Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of pragmatism and practical action in the work of party members and officials, advocating for a focus on real situations and effective solutions [1] - It highlights the necessity of thorough investigation and research to understand actual conditions, which is crucial for making informed decisions and avoiding hasty judgments [1] - The article stresses that correct decision-making relies on a fact-based approach, ensuring that proposed measures align with reality for maximum effectiveness [1] Group 2 - The text underscores the need to see beyond appearances and grasp underlying principles when advancing work, advocating for tailored strategies based on local conditions [2] - It provides examples of successful leaders who conducted in-depth research to address local issues effectively, demonstrating the value of respecting and utilizing natural and social laws [2] - The article warns against ignoring established rules and relying solely on brute force, which can lead to failures and setbacks [2] Group 3 - The necessity to combat formalism and bureaucratism is emphasized, identifying these as significant obstacles to the development of the party and the nation [3] - It points out that formalism stems from a misalignment of performance views and a lack of responsibility, while bureaucratism arises from a distorted view of power and detachment from the masses [3] - The article calls for continuous self-reflection and adherence to practical standards in work, urging officials to focus on substantive results rather than superficial appearances [3]

近日，浙江省委、省政府印发《浙江省党政机关厉行节约反对浪费实施办法》提出，党政机关应当严格控制视频、PPT在会议中制作使用，一般性工 作会议，原则上不播放视频短片。 这项最新规定，算的不仅是行政成本经济账，更是剑指"屏幕中的形式主义"的政治账。 视频、PPT本是提升效率、辅助表达的工具，却在一些地方异化为政绩展示的"秀场"。工作汇报追求动画特效，年终述职讲究炫目模板，就连村社干 部入户走访的点滴成果，也被强行制作成几页"高大上"的幻灯片。更有甚者，动用财政资金外包制作，把"真金白银"浪费在华而不实的视觉包装上。 这些做法，问题表现在"屏上"，根子却深植于错位的政绩观中。一些干部以为，材料做得亮眼，比工作干得扎实更能"出彩"；视频拍得精致，比群众 口碑传得响亮更易"出圈"。于是，把制作技巧当作"软实力"，却对群众的急难愁盼视而不见；把汇报包装当成"硬通货"，却对实际成效避而不谈。更深层 次原因在于，部分地方的考核评价仍依赖"材料厚度""视频精度""PPT美观度"，考核"看包装"，干事就"重包装"，实干者疲于应付，虚功者反得其便。 海报：王宇峰 破除屏幕中的形式主义，关键在于树立和践行正确政绩观。政绩不是秀出来的 ...

Group A: Investigation Findings - The "most busy five" names were used in fraudulent bidding announcements to obtain funds, with a specific case in Hubei Province where a company faked a project to secure 5 million yuan [1][2] - The investigation revealed that the funds were used for purchasing construction materials for other projects, and no personal profit was found [3] - A comprehensive self-inspection was conducted, uncovering additional fictitious projects, leading to the establishment of new regulatory measures [3] Group B: Administrative Violations - In Liaoning Province, the same names appeared in a fabricated administrative penalty list, highlighting issues of authenticity in administrative enforcement [4][5] - The investigation found that enforcement officers created false names to simplify their workload, reflecting a lack of legal awareness and adherence to procedures [5][6] - A total of 40 party members were disciplined for their roles in the administrative violations [7] Group C: Educational Sector Issues - At Hangzhou Normal University, a public welfare project was found to have used fictitious names in its beneficiary list, leading to an investigation [8][9] - The project faced issues with fund management and improper expenditure, resulting in disciplinary actions against several staff members [9]

