本文来自微信公众号：Dr昕理学，作者：白鹿 张昕，题图来自：AI生成 我说这些，并不是要指责岳母不好，她一辈子都在退让和反思，不招灾，不惹事，甚至可以说是很有代 表性的"中国老实人"。 中国老实人受到儒家文化几千年的影响，最常见的人际交往和处理冲突的策略，就是"息事宁人"，表面 和谐是比个人诉求更重要的。 传统的"互依型自我"文化中，诉讼会破坏人际关系，导致冲突升级，所以"无讼"才是一种理想状态。完 美的"无讼"社会中，每个人都相互妥协，相互退让，牺牲利益，避免纠纷；遇到冲突，倾向于"私 了""退一步海阔天空" "吃亏是福"而非对簿公堂。 岳母那句"现在你们在警局就留下案底了，以后谁都知道你们是刺儿头"，就是很典型的"无讼"价值观， 对"好讼"行为充满了耻辱感和恐惧感。 但是随着"互依型"熟人社会向"独立型"陌生人社会的转变，"息事宁人"赖以生存的土壤也逐步瓦解， 极 端"无讼"观遇上极端"好讼"者，加上网络舆论的推波助澜，事情往往向着我们难以理解的方向失控。 本身猥亵和性骚扰的犯罪成本就很低了，现在我很悲催地发现，网暴的犯罪成本同样很低。一方面，真 正遭遇不法侵害的受害者维权依然艰难；而另一方面，构陷甚至只 ...

推荐一部丹麦电影——《狩猎》，该电影的经典之处，不仅在于首次将污蔑性骚扰这件事摆在了台面 上，而且电影极其符合现实的逻辑，每一个细节都能在现实中复刻，它真实到了一种什么程度，下文会 详细展开。 故事背景：丹麦的一个小镇上一共没多少人，人与人之间相互认识，可以说没有秘密可言。这个设定的 意义在于构建一个"熟人社会"，因为环境封闭，信息传播效率很高，社死的威力就更大。现实生活中， 常见的"熟人社会"有很多，比如农村、单位、学校。 故事情节也比较简单：男主卢卡斯（以下简称为"老卢"）是个老实人，在镇上人缘也很好，在一家幼儿 园当老师。小孩都很喜欢他，有个小女孩对他表达了好感，但老卢也知道避嫌，没做任何回应。小女孩 产生了一定的不满情绪，就去找园长告状，胡扯了一些容易联想到下三路的模糊信息。事后查明，小女 孩其实没什么恶意，只是单纯对老卢有点意见。当然她也想不到，自己随口的几句话，造成了多大的连 锁反应。 这事立刻引起了园长的重视，以迅雷不及掩耳之势停了老卢的职。 对，没错，一点石锤都没有，先把职停了再说。老卢也不是什么有钱人，生活立刻陷入困顿。 然后来了调查组，调查组对小女孩进行了提问，提问带有明显的诱导性。小女孩 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the limitations of the law in addressing issues like online violence and campus bullying, highlighting the case of the Wuhan University library false accusation as a classic example of these problems [1] - It emphasizes that campus bullies often target those perceived as weak, showcasing the ability of bullies to identify vulnerable individuals [2] - The article points out that the victim, Xiao, lacked awareness of human malice and was easily intimidated, leading to a series of unfortunate events [2][3] Group 2 - The response of individuals who are not easily bullied can differ significantly, with some choosing to confront their accusers aggressively [4] - The article illustrates how bystanders often contribute to the perpetuation of bullying by remaining passive, akin to a crowd ignoring violence [5] - It criticizes the typical school response to bullying, which often involves equal punishment for both parties, rather than a thorough investigation [6] Group 3 - The article raises doubts about the plausibility of the accusations against Xiao, questioning the circumstances and logic behind the claims [7][8][9] - It discusses the long-term psychological impact of bullying on victims, noting that the scars from such experiences can last a lifetime [10] - The article concludes that the consequences for bullies are often minimal, as societal memory fades and they may continue to thrive without accountability [14][15]

