郭嘉昆对此表示，我要再次强调，一个中国原则是国际关系基本准则和国际社会的普遍共识，坚持一个 中国原则是国际大义、人心所向、大势所趋。赖清德当局谋"独"挑衅的行径绝不可能得逞，也不可能动 摇国际社会坚持一个中国原则的牢固格局，阻挡不了中国终将统一的历史大势。我们也希望所谓"台邦 交国"不要反复被"台独"势力操纵利用，而是要认清形势，迷途知返，早日作出符合历史潮流和本国人 民长远利益的正确决断。 【环球时报-环球网报道 记者 索炎琦】外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持7月30日例行记者会。会上有记者提问 称：据报道，由于"过境"纽约的计划遭到了美方的拒绝，赖清德推迟了窜访拉美地区所谓"台邦交国"的 计划，请问发言人对此有何评论？ ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the tension in the Taiwan Strait, attributing it to the "Taiwan independence" stance of the Lai Ching-te administration, which is seen as a threat to regional stability and peace [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes that foreign companies operating in Taiwan should recognize the risks associated with the current geopolitical climate, particularly in light of the reported evacuation plans by Japanese firms [1] - The statement calls for other nations to oppose "Taiwan independence" and support China's unification efforts as a means to ensure regional peace and the safety of their own citizens [1]

Core Viewpoint - The essence of Lai Ching-te's administration is described as "false democracy, true dictatorship," which has been recognized by the world [1] Group 1: Political Context - The spokesperson from the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that there is only one China and Taiwan is part of it, asserting that 23 million Taiwanese are all part of the Chinese nation [1] - The spokesperson stated that differences in systems should not be an obstacle to unification, nor an excuse for division, framing the current struggle against "Taiwan independence" as a fight between unification and division, and justice versus evil [1] Group 2: Criticism of Lai Ching-te's Administration - Since Lai Ching-te's administration took office, it has allegedly suppressed political dissent within Taiwan, creating a "chilling effect" and engaging in what is termed "green terror" [1] - The administration is accused of stubbornly adhering to a "Taiwan independence" stance, provoking actions that aim to bind the Taiwanese people to the "Taiwan independence" agenda, which contradicts democratic principles [1]

民进党当局要求9月启用"台独"教材 国台办：必遭两岸同胞坚决反对和唾弃 金十数据7月30日讯，国务院台办举行例行新闻发布会。有记者问：民进党当局要求于9月新学期启用13 篇所谓"识读中国威胁"补充教材。抨击此举是进行系统性"台独"洗脑，将严重危害岛内青年认知与两岸 关系。对此有何评论？发言人陈斌华表示，民进党当局顽固坚持"台独"分裂立场，大搞"去中国化"，罔 顾历史，歪曲事实，妄图利用"台独"教材割断两岸历史文化联结，造成台湾青年一代历史记忆混乱和国 家认同扭曲。如此数典忘祖的倒行逆施，必将遭到两岸同胞的坚决反对和唾弃。涉及利用职权在教育领 域大肆歪曲、篡改台湾是中国一部分的事实的行为和人员，也必将遭到惩处。 （央视新闻） ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent large-scale recall election in Taiwan resulted in a significant defeat for the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), indicating a shift in public sentiment against the "Taiwan independence" stance and the "anti-China" narrative promoted by the DPP [2][3][5][10]. Group 1: Election Outcome - The recall election held on July 26 saw voters reject the recall of 24 Kuomintang (KMT) legislators and the mayor of Hsinchu City, Gao Hongan from the People's Party, signaling a clear disapproval of the DPP's actions [2]. - The election results suggest that mainstream public opinion in Taiwan is moving away from supporting "Taiwan independence" [3][5]. Group 2: Implications for DPP's Strategy - The DPP's campaign slogan of "anti-China to protect Taiwan" was heavily criticized, with the failure of the recall election raising questions about its effectiveness and future viability [4][6][10]. - Concerns have been raised within the DPP regarding the sustainability of the "anti-China" narrative and the feasibility of pursuing "Taiwan independence" in light of the election results [6][8]. Group 3: International Reactions - Observers from Japan noted that the recall election results could imply a weakening of the DPP's "anti-China" stance and raise doubts about Taiwan's commitment to resisting unification with mainland China [8][10]. - The response from the U.S. has not been prominently reported, but it is generally understood that the U.S. focuses more on democratic processes, while Japan is more concerned with the issue of Taiwan's independence [11]. Group 4: Mainland China's Response - The response from mainland China was notably measured, with the Taiwan Affairs Office commenting on the election results a day later, indicating a relaxed attitude towards the developments [15][16]. - The official statement criticized the DPP for its "Taiwan independence" agenda and political maneuvering, suggesting that the election results reflect a disconnect between the DPP's actions and public sentiment [16][18]. Group 5: Future Considerations - A subsequent wave of recall elections is scheduled for August 23, where seven KMT legislators will be subject to voting, raising questions about their ability to withstand similar scrutiny [19][20].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the recent recall election in Taiwan signifies a rejection of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) stance on "Taiwan independence" and its "anti-China" narrative [2][3][4] - The failure of the recall election raises concerns within the DPP about the sustainability of their "anti-China" platform and the viability of pursuing "Taiwan independence" [5][6] - Observations from Japan indicate that the recall election results challenge the DPP's "anti-China" stance, suggesting a potential shift in public sentiment against "Taiwan independence" [7][6] Group 2 - The response from mainland China to the recall election was notably calm and delayed, indicating a strategic approach to the political developments in Taiwan [12][11] - The official statement from the Taiwan Affairs Office criticized the DPP for its political maneuvers and highlighted the disconnect between the DPP's actions and public sentiment [13][15] - The upcoming second wave of recall elections scheduled for August 23 will further test the resilience of the current political landscape in Taiwan, particularly for the seven KMT legislators involved [16]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office commented on the results of the first round of voting for the "mass recall" of Taiwan's public representatives, highlighting the Kuomintang's victory and criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) political maneuvers as hypocritical and contrary to public sentiment [1] Group 1 - The Kuomintang successfully retained all 24 seats in the first round of voting on July 26, indicating strong public support [1] - The DPP's actions are characterized as driven by "Taiwan independence" ambitions and a desire for one-party dominance, neglecting the welfare of the people [1] - The spokesperson accused the DPP of engaging in political strife, suppressing dissent, and creating social division, labeling their governance as "false democracy, true dictatorship" [1]

