Core Points - The U.S. Senate narrowly passed a tax and spending bill known as "Big and Beautiful" with a vote of 51 to 50, influenced by Vice President Vance's tie-breaking vote, which will significantly impact U.S. economic policy and energy subsidies [1][9] - The atmosphere surrounding the vote was tense, with notable divisions among lawmakers and public figures, including Elon Musk, who criticized the bill and threatened to form a new political party, the "American Party," if it passed the House [3][5] - Musk's opposition stems from dissatisfaction with the current two-party system, which he believes limits voter expression, and he sees the establishment of a third party as a potential solution [5][7] - Former President Trump responded to Musk's criticism, suggesting that Musk's opposition is motivated by the bill's potential cuts to renewable energy subsidies, which his companies benefit from, and hinted at the possibility of expelling Musk from the U.S. [5][7] - Former President Obama also joined the debate, urging the public to lobby against the bill, which reflects the ongoing struggle within the Democratic Party to regain influence amid recent legislative setbacks [8][9] - The bill's passage reflects deep changes in the U.S. economic and political landscape, with supporters viewing it as a crucial step to stimulate the economy and reshape the tax system, while opponents fear it could harm vulnerable populations and renewable energy policies [9]

Group 1 - Elon Musk claims he is ready to reveal details about the so-called "Lolita Island" related to the Epstein case, suggesting involvement of many prominent figures in the U.S. political and business sectors [1][5] - The U.S. government quickly denied the existence of a "client list," asserting that Epstein's death was a suicide and that there are no new revelations to disclose [7][9] - The Epstein case is sensitive due to the high-profile individuals involved, with over 150 names mentioned in public documents, including former President Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew [7][8] Group 2 - Musk's announcement comes amid his ongoing feud with Trump, with speculation that he may have found leads from Epstein's old files [8][11] - The U.S. government's swift denial of a client list indicates the potential risks of reopening investigations into powerful figures, which could have significant political implications [9][11] - The public's demand for truth regarding the Epstein case is growing, with Musk's claims generating both support and skepticism, impacting his new political party, the "American Party" [9][12]

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk has announced that his newly formed political party, the "American Party," will prioritize the exposure of documents related to the Epstein case, criticizing former President Trump for not releasing these files [1][3]. Group 1: Musk's Political Moves - Musk confirmed on his social media platform X that the exposure of Epstein-related documents will be a priority for the "American Party" [1]. - The "American Party" aims to focus on securing 2 to 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House seats to become a decisive force in Congress, leveraging this "critical minority" to influence significant legislation [4]. Group 2: Trump's Response - Trump dismissed questions about his alleged connections to Epstein, expressing disbelief that the topic is still being discussed and emphasizing the need to focus on current issues like the Texas floods [2]. - Trump criticized Musk's announcement of a new political party as "absurd" and expressed disappointment over Musk's recent behavior, suggesting that a third party has never succeeded in the U.S. [5]. Group 3: Legal Developments - The U.S. Department of Justice and FBI released a memo stating that no evidence was found to support the existence of a "client list" related to Epstein, contradicting previous statements made by the Justice Department [3]. - Musk reacted to the DOJ's statement by posting a meme that illustrated the shifting positions of the government regarding the Epstein case [3].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of Elon Musk's new political party, "American Party," appears to be a flawed political investment due to its lack of a unique party platform, inability to build a stable voter base, and unrealistic expectations of political influence in Congress [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Lack of Unique Party Platform - "American Party" lacks a distinct party platform and identity, making it difficult to attract voters [2] - Musk's political views closely align with the Republican Party, failing to provide a fresh alternative for disillusioned voters [2] - Without a novel policy agenda, "American Party" struggles to generate voter interest and support [2] Group 2: Inability to Build a Stable Voter Base - The party cannot establish a dedicated voter base due to the high loyalty of voters to the existing Democratic and Republican parties [3] - The shrinking pool of independent voters makes it challenging for "American Party" to attract significant support [3] - Most independent voters prefer to back parties with a realistic chance of winning, further limiting "American Party's" appeal [3] Group 3: Unrealistic Expectations of Political Influence - Musk's vision of "American Party" influencing Congress is disconnected from political realities [4] - Minority party members must collaborate with majority party members to achieve legislative success, which undermines the idea of "American Party" as a balancing force [4] - The party risks marginalization in Congress and potential electoral losses if it cannot deliver legislative results [4]

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk has confirmed that exposing documents related to the "Epstein case" will be a priority for his newly formed party, the "American Party" [1] Group 1 - Musk criticized former President Trump for not releasing Epstein-related documents, questioning how people can trust him if he does not [1] - In response to a query about whether exposing these documents would be a priority for the "American Party," Musk affirmed with a "100%" emoji [1]

