巴基斯坦军队总司令：巴基斯坦将继续致力于地区和平，但也准备维护国家利益。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent sale of port assets by Li Ka-shing's CK Hutchison Holdings has raised significant concerns regarding national interests and security, highlighting the complex interplay of political and economic factors involved in the transaction [2][4]. Transaction Details - CK Hutchison Holdings announced a principle agreement to sell its global port assets for $22.8 billion, covering 43 ports across 23 countries, including critical locations like the Panama Canal, which handles 6% of global maritime trade, with Chinese shipping accounting for 21% of that volume [6][8]. - The sale is seen as crucial for China's trade with Latin America and its supply chain stability, making the ports vital geopolitical assets [8][10]. Regulatory Response - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) expressed its intention to review the transaction on March 28, emphasizing the need to maintain fair competition and protect public interests, effectively pausing the deal [13][17]. - In response to regulatory scrutiny, CK Hutchison attempted to split the transaction into two parts to circumvent the review process, which included selling less sensitive ports to an Italian family and splitting sensitive ports between the U.S. BlackRock and Italy [15][18]. Market Reactions - Following China's firm stance, various stakeholders, including Hong Kong's Chief Executive John Lee and local media, have called for compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, increasing pressure on CK Hutchison [19][20]. - The U.S. BlackRock faces a dilemma, as continuing with the deal could lead to sanctions from China, while abandoning it risks damaging their business reputation [20][22]. Conclusion - The ongoing negotiations surrounding the port sale reflect broader issues of globalization and the intersection of business activities with national interests, underscoring the importance of adhering to national regulations in pursuit of commercial gains [24][26].

新华社悉尼4月28日电（记者齐紫剑 章建华）澳大利亚记者、澳全国记者协会前董事会成员保罗·马隆 日前在澳公共政策评论网站"珍珠与刺激"上发表文章指出，美国军事支出庞大，始终将自身利益置于国 际合作之上。文章摘要如下： 例如，美国经济学家丹尼斯·米勒1970年指出："越南战争的影响如此巨大且广泛，以致于无法充分计算 其所有政治、社会和经济成本。"据美国国防部报告，1965年至1976年期间，美国军方在东南亚冲突中 的支出总额高达1389亿美元。 美国学者阿尼娅·瓦哈尔2022年曾撰文指出："美国回避那些似乎将其治理权力置于联合国等国际机构权 力之下的条约。美国始终将其所认为的国家利益置于国际合作之上，选择不批准这些条约是为了保护美 国企业的权利或维护政府在国家安全问题上采取行动的自由。" 几十年来，美国在战争和军费方面挥霍了巨额资金。美国发动战争，有时是为了满足其帝国需求或谋求 其企业的利益，有时则是基于对地区和世界历史的错误解读。 美国军舰在远离美国海岸的国际水域巡逻，以保护美国利益。美国的区域政策并非旨在提高邻国的生活 水平。 特朗普政府的"贡献"在于其公开揭示了美国长期以来的立场：美国代表美国利益行事。 ...