Core Viewpoint - During the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, the Chinese procuratorial organs handled a total of 348,000 public interest litigation cases in the ecological environment sector, with 90% being administrative public interest lawsuits [1][2]. Group 1: Achievements in Ecological Environment Litigation - The procuratorial organs have established a unique Chinese model for addressing the global challenge of watershed ecological environment governance, creating an integrated case-handling mechanism across jurisdictions [2]. - Significant cases include the ecological governance of South Four Lakes, the management of ship pollution in the Yangtze River, and the water environment governance of the Pearl River, which have successfully resolved long-standing issues through inter-provincial collaboration [2]. Group 2: Collaborative Mechanisms and Future Plans - A collaborative mechanism has been established among various governmental departments, including the Supreme Court and environmental agencies, to enhance the effectiveness of ecological environment public interest litigation [3]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate plans to leverage modern technology, such as big data and satellite remote sensing, to improve the quality and efficiency of public interest litigation cases in the ecological environment sector [3].

Core Points - The press conference held by the State Council Information Office focused on the implementation of the "14th Five-Year Plan" and the commitment to the rule of law in China [1] - During the "14th Five-Year" period, the procuratorial authorities handled a total of 348,000 public interest litigation cases in the ecological and environmental sector, with 90% being administrative public interest litigation cases [1] Group 1 - The conference highlighted the importance of adhering to the socialist rule of law during the "14th Five-Year Plan" [1] - A significant number of cases were processed in the ecological environment field, indicating a strong focus on environmental protection [1] - The predominance of administrative cases suggests a proactive approach by the authorities in addressing environmental issues [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate of China has released 11 typical cases related to the protection of historical cultural resources from the Anti-Japanese War, highlighting the importance of preserving these historical sites and the role of public interest litigation in safeguarding them [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Cases - One notable case involves Chinese fishermen who risked their lives to rescue 384 British POWs from the "Lisbon Maru" ship, which was sunk by a torpedo in 1942, showcasing local heroism during the war [1]. - The "Xiao Hai Cave," where three British soldiers were hidden, is identified as a physical testament to the bravery of local fishermen, prompting local authorities to initiate preservation efforts due to risks of damage over time [1]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Statistics - The "Twenty-Four Bends" road in Qianlong County, a crucial supply route during the war, faced risks of damage due to landslides, leading to legal actions by the procuratorate to ensure its repair and protection [2]. - In 2023, a total of 2,243 public interest litigation cases related to the protection of martyrs, red cultural relics, and revolutionary sites were handled, with 83 cases specifically in the anti-war domain, protecting the honor of 49 martyrs [2]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate plans to focus on issues related to the infringement of martyrs' reputations and the management of memorial facilities, aiming to enhance public awareness and legal consensus on honoring heroes [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released typical cases of public interest litigation focusing on the protection of historical sites related to the Anti-Japanese War, emphasizing the importance of preserving red cultural resources and promoting the spirit of resistance [1][3]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1: The Shaanxi Province Suide County People's Procuratorate urged the protection of the Red Army's Eastern Expedition Command Post, highlighting the severe deterioration of the site and the lack of management [2][4][6]. - Case 2: The Jiangsu Province Baoying County People's Procuratorate focused on the protection of New Fourth Army cultural relics, addressing issues of damage to immovable and movable red resources [10][12][14]. - Case 3: The Shandong Province Ju'nan County People's Procuratorate emphasized the need for the protection of the Jiazi Mountain Field Hospital site, which faced risks due to inadequate management [17][19][21]. - Case 4: The Shanxi Province Shenchi County People's Procuratorate addressed the protection of the 120th Division Command Post, where private ownership led to significant deterioration [25][26][28]. - Case 5: The Henan Province Luoyang City Luolong District People's Procuratorate focused on the Wang Shanzhai Anti-Japanese site, which suffered from neglect and damage [31][32][33]. - Case 6: The Hebei Province Shenzhou City People's Procuratorate worked on the protection of the memorial facilities for 85 martyrs, emphasizing the need for proper management and preservation [37][38][39]. - Case 7: The Jilin Province Longjing City People's Procuratorate highlighted the need for better management of Northeast Anti-Union martyr memorial facilities, addressing issues of neglect [43][44][45]. - Case 8: The Hunan Province Hengyang City Yanfeng District People's Procuratorate focused on the protection of the Hengyang Anti-Japanese Cliff Site, addressing management and safety concerns [49][50]. Group 2: Key Actions and Outcomes - The procuratorates have actively issued recommendations and initiated administrative public interest litigation to ensure that local governments fulfill their responsibilities in protecting historical sites [3][6][14][21]. - Collaborative efforts between procuratorates and local administrative bodies have led to the establishment of protection measures, funding allocations, and the development of educational programs related to red culture [8][22][28][41]. - The cases serve as models for other regions, demonstrating the effectiveness of legal oversight in preserving cultural heritage and promoting public awareness of historical significance [9][16][29][36].

