转自：北京日报客户端 据报道，台当局近日更新"出口管制名单"，将华为和中芯国际列入。如岛内厂商想"出口"给管制名单中 的实体，须先取得台"国贸署"许可。不难看出，此举是台当局对美国遏华政策的又一次跟进。 谁都能看出，对美国，台湾只是一张"牌"；但对中国而言，台湾事关核心利益。我们具有坚定意志解决 台湾问题、实现国家统一，维护国家主权和领土完整的能力坚不可摧，反对"台独"分裂和外来干涉的行 动坚决有力。无论是谁、无论如何折腾，挑衅愈甚，反制也将愈烈。 众所周知，将华为和中芯国际列入"黑名单"，是美国泛化国家安全概念，滥用出口管制和长臂管辖的产 物。此前，台湾也禁止了向大陆"出口"光刻机等关键芯片制造设备，但基于岛内产业结构和发展所需， 并未将大陆主要科技企业或芯片制造商统统禁掉。据统计，2024年台湾第一大"出口"市场为大陆及香 港，占整体比重的31.7%，出口额为1506.19亿美元，其中约六成是电子产品。联系如此紧密，却在此刻 切断，有专家分析，不排除是台当局希望抓住这一轮中美贸易谈判的当口，发布"出口禁令"，"显示出 与美国的协作性"。 然而，这些年，台独的"投名状"一直没断过，美国真买账吗？在美国利益面 ...

Group 1: Cross-Strait Relations - The 17th Straits Forum held in Xiamen, Fujian, focused on "expanding civil exchanges and deepening integrated development," with over 7,000 attendees from Taiwan, including former Kuomintang Chairman Ma Ying-jeou [1] - The Taiwanese "Tourism Bureau" rejected an application for mainland personnel to hold the "2025 Cross-Strait Taipei Summer Travel Exhibition," marking the first interruption due to non-pandemic factors, which disrupts long-established cooperation mechanisms in the tourism industry [1] - The absence of mainland exhibitors at the travel exhibition will hinder the presentation of cross-strait tourism resources and reduce opportunities for collaboration, impacting tourism project negotiations and promotions [1] Group 2: Economic Impact - The Taiwanese "International Trade Bureau" has blacklisted Huawei, SMIC, and their subsidiaries, severing cooperation in technology research, technical exchanges, and supply chains, which negatively affects Taiwan's economy and livelihoods [2] - The blacklisting of Huawei and SMIC will disrupt existing partnerships and reduce orders for Taiwanese companies, potentially leading to layoffs and increased unemployment rates in Taiwan [2] - The DPP's actions to block cross-strait exchanges are part of a broader strategy to achieve "Taiwan independence," which includes restrictions on tourism and educational exchanges, increasing costs and risks for Taiwanese citizens [3] Group 3: Policy Comparison - The DPP's policies are characterized by a closed and obstructive approach, contrasting with the mainland's open and proactive stance, leading to a struggle between "anti-independence and pro-unification" versus "independence and rejection of unification" [4] - The DPP's narrative distorts the essence of cross-strait exchanges, labeling them as political maneuvers and claiming that the mainland uses economic ties to bind Taiwan [4] - The DPP's obstruction of cross-strait exchanges not only undermines peace and stability in cross-strait relations but also directly impacts Taiwan's economy, society, and livelihoods [4]

6月13日下午，国防部新闻局副局长、国防部新闻发言人蒋斌大校就近期涉军问题发布消息。蒋斌：台 湾问题纯属中国内政，不容任何外来干涉。任何怂恿支持"台独"分子搞分裂的行径，都只会破坏台海和 地区和平稳定，也必将引火烧身、自食苦果。我们敦促有关国家切实恪守一个中国原则，停止向"台 独"分裂势力发出任何错误信号。在祖国终将统一、必将统一的历史大势面前，任何"倚外谋独"、"以台 制华"的图谋都注定失败。(国防部发布) ...

