Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for continuous efforts to reduce formalism and lighten the burden on grassroots officials, highlighting the release of the "Several Regulations on Reducing Burdens for Grassroots" as a significant step in this ongoing battle against formalism [1][5]. Summary by Relevant Sections Manifestations of Formalism - Recent years have seen formalism manifest in excessive meetings, mandatory attendance, frequent inspections, and burdensome reporting requirements, which have significantly increased the workload of grassroots civil servants [1][4]. - The introduction of digital tools has added new layers of complexity, with mandatory use of government apps for reporting and tracking, further exacerbating the burden on officials [1]. Specific Measures in the Regulations - The "Several Regulations" propose targeted measures to address the issue of excessive documentation and meetings, such as limiting the length of official documents to 5,000 words and task-specific documents to 4,000 words [1][2]. - The regulations also prohibit using meeting attendance, documentation, and online engagement metrics as performance evaluation criteria [1][2]. Challenges in Implementation - Despite central government efforts to curb formalism, the tendency persists, with an increase in the number of evaluation criteria for grassroots officials, leading to a shift from positive to negative incentives in performance assessments [3][4]. - The proliferation of evaluation items has resulted in a culture where officials focus on avoiding mistakes rather than achieving results, leading to a cycle of meetings and documentation that fails to address real issues [3][4]. Recommendations for Improvement - To effectively reduce burdens on grassroots officials, it is essential to scientifically set evaluation projects and goals, replacing fragmented assessments with comprehensive evaluations that prioritize outcomes [5]. - The article argues that empowering grassroots officials and fostering an environment conducive to innovation is crucial for the success of broader reforms [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of reducing meeting frequency and duration to allow government officials to focus more on practical work and community engagement, aligning with the central government's directives to combat formalism and improve efficiency [3][5][10]. Group 1: Meeting Reduction Initiatives - The city of Quzhou initiated a "No Meeting Day" on Tuesdays in 2018, which has since been promoted across Zhejiang province, leading to a significant reduction in meeting frequency and an increase in time spent in the field [3][5]. - Various regions, including Quzhou and Ulan Taole, have implemented measures to streamline meetings, resulting in a nearly 20% reduction in the number of meetings and allowing officials to spend over half their time serving the community [5][10]. Group 2: Practical Outcomes - Officials like Huang Xin from Quzhou have reported that the time saved from fewer meetings allows them to address community needs more effectively, leading to better identification and resolution of local issues [2][3]. - In Ulan Taole, the introduction of a "Three Musts" meeting system has reduced the number of monthly meetings from eight to three, enabling more efficient project implementation and increased engagement with local farmers [8][10]. Group 3: Efficiency Improvements - The article highlights that shorter, more focused meetings have led to significant time savings, allowing officials to concentrate on actionable tasks rather than lengthy discussions [6][7]. - The overall approach has resulted in improved meeting quality and effectiveness, with local governments adopting stricter meeting management practices to minimize unnecessary gatherings [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to alleviate the burden of formalism on grassroots officials by implementing targeted measures to reduce excessive meetings, documentation, and inspections, thereby allowing for more effective governance and innovation [2][3][6]. Summary by Sections Background and Current Situation - The "Several Regulations on Reducing Burdens for Grassroots" was issued by the Central Committee and the State Council, showing a significant positive response, with over 95% of respondents indicating that the measures to combat formalism have been effective [2]. - Formalism manifests in various ways, including excessive meetings, mandatory attendance, frequent inspections, and the burdensome use of government apps for reporting, which significantly increases the workload of grassroots officials [2][3]. Specific Measures Proposed - The regulations propose specific measures to reduce formalism, such as limiting the length of documents to 5,000 words and task-specific documents to 4,000 words, and eliminating the use of meeting attendance and social media metrics as performance evaluation criteria [2][3]. Analysis of Formalism - The article discusses the increasing complexity of performance evaluations for grassroots officials, which have expanded from 9 major items in 2011 to 4 major items with 109 sub-items and 371 detailed items by 2020, leading to a shift from positive to negative incentives in performance assessments [4]. - This shift has resulted in a culture where officials focus on avoiding mistakes rather than achieving results, leading to a cycle of meetings and documentation that detracts from actual problem-solving [5]. Recommendations for Improvement - The article advocates for a reduction in the volume of documents and meetings, and a shift from "formality" to "substance" in evaluations, suggesting that this will help unleash the potential of grassroots governance and foster innovation [5][6]. - It stresses the importance of setting scientific assessment criteria that prioritize results over formal compliance, allowing grassroots officials the space and motivation to innovate and take responsibility [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of reducing bureaucratic burdens at the grassroots level, highlighting the ongoing efforts and achievements in combating formalism within the governance structure [3][4]. Summary by Sections Background and Importance - The re-release of the "Regulations on Reducing Burdens at the Grassroots Level" by the Central Government indicates a strong commitment to addressing formalism and its impact on grassroots governance [2][3]. - The success of these regulations is reflected in a survey where over 95% of respondents reported positive effects from the measures implemented [3]. Specific Measures - The regulations outline 21 specific measures aimed at reducing bureaucratic burdens, including the simplification of documents, meetings, and inspections, as well as clarifying responsibilities at the grassroots level [4][6]. - A key focus is on establishing clear responsibilities to prevent the overload of tasks that detract from primary duties, such as teaching in schools [6][7]. Implementation and Accountability - The regulations stress the need for a clear delineation of responsibilities to avoid overburdening grassroots entities with tasks outside their core functions [6][7]. - There is an emphasis on strengthening accountability for violations of these regulations, with a mechanism for reporting and addressing issues at various administrative levels [9]. Challenges and Obstacles - The article identifies two main obstacles to reducing formalism: the performance-driven mindset of higher authorities and the compliance mentality at the grassroots level [9]. - Addressing these issues is crucial for the successful implementation of the regulations and for fostering a more effective governance environment [9].