Core Viewpoint - The Anhui Provincial Procuratorate is actively enhancing ecological protection through public interest litigation, focusing on environmental and resource protection issues, and has made significant contributions to green development initiatives [1][10]. Group 1: Public Interest Litigation Efforts - In 2023, the Anhui Provincial Procuratorate initiated 1,307 public interest litigation cases related to ecological and resource protection, issued 727 prosecutorial suggestions, and filed 152 lawsuits, with three cases recognized as typical by the Supreme Procuratorate [1]. - The procuratorial efforts have led to the mobilization of over 30 million yuan for pollution remediation, including the removal of illegal constructions and the cleanup of polluted sites [2][3]. Group 2: Cross-Regional Pollution Management - The procuratorates of Huai Bei and Suzhou have established a collaborative mechanism to address cross-regional water pollution, resulting in significant funding and remediation actions [2][3]. - A notable case involved the illegal discharge of over 20,000 tons of hazardous waste into the Yangtze River, leading to a total ecological damage assessment of approximately 10.6 million yuan [4][5]. Group 3: Legal Accountability and Compensation - The procuratorial office in Wuwei successfully facilitated an ecological damage compensation agreement amounting to 912.6 million yuan, highlighting the role of public interest litigation in enforcing environmental accountability [8][9]. - The establishment of a long-term mechanism for industrial solid waste disposal and ecological damage compensation in Wuwei aims to enhance legal frameworks supporting low-carbon economic initiatives [9]. Group 4: Continuous Monitoring and Improvement - The Huai Bei procuratorate has implemented a continuous monitoring mechanism to prevent the recurrence of environmental violations, emphasizing the importance of sustained regulatory oversight [7]. - The Anhui Provincial Procuratorate aims to leverage public interest litigation to address prominent ecological issues, contributing to the legislative framework for environmental protection [10].

Group 1 - The year 2023 marks the 20th anniversary of the "Lucid Waters and Lush Mountains are Invaluable Assets" concept, with the third National Ecological Day set for August 15, 2025 [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Ministry of Ecology and Environment have released typical cases of ecological environmental damage compensation and public interest litigation [1] - The draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law is currently soliciting opinions from relevant departments and some representatives of the National People's Congress [1] Group 2 - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment plans to improve the mechanism for connecting ecological environmental damage compensation with public interest litigation [2] - From January 2024 to July 2025, national procuratorial organs handled 86,000 cases related to ecological environment and resource protection public interest litigation, with 57.6% of these being public interest lawsuits [2] - Between January 2018 and July 2025, approximately 56,900 ecological environmental damage compensation cases were handled, involving compensation amounts of about 33.4 billion yuan, leading to the restoration of many damaged ecological environments [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant environmental pollution case involving a company in Suzhou, highlighting the legal actions taken against the company and individuals responsible for illegal waste disposal, as well as the financial implications for environmental damage and remediation efforts [1][2][3]. Group 1: Case Overview - A Suzhou-based electrical company illegally disposed of over 340 tons of hazardous waste, impacting water quality in downstream areas of Shanghai and Zhejiang, leading to emergency response costs totaling 11.1732 million yuan [1]. - The case was referred to the police on April 15, 2023, and a public interest lawsuit was initiated by the Wujiang District People's Procuratorate on May 19, 2023 [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The Wujiang District People's Procuratorate filed a public prosecution against the company and six individuals for environmental pollution, seeking a total of 25.0614 million yuan in damages and punitive compensation [3]. - The court ruled that the company and individuals were jointly liable for ecological damage, ordering them to pay 23.1362 million yuan in damages and 1.9252 million yuan in punitive compensation for environmental restoration projects [3].

