Group 1 - Venezuelan citizens gathered in Caracas to express condemnation of the U.S. attack and support for President Maduro [1] - Citizens demanded the U.S. government to either return President Maduro or provide evidence of his safety, accusing the U.S. of imperialistic motives focused on seizing Venezuela's oil and natural resources [1][2] - The atmosphere in Caracas shows limited vehicle traffic and long queues outside some stores, indicating ongoing economic challenges [2] Group 2 - Citizens expressed confidence that President Maduro will return and that the revolution will continue regardless of external opinions [2] - Areas suspected of being bombed are heavily secured by armed military and police, restricting media access to those locations [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent military action by the United States against Venezuela, resulting in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, which has been characterized by President Trump as a significant display of U.S. military power and a necessary intervention to restore order in Venezuela [4][5][10]. Group 1: Military Action and Its Implications - President Trump described the military action as unprecedented since World War II, claiming it demonstrated the effectiveness of U.S. military capabilities [4]. - Trump stated that all military capabilities of Venezuela have been "completely paralyzed," and he emphasized the U.S. intention to govern Venezuela until a safe power transition can occur [4][5]. - The U.S. military operation was portrayed as complex and highly effective, with Trump claiming no U.S. casualties or losses during the operation [8][9]. Group 2: Economic Interests - Trump indicated that the U.S. would allow major American oil companies to invest billions in Venezuela to repair its oil infrastructure, which he described as a long-standing failure [5]. - He reiterated the U.S. commitment to maintaining a complete oil embargo against Venezuela until U.S. demands are fully met [5]. Group 3: International Reactions - The Venezuelan government condemned the U.S. actions as a violation of international law and called for the immediate release of Maduro and his wife [10][14]. - Various countries, including Russia and France, expressed strong opposition to the U.S. military intervention, emphasizing the need to respect Venezuela's sovereignty and international law [14][17][22]. - Protests against the U.S. military action erupted in multiple U.S. cities, with demonstrators calling for an end to military intervention in Venezuela [11][13].

Core Viewpoint - The situation in Venezuela has escalated with the U.S. military's actions against President Maduro, leading to widespread international condemnation and protests within Venezuela [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - The U.S. military conducted a raid in Caracas, capturing President Maduro and his wife, which has been described as a significant military intervention [1]. - President Trump announced that U.S. oil companies would enter Venezuela to generate profits following the military action [1]. Group 2: International Reactions - Multiple countries, including Colombia, Cuba, Brazil, and Russia, condemned the U.S. military actions, viewing them as a violation of Venezuela's sovereignty and an act of aggression [2]. - The European Union and several European nations expressed concern over the situation, urging adherence to the principles of the United Nations Charter [2]. - An emergency meeting of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) was convened to address the U.S. military actions and their implications for regional stability [2]. Group 3: Domestic Response in Venezuela - Venezuelan citizens gathered in support of President Maduro, demonstrating against the U.S. intervention and calling for his release [1]. - Protests against the U.S. actions occurred in various U.S. cities, with demonstrators advocating for non-intervention in Latin America [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Vice President of Venezuela has accused Trump of attempting to exploit the country's resources through threats [1] Group 1 - The Venezuelan government perceives Trump's actions as a direct threat to its sovereignty and resources [1] - The statement reflects ongoing tensions between Venezuela and the United States, particularly regarding resource control [1]

Core Viewpoint - The chairman of the National Assembly of Venezuela, Rodriguez, stated that the U.S. so-called "anti-drug" operations are a political excuse, with the true intention being to plunder Venezuela's oil resources [1] Group 1 - The U.S. actions are framed as a political pretext rather than genuine anti-drug efforts [1] - The focus of the U.S. operations is suggested to be on Venezuela's oil resources, indicating a potential geopolitical motive [1]