Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran, with the U.S. threatening military intervention amid domestic unrest in Iran, while Iran is actively engaging in diplomatic efforts to address the situation and regional security concerns [1][2]. Group 1: Diplomatic Engagements - Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian has been in communication with various foreign counterparts, including Turkey and the UAE, emphasizing the need for dialogue to ease regional tensions [1]. - In discussions with the UAE's Foreign Minister, Amir-Abdollahian attributed recent unrest in Iran to provocations by Israel and the U.S., labeling certain groups as "terrorists" disrupting peaceful protests [1]. - The Iranian Foreign Minister also spoke with Turkmenistan's Deputy Prime Minister, highlighting the increase in activities by "terrorist organizations" spreading false information [1]. Group 2: International Relations - Amir-Abdollahian communicated with France's Foreign Minister regarding bilateral relations and consular matters, urging the international community to oppose foreign interference in Iran's internal affairs [1]. - The Iranian Foreign Minister warned the UK about the security of the Iranian embassy in London, indicating that failure to ensure safety could lead to a reassessment of Iran's diplomatic personnel in the UK [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing unrest in Iran, driven by rising prices and currency devaluation, which has led to widespread protests and significant political implications for the Middle East [3]. Economic Conditions - Iran's GDP per capita in 2025 is approximately $4,070, a decline from 2024 and significantly lower than the peaks in 2011 and 2012 [5]. - The Iranian rial depreciated over one-third against the dollar in 2025, with the exchange rate reaching around 1.5 million rials per dollar [5]. - The inflation rate in December 2025 reached 52% year-on-year, severely impacting the purchasing power of ordinary Iranians, whose monthly salaries are around $100 [5][7]. Protests and Government Response - Protests began on December 28, 2025, with merchants in Tehran's Grand Bazaar closing shops in response to currency devaluation and rising prices [5][7]. - The Iranian government announced a subsidy of 10 million rials (approximately 48 RMB) per month for eligible citizens starting January 10, 2026, to alleviate economic burdens, but many citizens view this as insufficient [7][8]. - The government has implemented a nationwide internet shutdown to control the protests, which has been more severe than previous instances in 2019 [8]. External Influences - The protests are believed to be influenced by external forces, particularly the United States and Israel, with Iranian officials claiming these countries are orchestrating the unrest [11][12]. - U.S. President Trump has threatened intervention in Iran, indicating that military options are being considered, which could escalate tensions in the region [12][13]. Political Dynamics - Iranian President Pezeshkian emphasizes the need to combat corruption and improve living conditions as a means to address the unrest [12]. - The Iranian government is currently navigating a critical phase of external economic warfare and internal political challenges, seeking unity among various political factions [12].

每经编辑｜金冥羽 向江林 据新华社，美国总统特朗普10日在社交媒体上发文，再次威胁干涉伊朗当前局势，称美国随时准备提供"帮助"。 近日，伊朗因物价上涨和货币贬值爆发示威活动，多地发生骚乱，造成人员伤亡。特朗普在多个场合称美国"正密切关注"伊朗局势，威胁或对伊朗进 行"严厉打击"。 总统佩泽希齐扬发声 据央视新闻，总台记者当地时间1月10日获悉，当晚，伊朗全国局势平稳，未发生动荡。伊朗首都德黑兰主要区域均未发生集会或骚乱，安全状况得到保 障。 据悉，在德黑兰有370人企图聚集并准备煽动骚乱，但被警方驱散。在马什哈德，一恐怖分子向警务人员开火并导致一名警察受伤，随后该恐怖分子被打 死。在伊拉姆，警方发现7名武装活动的头目并展开抓捕行动，其中一人被打死，剩余人员已被逮捕。 当地时间1月10日，伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬在会见伊朗确定国家利益委员会成员时强调，政府正全力通过根除寻租、贿赂和腐败来改善民众生计。佩泽希齐 扬称，目前政府正处于对抗外部经济战争与国内寻租利益集团的关键阶段，他呼吁各政治流派、专家及机构在协商达成共识后保持齐心协力，以统一的步 调坚定支持政策执行。 当地时间1月10日，伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬在会见阿曼外交 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Embassy in Australia strongly opposes the Australian government's statement regarding China's military exercises near Taiwan, asserting that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and condemning external interference in its internal affairs [1]. Group 1: China's Position on Taiwan - The Chinese government expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to Australia's statement, claiming it distorts facts and misrepresents the situation [1]. - The military exercises conducted by the People's Liberation Army are described as a serious warning to "Taiwan independence" forces and external interference, aimed at safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity [1]. Group 2: U.S. Involvement - The article highlights that the U.S. has violated the One China principle and related agreements by announcing a large-scale arms sale to Taiwan, which is seen as encouraging separatist movements [1]. - The U.S. actions are characterized as transforming Taiwan into a "powder keg" and a "munitions depot," contributing to regional instability [1]. Group 3: Call for Respect and Cooperation - China urges Australia to adhere to its political commitments, cease interference in China's internal affairs, and stop condoning "Taiwan independence" activities to foster a conducive environment for healthy and stable Sino-Australian relations [1].

