封面图片来源：视觉中国（资料图） 本文转自红星新闻 法院认为，被告人王伟等人违反国家金融管理法规，未经有关部门批准，向社会公开宣传，承诺到期还本付息，面向社会不特定公众非法吸收公众存款； 违规发放私募基金，以私募基金形式向社会公开宣传，承诺到期还本付息，面向社会不特定公众非法吸收公众存款，扰乱金融秩序，数额巨大。公诉机关 指控王伟等34名被告人犯非法吸收公众存款罪的罪名成立。根据各被告人的犯罪事实、性质、情节和社会危害程度，依法作出上述判决。 编辑|程鹏 易启江 校对|许绍航 每经编辑｜程鹏 11月17日，贵州省安顺市西秀区人民法院依法公开宣判被告人王伟等34人非法吸收公众存款一案，对被告人王伟以非法吸收公众存款罪判处有期徒刑10 年，并处罚金人民币50万元；对其余33名被告人以非法吸收公众存款罪分别判处1年至9年不等有期徒刑，并处罚金。 经审理查明，自2011年3月起，被告人王伟等人在未经有关部门批准的情况下，相继以兴伟公司、安信卓越公司、兴东大健康公司、兴伟投资公司名义， 通过口口相传、组织答谢会、推介会、媒体广告等宣传方式，以还本付息、许诺高额回报为诱饵，向社会公众非法吸收存款，资金主要用于兑付本息、兴 ...

Core Points - Qian Zhimin, the main suspect in a large-scale investment fraud case involving over 70,000 bitcoins, was sentenced to 11 years and 8 months in prison in the UK after pleading guilty to charges related to holding and transferring criminal proceeds in cryptocurrency [2][13] - The case has revealed extensive details about Qian's evasion tactics, including the involvement of accomplices and the handling of seized bitcoins by UK authorities [5][7] Group 1: Case Background - Qian Zhimin was the actual controller of Tianjin Lantian Ge Rui Electronic Technology Co., which illegally raised over 402.2 billion yuan from the public between April 2014 and August 2017 [3][8] - The fraud involved over 128,000 investors, with funds being funneled into bitcoin through accounts opened on cryptocurrency exchanges [8][9] Group 2: Arrest and Legal Proceedings - Qian was arrested in York, England, on April 22, 2024, after being on the run for seven years, during which he attempted to convert bitcoins into cash and purchase high-value properties [5][12] - The UK court proceedings revealed that Qian had transferred over 18,000 bitcoins after arriving in the UK, with the total value of his seized cryptocurrency exceeding 3.84 billion pounds at the time of confiscation [7][8] Group 3: Accomplices and Operations - Qian was assisted by accomplices, including Wen Jian and Ling Zenghao, who helped him manage his daily needs and facilitated bitcoin transactions [5][10] - The accomplices were involved in various illegal activities, including the use of forged documents and the purchase of properties in the UK and Dubai [10][11] Group 4: Victim Impact and Recovery Efforts - The court highlighted the severe impact on victims, many of whom lost their homes and faced significant emotional distress due to the fraud [13] - Chinese authorities are actively pursuing international cooperation to recover assets and compensate victims, with ongoing discussions about the handling of the seized bitcoins [14][15]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the financial troubles faced by Dongguan Mengda Group Co., Ltd., highlighting a significant "run on the bank" situation where hundreds of users are unable to withdraw their investments, raising concerns about the company's financial stability and operational integrity [3][10]. Company Overview - Mengda Group was established in 2010 and is recognized as a national high-tech enterprise focused on integrated development services, utilizing technologies such as big data, IoT, and AI to create a digital service platform [3]. - The company claims to have over 1 million clients in the plastic chemical industry and an online trading volume exceeding 240 billion yuan, positioning itself among the top 10 B2B platforms in China [3]. Investment Scheme - The investment platform "Liuke Yunbang" offered investors fixed annual returns of 8% to 12%, promoting a perception of safety and ease in profit generation [5][6]. - Investors were required to sign two agreements: a "Distribution Cooperation Agreement" and a "Service Agreement," neither of which explicitly mentioned investment or returns, raising red flags about the legitimacy of the investment scheme [6][8]. Financial Crisis - On October 24, the company acknowledged a cash flow crisis due to a sudden halt in platform operations and significant customer withdrawals, attributing the situation to multiple factors, including a police investigation into money laundering that affected their bank accounts [10]. - The company proposed a "debt-to-equity swap" solution to investors, allowing them to exit their investments through a structured repayment plan [10]. Legal Actions - Investors have reported the company to the police, alleging illegal public deposit solicitation without regulatory approval, which could lead to serious legal consequences for the company [11].