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the shift from filling out forms to solving problems on-site, aiming to reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies and improve community satisfaction [3][7][6] - In Chongqing, local officials have adopted a hands-on approach to address community issues, such as replacing outdated streetlights, which had been neglected due to bureaucratic processes [3][6] - The article highlights the importance of community engagement and collaboration among various departments to effectively resolve issues that were previously left unaddressed [5][6] Group 2 - In Kaifeng, the implementation of a "multi-form consolidation" strategy has simplified the process for villagers, reducing the number of forms needed for various administrative tasks [10][11] - The article discusses how this reduction in paperwork has allowed village officials to focus more on community needs rather than administrative burdens [11] - The introduction of technology in administrative processes, such as facial recognition in Ma'anshan, has streamlined service delivery and reduced the need for citizens to provide multiple forms of proof [12][13] Group 3 - The concept of "no proof cities" in Ma'anshan aims to shift the responsibility of proof from citizens to the government, enhancing efficiency in administrative processes [13][14] - The article notes that while the requirement for proof has not been eliminated, the method of verification has been improved through technology, reducing bureaucratic delays [13][14] - The overall goal is to combat formalism and bureaucratic inefficiencies, ensuring that citizens receive timely and effective services [14]

刘瑞红，陕西省安康市汉滨区建民街道忠诚村党支部书记。 我们村有307户1060人，虽然规模不大，但事情不少。以前村干部一天经常要参加好几场会议，其他时 间也常被填各类报表和台账占据，大部分精力都耗在会场和办公室，影响了实际工作。 2023年初，区里针对村级组织负担重的问题，有针对性地为基层减负。来我们村调研的区纪委监委干部 告诉我，我们村和其他村级组织普遍存在"六多"问题：报表多、台账多、会议多、留痕多、检查多、牌 子多。之后，区里出台了为村级组织减负增效工作实施方案，重点从精简会议活动、减少报表台账、清 理办公场所标识标牌等方面入手，切实为基层工作人员减轻负担。 以前，区里一开会就要叫上村里的干部，我们经常得去凑人数；现在好了，和村里工作不相关的会，就 不叫咱们去了。以前，考核村干部干得好不好，就看你有没有成立这个那个组织；现在不看这个了，主 要看干部是不是真为村里办了事。还有，以前上级经常要求我们填表、报材料；现在不经过正规程序， 不能随便让村干部填表，此外，各类考核、检查也都统筹整合到一起，频次降低了不少。 这些实实在在的举措，把我们村干部从"文山会海"中解脱出来。现在，大家有更多精力办实事、解难 题、 ...

