12月13日，在第十二个 南京大屠杀死难者国家公祭日 中央档案馆公布了一批 俄罗斯政府转交我方的 日本731部队解密档案材料 2025年12月13日，中央档案馆公布一批俄罗斯转交我方的苏联审讯日本731部队的解密档案材料。 这是解密的档案。新华社记者 李鑫 摄 这批尘封已久的材料 以苏联审讯日本细菌战战犯 的伯力审判为主体 跨越审判前、中、后三个阶段 涵盖1939年5月 至1950年12月的珍贵档案 包括对731部队成员的审讯记录 731部队罪行调查报告等 这批材料首次披露了 审判前的侦讯过程 发现与731部队罪行相关人员 （一） 多达200余人 被公开审判的12个战犯 对其准备和实施细菌战的罪行 供认不讳 2025年12月13日，中央档案馆公布一批俄罗斯转交我方的苏联审讯日本731部队的解密档案材料。 这是解密的档案。新华社记者赵博 摄 哈尔滨市社会科学院 731问题国际研究中心主任宫文婧说 这些材料 与我国保存的731遗址、731档案 形成证据链闭环 再次证明日本细菌战是 有组织、有预谋 "以毁灭全人类为目的" 将这一反人类暴行 死死地钉在历史的耻辱柱上 2025年9月18日，人们在侵华日军第七三一部队罪 ...

中新网北京12月16日电 (记者 黄钰钦)中国外交部发言人郭嘉昆16日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：16日上午，日本防卫大臣小泉进次郎在国会答辩中就日本增加军费应询称，"你应该想想 该说谁，比如中国，20年间军费增加7倍，最近3年涨幅也明显超过日本。"中方对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆：日方无端指责、恶意抹黑中国正当国防建设，态度恶劣，令人不齿。在和平与安全问题上，中 国是世界上纪录最好的大国。中国国防费的增长合理合法，既是应对安全挑战、维护国家正当利益的需 要，也是为更好履行大国国际责任义务。日方作为有严重侵略前科的国家，没有任何资格说三道四。 由于罪恶罄竹难书的侵略历史，日本的军事安全动向一直备受亚洲邻国和国际社会关注。2025财年，日 本国民人均防卫费、防卫人员人均费用分别是中国3倍和2倍多，近年来日本大幅调整安保政策，防卫费 13年连增，近5年激增约60%。日本还自我松绑集体自卫权，发展所谓"对敌基地攻击能力"，修改武器 出口原则，强化"延伸威慑"合作，图谋修改"无核三原则"。日方嘴上说坚持"专守防卫"和"被动防御"， 行动上却一再背弃《开罗宣言》和《波茨坦公告》对日明确规定的战败国义务，违背自身在日本宪法中 ...

（总台央视记者 赵晶） 中方呼吁所有爱好和平的国家警惕和阻止任何复活日本军国主义的危险动向，共同维护来之不易的二战 胜利成果。 12月10日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。总台央视记者提问：我们注意到日本"再军事化"加快 抬头，引发国际社会普遍关切，有评论称，日本正在从一个和平主义国家转向军事强国；日本企图复活 军国主义只会威胁地区和世界和平稳定，值得警惕。发言人对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆表示，日本加速强军扩武图谋"再军事化"，只会引发对日本未来向何处去的"再质疑"，换来国际 社会对日本历史罪行的"再清算"。 ...

1945年7月，中美英共同签署、后来苏联参加的《波茨坦公告》第八条规定，《开罗宣言》之条件必将 实施。 1945年8月15日日本战败，日本天皇承诺忠实履行《波茨坦公告》各项规定并无条件投降。10月25日， 中国政府宣布恢复对台湾行使主权，并在台北举行中国战区台湾省受降仪式。 新华社北京12月9日电 12月8日，中共中央政治局委员、外交部长王毅在北京同德国外长瓦德富尔会谈 时就台湾问题的历史事实和法理经纬作了全面阐述。 王毅表示，日本现职领导人日前竟然发出台湾有事日本就可以使用武力的荒谬言论，严重侵犯中国的主 权和领土完整，公然违背迄今对中方所做的承诺，直接挑战二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序，也对亚洲乃 至世界和平带来严重隐患。 王毅强调，台湾自古以来就是中国领土。 1943年12月，中美英发表《开罗宣言》明确规定，日本战后必须将所窃取于中国之领土台湾等归还中 国。 1978年《中日和平友好条约》确认，《中日联合声明》所表明的各项原则应予严格遵守。 王毅说，以上一系列铁的事实从政治上、法理上充分证明台湾就是中国领土，台湾的地位已经被"七重 锁定"。图谋"台独"就是分裂中国领土，支持"台独"就是干涉中国内政，既违反中 ...