转自：北京日报客户端 中国驻澳大利亚使馆发言人就澳政府涉台声明答记者问 问：2025年12月31日，澳大利亚外交贸易部发表声明，就中方近日在台湾岛附近开展军事演习表达关 切，中方对此有何评论？ 台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。台湾问题纯属中国内政，不容任何外来干涉。中国人民解放军有关 军事演习，是对"台独"分裂势力和外部干涉势力的严重警告，是捍卫国家主权和领土完整的正义行动。 "一个中国"是中澳关系的政治基础。中方强烈敦促澳方恪守政治承诺，停止干涉中国内政，停止纵 容"台独"分裂行径，为中澳关系健康稳定发展营造良好环境。 来源：中国驻澳大利亚大使馆 答：澳方有关声明颠倒黑白、混淆是非，中方对此表示强烈不满和坚决反对，已向澳方提出严正交涉， 中国外交部发言人也已就此表明中方严正立场。 近日，美国违反一个中国原则、中美三个联合公报和美领导人所作承诺，宣布向中国台湾地区大规模出 售武器，助长"台独"分裂势力"以武谋独""倚美谋独"的气焰，正把台湾变成"火药桶""弹药库"。"台 独"分裂行径和外部势力干涉，才是最大的单方面改变台湾海峡现状的行为，才是"地区和平破坏者""危 机制造者""战争煽动者"，才应该受到各方谴责 ...

Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked widespread criticism, particularly for allegedly supporting "Taiwan independence" forces and violating the One China principle [3][5][8]. Group 1: Political Implications - Takaichi's statements are seen as a violation of the four political documents between China and Japan, sending a strong signal of support to "Taiwan independence" advocates, including Lai Ching-te and the Democratic Progressive Party [3][5]. - The comments have been interpreted as positioning Takaichi as a protector of "Taiwan independence," which has raised concerns among various political commentators in Taiwan [3][5]. Group 2: Historical Context - The article highlights Japan's historical responsibilities regarding Taiwan, including past colonial actions that have caused significant harm to the Taiwanese people. Takaichi's lack of reflection on this history is viewed as provocative and damaging to the sentiments of the Chinese people [8]. Group 3: Reactions from Taiwan - Taiwanese commentators have criticized Lai Ching-te for his perceived sycophancy towards Japan, suggesting that the current administration is prioritizing political gain over the interests of the Taiwanese populace [9][11][13]. - There is a call among Taiwanese intellectuals for the public to oppose foreign interference in Taiwan's affairs, emphasizing that Taiwan is an internal matter for China [14][16]. - Former Kuomintang Chairman Hung Hsiu-chu has warned that allowing "Taiwan independence" forces to act freely could lead Taiwan towards conflict, stressing the importance of unity and historical awareness among the Chinese people [18].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly opposes Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, asserting that Taiwan is an internal matter of China and should not be interfered with by external forces [1][2]. Group 1: Reactions to Provocative Remarks - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that Japan should immediately cease its interference in China's internal affairs and stop provocative actions [1]. - A recent poll indicated that 91.1% of respondents believe Japan should reflect on its historical responsibilities and respect China's sovereignty [1]. - The spokesperson criticized Kishi's remarks as an attempt to intervene in the Taiwan Strait situation and as a challenge to international justice and post-war order [1]. Group 2: Taiwan's Response and Internal Dynamics - Taiwan's Vice President Lai Ching-te claimed that China is conducting a "composite attack" against Japan and urged China to return to a rules-based international order [2]. - The spokesperson attributed the tension in the Taiwan Strait to the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) insistence on "Taiwan independence" and collusion with external forces [2]. - Prominent figures in Taiwan, such as Ma Ying-jeou and Hung Hsiu-chu, expressed concern over Kishi's remarks, advocating for cross-strait dialogue without foreign intervention [2]. Group 3: Call for Unity and Historical Awareness - The spokesperson urged Taiwanese compatriots to recognize the dangers of Japan's actions and to unite against "Taiwan independence" and external interference [3]. - There is a call for Taiwanese people to stand on the right side of history and work together with mainland compatriots to oppose separatism and safeguard national unity [3].

Core Points - The report from the RAND Corporation indicates that the actions of the Lai Ching-te administration are provoking strong countermeasures from the mainland, suggesting that the U.S. should not allow Lai's administration to take actions that may escalate tensions across the Taiwan Strait [1] - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, Peng Qing'en, expressed a willingness to create broad space for peaceful reunification, emphasizing maximum sincerity and effort to achieve a peaceful future, while also stating that the use of force remains an option against "Taiwan independence" and external interference [1] Summary by Categories U.S. Involvement - The RAND Corporation report advises the U.S. to urge Lai's administration to avoid actions that could aggravate tensions with the mainland and to encourage a gradual unification approach from the mainland [1] Cross-Strait Relations - The Taiwan Affairs Office emphasizes the importance of peaceful reunification and expresses a commitment to making efforts towards this goal, while also retaining the right to use force if necessary [1]