Core Viewpoint - The Beijing People's Procuratorate and the Beijing Federation of Trade Unions have jointly released six typical cases of public interest litigation to safeguard workers' rights, covering various key sectors such as the automotive repair industry, construction, express delivery, food safety in canteens, labor protection for disabled delivery workers, and safety measures for thermal paper [1][7]. Group 1: Cases of Public Interest Litigation - Case 1: Some automotive repair companies failed to conduct occupational disease hazard factor testing, leading to the establishment of a regulatory framework for 207 automotive repair enterprises, with all involved companies completing rectifications [3]. - Case 2: Safety hazards were identified in electric tricycles used in the express delivery industry, resulting in the elimination of safety risks in 796 vehicles and legal training for over 2,000 individuals [4]. - Case 3: Multiple construction site canteens were found operating without food business licenses, prompting a special rectification that led to inspections of 36 canteens and the establishment of a collaborative regulatory mechanism [5]. - Case 4: Bisphenol A levels exceeded standards in 12 out of 17 thermal paper samples, leading to guidance issued to over 1,400 catering entities and 334 express delivery points to distribute protective gear to more than 8,000 workers [6]. Group 2: Addressing Workers' Rights - The Beijing procuratorial authorities are focusing on resolving the rights issues of vulnerable groups such as migrant workers and disabled delivery personnel, promoting system improvements and problem-solving initiatives [7][10]. - Case 5: During a wage arrears governance action, it was discovered that some construction projects had not established wage guarantee funds, leading to the establishment of nine special accounts and the payment of over 700 million yuan in wage guarantees [8][9]. - Case 6: Restrictions on delivery personnel entering residential areas resulted in delays for disabled delivery workers, prompting a collaborative effort to allow access to over 460 residential complexes through the installation of NFC smart access systems [10].

央视网消息：据最高人民检察院网站消息，12月5日是国际志愿者日。为学习贯彻党的二十届四中全会 精神，深入践行习近平总书记致中国志愿服务联合会第三届会员代表大会贺信精神，最高人民检察院今 天发布了一批"益心为公"志愿者辅助检察公益诉讼办案典型案例，充分展现"益心为公"志愿者参与辅助 检察公益诉讼办案的工作成效，进一步弘扬志愿精神，发挥各群体各行业"益心为公"志愿者作用，为高 质效办理检察公益诉讼案件提供强大助力。 2021年，最高检建设"益心为公"志愿者检察云平台。截至目前，全国检察机关已招募"益心为公"志愿者 共计12万余人，并在"12309中国检察网"微信小程序设置"益心为公"志愿者履职功能模块，方便志愿者 安全便捷有序有效参与检察公益诉讼监督办案。 本次发布的典型案例包括四川省九寨沟县检察院督促完善景区无障碍设施建设行政公益诉讼案等8件， 涵盖无障碍环境建设、生态环境与资源保护、食品安全、文物保护、安全生产等多个办案领域。参与其 中的志愿者，有的来自民革、致公党等民主党派，有的是人大代表、政协委员，有的是高校专家，有的 是文旅博主，他们背后还有强大的跨行业跨领域跨区划志愿者团队。志愿者在线索提报、专业咨询 ...

Core Viewpoint - The draft of the "Public Interest Litigation Law" aims to establish a legal framework for public interest litigation in China, enhancing the protection of national and social public interests through clearer regulations and procedures [4][5][6]. Group 1: Legislative Developments - The draft law is a significant step in the evolution of public interest litigation, transitioning from pilot programs to a comprehensive legal framework [5]. - It specifies 14 areas of public interest protection, including ecological environment, food safety, and cultural heritage, while also allowing for the inclusion of new areas as needed [6][12]. Group 2: Investigation and Evidence Collection - The draft law strengthens the investigation and evidence collection process, granting prosecutors the authority to gather evidence and conduct inquiries [7][9]. - It includes provisions to ensure compliance from entities and individuals during investigations, imposing penalties for obstruction [8][9]. Group 3: Pre-Litigation Procedures - The draft emphasizes pre-litigation procedures, encouraging administrative agencies to rectify issues before formal litigation is initiated [10][11]. - It outlines the process for issuing pre-litigation recommendations, aiming for high compliance rates and effective resolution of public interest issues [10][11]. Group 4: Collaborative Governance - The draft promotes a collaborative governance model, integrating administrative enforcement with criminal justice and public interest litigation to enhance regulatory effectiveness [12]. - It encourages public participation in protecting national and social interests, fostering a cooperative environment among various stakeholders [13].

