Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked widespread criticism, particularly for allegedly supporting "Taiwan independence" forces and violating the One China principle [3][5][8]. Group 1: Political Implications - Takaichi's statements are seen as a violation of the four political documents between China and Japan, sending a strong signal of support to "Taiwan independence" advocates, including Lai Ching-te and the Democratic Progressive Party [3][5]. - The comments have been interpreted as positioning Takaichi as a protector of "Taiwan independence," which has raised concerns among various political commentators in Taiwan [3][5]. Group 2: Historical Context - The article highlights Japan's historical responsibilities regarding Taiwan, including past colonial actions that have caused significant harm to the Taiwanese people. Takaichi's lack of reflection on this history is viewed as provocative and damaging to the sentiments of the Chinese people [8]. Group 3: Reactions from Taiwan - Taiwanese commentators have criticized Lai Ching-te for his perceived sycophancy towards Japan, suggesting that the current administration is prioritizing political gain over the interests of the Taiwanese populace [9][11][13]. - There is a call among Taiwanese intellectuals for the public to oppose foreign interference in Taiwan's affairs, emphasizing that Taiwan is an internal matter for China [14][16]. - Former Kuomintang Chairman Hung Hsiu-chu has warned that allowing "Taiwan independence" forces to act freely could lead Taiwan towards conflict, stressing the importance of unity and historical awareness among the Chinese people [18].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly opposes Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, asserting that Taiwan is an internal matter of China and should not be interfered with by external forces [1][2]. Group 1: Reactions to Provocative Remarks - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that Japan should immediately cease its interference in China's internal affairs and stop provocative actions [1]. - A recent poll indicated that 91.1% of respondents believe Japan should reflect on its historical responsibilities and respect China's sovereignty [1]. - The spokesperson criticized Kishi's remarks as an attempt to intervene in the Taiwan Strait situation and as a challenge to international justice and post-war order [1]. Group 2: Taiwan's Response and Internal Dynamics - Taiwan's Vice President Lai Ching-te claimed that China is conducting a "composite attack" against Japan and urged China to return to a rules-based international order [2]. - The spokesperson attributed the tension in the Taiwan Strait to the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) insistence on "Taiwan independence" and collusion with external forces [2]. - Prominent figures in Taiwan, such as Ma Ying-jeou and Hung Hsiu-chu, expressed concern over Kishi's remarks, advocating for cross-strait dialogue without foreign intervention [2]. Group 3: Call for Unity and Historical Awareness - The spokesperson urged Taiwanese compatriots to recognize the dangers of Japan's actions and to unite against "Taiwan independence" and external interference [3]. - There is a call for Taiwanese people to stand on the right side of history and work together with mainland compatriots to oppose separatism and safeguard national unity [3].

近期，还有民进党政客参加"对华政策跨国议会联盟"年会并鼓吹所谓"台欧关系新阶段"。对此，陈斌华 指出，该组织不过是一群极端反华分子组成的小集团，对其再度在涉台问题上滋事，我们坚决反对。民 进党当局勾连这样的组织上演一出闹剧，徒增笑柄、自取其辱。 中新社北京11月12日电 (记者 刘大炜 张杨彬)国务院台办新闻发言人陈斌华12日在北京表示，日本在台 湾问题上对中国人民负有历史罪责，在殖民奴役台湾的50年里更是犯下罄竹难书的罪行。 当天举行的国台办例行新闻发布会上，就日本首相高市早苗日前所谓"台湾有事"言论的相关提问，陈斌 华作上述表示。 他强调，80年前，我们打败日本侵略者，光复台湾，终结日本对台湾的侵占掠夺。80年后的今天，谁再 企图挑战中国核心利益，妄想阻挠中国统一大业，中国政府、中国人民、中国军队决不答应、决不容 忍。 陈斌华指出，日本应深刻反省历史，汲取历史教训，恪守一个中国原则和中日四个政治文件精神，信守 在台湾问题上的政治承诺，慎之又慎处理涉台问题。 另就近期许多外国媒体、专家、学者发声批评赖清德当局鲁莽冒进、一再进行谋"独"挑衅，陈斌华表 示，这说明有越来越多的人认清其"和平破坏者""麻烦制造者" ...