日本执政党计划于明年春季放宽防卫装备出口限制。现行规定仅允许出口救援、运输等五类非战斗装备，日本执政党计划删除品类限制， 意味着日本可对外出口驱逐舰、导弹等高致命性武器。此举引发对日本是否背离和平主义承诺的质疑。自民党此前联合执政的公明党在安全政 策上长期扮演"刹车"角色，如今自民党与支持解除武器出口限制的维新会组成执政联盟，后者可能成为政策转向的"涡轮增压引擎"。 央视网消息：由日本首相高市早苗推动设立的国家情报局，最早将于明年开始运作，日本执政党同样计划明年放宽防卫装备出口限制。诸 多动向标志着日本安保政策加速"向右转"，引发严重关切。 新加坡《联合早报》：日本推动设立情报局 加剧地区紧张 日本自民党预计将于明年正式启动建立国家情报局的立法程序。该机构旨在整合外务省、防卫省、警察厅和公安调查厅等部门的情报资 源，建立统一分析与汇总机制。分析认为，此举意在为首相高市早苗塑造"安保强人"形象，符合推动日本突破和平宪法限制、强化防务能力的 倾向。这必然引起周边国家警惕，对地区安全互信与合作造成负面影响。 日本《日本时报》：松绑武器出口 日本迈出危险步伐 尼日利亚《每日时报》：警惕日本军国主义复活 日本首相高市早 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japan is significantly shifting its security policies, moving away from its post-war pacifist stance towards a more militarized approach, raising concerns about a resurgence of militarism in the region [1][2][10]. Summary by Sections Security Policy Changes - Japan has lifted restrictions on collective self-defense and is expanding its military capabilities, including the establishment of missile bases in the Ryukyu Islands and the expansion of F-35 bases [2][3]. - The country is investing in "security resilience" initiatives, such as developing versatile blood plasma and modifying civilian ports for dual-use [2]. Public Sentiment and Opposition - There is growing public opposition to Japan's military expansion, as evidenced by large protests in cities like Kumamoto against government plans and statements from officials [4][5]. - The rightward shift in Japanese politics is seen as a long-term trend, with increasing military activities affecting the daily lives of citizens [4]. Constitutional Amendments - The core demands of the "constitutional revisionists" in Japan include redefining the emperor's role, lowering the threshold for constitutional amendments, and modifying Article 9 of the pacifist constitution [5][6]. - Despite existing obstacles, the risk of constitutional amendments is accumulating, with potential implications for Japan's military identity and actions [6]. Regional and Global Implications - Japan's military policy shift is perceived as a threat to regional stability, potentially leading to an arms race and increased military tensions in East Asia [7][8]. - The reinterpretation of history and military policies could redefine moral boundaries and impact collective security arrangements in Asia [8][9]. Historical Context - The rise of right-wing sentiments in Japan is linked to historical revisionism, which may obscure the lessons learned from past militarism and aggression [6][8]. - The international community emphasizes the importance of Japan adhering to its pacifist constitution to maintain trust and stability in the region [9][10].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around China's strong diplomatic response to Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, emphasizing the importance of maintaining political foundations in Sino-Japanese relations [1][2][6] - China has taken multiple actions in response to Kishi's comments, including summoning the Japanese ambassador, issuing warnings from various ministries, and advising Chinese citizens to avoid traveling to Japan, indicating a serious diplomatic crisis [1][2] - The economic implications of reduced Chinese tourism to Japan are significant, with estimates suggesting a potential loss of 2.2 trillion yen (approximately 101.16 billion yuan) for the Japanese economy [1] Group 2 - The articles highlight the historical context of Japan's militaristic tendencies, particularly in light of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War, and how Kishi's remarks challenge the post-war order and moral consciousness [2][4] - Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party, under Kishi's leadership, is pushing for constitutional amendments to remove the pacifist clause, which could lead to a normalization of Japan's military status [4][5] - Japan's defense budget is set to increase significantly, with plans to reach 8.85 trillion yen by 2026, indicating a shift towards a more aggressive military posture [5] Group 3 - The regional response to Kishi's actions has been overwhelmingly negative, with countries like Russia and South Korea expressing strong opposition, highlighting Japan's growing isolation in East Asia [6] - The articles suggest that Japan's current trajectory poses a significant risk to regional peace, with calls for Japan to adhere to its commitments to peaceful development [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strong diplomatic response to Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations [1][2]. Group 1: Diplomatic Tensions - China has formally protested against Kishi's comments, urging Japan to retract its statements and cease provocations related to China [1]. - The Chinese government has taken multiple actions, including summoning the Japanese ambassador and warning citizens against traveling to Japan [1][2]. - The economic implications for Japan are significant, with estimates suggesting a potential loss of 2.2 trillion yen (approximately 101.16 billion yuan) if Chinese tourist numbers decline sharply [1]. Group 2: Historical Context - The article highlights the historical responsibility of China in countering Japan's militaristic tendencies, especially in the context of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War [2]. - Kishi's actions are seen as part of a broader trend of Japanese right-wing forces challenging the post-war order and seeking military normalization [2]. Group 3: Military Expansion - Japan plans to revise its security documents and accelerate defense spending, aiming for a defense budget of 8.85 trillion yen, which marks a continuous increase over 14 years [3]. - The article notes Japan's intention to develop nuclear capabilities, with reports indicating the possession of sufficient plutonium for hundreds of nuclear warheads [3]. Group 4: Regional Reactions - Neighboring countries, including Russia and South Korea, have criticized Kishi's remarks, indicating a growing concern over Japan's military ambitions and historical revisionism [4]. - The article suggests that Kishi's provocations have led to widespread condemnation from multiple nations, highlighting Japan's emerging role as a potential destabilizing force in East Asia [4]. Group 5: Call for Peace - The article concludes with a call for Japan to adhere to its commitments to peace and development, emphasizing the need for the international community to prevent the resurgence of militarism [5].