Group 1 - The core argument is that the actions of Lai Ching-te and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are seen as a facade for promoting "Taiwan independence" under the guise of "democracy and freedom," misleading both the international community and the Taiwanese public [1][2][3] - The DPP is accused of distorting the concept of "one China" and using it to label legitimate governance as "authoritarian," while framing their separatist actions as a defense of democracy [2][3] - The DPP's policies are characterized as a form of "green terror," suppressing dissent and limiting freedom of expression through political persecution and media manipulation [3][4] Group 2 - The DPP's military budget has reached historical highs, and they are implementing policies aimed at creating a wartime society, which is seen as a provocation that undermines cross-strait relations [4] - Public dissatisfaction with Lai Ching-te's governance is highlighted, with over 53% of the population expressing discontent, marking the highest dissatisfaction rate for a leader's first anniversary in nearly 30 years [4] - The DPP's economic policies are criticized for exacerbating wealth inequality and failing to address the low wage crisis faced by the younger generation in Taiwan [4][5] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that the essence of democracy is to ensure that the people's will is reflected in governance, contrasting this with the DPP's approach [5] - It argues that only under the framework of national unity can the democratic rights and welfare of Taiwanese people be genuinely safeguarded [5][6] - The narrative concludes that any separatist actions disguised as "democracy" are a betrayal of historical justice and national integrity, with a warning that those who persist in such actions will be condemned by history [6]

记者：据报道，特朗普政府计划在第二任期大幅增加对台军售，预计未来4年批准对台军售规模将超 过其第一任期的总额183亿美元；美方还施压台"在野党"勿阻挡民进党当局提高防务预算。此外，赖 清德表示台防务预算要达GDP3%或更高。对此有何评论？ 国台办发言人朱凤莲：我们坚决反对美国向中国台湾地区出售武器，敦促美方恪守一个中国原则和 中美三个联合公报规定，慎重处理台湾问题，停止售台武器，停止"武装台湾"，停止支持怂恿"台 独"分裂势力"以武谋独"。 近期有岛内民调显示，超过六成的受访者认为，美国要求台湾提高军购费用，是想卖军火赚更多 钱。这充分证明，越来越多的台湾民众认清了美国把台湾当"提款机"、"火药桶"的险恶用心。但赖 清德当局为谋取"台独"私利，悖逆民意，置岛内安全利益于不顾，甘当鱼肉任人宰割，无底线"卖 台"、"害台"。这种"倚外谋独"、"以武谋独"的行径注定失败。 国台办举行例行新闻发布会。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The statement by US Vice President Vance indicates a shift in US foreign policy towards prioritizing core American interests and avoiding involvement in endless conflicts, which may undermine the "Taiwan independence" narrative and suggest that the US may not intervene in a Taiwan Strait conflict [1] Group 1 - The Taiwan issue is characterized as an internal matter of China, with no room for foreign interference [1] - The US is urged to handle the Taiwan issue with caution to prevent a dangerous confrontation between China and the US, driven by a minority of "Taiwan independence" advocates [1] - There is a growing recognition among Taiwanese citizens that the US prioritizes its own interests and views Taiwan merely as a pawn in its strategy to contain mainland China [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by mainland spouses in Taiwan due to the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) requirement for them to provide a "loss of nationality certificate," with only about 3,000 out of 12,000 completing the process, leading to potential cancellation of their household registration in Taiwan [1] Group 1 - The cross-strait marriage community is described as a vivid representation of "one family across the strait," emphasizing that mainland spouses are family members of Taiwanese residents and deserve fair treatment in Taiwan [1] - The DPP is accused of discriminating against and oppressing mainland spouses in Taiwan, using administrative and judicial means to bully and persecute them, which is seen as a violation of human rights [1] - The article mentions that the DPP's actions have faced strong condemnation and opposition from public opinion within Taiwan [1] Group 2 - The State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office has launched a reporting section on its website for individuals to report the DPP's persecution of mainland spouses, encouraging those affected or with relevant information to submit their cases [1] - The office promises to hold accountable and punish those who cooperate with the DPP in persecuting mainland spouses, based on facts and legal standards [1]

