（文章来源：央视新闻客户端） 委内瑞拉副总统罗德里格斯当地时间21日确认，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗于9月5日致函美国总统特朗普，信 中澄清委内瑞拉不存在任何非法毒品活动。罗德里格斯表示，为确保信件送达指定收件人，该信函已于 9月6日通过南美洲中间人转交。鉴于信件内容已在美国媒体部分泄露，委内瑞拉政府决定承担责任予以 全文公布。根据罗德里格斯发表的内容，信函中呼吁美国针对委内瑞拉、加勒比地区及南美洲的军事威 胁必须终止，拉共体和平区宣言必须得到尊重。委内瑞拉人民、军队和警察力量团结一致，将继续捍卫 国家的主权权利及和平权利。 ...

Core Points - The Non-Aligned Movement Coordinating Bureau expressed deep concern and worry regarding the presence of external military forces in Latin America and the Caribbean [1] - The Bureau supports the stance of member countries of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) against this military presence and calls for adherence to the Treaty of Tlatelolco to maintain the region as a zone of peace and a nuclear-free area [1] Group 1 - The Bureau reaffirms the right of the peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean to self-determination without external interference [1] - It commits to resolving disputes through peaceful means to eliminate the use or threat of force in the region [1] - The Bureau emphasizes the principles of national sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference in domestic or foreign affairs [1] Group 2 - The Bureau warns against using aggressive rhetoric, hostile actions, and military threats as tools of foreign policy, particularly in a region committed to diplomacy, peace, and nuclear disarmament [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing tensions between the EU and Russia regarding energy imports are escalating, with Hungary opposing the EU's plans to reduce reliance on Russian fossil fuels, citing national energy security concerns [1][4][6]. Group 1: EU's Energy Policy - The EU Commission is preparing to submit the 19th round of sanctions against Russia, which includes measures to reduce energy imports [1]. - The EU's legislative proposal aims to phase out imports of Russian gas and oil by the end of 2027, facing opposition from Hungary and Slovakia [6]. Group 2: Hungary's Position - Hungary's Energy Ministry has reiterated its stance against prematurely halting imports of Russian fossil fuels without viable alternatives, emphasizing the risk to national energy security [4]. - Hungary argues that energy policy is a matter of national sovereignty, and the EU's proposed plan threatens this sovereignty and the country's energy security [6]. Group 3: Russia's Response - Russia's Foreign Ministry spokesperson criticized the EU's approach as self-destructive, warning of severe consequences if the EU continues its current energy import reduction strategy [3].

据央视新闻消息，当地时间9月15日，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗在新闻发布会上表示，五周前，委内瑞拉遭 到导弹舰艇、潜艇的威胁，面临被轰炸、入侵和占领的危机，美国对委内瑞拉的所作所为是侵略，而非 单纯的局势紧张。这是美国对委司法与政治层面的侵略，完全基于借口和谎言。 驳斥涉毒指控：美编造谎言 目的是掠夺财富 马杜罗强调，美国所谓"委内瑞拉运输毒品"的说法是谎言，所有运往美欧的可卡因来自哥伦比亚，而美 国合法生产合成超级大麻，根本无资格指责委——委始终将毒品相关行为列为非法，也绝不会使其合法 化。美国每年超10万人死于芬太尼等毒品影响，却编造涉委谎言，其真实目的是"企图侵占我们的国 家、强加殖民统治、推动政权更迭，以窃取我国巨大的石油和天然气财富"，而非打击毒品贸易。 内外应对：强化国防部署 呼吁拉美多国共护和平 美破坏对话渠道 马杜罗强调委自卫合法性 马杜罗称，美国通过炸弹威胁、死亡恐吓及勒索手段破坏了双方沟通渠道，其军事部署的理由全是谎 言。他强调，美国对委内瑞拉的相关行为属于军事袭击，理应接受最彻底的调查；而委内瑞拉对海上和 空中的犯罪分子进行拦截，是有充分法律依据的。 关于应对美方威胁，马杜罗表示，委已升级国防计 ...

当地时间9月15日，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗在新闻发布会上表示，五周前，委内瑞拉遭到导弹舰艇、潜艇的威胁，面临被轰炸、入侵和占领的危机，美国对委 内瑞拉的所作所为是侵略，而非单纯的局势紧张。这是美国对委司法与政治层面的侵略，完全基于借口和谎言。 驳斥涉毒指控：美编造谎言目的是掠夺财富 马杜罗强调，美国所谓"委内瑞拉运输毒品"的说法是谎言，所有运往美欧的可卡因来自哥伦比亚，而美国合法生产合成超级大麻，根本无资格指责委——委 始终将毒品相关行为列为非法，也绝不会使其合法化。美国每年超10万人死于芬太尼等毒品影响，却编造涉委谎言，其真实目的是"企图侵占我们的国家、 强加殖民统治、推动政权更迭，以窃取我国巨大的石油和天然气财富"，而非打击毒品贸易。 美破坏对话渠道马杜罗强调委自卫合法性 马杜罗称，美国通过炸弹威胁、死亡恐吓及勒索手段破坏了双方沟通渠道，其军事部署的理由全是谎言。他强调，美国对委内瑞拉的相关行为属于军事袭 击，理应接受最彻底的调查；而委内瑞拉对海上和空中的犯罪分子进行拦截，是有充分法律依据的。 内外应对：强化国防部署呼吁拉美多国共护和平 关于应对美方威胁，马杜罗表示，委已升级国防计划，在全国部署250万名士兵 ...