Core Viewpoint - The draft of the "Public Interest Litigation Law" is being reviewed by the National People's Congress, marking a significant step in the legal framework for public interest litigation in China, aiming to enhance the protection of national and social public interests [5]. Summary by Sections Legislative Framework - The draft law outlines the scope of public interest litigation, solidifying 14 existing areas of focus, including environmental protection, food safety, and cultural heritage, while also introducing new areas such as cultural heritage protection and national defense [6]. - The law aims to adapt to emerging public interest issues by allowing for additional areas to be included through future regulations [6]. Investigation and Evidence Collection - The draft law emphasizes the importance of rigorous investigation and evidence collection for public interest litigation, granting prosecutors the authority to gather evidence through various means, including inquiries and inspections [8]. - It establishes strict measures against entities that obstruct investigations, enhancing the enforcement capabilities of public interest litigation [8]. Pre-Litigation Procedures - The draft law prioritizes pre-litigation procedures to resolve public interest issues before resorting to court, with a high success rate in resolving issues through administrative recommendations [9][10]. - It aims to streamline the process, ensuring that administrative bodies take corrective actions before litigation is initiated [9]. Collaborative Governance - The draft law promotes a collaborative governance model, encouraging cooperation between judicial and administrative bodies to enhance the effectiveness of public interest protection [11]. - It establishes mechanisms for information sharing and joint efforts in addressing public interest violations, fostering a comprehensive regulatory environment [11]. Public Participation - The draft law encourages public participation in protecting national and social public interests, creating a bridge between legal protection, public involvement, and social oversight [12]. - It allows social organizations to play a role in public interest litigation, promoting a multi-faceted approach to public interest protection [12].

Core Points - The article discusses the preservation of historical documents and technical drawings related to the Shanghai Hero Pen Factory, which has a rich history of over 90 years and is recognized as a national brand [1][3] - The intervention of the public prosecution office aims to protect these valuable archives, which are considered national intangible assets and industrial heritage [4][6] Group 1: Historical Significance - The Hero Pen Factory has a comprehensive archive of over 3,600 volumes and more than 620,000 documents, including designs that broke foreign technology monopolies in 1958 and commemorative pens for significant events [3][4] - The factory's original hand-drawn designs and the intricate manufacturing process highlight the cultural and historical importance of these documents [3][4] Group 2: Legal and Administrative Actions - The public prosecution office has taken steps to ensure the protection of these archives by issuing recommendations to relevant administrative bodies for urgent protective measures [4][5] - A collaborative effort has been established involving the prosecution office, local government, and academic experts to guide the preservation and digitization of the archives [5][6] Group 3: Economic Impact - The successful digitization of 2,185 significant documents and 35 audio-visual materials has been completed, with some archives recognized as industrial heritage to be displayed in the Shanghai Industrial Museum [6] - The Hero Group has reported annual revenues exceeding 500 million yuan, attributing part of this success to the protection and innovation of intellectual property through new product strategies [6][7]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the development and significance of public interest litigation by the People's Procuratorate in China, highlighting its role in protecting social and public interests through legal means [2][3][6] - The public interest litigation system has evolved over the past decade, with over 1.224 million cases handled by procuratorial agencies, indicating a significant expansion in the scope of public interest protection [2][3] - The draft of the "Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation Law" has been introduced, aiming to clarify the jurisdiction and procedural aspects of public interest litigation, which has garnered substantial public attention with over 15,000 comments received [3][4] Group 2 - The draft law emphasizes the investigatory powers of procuratorial agencies, allowing them to collect evidence while ensuring that they do not impose coercive measures, reflecting a cautious legislative approach [4][5] - There is ongoing discussion regarding the expansion of the scope of public interest litigation to include areas such as food security and online space, indicating a potential for further legislative development [4][5] - The current legal framework allows only procuratorial agencies to initiate administrative public interest litigation, positioning them as the primary force in this area, with a significant disparity in case numbers compared to social organizations [6]

