Core Viewpoint - A controversial video featuring a model inappropriately interacting with a vehicle from XPeng Motors has sparked significant public backlash, leading the company to issue a statement condemning the malicious use of AI technology to create and disseminate false content aimed at damaging its brand image [1][2] Group 1: Incident Overview - A video showing a model in a revealing outfit performing inappropriate actions in front of an XPeng P7 has gone viral, prompting negative reactions from viewers who expressed their disapproval and stated they would not purchase the vehicle [1] - The video was generated using AI technology and does not represent any actual event at the Guangzhou auto show, where XPeng Motors did not invite any models or performers [2] Group 2: Company Response - XPeng Motors' legal department has strongly condemned the malicious actions aimed at defaming the company and has stated that it will pursue legal action against those responsible [1] - The company has collected evidence related to the incident and has reported it to law enforcement, which is currently investigating the matter [2]

Group 1 - The legal department of XPeng Motors issued a statement refuting rumors about the company being associated with maliciously generated explicit content using AI technology, which aimed to defame the brand and its products [2] - XPeng Motors emphasized that it did not invite any models or performers to its exhibition and condemned the use of inappropriate content for promotion, asserting that it would pursue legal action against those responsible [2] - The company has collected evidence and reported the matter to the police, who are now investigating the situation [2] Group 2 - In the third quarter, XPeng Motors reported total vehicle deliveries of 116,000 units, a 149.3% increase compared to the same period in 2024 [4] - The total revenue for the third quarter was RMB 20.38 billion, reflecting a 101.8% increase year-over-year and an 11.5% increase compared to the second quarter of 2025 [4] - The automotive sales revenue for the third quarter was RMB 18.05 billion, up 105.3% from the same quarter in 2024 and up 6.9% from the second quarter of 2025 [4] - The gross margin for automotive sales in the third quarter was 13.1%, compared to 8.6% in the same quarter of 2024 and 14.3% in the second quarter of 2025 [4] - XPeng Motors reported a net loss of RMB 380 million in the third quarter, significantly reduced from RMB 1.81 billion in the same quarter of 2024 and RMB 480 million in the second quarter of 2025 [4] - As of September 30, 2025, the company had cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments, and time deposits totaling RMB 48.33 billion [4]

小鹏汽车法务部发文辟谣。 11月28日， 小鹏汽车法务部发文称， 部分账号在社交媒体及私域渠道，恶意传播利用AI技术生成的、以小鹏 汽车广州车展展台为背景的，虚假的低俗色情视频并以此炒作负面话题、诋毁小鹏汽车品牌和产品。 小鹏汽车法务部表示，此类行为不仅严重违背公序良俗，污染网络生态，更侵犯了小鹏汽车的合法权益，触碰 了法律红线。小鹏汽车法务部强调，小鹏汽车车展未邀请任何模特及演艺人员，也一贯坚决抵制、反对以不良 内容展开宣传的行径。 "我们对这种滥用AI技术、恶意抹黑公司形象的违法行为表示强烈谴责并会坚决追责到 底！目前，公司已全面固定相关证据并正式报警，公安机关已介入调查。我们坚信违法之人必将付出代价！" 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes END 三季度，公司汽车毛利率（即汽车销售毛利润占汽车销售收入的百分比）为13.1%，2024年同期为8.6%，2025 年第二季度为14.3%。 三季度，小鹏汽车净亏损为人民币3.8亿元，2024年同期为人民币18.1亿元，而2025年第二季度为人民币4.8亿 元。 截至2025年9月30日，小鹏汽车现金及现金等价物、受限制现金 ...

Core Viewpoint - Xiaopeng Motors has condemned the malicious use of AI-generated explicit videos that falsely portray the company and its brand, emphasizing that it did not invite any models or performers to its exhibition and has a history of opposing inappropriate promotional content [1] Group 1 - The legal department of Xiaopeng Motors issued a statement on November 28, addressing the spread of fake explicit videos on social media and private channels [1] - The company has collected evidence and reported the matter to the police, who are now involved in the investigation [1] - Xiaopeng Motors strongly condemns the misuse of AI technology to tarnish its image and has vowed to pursue accountability for these actions [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent incident involving Xiaopeng Motors, where false and inappropriate content was generated using AI technology to tarnish the company's image and brand reputation [3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Xiaopeng Motors' legal department issued a statement addressing the malicious spread of AI-generated false and vulgar videos that misused the backdrop of their exhibition booth at the Guangzhou Auto Show [3]. - The company emphasized that it did not invite any models or performers to the auto show and has consistently opposed the use of inappropriate content for promotional purposes [3]. Group 2: Legal Actions - Xiaopeng Motors condemned the misuse of AI technology to defame the company and announced that they have collected evidence and reported the matter to the police, who are now investigating [3]. - The company expressed confidence that those responsible for the illegal actions will face consequences [3].