Group 1 - The new spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, Peng Qing'en, emphasized the consistent and clear policy towards Taiwan, stating that "peaceful reunification and 'one country, two systems'" are the fundamental principles for resolving the Taiwan issue and achieving national unity [1] - Peng expressed willingness to create broad space for peaceful reunification and to make maximum efforts for this prospect, while also stating that the option to use force remains on the table if necessary [1] - The spokesperson called for joint efforts from compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to oppose "Taiwan independence" and foreign interference, aiming to advance the cause of national reunification and share in the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent poll by the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation indicates a significant dissatisfaction among the Taiwanese public regarding Lai Ching-te's governance, with 53% expressing disapproval and 27% stating they are "very disapproving" of his administration, reflecting ongoing public discontent [1] Group 1 - Lai Ching-te has maintained a rigid stance on "Taiwan independence," disregarding the interests and welfare of the Taiwanese people and businesses [1] - His administration has intensified efforts to obstruct cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, pushing for economic decoupling between Taiwan and mainland China [1] - The poll results highlight that Lai's actions are unpopular, and if he continues on this path, it may lead to greater public resentment and further harm to Taiwan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an inevitable trend and a common aspiration of the Chinese people, essential for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [1][5][8] Group 1: Historical Context - Throughout Chinese history, unification has been the mainstream development, with a shared understanding that "unity brings strength, division leads to chaos" [2] - Taiwan has been part of a unified multi-ethnic nation for most of its history, and the Taiwanese people have a strong patriotic tradition [2][4] - The Chinese Communist Party has consistently prioritized the resolution of the Taiwan issue as a historical mission since 1949 [5] Group 2: Current Relations and Developments - Under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, cross-strait relations have developed significantly, with increasing exchanges and cooperation benefiting both sides [3] - The desire for peace, development, and cooperation is the mainstream sentiment among Taiwanese society, supported by policies from the mainland [3] Group 3: Challenges and Opposition - "Taiwan independence" forces are seen as detrimental to the future of Taiwan and are accused of manipulating public sentiment for political gain [4] - These forces are viewed as acting against the interests of the Taiwanese people and the broader Chinese nation, ultimately facing historical judgment [4] Group 4: Future Prospects - The development and strength of the mainland are key factors in determining the future of cross-strait relations, with the potential for increased social and emotional connections [7] - The unification process is framed as not only a national interest but also a guarantee of the welfare of the Taiwanese people [5][6] - The international community is generally supportive of China's stance on unification, viewing it as a matter of upholding international law and order [6] Group 5: Conclusion - The unification of Taiwan is portrayed as a historical inevitability, supported by the collective will of the Chinese people and the ongoing progress of the mainland [8] - The narrative emphasizes that unity is essential for national prosperity and that the path forward is clear and unstoppable [8]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government views the activities of "Taiwan independence" advocates as a significant threat to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, emphasizing the need for legal action against such individuals to maintain national unity and sovereignty [2][2][2] Group 1: Government Actions - The Chinese authorities have initiated an investigation against Shen Boyang for establishing a "Taiwan independence" organization and promoting separatist ideologies, which is seen as a direct response to the ongoing threat posed by "Taiwan independence" activities [2][2] - The legal actions taken against "Taiwan independence" advocates are framed as necessary measures to protect the interests and welfare of the Taiwanese people while safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity [2][2] Group 2: Implications for Cross-Strait Relations - The government characterizes "Taiwan independence" advocates as detrimental to cross-strait relations, labeling them as criminals who incite division and conflict, thereby undermining the potential for peaceful cooperation and development between Taiwan and mainland China [2][2] - There is a call for the Taiwanese populace to recognize the dangers of "Taiwan independence" and to work towards enhancing cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, promoting a unified national identity and shared prosperity for the Chinese nation [2][2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an inevitable trend and a shared aspiration of the Chinese people, essential for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [2][4][10] Group 1: Historical Context - Throughout Chinese history, unification has been the mainstream development, with a strong recognition of the principle that "unity brings strength, while division leads to