卢拉在美国《纽约时报》撰文：巴西民主与主权不容谈判 中新网9月15日电 当地时间9月14日，美国《纽约时报》发布了巴西总统卢拉发表的署名文章。卢拉表 示，巴西愿意与美国就任何能够互利互惠的议题进行谈判，但巴西的民主和主权不在谈判范围之内。 卢拉表示，"当美国背弃与巴西延续了200多年的关系时，所有人都会受损。两国政府在拥有共同目标的 领域开展合作，不应被任何意识形态差异阻碍。" 最后，卢拉指出，他对巴西和美国关系的看法是：两国能够相互尊重，并为两国人民的福祉进行合作。 资料图：巴西总统卢拉。 针对美国特朗普政府对巴西商品加征50%关税，卢拉表示，美国推动就业回流和再工业化无可厚非，但 对其他国家采取单边行动是"错误的药方"。 他批评道，美国对巴西加征关税是"被误导"和"不合逻辑"的。卢拉指出，过去15年，美国与巴西的双边 贸易累计顺差达4100亿美元，近75%的美国产品进入巴西时已免关税。 文章指出，美方举措背后缺乏经济依据，这表明其有政治动机。 卢拉援引美国高官的观点称，美政府正在利用关税和《马格尼茨基法案》为巴西前总统博索纳罗寻求豁 免。巴西联邦最高法院11日宣布，博索纳罗策划政变罪名成立，获刑27年零3 ...

Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court convicted former President Bolsonaro of attempting to overthrow the democratic system, sentencing him to 27 years and 3 months in prison, marking a historic ruling in Brazil's judicial history [1][3] - The conviction stems from Bolsonaro's alleged conspiracy with seven political allies to disrupt the power transition after losing the 2022 presidential election to Lula [3] - Following the ruling, Bolsonaro is currently under house arrest, and his legal team plans to appeal to the full Supreme Court [3] Reactions and Implications - Former U.S. President Trump publicly supported Bolsonaro, criticizing the ruling as "very bad" and drawing parallels to perceived political persecution in the U.S. [4] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio threatened a response to Bolsonaro's conviction, labeling it as political persecution, while Brazil's Foreign Ministry defended its judicial process as evidence-based [4][6] - Brazilian President Lula expressed indifference to potential U.S. sanctions related to Bolsonaro's trial, asserting that the U.S. should not interfere in Brazil's judicial matters [5][6]

Core Points - The Brazilian government has rejected threats from the U.S. following the sentencing of former President Bolsonaro to 27 years and 3 months in prison for conspiracy to commit a coup [1][3][4] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio criticized the Brazilian Supreme Court's ruling, labeling it as "political persecution" and indicated that the U.S. would respond accordingly [3][4] - Bolsonaro is the first former president in Brazil's history to be convicted for conspiracy to commit a coup, following the violent protests by his supporters on January 8, 2023 [4] Summary by Sections - **U.S. Response**: Rubio's comments on social media condemned the Brazilian government's actions and suggested a U.S. response to the ruling against Bolsonaro [3] - **Brazil's Defense**: The Brazilian Foreign Ministry quickly countered Rubio's statements, asserting the country's commitment to defending its sovereignty against foreign threats [3] - **Judicial Context**: The conviction of Bolsonaro comes after a series of investigations into the January 8 riots, which were instigated by his supporters following the election of Lula [4] - **Political Implications**: Trump's demand for Brazil to halt judicial investigations into Bolsonaro and the imposition of a 40% tariff on Brazilian products have sparked significant backlash from the Brazilian government and public opinion [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly rejects the Philippines' accusations and protests regarding the establishment of a nature reserve at Huangyan Island, asserting that it is within China's sovereign rights to protect the ecological environment of the area [1] Group 1: China's Position - The establishment of a national-level nature reserve at Huangyan Island is aimed at protecting the ecological environment and maintaining the diversity, stability, and sustainability of the natural ecosystem [1] - China's actions are in accordance with both domestic and international law, reflecting its commitment as a responsible major power to environmental protection and sustainable development [1] Group 2: Philippines' Claims - The Philippines has expressed strong opposition to China's plans, labeling them as "illegal actions" and intends to formally engage in diplomatic discussions regarding these claims [1] - The territorial boundaries of the Philippines have been established by a series of international treaties, which do not include Huangyan Island [1] Group 3: Call for Restraint - China urges the Philippines to cease provocative actions and refrain from escalating tensions in the maritime region [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government asserts its sovereignty over Huangyan Island and defends the establishment of a national-level nature reserve as a legitimate action aimed at ecological protection, rejecting the Philippines' protests as unfounded [1] Group 1: Sovereignty and Territorial Claims - The Chinese government emphasizes that Huangyan Island is an inherent part of its territory, and the creation of the nature reserve falls within its sovereign rights [1] - The Philippines' territorial boundaries have been established by a series of international treaties, which do not include Huangyan Island [1] Group 2: Environmental Protection and Responsibility - The establishment of the nature reserve is intended to protect the ecological environment and maintain the diversity, stability, and sustainability of Huangyan Island's natural ecosystem, aligning with both domestic and international laws [1] - The Chinese government positions itself as a responsible major power committed to ecological protection and sustainable development [1] Group 3: Diplomatic Relations and Tensions - The Chinese government urges the Philippines to cease its provocative actions and avoid complicating the maritime situation [1]