面对AIT抛出的谬论，民进党当局宛如抓住了救命稻草。"台独"势力对"台湾地位未定"的鼓吹并非始于 今日。自20世纪90年代以来，随着"台独"思潮在岛内蔓延，部分分裂势力便将这一谬论当作"理论武 器"，不断宣称台湾的"地位尚未确定"，旨在为"公投决定台湾前途"制造舆论和理论铺垫——他们试图 通过歪曲历史和国际法，误导台湾民众认为"台湾的前途地位应由2300万台湾人民自行决定"，进而为最 终推动"台湾独立"。此次民进党当局急不可耐地呼应AIT的谬论，正是这一长期"台独"策略的延续。民 进党将AIT的谬论，当作构造"一中一台""台湾独立"的"法理依据"，殊不知AIT的"未定论"不过是美国短 期政治博弈的话术，从未承诺保护"台独"。 值得警惕的是，从历史上看，尽管美国一些政客与"台独"势力鼓吹"台湾地位未定"的目的存在差异—— 美国鼓吹"未定论"的核心目的是插手台湾问题、"以台制华"，以及出于地缘政治博弈的霸权需求， 而"台独"势力则是为了实现"台独"目标。然而，近年来两者形成了相互勾连、彼此唱和的表演套路。例 如，在对联合国大会第2758号决议的立场上，美国反华势力与"台独"势力口径日趋一致，均刻意歪曲决 议对一个 ...

王毅转达习近平主席的亲切问候，表示在两国元首战略引领下，中波全面战略伙伴关系保持稳定 发展。中方愿同波方继续深化战略互信，增进战略合作，共同推动中波全面战略伙伴关系不断向 前发展。希望波方为推动欧盟树立客观理性对华认知发挥积极作用。 新华社华沙9月15日电 当地时间2025年9月15日，波兰总统纳夫罗茨基在华沙会见中共中央政治 局委员、外交部长王毅。 纳夫罗茨基请王毅转达对习近平主席的诚挚问候，赞赏中国取得举世瞩目的发展成就。纳表示， 波兰是最早同新中国建交的国家之一，两国之间一直保持良好友谊。作为历史学家，我深知中国 当年为抗战胜利作出巨大牺牲和贡献。波方珍视同中方传统友好，愿同中方加强交往，深化合 作，以史为鉴，推动两国关系持续发展，共同维护世界和平与安全。 双方还就乌克兰危机等共同关心的问题交换意见。 访问期间，王毅同波兰副总理兼外长西科尔斯基举行会谈，并召开中波政府间合作委员会第四次 全会。 王毅说，中波都是独立自主的国家，都坚定维护国家主权和领土完整。"台独"势力试图分裂国 家，挑战二战胜利成果，是冒天下之大不韪，注定以失败告终。相信波方将继续奉行一个中国政 策，支持中国国家统一大业。纳表示，波兰政 ...

林剑说，无论民进党当局如何炒作所谓"大陆威胁"，渲染台海紧张，拿着台湾老百姓的血汗钱企图"倚 外谋独"，都改变不了两岸同属一个中国的客观事实，更阻挡不了中国终将统一、也必将统一的历史大 势。送给邱垂正之流一句话，靠出卖民族利益，搞"台独"分裂，不过是蝇营狗苟、小丑跳梁，终是枉 然，必遭失败。 责任编辑：王许宁 【环球时报-环球网报道 记者 索炎琦】外交部发言人林剑主持9月15日例行记者会。会上有记者提问 称：我们注意到中国台湾地区陆委会主委邱垂正近期窜访美国时，与美国会两党议员会面，并在美智库 传统基金会演讲，期间邱称中国大陆是台海和平稳定的"最大威胁"，炒作所谓"大陆武力攻台"，感谢美 重申对台承诺，请问发言人对此有何评论？ 林剑对此表示，世界上只有一个中国，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，这是台海的真正现状，"台 独"分裂和外部势力纵容支持是台海和平稳定的最大威胁。中方坚决反对任何形式的美台官方往来和军 事勾连，坚定捍卫国家主权和领土完整。我们敦促美方切实恪守一个中国原则和中美三个联合公报，停 止向"台独"分裂势力发出错误信号。 ...