此外，凌涛亦曾揭露，民进党前民代郑运鹏在2008年民代选举败选后，曾到大陆经商，并于同年10月24 日向知识产权局提出"专利申请文件"，当时郑运鹏填写国籍为"中国"，申请地址是"中国台湾省台北 市"。 沈伯洋父 亲沈土城担任负责人的兆亿有限公司在海关总署的在案登记记录。 图片来源：台媒 沈伯洋被视为民进党"抗中保台"的"英雄"和"急先锋"，常用"高标准"抹黑其他台湾人在大陆从事经贸、 文化、教育或学术交流。随着其"两面人"真实面目被揭穿、"抗中保台"人设崩塌，引来岛内舆论猛烈抨 击和挞伐。 台湾"中时新闻网"引述前民代郭正亮观点指出，"沈伯洋此人最恶心，"他整天指责别人赚大陆钱、是所 谓"中共同路人"，自己创办的"黑熊学院"却售卖大陆制造的"淘宝货"，如今又被查出其父在大陆做生意 将近20年，"赖清德要不要调查？" 台湾《联合报》引述台北市议员柳采葳质问民进党，将沈伯洋列为不分区民代，将其人设打造为所 谓"抗中保台"第一人，究竟是事先不知情、查证无能，还是明知真相却刻意操弄两岸意识形态骗取选 票？ 中新网6月10日电（燕新台）"台独"顽固分子沈伯洋近日被港媒曝光，其家族企业曾在大陆捞金，且交 易金额高达上亿元 ...

国防部：正告民进党当局 美制武器救不了自己的命 6月9日下午，国防部新闻局副局长、国防部新闻发言人蒋斌大校就近期涉军问题发布消息。 来源：国防部发布 责编：罗晓霞 校对：陶谦 记者：据报道，美正向台湾运送新一批M1A2坦克，并计划未来4年增加对台售武，或超过特朗普第一任 期水平。此外，美军前官员称约有500名美军人员在台湾活动，这是美国会此前披露数字的十倍以上。请 问发言人有何评论？ 蒋斌：这是由美方和"台独"势力主导、侵犯中方核心利益、妄图改变台海现状、推高台海紧张局势的又一 起实证。谁在不顾中方坚决反对一味挑衅？谁又在破坏台海稳定反复拱火滋事？相信世人一目了然。我们 对此强烈不满、坚决反对。 违法和不良信息举报电话：0755-83514034 邮箱：bwb@stcn.com 台湾问题是中国核心利益中的核心，是中美关系第一条不可逾越的红线。我们敦促美方停止与中国台湾任 何形式的军事勾连，否则只会引火烧身、得不偿失；正告民进党当局美制武器救不了自己的命，"倚外谋 独"注定失败。解放军将继续加强练兵备战，全面提升打赢能力，坚决粉碎"台独"分裂和外来干涉图谋。 百万用户都在看 关税，突传重磅！日本、韩国、欧盟，发 ...

Group 1 - The core stance of the article emphasizes that both the China Times and the Wang Wang Group assert that Taiwanese people are Chinese, advocating for adherence to the constitution and peaceful cross-strait relations [2][12] - The article discusses the backlash from the Taiwanese Mainland Affairs Council against the Wang Wang Group's participation in a cross-strait cultural summit, accusing them of undermining Taiwan's sovereignty [2][3] - The article highlights the contrasting positions of the Taiwan authorities and the China Times, with the former being described as authoritarian and the latter standing firm on their beliefs [3][4] Group 2 - The article notes a recent trend in Taiwan where discussions about cross-strait relations are approaching a critical point, with both blue and green camps engaging in more open dialogue [5] - It mentions that Lai Ching-te's unexpected "merger theory" suggests a shift in the political landscape, indicating a potential willingness to engage with mainland China [6][7] - The article points out that the China Times has been actively publishing editorials advocating for improved cross-strait relations, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for dialogue [9][10]