Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the contrasting lives of former Evergrande president Xia Haijun and another fugitive, Chen Xuanlin, who have both escaped to the U.S. amid financial scandals, reflecting a broader narrative of greed and evasion of accountability [2][11]. Group 1: Xia Haijun's Background and Actions - Xia Haijun, once a prominent figure in Evergrande with a peak annual salary of 270 million yuan, has largely disappeared from public view following the company's financial collapse, only to resurface in California [5][8]. - He purchased a property in California for $1.2 million in 2011, which has appreciated to over $3.2 million, and has since transferred ownership to his wife, indicating premeditated asset protection [7]. - Despite Evergrande's staggering debt of 2.39 trillion yuan and the suffering of investors and homeowners, Xia enjoys a luxurious lifestyle in the U.S., seemingly detached from the consequences of his actions [8][11]. Group 2: Chen Xuanlin's Background and Actions - Chen Xuanlin, known for his rapid rise in the investment sector, faced legal issues for illegal fundraising, with over 30 billion yuan involved, leading to significant financial losses for investors [9]. - He orchestrated his escape from China through a series of strategic moves, including a boat trip to Southeast Asia, ultimately settling in California where he owns a Mediterranean-style villa valued at over $10 million [9]. - Both Xia and Chen exemplify individuals who have managed to evade accountability while enjoying the fruits of their questionable financial practices, highlighting a systemic issue within the industry [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful extradition of suspects involved in economic crimes from Thailand to China, showcasing the strengthening cooperation between the two countries in law enforcement and judicial matters [2][3][4]. Group 1: Extradition Cases - The Chinese police successfully extradited Li, who illegally raised over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial backing and high returns [2]. - The extradition of Zhang, a major suspect in a large-scale pyramid scheme involving over 1,000,000 participants and more than 100 billion RMB in illicit funds, marks a significant achievement in international law enforcement cooperation [3][4]. - The extradition of these suspects is part of a broader initiative, with Li's case being the 63rd return of a "Red Notice" individual under the "Sky Net" operation [3]. Group 2: Law Enforcement Cooperation - The successful extradition of Li demonstrates the deepening cooperation and mutual trust between China and Thailand in law enforcement, which is expected to serve as a positive example for future collaborations with other countries [4]. - The article emphasizes the commitment of Chinese authorities to protect citizens' property rights and uphold legal standards through international cooperation [4].

Core Points - The article discusses the extradition of a suspect, Li, who was involved in illegal public deposit collection, highlighting the cooperation between China and Thailand in law enforcement [1][2] Group 1: Extradition Details - Li was accused of illegally collecting over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial capabilities and promising high interest rates [1] - After fleeing to Thailand, Li was arrested by Thai authorities in June 2025 and subsequently extradited back to China [1] Group 2: Law Enforcement Cooperation - The successful extradition is seen as a result of deepening law enforcement cooperation and mutual trust between China and Thailand [1] - The case serves as a positive example for future law enforcement collaborations between China and other countries [1]

8月15日，在中国驻泰国使馆和泰国相关执法部门的大力协助下，我公安机关将涉嫌非法吸收公众存款犯罪的嫌疑人李某从泰国引渡回国。 公安部微信公众号截图 据了解，李某在不具备吸收公众存款资质的情况下，虚构公司资金实力雄厚、经济效益良好和即将挂牌上市等不实信息，以扩大生产经营为由，以高额利息为诱 饵，先后向800余名群众非法吸收3亿余元人民币。案发后，李某逃往境外。 李某外逃后，公安机关坚持不懈开展追逃追赃工作。2023年9月，河南省商丘市睢阳区人民检察院以涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪对李某批准逮捕。2024年10月，国际 刑警组织对其发布红色通报。2025年6月，泰国有关部门将李某逮捕，并依法判决将其引渡回中国。 公安部相关负责人表示，李某的成功引渡，是中泰两国执法司法合作不断深化、双边互信不断加强的成果，彰显了公安机关维护公民财产安全、捍卫法律底线的坚 定决心，对今后我国与其他国家建立和深化执法合作起到积极示范作用。 来源：公安部微信公众号 责编：万健祎 校对： 廖胜超 版权声明 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小 ...

Core Viewpoint - The successful extradition of suspect Li from Thailand to China highlights the deepening law enforcement cooperation between China and Thailand, showcasing the commitment of Chinese authorities to protect citizens' property and uphold legal standards [1]. Group 1 - Li was accused of illegally absorbing public deposits amounting to over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial capabilities and imminent public listing [1]. - After fleeing to Thailand, Chinese authorities continued their pursuit, leading to Li's arrest in June 2025 and subsequent extradition [1]. - The case serves as a positive example for future law enforcement collaborations between China and other countries [1].