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mao Ning, emphasized that Japan's invocation of "survival crisis" and "self-defense" as justifications for foreign aggression is a tactic commonly used by Japanese militarism, urging the international community to remain vigilant against any attempts to revive militarism and to collectively maintain post-war international order and world peace [1][2]. Group 1 - Mao Ning highlighted that the concept of "collective self-defense" as defined by the UN Charter was created to maintain collective security and prevent the resurgence of fascist forces, and Japan has been restricted from exercising this right post-World War II [1]. - The Potsdam Declaration explicitly prohibits Japan from rearming, and Japan's constitution commits to "forever renouncing war" and the use of force to resolve international disputes, establishing a principle of "defensive defense" [1]. - Historical examples were cited, such as Japan's invasion of Northeast China in 1931 under the pretext of a "survival threat," and the declaration of the "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere" as a battle for Japan's survival, which led to widespread aggression across Asia [2]. Group 2 - Mao Ning warned that the alarm has been sounded and that the tragedies of the past must not be repeated, calling for the international community to be highly alert and to decisively counter any attempts to revive militarism [2]. - The statement coincides with the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist war, reinforcing the need for collective action to safeguard world peace [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the revival of Japanese militarism and any challenges to the post-war international order, emphasizing the importance of remembering historical lessons to maintain global peace and stability [1][2]. Group 1: Japan's Military Developments - Recent statements from multiple Japanese officials indicate plans to restore military rank terminology such as "Colonel," which could break the long-standing practice of downplaying military aspects within Japan's Self-Defense Forces [1]. - The shift in military terminology is viewed as a potential aggravation for countries that suffered from Japanese colonial aggression, likened to "salting historical wounds" [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and Concerns - The Chinese spokesperson highlighted that Japan's militaristic past has caused significant suffering in Asia and worldwide, stressing that historical lessons must not be forgotten or distorted [2]. - The Potsdam Declaration explicitly prohibits Japan from rearming, and Japan's pacifist constitution establishes a principle of "defensive defense" [1]. - There is growing concern over Japan's recent security policy adjustments, including increased defense budgets, relaxed weapon export restrictions, and ambitions to develop offensive weaponry, which may lead to a departure from the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [1].