每经记者｜孔泽思 每经编辑｜程鹏 廖丹 临近年终，许多投资者怎么也没有想到，和中国500强企业——深圳金雅福控股集团有限公司（以下简称金雅福）有关联的理财项目会出问题。 12月17日，来自全国多个省份的投资者告诉《每日经济新闻》记者，其此前从金雅福购买黄金，并将所购黄金委托给深圳市博耀创金担保投资有限公司 （以下简称深圳博耀）获取投资收益，年化收益率在8%上下。 从2025年11月份开始，有投资者陆续发现理财产品出现延期兑付，这时不少人才注意到深圳博耀和金雅福有较多关联。近期的社交媒体上，对金雅福资金 情况的讨论逐渐增多，也有多名公司员工表示金雅福已拖欠两三个月工资和报销。 有金雅福相关人士向记者表示，"形势不容乐观"，但公司在积极处理，目前公司也在和政府部门沟通，商讨解决方案。 12月18日上午，记者以投资者身份联系到深圳市盐田区相关部门，接线工作人员表示，政府部门已全面介入，已聘请会计组，会对公司资产进行清算，警 方也在对公司进行监管。其建议投资者报警处理，并按警方要求发送相关资料。 12月17日晚，金雅福总部办公室前台，公司名称字样已摘下。 图片来源：每经记者 孔泽思 摄 黄金"委托投资"： 多名投资人 ...

此举源于许家印未遵守法院此前的资产披露令，按照判决，他在全球价值最高达77亿美元（约合人民币550亿元）的资产被全面禁止处置。 2025年11月底，香港高等法院作出关键判决，指定恒大清盘人全面接管许家印的所有资产，其监管范围不仅涵盖许家印的显性资产，还通过"穿透式"监 管，将其借十几家离岸公司、信托架构隐匿的资产一并纳入。 这事儿说出来都让人头皮发麻。证监会调查发现，恒大在2019年虚增收入2139亿元，占了当年营收总额的50.14%；到了2020年更夸张，直接虚增了3501 亿元，占营收总额的78.54%！两年时间加起来，虚增的金额足足有5640亿！ 靠着这些彻头彻尾的虚假数据，恒大还发行了208亿的公司债，妥妥地涉嫌欺诈发行。许家印作为这事儿的主谋，被罚款4700万，还被终身禁止进入证券 市场。但说实话，这都只是开胃小菜，更严重的还在后头。 其实早在喊出"保交楼"之前，许家印就已经在为跑路铺路了。2021年恒大危机刚冒头，他就赶紧跟丁玉梅办了离婚，把估值45亿港元的伦敦顶级豪宅、私 人飞机，还有瑞士银行的匿名账户这些优质资产，一股脑全转到了丁玉梅名下，明摆着就是想靠离婚这招躲债。 时间拨回到2021年秋天 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal troubles faced by Dongguan Mengda Group Co., Ltd. and its actual controller Li, who has been investigated for illegal public deposit absorption, leading to investor concerns and actions [3][4]. Company Overview - Mengda Group was established in 2010 and is recognized as a national high-tech enterprise focusing on industrial integration development services, utilizing technologies such as big data, IoT, and AI [6]. - The company claims to serve over 1 million plastic chemical enterprise clients, with an online trade volume exceeding 240 billion yuan, positioning itself among the top 10 B2B platforms in China [6]. Recent Developments - On October 24, Mengda Group issued a letter to clients indicating that hundreds of users were experiencing a "run on the bank," leading to abnormal termination of platform operations and severe withdrawal of funds [6]. - The letter mentioned that the company had to mobilize cash from its subsidiaries to address the liquidity crisis [6]. Investor Reactions - Multiple investors expressed concerns about the "run on the bank" situation, fearing potential losses and seeking to withdraw their investments, but found it challenging to do so [7]. - Following the police announcement, investors are hopeful for a resolution and the possibility of recovering their invested funds [7].

