition that Ukraine will not be accepted into NATO at any time in the future, while a leaked European counter-proposal removes this clause, opening the door for future NATO membership for Ukraine [1] Group 2 - Some Western leaders are discussing the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO as a lure for Ukrainians, but closed-door meetings reveal that this is unlikely due to the risk of direct conflict with Russia [2] - The European document states that any discussions about territorial exchanges will start from the current contact line, which aligns with Ukrainian President Zelensky's desire to freeze the front lines [2] - President Putin has reiterated his stance that Zelensky's government is illegal, questioning the legitimacy of any final agreement signed by it [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov's remarks on NATO's eastward expansion and the potential for a positive response from the U.S. regarding the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty [1] Group 1: NATO Expansion - Lavrov stated that NATO had promised not to expand eastward but has "not stopped" this expansion at any moment [1] - The ongoing eastward expansion of NATO is a point of contention for Russia, indicating a perceived breach of trust [1] Group 2: New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty - Lavrov expressed hope for a "positive response" from the U.S. regarding Russia's proposals related to the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty [1] - The treaty, which officially came into effect on February 5, 2011, was originally set for a 10-year duration and has been extended through negotiations until February 5, 2026 [1] - Russia believes that the treaty's measures are only feasible if the U.S. refrains from actions that disrupt the existing balance [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights Russia's criticism of NATO's continuous eastward expansion, which contradicts previous commitments made by NATO [1] - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov emphasizes the need for strict adherence to principles of sovereign equality and indivisible security to ensure stability and prosperity in the region [1] - Lavrov expresses hope for a positive response from the U.S. regarding Russia's proposals on the New START treaty, which aims to limit nuclear arsenals [3] Group 2 - The New START treaty, signed in 2010, was designed to limit the number of nuclear warheads and delivery systems deployed by both the U.S. and Russia, originally set to last for 10 years and extended until February 2026 [3] - President Putin stated that maintaining the current status of the New START treaty after its expiration is reasonable to prevent further strategic arms races, contingent on the U.S. not undermining existing balances [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov claims that Europe's call for an "immediate ceasefire" is a tactic to replenish Ukraine's weapon supplies, indicating that Europe's stance fluctuates based on the situation on the front lines [1][3]. Group 1: European Stance - Europe previously adopted a strategy of "strategic defeat" against Russia, refusing any negotiations [3]. - Currently, Europe is both pleading and threatening for an immediate ceasefire without any preconditions, as Ukraine's weapon supplies are nearing depletion [3]. Group 2: Russian Objectives - The primary goal of Russia's special military operation remains unchanged, which is to counter NATO's attempts to absorb Ukraine and establish military bases in Crimea and along the Sea of Azov, posing a direct threat to Russia's borders [5][7].

Core Points - President Putin emphasized that Western countries are unwilling to relinquish their hegemony and are tempted by "absolute power" [1] - He stated that all attempts by the West to issue commands to other nations have ended in failure [1] - Putin argued that the exclusion of Russia from the international system would undermine global balance, asserting that Russia will never show weakness or hesitation in the face of changing circumstances [1] - He claimed that the conflict in Ukraine could have been avoided if NATO had not approached Russia's borders, and he expressed that the West does not empathize with the Ukrainian people [1]