Core Viewpoint - Dongguan Mengda Group has faced a liquidity crisis due to a large number of users requesting withdrawals, leading to a non-normal termination of platform operations and significant cash flow issues [7] Company Overview - Mengda Group, established in 2010, is a national high-tech enterprise focused on industrial integration development services, utilizing technologies such as big data, IoT, and AI [1] - The company has over 1 million clients in the plastic chemical industry and has achieved an online trading volume exceeding 240 billion yuan, ranking among China's top 10 B2B platforms [1] Investment Scheme - The "Liuke Yunbang" platform, operated by Mengda Data Company, promised investors fixed annual returns of 8% to 12%, claiming capital safety and principal protection [3] - Investors were required to sign two agreements: a Distribution Cooperation Agreement and a Service Agreement, neither of which explicitly mentioned investment or returns, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the investment [4][5] Financial Operations - The Distribution Agreement involved investors providing "stock turnover funds" to a supplier, while the Service Agreement indicated that investors would receive distribution income, which they believe is actually investment returns [5][6] - Prior to October, the platform operated normally, and investors received their returns as promised [6] Crisis and Response - On October 24, Mengda Group acknowledged the liquidity crisis in a letter to clients, attributing it to multiple factors, including a protective freeze on bank accounts due to a police investigation related to money laundering [7] - The company proposed a debt restructuring plan involving a "debt-to-equity swap" to address the financial issues, but many investors have not agreed to this proposal [7][8] Legal Actions - Investors have reported the company to the police, alleging illegal public deposit solicitation without regulatory approval [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the contrasting lives of former Evergrande president Xia Haijun and another fugitive, Chen Xuanlin, who have both escaped to the U.S. amid financial scandals, reflecting a broader narrative of greed and evasion of accountability [2][11]. Group 1: Xia Haijun's Background and Actions - Xia Haijun, once a prominent figure in Evergrande with a peak annual salary of 270 million yuan, has largely disappeared from public view following the company's financial collapse, only to resurface in California [5][8]. - He purchased a property in California for $1.2 million in 2011, which has appreciated to over $3.2 million, and has since transferred ownership to his wife, indicating premeditated asset protection [7]. - Despite Evergrande's staggering debt of 2.39 trillion yuan and the suffering of investors and homeowners, Xia enjoys a luxurious lifestyle in the U.S., seemingly detached from the consequences of his actions [8][11]. Group 2: Chen Xuanlin's Background and Actions - Chen Xuanlin, known for his rapid rise in the investment sector, faced legal issues for illegal fundraising, with over 30 billion yuan involved, leading to significant financial losses for investors [9]. - He orchestrated his escape from China through a series of strategic moves, including a boat trip to Southeast Asia, ultimately settling in California where he owns a Mediterranean-style villa valued at over $10 million [9]. - Both Xia and Chen exemplify individuals who have managed to evade accountability while enjoying the fruits of their questionable financial practices, highlighting a systemic issue within the industry [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful extradition of suspects involved in economic crimes from Thailand to China, showcasing the strengthening cooperation between the two countries in law enforcement and judicial matters [2][3][4]. Group 1: Extradition Cases - The Chinese police successfully extradited Li, who illegally raised over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial backing and high returns [2]. - The extradition of Zhang, a major suspect in a large-scale pyramid scheme involving over 1,000,000 participants and more than 100 billion RMB in illicit funds, marks a significant achievement in international law enforcement cooperation [3][4]. - The extradition of these suspects is part of a broader initiative, with Li's case being the 63rd return of a "Red Notice" individual under the "Sky Net" operation [3]. Group 2: Law Enforcement Cooperation - The successful extradition of Li demonstrates the deepening cooperation and mutual trust between China and Thailand in law enforcement, which is expected to serve as a positive example for future collaborations with other countries [4]. - The article emphasizes the commitment of Chinese authorities to protect citizens' property rights and uphold legal standards through international cooperation [4].