Group 1 - The draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law has been submitted for review, aiming to clarify the areas of cases, principles, powers, and procedures for public interest litigation by the procuratorial organs [1] - The law aims to enhance the protection of national interests and social public interests by defining the role of the procuratorial organs as representatives of public interest [3][4] - Since the pilot program began in 2015, the scope of public interest litigation has expanded significantly, with over 1.224 million cases handled by procuratorial organs from July 2015 to September 2025 [3] Group 2 - The draft specifies that procuratorial organs must adhere to principles of objectivity, legality, and public supervision while conducting public interest litigation [4] - It emphasizes the importance of public participation and supervision in enhancing the quality of public interest litigation, encouraging individuals and organizations to report violations [6] - The draft outlines detailed regulations for investigation and evidence collection, which are crucial for the quality of case handling [5] Group 3 - The draft prioritizes achieving public interest protection before litigation, with a high response rate to procuratorial suggestions from administrative bodies [8] - It establishes a mechanism for procuratorial organs to propose suggestions to administrative bodies when violations are identified, allowing for resolution before formal litigation [8] - This approach is seen as a way to respect administrative priorities and improve efficiency in public interest protection [8] Group 4 - The draft addresses the responsibilities of courts and procuratorial organs in the trial and execution phases of public interest litigation, ensuring effective protection of public interests [10] - It includes provisions for mediation and execution in public interest litigation cases, enhancing collaboration between judicial bodies [10] - The law aims to incorporate effective practices and public feedback to ensure that legislation aligns with practical needs [10]

Group 1 - The draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law clarifies the areas and principles for handling public interest cases, expanding from initial focus areas to include military interests and other mature fields, thus enhancing public awareness and legal basis for such cases [2][3] - The draft emphasizes the importance of objective, lawful, and transparent practices in public interest litigation, ensuring that the prosecutorial authority does not overstep its boundaries while promoting effective administrative compliance [3][4] Group 2 - The draft specifies detailed regulations for investigation and supervision, allowing prosecutors to collect evidence and encouraging public participation in reporting violations of public interest, which is seen as a crucial step for improving the quality of public interest litigation [4][5] - The draft prioritizes pre-litigation measures for public interest protection, with a significant number of administrative suggestions leading to high compliance rates, thus aiming to resolve issues before they escalate to litigation [6][7] Group 3 - The draft addresses the execution and trial processes in public interest litigation, clarifying the responsibilities of both the courts and prosecutors, which is expected to enhance collaboration and protect public interests effectively [7]

Group 1 - During the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, courts across the country accepted a total of 189.745 million cases, providing strong support for high-quality development and long-term social stability [1] - A landmark case regarding plant variety infringement resulted in the highest compensation of over 50 million yuan, highlighting the effectiveness of punitive damages in deterring infringement [1] - A total of 2.34 million intellectual property cases were concluded during the "14th Five-Year Plan," fostering a favorable legal environment for innovation and high-quality development [1] Group 2 - The implementation of the Private Economy Promotion Law in May 2025 will hold administrative agencies accountable for failing to fulfill promises that harm the legitimate rights of private enterprises [2] - The scope of public interest litigation in ecological and environmental protection has expanded, with 348,000 cases handled, 90% of which are administrative public interest lawsuits [2] Group 3 - Courts concluded 23.466 million cases related to education, employment, elderly care, and healthcare during the "14th Five-Year Plan" [3] - In 2024, the number of cases received by courts is projected to reach 46.02 million, a 41.5% increase from 2020, with a cumulative adjudication rate of 98.03% [3]

Group 1 - The "14th Five-Year Plan" period has seen significant progress in the construction of a rule-of-law China, providing strong support for economic development and social stability [1] - As of early September, there are 306 effective laws in China, with 36 new laws and 63 amendments made since 2021, promoting high-quality economic development [2] - The National People's Congress (NPC) has conducted proactive reviews of over 4,100 regulatory documents, ensuring the implementation of constitutional laws [3] Group 2 - The courts received a total of 189.74 million cases during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, with a projected 46.02 million cases in 2024, marking a 41.5% increase from 2020 [4] - The Supreme People's Court has issued judicial interpretations on new business models, including facial recognition and online consumption, to protect civil rights [4] - The ecological environment has been a major focus, with 348,000 public interest litigation cases handled in this area, primarily administrative [6] Group 3 - Criminal cases reported a 25.7% decrease in 2024, highlighting the effectiveness of law enforcement in maintaining public safety [7] - The judicial system has emphasized social fairness and justice, with over 79 million disputes mediated successfully, achieving a 95% success rate [8] - Various dispute resolution methods, including mediation and arbitration, have been actively utilized, with 2.27 million arbitration cases processed [8]