Core Points - The court sentenced Wang Wei and 34 others for illegally absorbing public deposits, with Wang receiving a 10-year prison term and a fine of 500,000 RMB [1][2] - The total amount of illegal public deposits absorbed was over 48.4 billion RMB, resulting in actual losses of over 12.8 billion RMB for participants [1][2] Group 1 - The defendants, including Wang Wei, violated national financial management regulations by illegally absorbing public deposits without approval from relevant authorities [2] - The illegal activities included promises of principal and interest repayment, which disrupted financial order and involved a significant amount of money [2] - The court's judgment was based on the nature, circumstances, and social harm of the crimes committed by each defendant [2] Group 2 - Following the incident, authorities initiated asset recovery efforts, successfully retrieving some funds, real estate, vehicles, and other assets [1] - The recovered assets will be returned to the participants based on the proportion of the raised funds after the judgment becomes effective [1]

Core Points - Qian Zhimin, the main suspect in a large-scale investment fraud case involving over 70,000 bitcoins, was sentenced to 11 years and 8 months in prison in the UK after pleading guilty to charges related to holding and transferring criminal proceeds in cryptocurrency [2][13] - The case has revealed extensive details about Qian's evasion tactics, including the involvement of accomplices and the handling of seized bitcoins by UK authorities [5][7] Group 1: Case Background - Qian Zhimin was the actual controller of Tianjin Lantian Ge Rui Electronic Technology Co., which illegally raised over 402.2 billion yuan from the public between April 2014 and August 2017 [3][8] - The fraud involved over 128,000 investors, with funds being funneled into bitcoin through accounts opened on cryptocurrency exchanges [8][9] Group 2: Arrest and Legal Proceedings - Qian was arrested in York, England, on April 22, 2024, after being on the run for seven years, during which he attempted to convert bitcoins into cash and purchase high-value properties [5][12] - The UK court proceedings revealed that Qian had transferred over 18,000 bitcoins after arriving in the UK, with the total value of his seized cryptocurrency exceeding 3.84 billion pounds at the time of confiscation [7][8] Group 3: Accomplices and Operations - Qian was assisted by accomplices, including Wen Jian and Ling Zenghao, who helped him manage his daily needs and facilitated bitcoin transactions [5][10] - The accomplices were involved in various illegal activities, including the use of forged documents and the purchase of properties in the UK and Dubai [10][11] Group 4: Victim Impact and Recovery Efforts - The court highlighted the severe impact on victims, many of whom lost their homes and faced significant emotional distress due to the fraud [13] - Chinese authorities are actively pursuing international cooperation to recover assets and compensate victims, with ongoing discussions about the handling of the seized bitcoins [14][15]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the financial troubles faced by Dongguan Mengda Group Co., Ltd., highlighting a significant "run on the bank" situation where hundreds of users are unable to withdraw their investments, raising concerns about the company's financial stability and operational integrity [3][10]. Company Overview - Mengda Group was established in 2010 and is recognized as a national high-tech enterprise focused on integrated development services, utilizing technologies such as big data, IoT, and AI to create a digital service platform [3]. - The company claims to have over 1 million clients in the plastic chemical industry and an online trading volume exceeding 240 billion yuan, positioning itself among the top 10 B2B platforms in China [3]. Investment Scheme - The investment platform "Liuke Yunbang" offered investors fixed annual returns of 8% to 12%, promoting a perception of safety and ease in profit generation [5][6]. - Investors were required to sign two agreements: a "Distribution Cooperation Agreement" and a "Service Agreement," neither of which explicitly mentioned investment or returns, raising red flags about the legitimacy of the investment scheme [6][8]. Financial Crisis - On October 24, the company acknowledged a cash flow crisis due to a sudden halt in platform operations and significant customer withdrawals, attributing the situation to multiple factors, including a police investigation into money laundering that affected their bank accounts [10]. - The company proposed a "debt-to-equity swap" solution to investors, allowing them to exit their investments through a structured repayment plan [10]. Legal Actions - Investors have reported the company to the police, alleging illegal public deposit solicitation without regulatory approval, which could lead to serious legal consequences for the company [11].