Core Points - The article discusses the extradition of a suspect, Li, who was involved in illegal public deposit collection, highlighting the cooperation between China and Thailand in law enforcement [1][2] Group 1: Extradition Details - Li was accused of illegally collecting over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial capabilities and promising high interest rates [1] - After fleeing to Thailand, Li was arrested by Thai authorities in June 2025 and subsequently extradited back to China [1] Group 2: Law Enforcement Cooperation - The successful extradition is seen as a result of deepening law enforcement cooperation and mutual trust between China and Thailand [1] - The case serves as a positive example for future law enforcement collaborations between China and other countries [1]

8月15日，在中国驻泰国使馆和泰国相关执法部门的大力协助下，我公安机关将涉嫌非法吸收公众存款犯罪的嫌疑人李某从泰国引渡回国。 公安部微信公众号截图 据了解，李某在不具备吸收公众存款资质的情况下，虚构公司资金实力雄厚、经济效益良好和即将挂牌上市等不实信息，以扩大生产经营为由，以高额利息为诱 饵，先后向800余名群众非法吸收3亿余元人民币。案发后，李某逃往境外。 李某外逃后，公安机关坚持不懈开展追逃追赃工作。2023年9月，河南省商丘市睢阳区人民检察院以涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪对李某批准逮捕。2024年10月，国际 刑警组织对其发布红色通报。2025年6月，泰国有关部门将李某逮捕，并依法判决将其引渡回中国。 公安部相关负责人表示，李某的成功引渡，是中泰两国执法司法合作不断深化、双边互信不断加强的成果，彰显了公安机关维护公民财产安全、捍卫法律底线的坚 定决心，对今后我国与其他国家建立和深化执法合作起到积极示范作用。 来源：公安部微信公众号 责编：万健祎 校对： 廖胜超 版权声明 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小 ...

Core Viewpoint - The successful extradition of suspect Li from Thailand to China highlights the deepening law enforcement cooperation between China and Thailand, showcasing the commitment of Chinese authorities to protect citizens' property and uphold legal standards [1]. Group 1 - Li was accused of illegally absorbing public deposits amounting to over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial capabilities and imminent public listing [1]. - After fleeing to Thailand, Chinese authorities continued their pursuit, leading to Li's arrest in June 2025 and subsequent extradition [1]. - The case serves as a positive example for future law enforcement collaborations between China and other countries [1].

Core Points - The article discusses the extradition of a suspect, Li, from Thailand to China for illegal public deposit absorption, highlighting the cooperation between Chinese and Thai law enforcement agencies [1] Group 1: Extradition Details - Li was accused of illegally absorbing over 300 million RMB from more than 800 individuals by falsely claiming strong financial capabilities and promising high interest rates [1] - After fleeing to Thailand, Li was arrested by Thai authorities in June 2025 and subsequently extradited back to China [1] Group 2: Legal and Cooperative Aspects - The successful extradition is seen as a result of deepening law enforcement cooperation and mutual trust between China and Thailand [1] - The case demonstrates the commitment of Chinese authorities to protect citizens' property and uphold legal standards, serving as a positive example for future international law enforcement collaborations [1]