上午9点多，湖北襄阳枣阳市南城街道沙店社区老年学校内人头攒动，沙店社区邀请来医护人员，为老 年人进行爱心义诊和免费体检。80岁的郝金凤一摸口袋，发现身份证忘了带，没法登记体检。党员网格 员赵莹莹迅速掏出手机，点开社区智慧平台小程序，检索到郝金凤的身份证号码并录入系统。顺利完成 了各项检查，郝金凤松了口气。 沙店社区下辖131个小区，拥有常住人口5.6万人。"人多事多，以前上面一要数据，我们就得加班填 表""一位居民去世了，需要给多个部门重复上报信息""不仅要电子版，还要打印出来加盖公章送过 去"……曾经的工作状态，赵莹莹记忆犹新。 为破解基层报表多、重复报、多头报的负担，去年6月起，枣阳市深入调研，探索推进"一套表"改革。 枣阳市委常委、组织部部长康丹介绍，过多过滥的填表造册，源于职责不清、边界不明。为此，枣阳市 细化制定村级主责、协助、负面清单，将18大类主责事项细化为37项具体工作清单，将3大类协助事项 细化为80项工作清单，将12大类负面事项直接列为负面工作清单。比如司法局的社区矫正工作，列为村 （社区）协助事项后，基层只需做好协助工作，不用再填报相关表格。 在权责清晰的基础上，枣阳市大力推进表格源头减 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of Hengyang City in Hunan Province to reduce bureaucratic burdens on grassroots governance, allowing local officials to focus more on serving the community rather than preparing for inspections [1][2][3]. Group 1: Measures Taken - Hengyang's Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission has implemented a "no-disturbance inspection" mechanism to alleviate the pressures of frequent inspections on grassroots officials [1]. - The city has streamlined assessment requirements, eliminating city-level evaluations for village and town levels, and established a comprehensive assessment system led by annual evaluations [2]. - A total of 36 unnecessary certification requirements for village-level operations have been eliminated, and over 150,000 non-compliant signs and regulations have been cleared from 2,779 villages and communities [2]. Group 2: Impact on Local Governance - The reduction in inspections has allowed local officials to dedicate more time to public welfare projects, as expressed by local leaders [2]. - The city has addressed issues of excessive meeting sizes and unreasonable task assignments, correcting 10 such problems and investigating 91 cases of formalism this year [2]. - The initiative has led to a significant improvement in local governance, with over 13,400 urgent community issues resolved [4]. Group 3: Support for Grassroots Officials - The city has combined the reduction of formalism with incentives for accountability, ensuring that officials are encouraged to act responsibly while being protected from false accusations [3]. - A total of 1,863 officials and technical specialists have been deployed to support grassroots efforts, fostering local talent and enhancing community capabilities [4]. - The transformation from passive compliance to proactive engagement has been emphasized, with local officials now focusing on practical work rather than merely preparing for inspections [4].

Group 1: Core Views - The "grassroots reduction" policy is crucial for alleviating the burden on township cadres, enhancing their mental health, and improving governance capabilities [1][7][9] - The policy aims to address the issue of formalism that has consumed significant time and energy of grassroots cadres, impacting their work efficiency and personal well-being [2][3][4] Group 2: Background of the Policy - The increasing demands for effective grassroots governance have led to an overload of responsibilities for township cadres, who are tasked with implementing national policies and addressing community needs [2][3] - The rise of formalism, including excessive documentation and repetitive data entry, has hindered the ability of cadres to engage with the community and respond to pressing issues [2][3] Group 3: Current Challenges Faced by Township Cadres - Township cadres are experiencing significant pressure due to heavy workloads, including extensive reading, preparation for meetings, and participation in various assessments [3][4] - The proliferation of digital platforms intended to enhance efficiency has instead added to the burden, requiring repeated data entry and compliance with formal requirements [3][4] Group 4: Psychological Burnout of Township Cadres - Common manifestations of psychological burnout among township cadres include reduced work engagement and emotional exhaustion, leading to a lack of enthusiasm and creativity in their roles [4][5][6] - The gap between the extensive responsibilities and limited resources available to township cadres contributes to feelings of inadequacy and frustration [5][6] Group 5: Mechanisms of the "Grassroots Reduction" Policy - The policy directly alleviates psychological burdens by reducing the emphasis on formalism, allowing cadres to focus more on practical issues and community service [7][9] - By simplifying administrative tasks and streamlining processes, the policy enables cadres to allocate more time to addressing real challenges faced by their communities [7][9] Group 6: Indirect Psychological Support from the Policy - The implementation of the policy enhances the sense of achievement and value among township cadres, as they can see the direct impact of their work on community improvement [8][9] - The policy fosters a sense of belonging and recognition among cadres, which can serve as psychological support in facing challenges [8][9]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the efforts of Dongying City in Shandong Province to reduce the burdens on grassroots officials by addressing the issues of excessive signage and documentation requirements, thereby enhancing their ability to serve the community more effectively [1][2][4]. Group 1: Background and Issues - Dongying City has initiated a grassroots reduction action, focusing on the problems of "too many signs" and "too many certificates," which have been identified as significant burdens on local officials [1][2]. - Community leaders have reported that the previous overload of tasks and requirements hindered their ability to serve the public effectively, leading to a call for reform [1]. Group 2: Actions Taken - The Dongying City Discipline Inspection Commission has implemented measures to streamline the work mechanisms of villages and communities, clarifying responsibilities and reducing unnecessary tasks [1][2]. - A "reduction list" has been introduced, which includes ten specific measures aimed at alleviating burdens on grassroots officials, ensuring that they can focus on their core responsibilities [2]. Group 3: Mechanisms and Oversight - The city has established a mechanism for "clear list management and responsibility reduction," which aims to ensure that community officials operate based on a clear set of guidelines [2][3]. - A direct reporting platform has been created to collect and address issues related to excessive signage and documentation, allowing for timely feedback and adjustments [3]. Group 4: Future Directions - Dongying City plans to maintain its focus on reducing unnecessary burdens on grassroots officials, ensuring that they can dedicate more time to serving the community and improving governance efficiency [4].