Core Points - Sanya City has been officially recognized as a national model city for the construction of a law-based government in the third batch of national law-based government construction demonstration areas and projects [1] - The initiative for the third batch was launched in May 2023 by the Central Committee for the Rule of Law, involving a rigorous selection process including voluntary application, provincial preliminary review, third-party evaluation, public satisfaction assessment, and social announcement [1] - The recognition of Sanya City reflects significant achievements in law-based government construction, with local officials expressing commitment to further enhance and replicate successful experiences in governance [1] Summary by Sections - **Recognition and Achievement** - Sanya City has been awarded the title of a national model city for law-based government construction, marking a significant acknowledgment of its efforts in this area [1] - **Selection Process** - The selection involved a comprehensive process initiated by the Central Committee for the Rule of Law, ensuring transparency and objectivity through various evaluation stages [1] - **Future Commitment** - Local authorities in Sanya City plan to build on this recognition by focusing on key areas of law-based governance, addressing public concerns, and strengthening governance mechanisms for sustainable development [1]

Core Points - The third batch of national model areas and projects for the construction of a rule of law government has been announced, with Nanjing, Yangzhou, and Guannan County recognized as "National Model Cities (Counties, Districts) for Rule of Law Government" [1] - Wuxi's "e-road" social governance service and Nantong's exploration of self-correction mechanisms for administrative actions have been awarded as "National Model Projects for Rule of Law Government" [1] - Since 2019, the Central Committee for the Rule of Law has organized the creation of model areas for rule of law government, establishing benchmarks for the construction of rule of law government in the new era [1] - In May 2023, the third batch of model creation activities was initiated, resulting in 72 cities (counties, districts) and 33 projects being recognized as national model areas and projects for rule of law government [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Comprehensive Law-based Governance Committee Office announced the third batch of national law-based government construction demonstration regions and projects, including 72 demonstration cities (counties, districts) and 33 demonstration projects aimed at innovating grassroots social governance [1][1][1] Group 1: Demonstration Regions and Projects - The list includes cities such as Shijingshan District in Beijing and Gongzhuling City in Jilin Province [1] - The demonstration projects feature initiatives like the "Six-Foot Alley Work Method" in Tongcheng City, Anhui Province, which aims to innovate grassroots social governance [1] Group 2: Implementation Process - The third batch of demonstration creation activities was initiated in May 2023, following a process that includes voluntary application, provincial preliminary review, third-party evaluation, public satisfaction assessment, and social announcement [1][1][1] - The initiative has been ongoing since 2019, with batches released every two years to progressively promote and establish exemplary models of law-based government construction [1]

Core Points - The article discusses the launch of the third batch of national model areas for the construction of a rule-of-law government in China, initiated by the Central Committee for the Comprehensive Rule of Law [1][2] - The initiative aims to promote the construction of a rule-of-law government by establishing exemplary models and creating a strong atmosphere for excellence in governance [1][2] - The selected regions are encouraged to innovate and create replicable experiences to enhance the level of rule-of-law governance [2] Summary by Sections National Model Areas - The third batch of national model areas for rule-of-law government includes 72 cities, counties, and districts across various provinces [3][4][5][6][7] - The initiative emphasizes the importance of adhering to Xi Jinping's thoughts on socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era [2] Demonstration Projects - A total of 33 demonstration projects have been identified, focusing on various aspects of governance, such as administrative dispute resolution, legal supervision, and innovative governance models [6][7] - These projects aim to address prominent issues raised by the public and enhance the effectiveness of governance [2][6]

为深入学习贯彻习近平法治思想，不断把法治政府建设向纵深推进，加快实现法治政府建设率先突破， 自2019年起，中央依法治国办组织开展全国法治政府建设示范创建活动，每两年一批，梯次推进、辐射 带动，树立一批批新时代法治政府建设的典范标杆，营造法治政府建设创优争先的浓厚氛围。 2023年5月，中央依法治国办启动了第三批全国法治政府建设示范创建活动。根据《关于开展第三批全 国法治政府建设示范创建活动的实施方案》和《市县法治政府建设示范指标体系》（2023年版），按照 客观公正、公开透明、务求实效、为基层减负的原则，通过自愿申报、省级初审、第三方评估、人民群 众满意度测评、社会公示等程序，经报中央依法治国委批准，决定对第三批全国法治政府建设示范地区 和项目予以命名。 2025年10月19日 附件 第三批全国法治政府建设示范地区和项目名单 （按行政区划排列） 一、全国法治政府建设示范市（县、区）（72个） 北京市石景山区 北京市顺义区 获得示范命名的地区要坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，深入学习贯彻党的二十大和 二十届历次全会精神，全面贯彻习近平法治思想，珍惜荣誉、再接再厉，持续巩固深化示范创建成果， 进一 ...