Core Points - The case involves a social media platform where personal information of an individual, Zheng, was illegally collected and publicly shared, leading to online harassment [1][2] - The Beijing Internet Court ruled that both the user who published the infringing content and the platform that failed to ensure information security must bear liability for the infringement [4][7] Group 1: Incident Overview - Zheng's personal information, including account details and identification documents, was illegally collected and published due to differing opinions on a celebrity event [2][4] - The platform only took minimal actions, such as making the content private or deleting it, without further measures to protect user information [1][9] Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The technology company claimed it fulfilled its legal obligations as a network service provider and argued that the personal information leak was not possible due to their security measures [2][8] - The defendant, Zhang, denied using the social media platform and claimed the IP address of the infringing account was from a foreign country, but did not provide evidence of account theft [3][4] Group 3: Court Findings - The court determined that Zhang was the actual user of the infringing account and had violated Zheng's privacy and reputation by publicly sharing sensitive information [4][6] - The court highlighted that the technology company had data security management vulnerabilities and failed to take adequate measures to protect user information, leading to multiple users being similarly affected [8][9] Group 4: Implications for the Industry - The case illustrates the emerging trend of "opening boxes" as a form of online violence, combining doxxing and cyberbullying [10] - The court emphasized that online platforms must continuously improve their technical and management measures to fulfill their obligations in safeguarding personal information [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing prevalence of online harassment and the challenges faced by individuals who voice opinions, particularly in the context of the automotive industry and the proposal to lower autonomous driving standards to a "60-point" minimum [1][5]. Group 1: Online Harassment and Public Response - The online backlash against Professor Zhu Xichan, who suggested lowering autonomous driving standards, has led to widespread criticism and personal attacks, highlighting the risks of speaking out in the current digital environment [1][3]. - The criticism stems from a misinterpretation of Zhu's proposal, which was intended to encourage industry development rather than compromise safety [1][5]. Group 2: Industry Context and Implications - Zhu Xichan is recognized as a leading expert in automotive safety, and his insights are considered valuable during a critical transformation period in China's automotive industry [5]. - The push for stricter autonomous driving standards is influenced by recent incidents, such as the Xiaomi automotive accident, which has catalyzed discussions on safety regulations [6]. - The debate over the standards is not only about safety but also involves competitive dynamics among automotive companies, with some stakeholders advocating for higher standards to limit competition [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The newly revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law in China aims to address the rising and increasingly younger demographic of juvenile delinquency, emphasizing the need for stronger legal deterrence and a more comprehensive legal framework to prevent juvenile crime [1][2][3] Group 1: Legislative Changes - The revised law will take effect on January 1, 2026, and includes significant changes regarding minors, such as adjusting the conditions for administrative detention and ensuring timely police intervention in school bullying cases [1] - The law reflects a shift towards enhancing legal deterrence and improving the legal system's coherence in dealing with juvenile delinquency [1][2] Group 2: Social Context and Issues - The narrative of the British series "Adolescence" (translated as "混沌少年时") parallels real-life juvenile crime cases, highlighting the complexities of adolescent behavior and the underlying social issues [2][3] - The series illustrates that juvenile crime often stems from everyday interactions and pressures, suggesting that the motivations for such acts may be rooted in social dynamics rather than inherent malice [8][19] Group 3: Parental and Educational Roles - The series raises questions about parental responsibility in preventing juvenile crime, emphasizing the disconnect between parents and their children's experiences, particularly during adolescence [10][11] - It critiques the inability of educators to recognize and address the psychological crises faced by students, which can lead to tragic outcomes [7][10] Group 4: Impact of Social Media - The role of social media in facilitating bullying and the spread of harmful behaviors among minors is a significant concern, as it can amplify negative interactions and lead to severe consequences [14][15] - The series highlights how online platforms can become tools for both bullying and victimization, creating a toxic environment for adolescents [15][18] Group 5: Broader Societal Implications - The discussion extends to the societal factors contributing to juvenile delinquency, suggesting that structural issues within society may play a critical role in shaping youth behavior [19][20] - The need for a more inclusive and diverse evaluation system for youth is emphasized, advocating for a cultural shift that allows children to find their identity without resorting to harmful behaviors [21][22]