李梅介绍："南北高架是上海流量非常大的一个交通主动脉，那个建筑物又位于十字路口，剥落的瓷片散落在地上，对于行人、在路边停车的人都会造 成危险，这些肉眼都能观察到。" 央广网北京8月8日消息（总台中国之声记者白杰戈）据中央广播电视总台中国之声报道，建筑物外墙脱落带来的高空坠物风险越来越受关注，正值强降 雨和台风多发的季节，如何提前做好排查、修复，消除隐患？上海的检察机关用公益诉讼的方式作出了探索。 今年5月，上海静安区人民检察院的检察官在辖区走访发现，一座临街楼房的西侧外墙有瓷砖脱落，检察官轩翠告诉中国之声："我们发现的时候，这个 地方的外墙脱落已经持续6个多月了，但是处理的方式比较简单，仅在人行道上拉了一根警戒的小旗子的线，然后贴了一个'注意安全'，这种方式可能很难 消除掉危险。另外，上海这段时间已经是到台风季了，如果不修复的话，风险会持续加大。城市主干道下面紧临人行道、非机动车道，是我们城市公共安全 的领域。" 轩翠介绍，城市公共安全属于检察机关公益诉讼的领域。他们请公益诉讼志愿者、一级注册建筑师李梅到位于南北高架边的这幢建筑楼下，确认隐患的 状态。 这幢楼房大约30米高，脱落和疑似空鼓位于中下部。技术调查 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of cultural heritage protection in Henan province, highlighting the role of public interest litigation in safeguarding ancient artifacts and historical sites, as well as promoting cultural prosperity through legal frameworks [8][11][18]. Group 1: Public Interest Litigation in Cultural Heritage Protection - The newly revised Cultural Relics Protection Law includes provisions for public interest litigation, providing legal grounds for prosecutorial agencies to enhance their responsibilities in cultural heritage protection [8][11]. - The case involving the Tang Dynasty "Sea Beast Grape Mirror" illustrates the application of public interest litigation to hold accountable those who damage cultural relics during illegal transactions [9][11]. - The first civil public interest litigation case in Henan regarding movable cultural relics has set a precedent, emphasizing that cultural relics belong to the public and should be protected [11][12]. Group 2: Protection of Ancient Water Conservancy Facilities - The Five Dragon Mouth ancient water conservancy facility, dating back over 2,200 years, is recognized for its historical significance and ongoing irrigation function, making it a model for integrating cultural heritage protection with public welfare [12][13]. - Efforts are underway to apply for World Irrigation Heritage status for the facility, which would enhance its protection and utilization, thereby boosting Henan's cultural soft power [13][14]. Group 3: Collaborative Efforts in Cultural Heritage Protection - The establishment of a collaborative mechanism between prosecutorial agencies and cultural departments aims to enhance the protection of cultural heritage sites, such as the Zhou Bridge and nearby Bianhe ruins [15][16]. - The "Walking Henan, Understanding China" public welfare action has been initiated to strengthen cooperation between prosecutorial and cultural tourism departments, focusing on cultural market regulation and heritage protection [17][18]. - As of June this year, 499 related cases have been handled, with 366 prosecutorial suggestions issued, showcasing the active role of prosecutorial agencies in cultural heritage protection [17].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released typical cases of public interest litigation for the protection of cultural relics and heritage, emphasizing the importance of high-quality judicial actions to aid in the preservation of cultural heritage [1][5]. Group 1: Statistics and Trends - From January to May 2025, a total of 2,160 public interest litigation cases related to the protection of cultural relics and heritage were filed nationwide, accounting for 4.61% of the total public interest litigation cases, with a growth rate of 40.1% [1]. - The released cases include six typical examples, highlighting the proactive role of procuratorial organs in supervising administrative agencies that fail to fulfill their duties [1][5]. Group 2: Case Summaries - The cases cover various types of cultural relics, including ancient sites, buildings, and linear cultural heritage, focusing on both high and low-grade relics [2]. - Specific cases include: - The administrative public interest litigation case by the Ma'anshan City Procuratorate regarding the protection of the Wudanggang site [5]. - The case involving the "Dafu Di - Wenguang Archway" in Jiangxi Province, where the local procuratorate intervened due to the owner's inability to repair the dilapidated structure [14][15]. - The case concerning the protection of the Tuo Mountain Grottoes in Shandong Province, where the historical appearance of the relics was severely damaged [21][22]. - The case in Chongqing regarding the illegal transfer of state-owned immovable cultural relics [28][29]. - The case involving the protection of the Wanjia Tea Road cultural heritage in Hubei Province, focusing on the overall protection of linear cultural heritage [34][35]. - The case of the Ming Dynasty Huang Gong Guang Ji Bridge in Henan Province, where the bridge's safety and appearance were compromised due to municipal construction [41][42]. Group 3: Legal and Administrative Actions - The procuratorial organs have emphasized the use of public interest litigation to supervise administrative agencies that neglect their responsibilities, ensuring that cultural relics are effectively protected [13][20]. - The cases demonstrate a shift from individual relic protection to a more systematic approach, focusing on collective protection of similar relics or groups of relics [3]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate plans to conduct follow-up inspections on previously handled cases, such as the protection of the Great Wall, to ensure compliance with rectification measures [3].