Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between normal dining activities and violations related to extravagant eating and drinking, advocating for a balanced approach that maintains social warmth while addressing corruption [1][2][3] Group 1: Issues with Current Practices - Some regions are overly cautious, leading to a blanket ban on dining activities, which confuses normal interactions with violations, undermining the original intent of the rectification efforts [1][2] - The article highlights various forms of misconduct, such as using public funds for lavish meals and engaging in corrupt practices disguised as business dining [1] Group 2: The Need for Balance - It is essential to maintain a high-pressure stance against violations while also preserving the warmth of human interactions, ensuring that normal dining activities are not disrupted [2] - The article calls for a nuanced approach to supervision, where the context of dining is considered to differentiate between legitimate and illegitimate activities [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of avoiding formalism in the implementation of the Central Eight Regulations, as highlighted by Xi Jinping during his inspection in Henan, stating that superficial learning outcomes are counterproductive [1][2] - The article discusses the historical opposition to formalism within the Party, citing Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping's warnings against empty talk and the need for practical action [2][3] - It stresses that genuine learning should lead to effective identification and rectification of issues, rather than merely producing superficial results that do not fulfill the educational purpose [3][4] Group 2 - The article illustrates the role of exemplary conduct in promoting effective governance and community service, showcasing examples of local leaders who engage directly with the community to address issues [4] - It highlights the necessity of relying on institutional strength to combat formalism, suggesting reforms in educational initiatives and assessment systems to free Party members from bureaucratic constraints [5] - The focus is on ensuring that practical achievements become the primary measure of success, rather than being bogged down by formalistic practices [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a stable and effective institutional system for the construction of the Party's good conduct, which has been continuously improved since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [1] - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations and the focus on combating the "Four Winds" (formalism, bureaucratism, hedonism, and extravagance) are key components of the Party's internal regulations [1][2] - The Party has established a series of regulations and documents to address the new manifestations of formalism and bureaucratism, which are characterized by concealment and technicality [2][3] Group 2 - The evaluation of leadership effectiveness includes loyalty to responsibilities, courage to take action, and the ability to maintain the interests of the masses [3][4] - The Party emphasizes the need to reduce burdens on grassroots levels, which is crucial for enhancing governance efficiency [4][5] - The Party's commitment to frugality and opposition to extravagance is reinforced through strict adherence to regulations regarding gifts and hospitality [5][6] Group 3 - The Party has implemented strict regulations to combat corruption related to improper dining and entertainment practices, which are seen as breeding grounds for corruption [6][7] - The focus on controlling the construction of government buildings reflects a commitment to using limited resources effectively for public welfare rather than ostentation [7][8] - The Party aims to transform institutional constraints into internal recognition and behavioral consciousness among all members [7]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of addressing public grievances and the responsibility of the government to respond to the needs of the people, as highlighted by the complaint from Mr. Yuan regarding unpaid project funds [1][2] - The incident reflects a typical manifestation of formalism and bureaucratic attitudes within government, showcasing a lack of service awareness and a negligent work style among certain officials, which erodes public trust and damages the relationship between the government and the people [1][2] - Following the exposure of the incident, local authorities took swift action by suspending involved personnel, initiating self-examination of government conduct, and facilitating a payment agreement to settle the owed funds by the end of the year, demonstrating a commitment to rectify the situation [1][2] Group 2 - Continuous improvement in work style is essential, with a focus on enhancing team building within government departments to ensure officials are genuinely accountable to the public and actively serve their needs [2] - There is a call for proactive measures rather than relying solely on media exposure to address issues, advocating for optimized workflows and clear feedback mechanisms for public grievances [2] - The establishment of a "proactive handling" mechanism is suggested, utilizing data analysis to identify public concerns and potential risks, thereby transforming reactive responses into proactive solutions [2]

一些空话套话是因为屁股坐歪了。当干部，是为老百姓办事的，理应"把屁股端端地坐在老百姓的这一 面"。但有的干部热衷做"官老爷"，高高在上，目中无人，对待群众的事，用官腔官调和程式化回复敷 衍了事。下基层调研，不察实情、不询民需，只顾照本宣科提要求；听到群众反映的诉求，就说两 句"高度重视""定会解决"的漂亮话。这类有口无心的表态，不把群众放在心上，群众又怎么会听呢？ 还有一些空话套话暴露出能力不足。开会是要解决问题的，但有的领导翻来覆去地讲"要重视""要落 实"。可是，具体咋做呢？由于不掌握实际情况，不能给出指导性意见，很难说出有内容、有分量的 话。之前有一份通报显示，某乡党委书记一年内召开会议多达208次，基层干部群众普遍认为"空话、大 话、套话连篇，没一句能照着干的"。思路和办法从来都是从实践中来、从群众中来。如今，一些党员 干部通过板凳会、围炉夜话等形式，和群众拉家常，聊着聊着，就聊出了不少解决群众急难愁盼的好建 议、金点子。由此可见，脱离实际、脱离群众，自然看不到真正的问题，更拿不出切实可行的解决方 案，只能言之无物。 还有一些空话套话是因为工作态度出问题了。有的党员干部抱着"多一事不如少一事"的态度， ...