chaos" [4] - Taiwan has historically been part of a unified multi-ethnic nation, with a significant portion of its population participating in the anti-Japanese war, demonstrating a strong patriotic tradition [4] Group 2: Current Relations - Under the leadership of the Communist Party, cross-strait relations have developed significantly, with increasing exchanges and cooperation benefiting both sides [5] - The desire for peace, development, and cooperation is the mainstream sentiment among the Taiwanese people, supported by policies from the mainland [5] Group 3: Opposition to Separatism - The article describes "Taiwan independence" forces as insignificant and harmful, manipulating public sentiment and jeopardizing Taiwan's future [6] - It argues that these separatist forces are acting against the interests of the Taiwanese people and the broader Chinese nation, ultimately destined for historical judgment [6] Group 4: National Will and Sovereignty - The resolution of the Taiwan issue is framed as a matter for the Chinese people, including the 1.4 billion citizens, to decide, emphasizing national sovereignty and unity [9] - The article asserts that external interference cannot alter the objective reality of one nation and that unification is in the fundamental interest of the Chinese nation [9] Group 5: Future Prospects - The article posits that the development and strength of the mainland will facilitate unification, with the potential for a reasonable "two systems" approach for Taiwan [11] - It concludes that the historical trend towards unification is unstoppable, with the expectation that the complete unification of the motherland will be achieved [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an inevitable trend and a shared aspiration of the Chinese people, essential for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [2][6][9] Group 1: Historical Context - The pursuit of unification has been a mainstream historical trend throughout the thousands of years of Chinese history, with a strong recognition of the principle that "unity leads to strength, while division leads to chaos" [3] - Taiwan has historically been part of a unified multi-ethnic nation, and even during periods of foreign occupation, the Taiwanese people demonstrated a strong patriotic spirit [3][4] Group 2: Current Relations - Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, cross-strait relations have developed significantly, with increasing exchanges and cooperation benefiting both sides [4] - The desire for peace, development, and cooperation is the mainstream sentiment among the Taiwanese people, supported by policies from the mainland that have positively impacted Taiwan [4][6] Group 3: Opposition to Separatism - The article describes "Taiwan independence" forces as detrimental to Taiwan's future, manipulating public sentiment and endangering the well-being of the Taiwanese people [5][6] - It asserts that these separatist forces are acting against the interests of the Chinese nation and will ultimately face historical judgment [5][6] Group 4: National Unity as a Priority - The resolution of the Taiwan issue is framed as a historical mission of the Communist Party, with a commitment to achieving national unity as part of the broader goal of national rejuvenation [6][8] - The article argues that external interference cannot alter the objective reality of one nation and that the unification process is a matter for the Chinese people to decide collectively [6][7] Group 5: Future Prospects - The article posits that the development and strength of the mainland will facilitate the unification process, as the advantages of the mainland will increasingly support the push for unity [8][9] - It concludes that unification is not only a historical necessity but also a moral imperative, with the potential for a reasonable "two systems" approach that respects Taiwan's existing social system [9]

Core Viewpoint - The unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an inevitable historical trend and a common aspiration of the Chinese people, essential for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [1][5][8]. Group 1: Historical Context - Throughout Chinese history, unification has been the mainstream development, with a shared understanding that "unity leads to strength, while division leads to chaos" [2]. - Taiwan has been part of a unified multi-ethnic state for most of its history, and the Taiwanese people's resistance against foreign occupation reflects a strong patriotic tradition [2][4]. Group 2: Current Relations - Under the leadership of the Communist Party, cross-strait relations have developed significantly, with increasing cooperation and exchanges benefiting both sides [3][5]. - The desire for peace, development, and cooperation is the mainstream sentiment among the Taiwanese people, supported by policies from the mainland [3]. Group 3: Challenges and Opposition - The "Taiwan independence" movement is viewed as a minor force that undermines the collective interests of the Chinese nation and poses risks to Taiwan's future [4][5]. - External interference is seen as an obstacle to unification, but it is asserted that such efforts will ultimately fail [5][8]. Group 4: Future Prospects - The development of the mainland's economy and military strength is expected to facilitate the unification process, as it enhances the ability to promote social exchanges and deepen emotional connections between the two sides [8][9]. - A reasonable "two systems" proposal for Taiwan is suggested, which would respect its current social system while allowing greater participation in governance and international affairs [9].