Group 1 - The organization firmly supports the One China principle and opposes any form of "Taiwan independence" activities, emphasizing the importance of maintaining China's sovereignty and territorial integrity [2][3] - The recent actions of Lai Ching-te, who plans to visit Central and South American countries and transit through the United States, are viewed as a provocation that undermines peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [2] - The organization believes that the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait are crucial for regional development and international cooperation, and that "Taiwan independence" forces pose the greatest threat to this stability [2] Group 2 - The organization is dedicated to promoting practical cooperation between China and Italy in the manufacturing sector, contributing to the maintenance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [3]

Group 1 - The article criticizes Lai Ching-te's handling of disaster relief efforts following Typhoon Danna, suggesting that his focus is more on political gain than on aiding affected citizens [1][2] - It highlights the inefficiency and inadequacy of disaster response, with specific mention of the significant losses in agriculture, particularly in Yunlin County, which is governed by the opposition party [1] - The narrative suggests that Lai's actions are politically motivated, aiming to suppress opposition and consolidate power, while neglecting the pressing issues faced by the populace [1][2] Group 2 - The article argues that Lai Ching-te's approach to governance, particularly regarding Taiwan independence, is leading to increased dissatisfaction among the public, as evidenced by a 5.8 percentage point drop in approval ratings [1] - It posits that Lai's policies are exacerbating existing problems in Taiwan, such as shortages of water, electricity, land, labor, and talent, and that key industries like semiconductor manufacturing are being undermined [1] - The piece concludes with a strong assertion that Lai's actions are counterproductive to Taiwan's interests and may accelerate the push for unification with mainland China [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes Lai Ching-te's recent speech on national defense, arguing that it promotes "Taiwan independence" and incites conflict while misleading the Taiwanese military and public about the true nature of cross-strait relations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Critique of Lai Ching-te's Statements - Lai's claim that mainland China intends to "swallow" Taiwan and dominate the Western Pacific is portrayed as a distortion of facts, with the article asserting that China is committed to peace and development, contrasting its military spending of 1.3% of GDP by 2025 with the U.S. at 3.4% [1]. - The assertion that Taiwan is a peacekeeper in the Taiwan Strait is challenged, with the article stating that Lai's actions and rhetoric are actually destabilizing and provocative, undermining peace efforts [2]. - Lai's attempt to address the military's confusion about its purpose is criticized as a superficial solution that masks the underlying issues caused by the "Taiwan independence" agenda [3]. Group 2: Military and Defense Issues - Lai's ambition to build a military capable of deterring and defeating mainland China is described as unrealistic and misleading, suggesting that it serves to manipulate public sentiment while endangering the military personnel [4]. - The article questions the operational capability of the Taiwanese military, citing issues with equipment quality and training, and argues that the military's effectiveness cannot be validated under the current administration [5]. - The push for increased defense spending is framed as detrimental to Taiwan's social and economic stability, with the article asserting that such expenditures do not equate to security [6]. Group 3: Political Dynamics and International Relations - Lai's criticism of opposition parties for their defense budget policies is seen as a tactic to distract from his administration's failures and to facilitate closer ties with the U.S. at Taiwan's expense [6][7]. - The article argues that claims of Taiwan's defense autonomy and successful domestic weapon production are exaggerated, highlighting reliance on foreign technology and the challenges faced in military procurement [7]. - Lai's portrayal of U.S. military support as aligned with Taiwan's needs is contested, with the article asserting that U.S. arms sales are primarily driven by American interests rather than Taiwanese requirements [8].