Group 1 - The article discusses the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, which is a significant international trade and energy route, emphasizing the need for international efforts to de-escalate the conflict and maintain regional stability [2][3]. - The Chinese government condemns the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, stating it violates the principles of the UN Charter and exacerbates tensions in the Middle East, calling for immediate ceasefire and dialogue [4]. - China maintains communication with Iran regarding the current situation, with recent discussions between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian aimed at promoting de-escalation [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese representative at the UN, Fu Cong, strongly condemned the US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, emphasizing that such actions violate international law and exacerbate tensions in the Middle East [1][2]. Group 1: US Actions and International Response - The US has conducted strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, which Fu Cong stated severely violates the UN Charter and international law, infringing on Iran's sovereignty and security [1]. - Fu Cong expressed deep concern over the escalating tensions in the Middle East and called for an immediate ceasefire from conflict parties, particularly Israel, to prevent further escalation and avoid civilian casualties [1][2]. Group 2: Diplomatic Solutions and UN Role - Fu Cong asserted that military force cannot achieve peace in the Middle East, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the fundamental solution to the Iranian nuclear issue [2]. - A draft resolution has been proposed by Russia, China, and Pakistan in the UN Security Council, calling for an unconditional ceasefire, protection of civilians, adherence to international law, and the initiation of dialogue [2]. Group 3: China's Commitment - China expressed its willingness to work with the international community to restore peace and stability in the Middle East through continuous efforts [3].

Core Points - The international community condemned the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, stating it violates the UN Charter and international law, posing a threat to peace and security in the Middle East [1][2][3] - Various countries and organizations called for restraint and emphasized the need for dialogue and diplomatic solutions to resolve the conflict [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Reactions from International Organizations - The UN Secretary-General urged member states to de-escalate tensions and fulfill their obligations under international law [1] - The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) expressed concern that U.S. actions would exacerbate regional tensions and called for diplomatic solutions [1] - The Arab League condemned any military actions that violate national sovereignty and warned against a cycle of violence [1] Group 2: Statements from Individual Countries - Egypt reiterated its opposition to actions violating international law, emphasizing that military solutions are not viable [2] - Russia strongly condemned the U.S. strikes, highlighting the violation of international law and UN resolutions [2] - India called for immediate de-escalation and restoration of peace through dialogue [2] Group 3: Regional Concerns - Lebanon warned that the U.S. strikes could escalate conflicts between Israel and Iran [2] - Qatar expressed concerns about the potential catastrophic consequences of the current tensions [3] - Saudi Arabia condemned the infringement of Iranian sovereignty and called for political solutions [3] Group 4: Broader International Responses - Cuba condemned the U.S. actions as a serious violation of international law, warning of irreversible crises in the Middle East [4] - Colombia urged all parties to return to negotiations to prevent regional conflict escalation [4] - Switzerland emphasized the importance of respecting international law and called for maximum restraint [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the urgent need for a ceasefire in the Middle East, as highlighted by the draft resolution initiated by China, Russia, and Pakistan in the UN Security Council [1] - The draft resolution stresses the threat posed by attacks on nuclear facilities to international peace and security [1] - Currently, there is no scheduled voting time for the draft resolution within the UN Security Council [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. military has successfully targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, leading to widespread international condemnation and concerns over escalating conflict in the Middle East [1][2]. Group 1: International Reactions - The United Nations Secretary-General expressed shock at the U.S. military action, warning that it poses a direct threat to international peace and security, and could lead to catastrophic consequences for civilians and the region [1]. - Chile's President condemned the U.S. strikes as a violation of international law, emphasizing the importance of adhering to humanitarian principles [1]. - Colombia's Foreign Ministry expressed deep concern over the escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran, urging all parties to return to negotiations to prevent regional conflict [1]. Group 2: Statements from Cuba - Cuba's President strongly condemned the U.S. actions, stating they violate the UN Charter and international law, potentially dragging humanity into an irreversible crisis [2]. - The Cuban Foreign Minister labeled the U.S. actions as direct aggression against Iran, describing them as a criminal and irresponsible act that could have unpredictable severe consequences [2]. - Cuba expressed solidarity with the Iranian government and people, criticizing the attack as a threat to international nuclear safety and the standards set by the International Atomic Energy Agency [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, particularly focusing on military actions and their implications for international peace and security [4][7]. Group 1: Military Actions - Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has launched the 19th round of missile and drone strikes against Israel as part of "Operation Real Commitment-3" [2]. - The U.S. military has conducted large-scale precision strikes on three key Iranian nuclear facilities, aiming to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities [4][5]. - Iran claims to have evacuated and relocated materials from the targeted nuclear facilities prior to the U.S. attack, suggesting minimal damage from the strikes [6]. Group 2: Political Reactions - U.S. President Trump has warned Iran that any retaliation against the U.S. will result in a much stronger response, emphasizing the capability of the U.S. military to strike quickly and accurately [5]. - The United Nations Secretary-General expressed serious concern over the U.S. attacks, labeling them as a dangerous escalation that threatens international peace and security [7]. - Iran's Atomic Energy Organization condemned the U.S. strikes as a violation of international law and called for global condemnation of what it termed a "barbaric attack" [8].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that North Korea strongly condemns Israel's large-scale military attacks on Iran, labeling it as an act of state terrorism that increases the risk of comprehensive war in the Middle East [1][2] - North Korea's foreign ministry spokesperson emphasizes that Israel, supported by the United States and other Western powers, is a "cancer" to peace in the Middle East and the main culprit in undermining global peace and security [2]

Group 1 - The spokesperson of North Korea's Foreign Ministry condemned Israel's large-scale military attack on Iran, which occurred on the early morning of the 13th [1] - The statement described Israel's actions as illegal and a form of state terrorism, raising concerns about the risk of a new comprehensive war in the Middle East [1] - North Korea expressed serious concern over Israel's military actions and strongly condemned them, labeling Israel as a "tumor" to peace in the Middle East and a principal actor in undermining global peace and security [1] Group 2 - The spokesperson indicated that Israel, supported by the United States and other Western powers, is responsible for creating instability in the region [1] - It was asserted that Israel and its protective forces will bear full responsibility for the disruption of international peace and security [1]

Group 1 - The UN Security Council voted on a resolution calling for a lasting ceasefire in Gaza, which was not passed due to a veto from the United States, resulting in 14 votes in favor and 1 against [1] - China's permanent representative to the UN expressed disappointment over the outcome, highlighting the urgent need for a ceasefire and the lifting of humanitarian blockades for the struggling population in Gaza [1][2] - The ongoing conflict has resulted in over 54,000 deaths in Gaza over the past 600 days, with Israel continuing its military operations and blockade [1] Group 2 - Humanitarian aid has been weaponized since the outbreak of the conflict, with civilian facilities such as schools and hospitals being targeted, and journalists and humanitarian workers facing violence [2] - The actions of Israel have been described as violations of international humanitarian law, with the US's support preventing accountability for these actions [2] - The UN Security Council has reached a consensus on the need for a ceasefire and humanitarian assistance, but the US has repeatedly obstructed these efforts [2]