Core Viewpoint - The film "Malice," written and produced by Chen Sicheng, has received a mediocre rating of 6.3 on Douban, similar to his previous works, but its box office performance is significantly lower than expected, with a forecast of only 270 million yuan compared to over 400 million for competing imported films [1][4][5]. Group 1: Film Performance - "Malice" is projected to earn 270 million yuan, a stark contrast to the pre-release expectations of 400 to 500 million yuan [5]. - Competing films such as "Jurassic World: Dominion," "F1: Drive to Survive," and "Detective Conan: The Scarlet Bullet" are expected to surpass 400 million yuan in total box office [5][12]. - The film's box office trajectory has been flat, indicating a lack of audience engagement and interest [9][8]. Group 2: Marketing and Audience Reception - The film's low marketing budget has contributed to its poor performance, with only 46 marketing events compared to 148 for a competing film [7]. - The film's themes, which include social issues like online violence and the stigmatization of women, have not resonated with audiences, leading to a lack of emotional engagement [4][16]. - The film's critical stance towards the audience may have alienated potential viewers, as many are not inclined to pay for a film that critiques them [18][17]. Group 3: Comparison with Previous Works - Chen Sicheng's previous films, such as "The Disappearing Act" and "The Killing," successfully tapped into audience preferences for revenge narratives, while "Malice" has failed to do so [4][13]. - The success of "The Disappearing Act," which grossed 3.523 billion yuan, was attributed to its engaging themes, contrasting sharply with "Malice" [8][15]. - The decline in Chen Sicheng's appeal to frequent moviegoers is evident, as his recent works have struggled to maintain strong box office performances [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The article explores the story of a 17-year-old high school student who operates an AI-generated comment account called "暖言猫猫" on Bilibili, providing comforting responses to users in distress, highlighting the intersection of AI and human emotion in online interactions [18][39][44]. Group 1: Background of the Account - The account "暖言猫猫" gained significant popularity with nearly 500,000 followers and a video that reached 1.3 million views, despite having only one video posted [2][4]. - The creator of the account, a high school student, uses AI to craft warm and supportive comments for users sharing their struggles, creating a persona that contrasts with his real-life introverted nature [18][20][36]. Group 2: Interaction and Impact - The account's creator began responding to users after being inspired by a particularly sad post about a birthday disappointment, leading to a surge in followers as users sought his comforting replies [26][28]. - The responses often reflect genuine empathy, addressing various personal issues, such as academic stress and family problems, showcasing the emotional connection formed through these interactions [12][30][33]. Group 3: Challenges Faced - Following the account's rise in popularity, the creator faced online harassment and doxxing, with personal information being exposed and false accusations circulating [34][36]. - Despite the challenges, the supportive community that formed around the account helped combat the negativity, demonstrating the power of online friendships and solidarity [36][38]. Group 4: Future Aspirations - The creator is currently preparing for college entrance exams while also studying psychology, indicating a desire to continue helping others in a more formal capacity in the future [36][40]. - The article suggests that the phenomenon of supportive online personas may continue to grow, with more individuals inspired to provide kindness in digital spaces [36][41].

Core Viewpoint - The recent court ruling on the Liu Xuezhou cyberbullying case highlights the legal accountability of online influencers for their harmful comments, particularly regarding the protection of minors and the consequences of online violence [1][3][4] Group 1: Case Background - Liu Xuezhou gained public attention after posting a video seeking his biological parents in December 2021, but tragically took his own life in January 2022 due to severe online bullying [1] - The court ruled on June 9, 2023, that two prominent online figures were liable for defamation and ordered them to apologize and pay a total of 57,000 yuan (approximately 8,000 USD) for mental damages and legal fees [1][2] Group 2: Legal Implications - The court recognized the difficulty in establishing a direct causal link between individual comments and Liu's suicide, but emphasized that the cumulative effect of the online harassment significantly impacted his mental health [2][3] - The ruling serves as a precedent, indicating that both influential figures and anonymous participants in online bullying can be held accountable for their actions, countering the "law does not punish the crowd" mentality [3][4] Group 3: Legislative Context - Recent legal frameworks, including the "Guiding Opinions on Punishing Cyber Violence" and the "Regulations on the Protection of Minors Online," aim to strengthen protections against online bullying and ensure that individuals and organizations cannot harm minors through digital platforms [4]

Group 1 - The case of Liu Xuezhou's online bullying leading to his death highlights the importance of both prevention and accountability in addressing online violence [1][2] - The court ruling emphasized the "cumulative effect" of online bullying, indicating that even individual comments can contribute to a larger wave of violence, thus holding participants accountable [2][3] - The ruling also reflects the need for enhanced protection for minors in the digital space, as they are particularly vulnerable to online attacks and may suffer long-lasting psychological impacts [2][3][4] Group 2 - A survey indicated that over half of the interviewed minors have experienced online bullying, with nearly 30% reporting feelings of depression following such incidents [3] - China's legal framework provides comprehensive protections for minors, including laws that safeguard their personal rights and establish clear pathways for addressing online violence [3][4] - The case underscores the necessity for proactive measures, such as education on online behavior and mental health support, to prevent future tragedies involving minors [4][5]