8月15日，在中国驻泰国使馆和泰国相关执法部门的大力协助下，我公安机关将涉嫌非法吸收公众存款 犯罪的嫌疑人李某从泰国引渡回国。 李某外逃后，公安机关坚持不懈开展追逃追赃工作。2023年9月，河南省商丘市睢阳区人民检察院以涉 嫌非法吸收公众存款罪对李某批准逮捕。2024年10月，国际刑警组织对其发布红色通报。2025年6月， 泰国有关部门将李某逮捕，并依法判决将其引渡回中国。 公安部相关负责人表示，李某的成功引渡，是中泰两国执法司法合作不断深化、双边互信不断加强的成 果，彰显了公安机关维护公民财产安全、捍卫法律底线的坚定决心，对今后我国与其他国家建立和深化 执法合作起到积极示范作用。 据了解，李某在不具备吸收公众存款资质的情况下，虚构公司资金实力雄厚、经济效益良好和即将挂牌 上市等不实信息，以扩大生产经营为由，以高额利息为诱饵，先后向800余名群众非法吸收3亿余元人民 币。案发后，李某逃往境外。 ...

李某外逃后，公安机关坚持 不懈 开展追逃追赃工作。 公安部相关负责人表示，李某的成功引渡， 是 中泰两国执法司法合作不断深化 、 双边互信不断加 强 的成果， 彰显了公安机关维护公民财产安全、捍卫法律底线的坚定决心 ， 对今后 我国 与其他 国家建立和深化 执法 合作起到积极示范作用。 微信编辑 | 七三 2025.08. 19 本文字数：508，阅读时长大约1分钟 据央视新闻，8 月 15 日，在中国驻泰国使馆和泰国相关执法部门的大力协助下， 我 公安机关将 涉嫌非法吸收公众存款犯罪的嫌疑人李某 从泰国引渡回国。 据了解，李某在不具备吸收公众存款资质的情况下，虚构公司资金实力雄厚、经济效益良好和即将挂 牌上市 等不实信息， 以扩大生产经营为由，以高额利息为诱饵，先后向 800 余名群众非法吸收 3 亿余元人民币。 案发后，李某逃往境外。 （注：我们会对线索进行核实。您的隐私将严格保密。） 推荐阅读 美团启动"堂食提振"计划 第 一 财 经 持 续 追 踪 财 经 热 点 。 若 您 掌 握 公 司 动 态 、 行 业 趋 势 、 金 融 事 件 等 有 价 值 的 线 索 ， 欢 迎 提 供 。 专 用 邮 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the successful extradition of suspects involved in economic crimes from Thailand to China, showcasing the effectiveness of international law enforcement cooperation between the two countries [1][2][3] - The case of Li, who illegally raised over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial backing and high returns, emphasizes the ongoing efforts to combat financial fraud [1] - The extradition of Zhang, the first major economic crime suspect extradited under the 1999 China-Thailand extradition treaty, involved a network that defrauded over 1 billion RMB through a virtual currency scheme, affecting over 10 million participants [2] Group 2 - The successful extradition of Li is seen as a result of deepening law enforcement cooperation and mutual trust between China and Thailand, reinforcing the commitment to protect citizens' property and uphold legal standards [3] - The extradition cases serve as a positive example for future international law enforcement collaborations, potentially influencing similar agreements with other countries [3]

Group 1 - A major illegal fundraising case involving over 10.7 billion yuan was publicly sentenced by the Dalian Intermediate People's Court on August 1 [1] - Defendant Jin Cheng was sentenced to life imprisonment for fundraising fraud and money laundering, with all personal assets confiscated [1] - Defendant Li Jing received a 16-year prison sentence and a fine for similar charges, while defendant Cao Jingyu was sentenced to 13 years and 6 months in prison along with a fine for fundraising fraud and illegal public deposit acceptance [1]

Core Viewpoint - The rise in gold prices has led to an increase in gold investment schemes, with some companies allegedly using "gold consignment" as a lure to attract investments from the public, particularly targeting older individuals, which raises concerns about potential illegal fundraising activities [1][24]. Group 1: Company Operations - A company named Jin A Ge has been accused of misleading customers into signing gold consignment contracts without actual delivery of gold, promising high returns of up to 30% annually [2][11]. - Customers, such as a woman named Mao, reported that they never received the gold they purchased but were instead given monthly dividends, raising suspicions about the legitimacy of the company's operations [3][10]. - The company claims to have a strong financial background and even asserts ownership of gold mines, which has attracted many investors despite the lack of evidence supporting these claims [13][15]. Group 2: Customer Experiences - Multiple complaints have emerged from customers who invested significant amounts of money, only to find themselves unable to retrieve their funds or the gold they were promised [20][23]. - The company has been reported to have a history of similar complaints, with some customers receiving refunds only after media intervention and police involvement [18][24]. - The contracts signed by customers often include clauses that impose penalties for early termination, further complicating the withdrawal of funds [3][11]. Group 3: Regulatory Concerns - Experts in the financial industry have raised alarms about the company's practices, suggesting that they may constitute illegal fundraising under Chinese law, as the operations appear to lack the necessary financial institution qualifications [24][26]. - The company's claims of having a gold mine and substantial financial backing have been scrutinized, with investigations revealing inconsistencies and a lack of credible evidence [15][17]. - Legal experts warn that if the company's operations are found to be fraudulent, it could lead to severe legal consequences for the individuals involved, especially if the fundraising is deemed to be of a particularly large scale [27].