无论民进党当局如何炒作所谓"大陆威胁"，渲染台海紧张，拿着台湾老百姓的血汗钱企图"倚外谋独"都 改变不了两岸同属一个中国的客观事实，更阻挡不了中国必将统一、也终将统一的历史大势。 据央视新闻消息，9月15日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。有记者就中国台湾地区陆委会主委邱 垂正近期窜访美国，并炒作所谓"大陆武力攻台"提问。 郭嘉昆表示，世界上只有一个中国，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，这是台海的真正现状。" 台 独"分裂和外部势力纵容支持，是台海和平稳定最大威胁。中方坚决反对任何形式的美台官方往来、军 事勾连，坚定捍卫国家主权和领土完整。我们敦促美方切实恪守一个中国原则和中美三个联合公报停止 向" 台独"分裂势力发出错误信号。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the upcoming Kuomintang (KMT) chairperson election in Taiwan and the skepticism surrounding the new leader's potential to promote cross-strait unification, as expressed by Taiwanese internet celebrity "Guanzhang" (Chen Zhihan) [1][4]. Group 1: Election Context - The KMT chairperson election is a significant political event in Taiwan, attracting attention from both local and mainland Chinese audiences [1]. - The registration period for candidates is from September 15 to 19, with the number of participants to be revealed on Friday [1]. Group 2: Guanzhang's Perspective - Guanzhang asserts that the new KMT chairperson will not aid in unification efforts, emphasizing that their primary goal is to gain power and wealth in Taiwan [4]. - He advises mainland Chinese to abandon their hopes regarding the KMT's role in unification, stating that the party's leadership will not change their relationship with mainland China [4]. Group 3: KMT's Position on Unification - The article suggests that the KMT's historical view of cross-strait relations is flawed, as many KMT members mistakenly regard mainland China as their homeland rather than Taiwan [6]. - The KMT's current leadership is seen as lacking genuine commitment to unification, with the party's future actions dependent on its electoral success in upcoming elections [12]. Group 4: Future Implications - The article posits that the KMT's ability to either promote or hinder unification will be influenced by its performance in the 2026 and 2028 elections [11]. - If the KMT faces significant losses, it may become more supportive of unification; conversely, electoral victories could lead to increased demands from the party regarding the unification process [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes its stance on sovereignty and territorial integrity regarding Taiwan and expresses concerns over international relations, particularly with the U.S. and the Middle East situation [2][3][4][5][6]. Group 1: Taiwan Strait and Military Activities - The Fujian aircraft carrier's passage through the Taiwan Strait is described as a normal arrangement for scientific testing and training, not targeting any specific goal [2]. - The Chinese government reaffirms that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and opposes any official exchanges between Taiwan and other countries, particularly in Europe [3]. Group 2: U.S. Relations and Statements - The Chinese government condemns illegal violence and opposes U.S. politicians who use China as a scapegoat, as well as the spread of false information about China [4]. - There is a strong opposition to unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S. on entities like the Houthi movement in Yemen, which is viewed as a violation of international law [6]. Group 3: Middle East Situation - The Chinese government expresses deep concern over the escalating situation in the Middle East, condemning actions that violate the sovereignty and security of Middle Eastern countries and calling for peace and negotiation efforts [5].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes China's stance on sovereignty and territorial integrity, particularly regarding Taiwan and its military activities in the Taiwan Strait [2][3][4] - The article highlights China's condemnation of foreign interference in its internal affairs, specifically regarding Taiwan's international engagements and the actions of certain U.S. politicians [3][4] - It expresses China's concerns over the escalating situation in the Middle East, advocating for peace and dialogue rather than violence [5][6] Group 2 - The article discusses China's opposition to unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S., labeling them as violations of international law and norms [6] - It reiterates China's commitment to its national interests and the principle of one China, urging other nations to respect this stance [3][4] - The article calls for international cooperation to address regional conflicts and emphasizes the importance of restoring stability through negotiation [5]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes any official exchanges between Taiwan and countries that have diplomatic relations with China, emphasizing that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that any attempts to promote "Taiwan independence" will ultimately fail [1] Group 1 - The spokesperson, Lin Jian, highlighted that the individual in question is merely a local foreign affairs official from Taiwan [1] - The Chinese government has expressed strong dissatisfaction and has lodged formal representations with relevant countries regarding their interactions with Taiwan [1] - There is a call for European countries to adhere to the One China principle and take effective measures to prevent visits by "Taiwan independence" figures [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns the Taiwan authorities that the pursuit of "Taiwan independence" is a dead end [1] - Any attempts to create the notion of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" in the international community are destined to fail [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government reaffirms its stance that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and opposes any official exchanges between Taiwan and countries that have diplomatic relations with China [1] Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasizes that there is only one China and that Taiwan is a part of its territory [1] - The Ministry expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to any support for "Taiwan independence" activities and has lodged serious representations to relevant countries [1] - The Ministry urges European countries to adhere to the one-China principle and take effective measures to prevent visits by "Taiwan independence" figures [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns Taiwan authorities that "Taiwan independence" is a dead end and that any attempts to create the notion of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" will ultimately fail [1]

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) regarding historical claims about Taiwan and the Chinese Communist Party's role in World War II are characterized as a distortion of history and an attempt to mislead public opinion [1][2] Group 1: Historical Context - The Chinese people made significant sacrifices during the 14-year War of Resistance against Japan, with approximately 35 million casualties, contributing to the victory in the anti-fascist struggle [1] - International legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation confirmed China's sovereignty over Taiwan, which was returned to China after the war [1] Group 2: Political Implications - The DPP's narrative of a "mainland threat" and the promotion of a false dichotomy between democracy and authoritarianism are seen as manipulative tactics to mislead both domestic and international audiences [2] - Any attempts to distort the history of World War II or undermine the achievements of the war are deemed futile, and the historical and legal facts affirming Taiwan as part of China cannot be altered [2]