Core Viewpoint - Dongguan Mengda Group has faced a liquidity crisis due to a large number of users requesting withdrawals, leading to a non-normal termination of platform operations and significant cash flow issues [7] Company Overview - Mengda Group, established in 2010, is a national high-tech enterprise focused on industrial integration development services, utilizing technologies such as big data, IoT, and AI [1] - The company has over 1 million clients in the plastic chemical industry and has achieved an online trading volume exceeding 240 billion yuan, ranking among China's top 10 B2B platforms [1] Investment Scheme - The "Liuke Yunbang" platform, operated by Mengda Data Company, promised investors fixed annual returns of 8% to 12%, claiming capital safety and principal protection [3] - Investors were required to sign two agreements: a Distribution Cooperation Agreement and a Service Agreement, neither of which explicitly mentioned investment or returns, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the investment [4][5] Financial Operations - The Distribution Agreement involved investors providing "stock turnover funds" to a supplier, while the Service Agreement indicated that investors would receive distribution income, which they believe is actually investment returns [5][6] - Prior to October, the platform operated normally, and investors received their returns as promised [6] Crisis and Response - On October 24, Mengda Group acknowledged the liquidity crisis in a letter to clients, attributing it to multiple factors, including a protective freeze on bank accounts due to a police investigation related to money laundering [7] - The company proposed a debt restructuring plan involving a "debt-to-equity swap" to address the financial issues, but many investors have not agreed to this proposal [7][8] Legal Actions - Investors have reported the company to the police, alleging illegal public deposit solicitation without regulatory approval [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the contrasting lives of former Evergrande president Xia Haijun and another fugitive, Chen Xuanlin, who have both escaped to the U.S. amid financial scandals, reflecting a broader narrative of greed and evasion of accountability [2][11]. Group 1: Xia Haijun's Background and Actions - Xia Haijun, once a prominent figure in Evergrande with a peak annual salary of 270 million yuan, has largely disappeared from public view following the company's financial collapse, only to resurface in California [5][8]. - He purchased a property in California for $1.2 million in 2011, which has appreciated to over $3.2 million, and has since transferred ownership to his wife, indicating premeditated asset protection [7]. - Despite Evergrande's staggering debt of 2.39 trillion yuan and the suffering of investors and homeowners, Xia enjoys a luxurious lifestyle in the U.S., seemingly detached from the consequences of his actions [8][11]. Group 2: Chen Xuanlin's Background and Actions - Chen Xuanlin, known for his rapid rise in the investment sector, faced legal issues for illegal fundraising, with over 30 billion yuan involved, leading to significant financial losses for investors [9]. - He orchestrated his escape from China through a series of strategic moves, including a boat trip to Southeast Asia, ultimately settling in California where he owns a Mediterranean-style villa valued at over $10 million [9]. - Both Xia and Chen exemplify individuals who have managed to evade accountability while enjoying the fruits of their questionable financial practices, highlighting a systemic issue within the industry [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful extradition of suspects involved in economic crimes from Thailand to China, showcasing the strengthening cooperation between the two countries in law enforcement and judicial matters [2][3][4]. Group 1: Extradition Cases - The Chinese police successfully extradited Li, who illegally raised over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial backing and high returns [2]. - The extradition of Zhang, a major suspect in a large-scale pyramid scheme involving over 1,000,000 participants and more than 100 billion RMB in illicit funds, marks a significant achievement in international law enforcement cooperation [3][4]. - The extradition of these suspects is part of a broader initiative, with Li's case being the 63rd return of a "Red Notice" individual under the "Sky Net" operation [3]. Group 2: Law Enforcement Cooperation - The successful extradition of Li demonstrates the deepening cooperation and mutual trust between China and Thailand in law enforcement, which is expected to serve as a positive example for future collaborations with other countries [4]. - The article emphasizes the commitment of Chinese authorities to protect citizens' property rights and uphold legal standards through international cooperation [4].

Core Points - The article discusses the extradition of a suspect, Li, who was involved in illegal public deposit collection, highlighting the cooperation between China and Thailand in law enforcement [1][2] Group 1: Extradition Details - Li was accused of illegally collecting over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial capabilities and promising high interest rates [1] - After fleeing to Thailand, Li was arrested by Thai authorities in June 2025 and subsequently extradited back to China [1] Group 2: Law Enforcement Cooperation - The successful extradition is seen as a result of deepening law enforcement cooperation and mutual trust between China and Thailand [1] - The case serves as a positive example for future law enforcement collaborations between China and other countries [1]