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk has announced the establishment of a new political party in the U.S., aiming to provide freedom to the people, with 68% support from a voting group of 1.2 million participants [1]. Group 1: Political Context - Musk's decision to form a political party appears to be a response to perceived injustices from former President Trump, including the cancellation of subsidies for his companies and the replacement of a NASA administrator who had a good relationship with him [3]. - The current political landscape shows declining support for both the Republican and Democratic parties, with Trump's approval ratings hitting historical lows, indicating a potential opening for a new political entity [7]. Group 2: Challenges Ahead - The historical context of the two-party system in the U.S. suggests that attempts to establish a third party have often failed due to combined opposition from the existing parties [9]. - Musk's lack of a clear party platform and reliance on social media input for party guidelines raises concerns about the preparedness and viability of the new party [11]. Group 3: Potential Impact - Despite the challenges, Musk's influence as a billionaire could affect Trump's midterm elections, presenting a new complication for the former president [12]. - The emergence of Musk's party reflects growing societal tensions in the U.S., and if internal conflicts are not addressed, it could accelerate the decline of American political stability [14].

Group 1 - Elon Musk criticized U.S. Treasury Secretary Bentsen on social media, calling him "Soros's puppet" and questioning his mathematical abilities [1] - The conflict originated from Bentsen's comments on CNN, where he suggested that Musk's popularity was not reflected in polls, despite the principles of the government efficiency department (DOGE) being well-received [2] - Bentsen's background with Soros and his role in the financial world have fueled skepticism among conservatives regarding his influence in Washington [3] Group 2 - The ongoing feud between Musk and Bentsen has reportedly escalated, with previous reports indicating a physical altercation in the White House [3] - Following Musk's criticism, Trump has remained largely silent, only mocking Musk's third-party political ambitions as a "train wreck" [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the escalating tensions between Elon Musk and Treasury Secretary Becerra, highlighting their past confrontations and Musk's recent political maneuvers [1][5][8] - Musk's comments on social media label Becerra as a puppet of Soros, indicating a personal and political rivalry [1][3] - The article details a heated confrontation between Musk and Becerra in the Oval Office, showcasing the intensity of their disagreements over IRS leadership appointments [5][7][6] Group 2 - The conflict between Musk and Becerra is set against the backdrop of Musk's criticism of Trump's fiscal policies, particularly the $3.3 trillion "big beautiful" spending bill [8][9] - Following the signing of the spending bill, Musk announced the formation of a new political party, the "American Party," aimed at representing the interests of 80% of moderate voters [9][10] - Trump's reaction to Musk's new political party was dismissive, suggesting that Musk's actions were more for entertainment than serious political engagement [10]

Political Landscape - Elon Musk established the America Party, aiming to return freedom to the people [2] - Donald Trump criticized Musk's move, stating that forming a third party has never succeeded in American history and could lead to chaos [2] - The America Party is officially registered with the FEC (Federal Election Commission) with the name America Party (AMEP), located in Hawthorne, California [2] Public and Expert Opinions - Some analysts believe Musk will leverage his wealth and influence to promote the America Party without personally entering politics [2] - A poll indicates that 80% of respondents believe a new party representing centrist voters is needed [2] - Critics argue that the American electoral system favors a two-party system, making it difficult for third parties to sustain [2] Musk's Political Strategy - The America Party will adopt a targeted strategy, focusing on winning 2 to 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House seats to become a decisive minority in legislative votes [2] - Musk aims to represent 80% of centrist voters, providing a balanced force amidst political polarization [2] - Initial ideas for the America Party include reducing national debt, promoting responsible spending, fostering technological innovation, reducing regulations, maximizing free speech, and supporting pro-natal policies [3] Challenges and Opportunities - Third parties in the US face structural barriers due to the winner-take-all electoral system and geographic constituencies [3] - Musk's personal assets, estimated around $400 billion, can provide ample funding for the party [3] - Musk's control of X (formerly Twitter) and his millions of followers can effectively promote the party's ideas [3]

Group 1 - Elon Musk announced the formation of a new political party called the "American Party," aiming to represent 80% of moderate voters in the U.S. and to gain a seat in Congress [1][3] - The "American Party" was proposed in response to the recently enacted "Big and Beautiful" tax and spending bill, which Musk criticized for its impact on electric vehicle tax credits [3][5] - A poll conducted by Musk on social media showed that 65.4% of approximately 1.25 million respondents supported the establishment of the "American Party" [3] Group 2 - The "Big and Beautiful" bill is expected to cut tax credits that have historically encouraged the purchase of electric vehicles, including those from Tesla, potentially leading to a loss of $1.2 billion annually for Tesla [5][6] - There are concerns that the bill may also significantly reduce NASA's scientific budget from approximately $7.3 billion to $3.9 billion, which could adversely affect SpaceX's government contracts [6] - The relationship between Trump and Musk has deteriorated due to a series of trust issues, power conflicts, and unmet financial commitments, reflecting differing priorities within the Republican Party [6]