破除屏幕中的形式主义，关键在于树立和践行正确政绩观。政绩不是秀出来的，而是干出来的；不是写 在屏幕上，而是刻在民心上。唯有坚决摒弃"卷PPT"式虚浮作风，让"表演式"做派失去生存土壤，真抓 实干才能蔚然成风。 破除屏幕中的形式主义，还需从考核机制上动真格。从制度源头破除"唯材料论""唯汇报论"的惯性思 维，建立以实际成效、群众满意度为核心的评价体系。 说到底，我们反对的不是视频、PPT，而是其背后的形式主义不实之风。近年来，从压缩会议时长、精 简文件字数，到明确"不得将点赞量、转发数、学习时长等作为考评依据"，再到关停冗余政务APP、解 散无效工作群……一系列"小切口"改革，瞄准形式主义的新变种、新套路，共同目的都是为基层减负、 为实干松绑。 近日，浙江省委、省政府印发《浙江省党政机关厉行节约反对浪费实施办法》提出，党政机关应当严格 控制视频、PPT在会议中制作使用，一般性工作会议，原则上不播放视频短片。 这项最新规定，算的不仅是行政成本经济账，更是剑指"屏幕中的形式主义"的政治账。 视频、PPT本是提升效率、辅助表达的工具，却在一些地方异化为政绩展示的"秀场"。工作汇报追求动 画特效，年终述职讲究炫目模板， ...

近日，云南月季新品种征名结果揭晓，"娇龙"一名高票当选。它寄托着广大网友对不幸离世的新疆干部 贺娇龙的缅怀与敬意。 "十五五"开局之年，容不得半点弄虚作假、摆花架子。今年以来，从二十届中央纪委五次全会公报指 出"坚决纠治临近换届等待观望不作为，换届后急功近利'翻烧饼'、搞'政绩工程'等突出问题"，到中央 层面整治形式主义为基层减负专项工作机制会议召开，再到3起整治形式主义为基层减负典型问题被公 开通报……传递的信号坚决有力：党员干部须树立和践行正确政绩观，为人民出政绩、以实干出政绩， 坚持从实际出发、按规律办事，创造经得起实践、历史和人民检验的业绩。 "娇龙"提名的高票胜出，源于贺娇龙多年来扎根基层、苦干实干：牵头搭建农产品全链条溯源体系，助 力打造"品味新疆"公用品牌，化身"推销员"推广特产；截至2025年3月，累计直播500余场，带动线上销 售额超6亿元，惠及万余户农牧民，直播收入全部用于公益……她以实际行动践行了生前常说的话："我 时刻警醒自己，要牢记自己是公职人员，我的流量是服务老百姓的。" 一朵花的命名，折射出真挚的民意。同样触动人心的，还有"文秀月季"。不久前，云南为一种黄色月季 征名时，数以万计 ...

1 多选题 【《创新实干促发展》测验题】以下属于基层反映比较突出的形式主义问题的有____。 A.文山会海 H.数字负担 2 单选题 【《创新实干促发展》测验题】过度留痕是基层反映比较突出的形式主义问题之一。以下属于过度留痕 的情况有____。 ①通过保留文字、图片、视频等资料，还原工作落实情况 ②将"有迹可循"等同于"工作到位" ③将"材料厚度"等同于"工作强度" ④将"痕迹"多少等同于"成绩"大小 A.①②③ B.②③④ C.①③④ D.①②③④ 3 多选题 据新华社2026年1月28日报道，日前，国务院办公厅印发《政务移动互联网应用程序规范化管理办 法》，以下关于办法对政务应用程序提出的规范化管理要求的表述，正确的有____。 A.县以下（不含县级）单位原则上必须开发建设政务应用程序 B.走马观花 C.过度留痕 D.走访调研 E.层层加码 F.督查过多 G.政绩工程 B.对政务应用程序填表报数、推广下载、考核通报、从事经营等方面提出要求，严防功能异化 C.在确保安全前提下，充分考虑对用户端软硬件的适配性，支持在不同操作系统环境下稳定运行等 D.加强政务应用程序运行监测，保障可靠稳定运行 4 单选题 据新 ...