Core Points - The conference emphasized the importance of constructing an independent knowledge system for administrative law in China to enhance governance and legal confidence [1][2] - The meeting highlighted the need for reforms in administrative litigation to improve the accessibility and effectiveness of legal remedies for administrative subjects [2][3] - The discussion included the necessity of addressing various issues in law enforcement and judicial practices, such as non-action and improper actions by law enforcement agencies [4][5] Group 1: Conference Overview - The annual meeting of the Administrative Law Research Association focused on deepening reforms and building a rule-of-law government [1] - The meeting marked the 40th anniversary of the association, reflecting on its achievements and discussing the historical mission of administrative law in the new era [1] Group 2: Legislative and Institutional Reforms - The upcoming National People's Congress meeting will review the draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law, which aims to enhance legal supervision in governance [3] - The need for a systematic approach to supervising administrative violations was emphasized, particularly in light of the recent reforms initiated by the 20th National Congress [3] Group 3: Current Issues in Law Enforcement - The conference addressed ongoing issues in law enforcement, including excessive administrative checks and the need for better protection of new employment groups' rights [4][5] - A nationwide campaign to standardize administrative enforcement has led to a significant reduction in administrative inspections, with a reported 30% decrease in inspections from January to August [4][5]

Core Points - The enforcement inspection team emphasizes the importance of implementing the Administrative Review Law effectively in the province, focusing on key legal provisions to enhance the quality and efficiency of administrative review work [1][2] - The team conducted inspections in six cities, utilizing various methods to understand the implementation status and identify prominent issues, aiming to improve public trust and satisfaction in administrative reviews [1] Group 1 - The enforcement inspection team acknowledges the achievements in implementing the Administrative Review Law and provides targeted suggestions for identified issues and weaknesses [1] - The team stresses the need for a high-quality, professional administrative review workforce to meet the demands of legal implementation [2] - The team highlights the importance of collaboration and coordination among departments to strengthen the enforcement of the Administrative Review Law [2] Group 2 - The team calls for the establishment of a robust evaluation mechanism for administrative review work and encourages public supervision to address social concerns promptly [2] - The team advocates for legal education and awareness to foster a culture of lawfulness in society, providing a strong legal guarantee for revitalization and development [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the interdependence of reform and rule of law, highlighting the need for comprehensive legal reforms to enhance governance capabilities and stimulate development in Liaoning [1][2] - Comprehensive reform is identified as a crucial strategy for achieving overall revitalization in Liaoning, requiring the breaking of existing interest patterns and reliance on the rule of law to resolve conflicts and reduce reform risks [1][2] - Strengthening the legal environment and optimizing the business environment are essential for addressing complex challenges and maintaining social stability, thus driving development momentum [1][2] Group 2 - The construction of a rule-of-law government is prioritized, focusing on clarifying responsibilities, regulating government decision-making, and enhancing regulatory services to better combine effective markets with proactive government [2] - Fairness and justice are highlighted as the lifelines of the rule of law, necessitating continuous judicial reforms to ensure equitable access to the benefits of development for all citizens [2][3] - The promotion of legal awareness and education is crucial for building a law-abiding society, with an emphasis on grassroots conflict resolution and the establishment of a modern public legal service system [3] Group 3 - The current year marks the conclusion of the 14th Five-Year Plan, necessitating a problem-oriented approach to deepen legal reforms and provide solid legal guarantees for comprehensive revitalization [3]

Core Viewpoint - The case represents a significant step in promoting legal governance and accountability within the government, showcasing the mayor's commitment to transparency and the rule of law [1][2] Group 1: Case Details - The case involves a citizen, Li, who contested a land compensation decision made by the Wudang Mountain Tourism Economic Special Zone Management Committee, leading to an administrative lawsuit after the city government rejected his appeal [1] - This is the first instance in Shiyan City where the mayor, Wang Yonghui, appeared in court as the head of the administrative agency to respond to the lawsuit [1] Group 2: Government's Response and Legal Implications - Wang Yonghui emphasized the importance of administrative litigation in safeguarding the rights of citizens and ensuring that administrative agencies operate within the law [1] - The city government aims to enhance the legal decision-making process and reduce administrative disputes by fostering a culture of legal awareness among its leaders [1][2] Group 3: Judicial System and Administrative Accountability - The Shiyan courts have achieved a 100% appearance rate of administrative agency heads in court, indicating a strong commitment to resolving administrative disputes effectively [2] - The implementation of mechanisms such as open dispute resolution and the integration of administrative case handling has improved the resolution of administrative and civil disputes [2]

Core Points - The Yellow River Water Resources Commission has officially issued the "Guidelines for the Legality Review of Major Decision-Making Matters" marking a new phase of institutionalization, standardization, and normalization in legality review of major administrative decisions [1][2] - The guidelines aim to support ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River basin by implementing legal governance and standardizing administrative decision-making [1] Summary by Sections Legality Review Mechanism - The guidelines establish a comprehensive and efficient legality review mechanism focusing on the principles of "review all that should be reviewed, advance the review process, standardize procedures, and ensure legality" [1] - The review scope is comprehensive, ensuring that all decision-making matters submitted for meetings are included in the legality review, with specific exceptions for emergency responses, personnel matters, and party discipline [1] Review Focus and Elements - The review process emphasizes three core elements: authority, procedure, and content, ensuring that decisions comply with legal authority, necessary procedures, and national laws and policies [1][2] Submission Process and Efficiency - The guidelines specify the submission materials required for review, including a submission letter, decision draft, explanatory notes, and legal basis compilation, addressing issues of procedural rigor, time constraints, and quality stability [2] - The guidelines promote the use of digital tools, such as the "National Laws and Regulations Database," to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of the legality review process, contributing to the digital transformation of legal work [2] Legal Governance Enhancement - The implementation of the guidelines is a critical step for the Yellow River Water Resources Commission in advancing comprehensive legal governance and enhancing the level of government legal work [2]