Core Viewpoint - The company strongly condemns the malicious spread of AI-generated inappropriate videos that tarnish its brand image and asserts its commitment to legal action against such behavior [1] Group 1: Company Response - The company has officially stated that it did not invite any models or performers to its exhibition and opposes the use of inappropriate content for promotion [1] - The company has gathered evidence and reported the incident to law enforcement, which has initiated an investigation [1] - The company emphasizes that those who engage in such illegal activities will face consequences [1] Group 2: Public Reaction - Following the circulation of the inappropriate video, the company has been labeled as "vulgar" by consumers, leading to negative sentiments and calls for boycotts [1] - Consumers have expressed their disapproval online, stating they would refuse to purchase products from the company due to the incident [1]

Core Viewpoint - On November 28, the topic "Xpeng Reports to Police" gained significant attention on social media due to malicious activities targeting Xpeng Motors' brand image [1] Group 1: Company Response - Xpeng Motors' legal department issued a statement addressing the malicious dissemination of AI-generated, false, and vulgar videos using the backdrop of their exhibition booth at the Guangzhou Auto Show, aimed at creating negative publicity and defaming the brand [2] - The company emphasized that it did not invite any models or performers to the auto show and has consistently opposed the use of inappropriate content for promotional purposes [2] - Xpeng Motors has collected relevant evidence and officially reported the incident to the police, who have initiated an investigation into the matter [2]

Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI-generated prank videos, particularly involving scenarios like "homeless people breaking into homes," has sparked significant public concern and highlighted the challenges of AI governance and misuse [2][5][9]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A recent incident in Guangzhou involved a child using AI to create a realistic image of a homeless person attempting to enter their home, which led to panic among residents and calls for security investigations [3][5]. - Similar incidents have occurred in other regions, where AI-generated images have caused police to respond to false alarms, wasting public resources [3][6]. Group 2: Social Media Influence - The trend of AI pranks originated from overseas social media platforms, particularly TikTok, where users began sharing videos of these pranks, leading to widespread imitation among teenagers [5][6]. - The hashtag "homelessmanprank" on TikTok has accumulated over 1,600 videos, with some receiving significant engagement, indicating a viral spread of this content [5]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Implications - Legal experts warn that creating and sharing AI-generated images that could mislead others may lead to criminal liability, as seen in cases where individuals have been arrested for causing false alarms [7][8]. - The misuse of AI technology raises concerns about the blurred lines between reality and fiction, necessitating increased education on AI literacy and ethical responsibilities, especially among youth [9].

Group 1 - The article discusses the deceptive pricing tactics used by online ticketing platforms, where consumers are often misled into paying higher prices due to hidden fees like "refund protection" that are bundled with the advertised low prices [2][3] - Regulatory challenges are highlighted, as local authorities struggle to enforce rules against these platforms due to jurisdictional issues, leading to a lack of effective consumer protection [3] - The article calls for breaking down regional barriers in regulation, implementing clear penalties for deceptive practices, and simplifying the complaint process for consumers [3] Group 2 - The second commentary addresses the issue of online travel agencies (OTAs) unilaterally adjusting prices, which undermines the pricing autonomy of businesses and negatively impacts consumer experience [4][5] - It emphasizes that such practices, justified under the guise of "optimizing supply and demand," are a form of overreach that harms both merchants and consumers [4][5] - The article argues for the need to respect the pricing rights of businesses and maintain a fair competitive environment, as well as the importance of platforms acting as facilitators rather than price manipulators [5] Group 3 - The third commentary focuses on the misuse of AI models in e-commerce, where some merchants use AI to create misleading representations of products, leading to significant discrepancies between advertised and actual items [6][7] - It points out that while AI technology can enhance marketing, its abuse can lead to consumer distrust and increased return rates, ultimately harming businesses [7][8] - The article references new regulations aimed at ensuring transparency in AI-generated content, highlighting the legal implications of misleading advertising practices [8][9]

Core Insights - The misuse of AI technology, particularly in creating inappropriate content, has led to significant concerns for both ordinary individuals and public figures, highlighting the urgent need for regulatory measures and technological safeguards [1][3][4] Group 1: AI Misuse Cases - Several individuals, including a university mentor and a white-collar worker, have fallen victim to AI-generated inappropriate content, such as deepfake videos and cloned images, raising alarms about privacy and security [1][3] - Public figures, including athletes, have also reported being targeted by malicious AI-generated content, indicating that the issue affects a wide range of individuals [4][3] Group 2: Regulatory Responses - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission initiated a special action to address the misuse of AI technology, focusing on seven key issues, including the production of pornographic content and impersonation [2] - Legal experts emphasize the need for clearer regulations regarding the use of personal images in AI training, as many users are unaware of how their data is being utilized [4][19] Group 3: Content Generation and Platform Responsibility - A recent test of 12 popular AI applications revealed that five could easily perform "one-click dressing" of celebrities, while nine could generate suggestive images, showcasing the vulnerabilities in current content moderation systems [10][12] - Social media platforms are under pressure to enhance their content moderation capabilities, with some companies claiming to improve their AI detection models to reduce the exposure of low-quality content [7][16] Group 4: Legal Framework and Challenges - Existing laws provide a framework for regulating AI-generated content, but ambiguities in definitions and enforcement create challenges in addressing "borderline" content [18][19] - Experts suggest that while technology can identify and flag inappropriate content, the responsibility often falls short due to a lack of accountability and clear standards [17][19] Group 5: User Awareness and Rights - Users are encouraged to document evidence of any malicious use of their images and report such incidents to platforms and regulatory bodies, emphasizing the importance of personal vigilance in the digital age [20] - The need for increased penalties for violations is highlighted as a crucial step in deterring misuse of AI technology and protecting individual rights [20]