Group 1 - The core issue identified is that many departments and units are conducting opinion solicitation activities that are superficial and do not genuinely seek input, leading to a lack of meaningful engagement with the public [1] - Various problematic practices in opinion solicitation were highlighted, including filtering responses, ignoring feedback, and rushing the process, which undermine the purpose of gathering public input [1] - The article emphasizes that the superficial approach to opinion solicitation damages public trust and the credibility of grassroots governance, attributing this issue to bureaucratic and formalistic tendencies within certain departments [1] Group 2 - To address the issue of insincere opinion solicitation, it is essential to focus on genuine engagement by strengthening institutional rigor and making public satisfaction a key standard [2] - The article suggests that the collection, adoption, and implementation of opinions should be included in government transparency efforts to enhance public participation and accountability [2] - Increased oversight and strict penalties for departments treating opinion solicitation as a mere formality are recommended to improve the quality and efficiency of the process [2]

Group 1 - The core issue identified is that many departments are conducting opinion solicitation activities that are superficial and do not genuinely seek public input, leading to a lack of effective decision-making [1][2] - Various methods of insincere solicitation are highlighted, including filtering opinions from only selected individuals, ignoring submitted feedback, and rushing the process without proper consideration [1] - This superficial approach undermines public trust and the credibility of grassroots governance, primarily driven by bureaucratic and formalistic tendencies within certain departments [1] Group 2 - To address the issue of insincere opinion solicitation, it is essential to focus on genuine engagement by strengthening institutional rigidity and making public satisfaction a key standard [2] - The collection, adoption, and implementation of opinions should be included in government transparency efforts to enhance public participation and compel solicitors to improve their work quality [2] - Increased oversight and strict penalties for departments treating opinion solicitation as a mere formality are necessary to ensure accountability and effectiveness in governance [2]

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the ineffective implementation of public opinion solicitation, where many departments engage in superficial practices rather than genuinely seeking feedback [1][2] - Various problematic practices were identified, such as filtering opinions from a closed circle, ignoring submitted feedback, and rushing the process, which undermines the purpose of soliciting public input [1] - The article emphasizes that the superficial approach to opinion solicitation not only fails to aid scientific decision-making but also erodes public trust and credibility in grassroots governance [1] Group 2 - To address the issue of ineffective opinion solicitation, it is essential to focus on genuine engagement and strengthen institutional rigidity, making public satisfaction a key standard [2] - The article suggests that the collection, adoption, and implementation of opinions should be included in government transparency efforts to enhance public participation and accountability [2] - Increased oversight and strict penalties for departments treating opinion solicitation as a mere formality are recommended to improve the quality and efficiency of the process [2]

Core Viewpoint - The emphasis on pragmatism as a fundamental quality for Communist Party members, highlighting the importance of being realistic, fact-based, and results-oriented in governance and decision-making [1] Group 1: Pragmatism and Its Importance - Pragmatism is rooted in objective reality, focusing on effectiveness and problem-solving, which is essential for understanding and transforming the world [2] - The need for a practical approach is underscored by the recognition that the Party faces a complex reality rather than abstract social forms, necessitating a methodology that aligns subjective understanding with objective truths [2] Group 2: Opposition to Formalism and Bureaucracy - The article identifies formalism and bureaucracy as significant obstacles to pragmatism, stemming from misplaced performance views and a lack of responsibility [3] - It describes various manifestations of formalism and bureaucracy, such as prioritizing appearances over substance and focusing on superficial achievements rather than genuine efforts [3] Group 3: Importance of Research and Grounded Work - Emphasizing the necessity of thorough research, the article advocates for listening to grassroots voices to accurately identify problems and develop effective solutions [4] - The approach taken by leaders, such as engaging directly with the public, is highlighted as a model for ensuring that the Party remains connected to the people's needs and experiences [4] Group 4: Commitment to Practical Action - The focus on "true action" signifies the importance of accountability and confronting challenges directly, avoiding superficial measures [5] - The article stresses the need for sustained effort and strategic patience in achieving long-term goals, particularly in the context of international competition and national development [5]