Core Viewpoint - Israel is reportedly engaged in secret talks with Russia regarding issues related to Iran and Syria, indicating a potential shift in diplomatic relations and a search for peace agreements in the region [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Engagement - Israel and Russia have initiated undisclosed diplomatic discussions following a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, suggesting a new phase in their interactions [1] - The Israeli government views Russia as a potential partner in de-escalating tensions in the region, highlighting a strategic approach to foreign relations [1] Group 2: Regional Stability - The discussions aim to explore the possibility of reaching a peace agreement with Syria, reflecting Israel's interest in stabilizing the situation in the area [1] - Reports from Syrian state television indicate that these talks are focused on the broader implications of Iranian influence in Syria [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that despite the ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel, the underlying issue of Iran's nuclear program remains unresolved, and the duration of the ceasefire is uncertain [1] - Both Iran and Israel have suffered significant losses during the recent conflict, making prolonged warfare unsustainable, and the U.S. is also reluctant to engage further, leading to a temporary ceasefire as a pragmatic choice for all parties involved [1][2] - The U.S. has lost credibility in negotiations with Iran due to its inconsistent approach, complicating future talks regarding Iran's nuclear program [1] Group 2 - Diplomatic negotiations are deemed the only viable solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, as military actions have not resolved the core problems, including the handling of Iran's nuclear materials and the verification by the International Atomic Energy Agency [2] - There is a significant uncertainty regarding the potential for successful negotiations, as previous rounds have not yielded results, and the future of the ceasefire hinges on reaching a compromise [2] - If negotiations fail, Israel may resort to military action against Iran's nuclear facilities, potentially leading to increased instability in the Middle East [3]

Core Viewpoint - Iran possesses the necessary rationality to initiate diplomacy after punishing aggressors, indicating a potential shift towards negotiation if attacks from Israel and the United States cease [1] Group 1 - Iranian officials emphasize the importance of stopping attacks from Israel and the U.S. as a prerequisite for negotiations [1]

德国政府官员：（谈伊朗问题）我们知道美国也在致力于进行外交谈判。 ...

德国外交部长：伊朗需要与美国直接进行谈判。 ...

Group 1: Iran-Israel Conflict - Iran has evacuated three nuclear facilities prior to the attacks, with only the surface of the Fordow facility damaged and repairable [2] - The Iranian Revolutionary Guard has vowed to strike all U.S. interests in the Middle East, and a senior official stated that any action against Khamenei would eliminate the possibility of negotiations [2] - Israel's air force has conducted strikes on Iranian facilities, destroying two F-5 fighter jets and targeting locations in Yazd for the first time [2] Group 2: U.S. Military Actions - The U.S. military used B-2 bombers and 14 massive bunker-busting bombs in the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities [2] - U.S. officials noted that Iran has the naval capability to block the Strait of Hormuz [2] - Satellite imagery indicated that Iran had reinforced the entrances to its nuclear facilities with dirt prior to the U.S. strikes [2] Group 3: Diplomatic Efforts - UK Prime Minister Starmer emphasized the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table for a diplomatic resolution [3] - The EU's foreign policy chief stated that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons and called for a return to negotiations [3] - The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency stressed the urgency of returning to negotiations and allowing inspectors back into Iran's nuclear facilities [3] Group 4: Regional Tensions - The Houthis have announced plans to resume attacks on U.S. vessels [4] - Iranian state media has labeled U.S. citizens and military personnel as "legitimate targets" [4] Group 5: Economic and Political Implications - The Iranian National Resistance Council stated that Iran's nuclear program has cost trillions and resulted in countless deaths, calling for Khamenei's resignation [5] - The U.S. Vice President indicated that Trump concluded in mid-May that negotiations with Iran were unproductive and issued a final ultimatum [5] - Reports suggest that the U.S. is withdrawing more diplomatic personnel from Iraq [6]

Group 1 - The Iranian Foreign Minister stated that negotiations have been interrupted due to "aggression" from the United States, yet communication channels remain open through various intermediaries, particularly Oman [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Minister expresses a lack of trust in Western nations during negotiations, indicating that there are even more reasons for skepticism now. The minister emphasizes the importance of keeping diplomatic channels open but states that decisions regarding future diplomatic actions will depend on the cessation of what is termed "aggression" [1] Group 1 - The Iranian Foreign Minister has never trusted Western countries during negotiations [1] - There are increased reasons for distrust in current circumstances [1] - Diplomatic channels should always remain open, but no decisions on future diplomacy have been made yet [1] Group 2 - The minister calls for patience and suggests waiting for a response before deciding on diplomatic actions [1] - Future diplomatic actions will be contingent upon the end of what is referred to as "aggression" [1]

伊朗外长：要求伊朗重返外交谈判是毫无意义的。 ...

伊朗外长：谴责英国和欧盟敦促伊朗重返谈判的言论。 ...