习近平总书记曾指出一些党员干部在调查研究中存在的问题："有的下基层调研走马观花，下去就是为 了出出镜、露露脸，坐在车上转，隔着玻璃看，只看'门面'和'窗口'，不看'后院'和'角落'，群众说是'调 查研究隔层纸，政策执行隔座山'。"无论是调研还是考核，都应该深入群众，看群众的难题解决了没 有，群众的生活改善了没有；都应该深入一线，把关注的重点放在实绩实效上，看相关地方和部门做了 哪些工作。人到心不到，"蜻蜓点水"式查阅资料，不求甚解听取汇报后打道回府，无法掌握基层真实情 况与群众内心诉求。 前段时间，河南省纪委监委公开通报6起违反中央八项规定精神典型问题。其中，宁陵县委原常委、宣 传部长，县政府原副县长王东霞在任某镇党委书记期间，为应付人居环境治理工作检查，花费财政资金 249.62万元打造"经典观摩路线"，对沿线21个行政村共计40多万平方米墙体喷漆刷白。 这一"刷白墙"事件，并非首例。此前，安徽省阜南县郜台乡在脱贫攻坚期间"刷白墙"被曝光，新疆和静 县委原书记刘克文在农村道路两侧"刷白墙"被点名通报。"刷白墙"为何禁而不止？ "刷白墙"是典型的面子工程，其目的是应付考核、调研，往往华而不实、劳民伤财，会损害 ...

Group 1 - The revised regulations on frugality and opposition to waste by party and government agencies emphasize the prohibition of superficial learning exchanges and inspections without substantial content, reflecting a strong commitment from the central government to combat formalism and address the chaos in research and investigation [1] - The article highlights that effective research should focus on solving real problems rather than merely fulfilling quotas or showcasing large-scale inspections, which can lead to wasted resources and diminished public trust [1][2] - It is essential to adopt a practical approach to research, engaging directly with various stakeholders to gather comprehensive insights, thereby avoiding superficial assessments [2] Group 2 - The fundamental purpose of research is to solve problems, and there is a need to establish a closed-loop mechanism for discovering, analyzing, solving, and providing feedback on issues, transforming research outcomes into actionable policies [2] - The implementation of the central eight regulations is currently being promoted across the party, with a focus on improving research practices as the first directive, emphasizing the importance of genuine engagement in the field [2]

Group 1 - The article highlights the ongoing efforts by the Jilin Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission to combat formalism and bureaucratism within local government, emphasizing the need for accountability among officials [1][2][3][4] - Four specific cases of misconduct are detailed, showcasing various forms of mismanagement and corruption among local officials, including extravagant spending on unnecessary projects and neglect of public concerns [1][2][3] - The cases involve significant financial implications, such as the doubling of project costs and the burden of debt from poorly conceived initiatives, which have led to severe fiscal strain on local governments [2][3] Group 2 - The first case involves Li Deming, who oversaw a costly public restroom project that exceeded budget by over 100%, disregarding local economic conditions [1] - The second case features Zeng Haiyang, who initiated a financially unsustainable deer industry project, resulting in long-term losses and a heavy fiscal burden [2] - The third case discusses Yu Fengxiang's mismanagement in the disposal of infected timber, leading to extensive ecological damage and legal repercussions [3] - The final case addresses the inaction of the Nong'an County government in responding to public grievances, resulting in significant public discontent and disciplinary actions against 25 officials [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article reports on the national situation regarding violations of the Central Eight Regulations, highlighting the number of cases and disciplinary actions taken in April this year [2]. Summary by Relevant Sections - In April, a total of 18,845 cases of violations of the Central Eight Regulations were investigated, resulting in 24,559 individuals being criticized or dealt with, including 100 officials at the provincial and ministerial level and 1,113 at the county and department level [2]. - Among the violations, 9,658 cases were related to formalism and bureaucratism, with 12,845 individuals receiving criticism or disciplinary actions. The most significant issues involved a lack of responsibility and action in economic and environmental protection, with 8,329 cases reported [2]. - Additionally, 9,187 cases of hedonism and extravagance were addressed, affecting 11,714 individuals. Specific violations included 5,097 cases of accepting valuable gifts and cash, 1,149 cases of improper allowances or benefits, and 1,853 cases of inappropriate dining [2].

Group 1 - The meeting emphasized the importance of the Central Eight Regulations and the achievements made since the 18th National Congress, attributing success to the leadership of Xi Jinping and the guidance of Xi Jinping's Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era [1][2] - It was highlighted that addressing the "Four Winds" issues is crucial for deepening the education on the Central Eight Regulations, advocating for a comprehensive approach to reduce bureaucratic burdens at the grassroots level [1][2] - The meeting called for leaders at all levels to take responsibility in promoting the learning and implementation of the Central Eight Regulations, ensuring that the political responsibilities are met with higher standards and practical measures [2] Group 2 - The meeting underscored the need for political guidance through Xi Jinping's Thought, aiming to unify various political parties and groups within the People's Political Consultative Conference (PPCC) to ensure political steadfastness [2] - It was stressed that the focus should be on practical and beneficial discussions that align with the provincial decision-making, contributing to the modernization efforts in Shaanxi [2]