Core Viewpoint - The article highlights concerns regarding the impact of U.S. policies on Taiwan's economy and industries, emphasizing that the Taiwanese government is compromising local interests for external support [1] Group 1: U.S. Influence on Taiwan - The U.S. is accused of using tariffs and other means to undermine Taiwan's industries, leading to significant distress among the Taiwanese populace [1] - The Taiwanese government, particularly the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), is criticized for its submissive stance towards the U.S., which is perceived as detrimental to the welfare of the Taiwanese people [1] Group 2: Economic Consequences - The article suggests that the DPP's alignment with U.S. interests is at the expense of Taiwan's economic prospects and the well-being of its citizens [1] - There is a growing recognition among the Taiwanese public that U.S. policies prioritize American interests over Taiwan's, potentially leading to adverse outcomes for local industries [1] Group 3: Public Sentiment - The actions of the DPP are described as damaging to the foundational development of Taiwan's industries and the welfare of its citizens, which could result in public backlash [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the negative impact of U.S. trade policies on Taiwan's industries, particularly the semiconductor sector, which is now viewed as a "weak industry" due to U.S. exploitation [1][2] - The Taiwanese government is criticized for its lack of principles in dealing with the U.S., leading to a situation where local industries are forced to compromise and cede control to American interests [1] - The so-called "Taiwan model" proposed by the Taiwanese authorities is described as a facade for selling out to the U.S., which will result in a detrimental outflow of resources from Taiwan [1] Group 2 - The U.S. Department of Agriculture's recent visit to Taiwan aimed to secure a 30% increase in agricultural product purchases over the next four years, which is seen as a form of economic bullying [2] - The Taiwanese agricultural sector is at risk of becoming a dumping ground for U.S. products, which could severely impact local prices and the livelihoods of Taiwanese farmers [2] - The article suggests that the U.S. views Taiwan primarily as a tool for its geopolitical strategies against China, rather than as a partner [2]

Group 1 - The article discusses the recent comments made by U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo regarding a trade agreement with Taiwan, emphasizing the "50-50" concept in semiconductor manufacturing, which has been denied by the Taiwanese authorities [1][3] - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, Chen Binhua, criticized the U.S. for prioritizing its own interests and highlighted the absurdity of the Taiwanese government's claims about the best-ever Taiwan-U.S. relations, suggesting that such compromises only lead to increased pressure from the U.S. [3] - The semiconductor industry, identified as Taiwan's core competitive advantage, is portrayed as being exploited by the U.S., with the article attributing this situation to the Taiwanese government's reliance on external forces for independence, leading to a lack of principles and concessions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's approach towards Taiwan's semiconductor industry is perceived as exploitative, with the Taiwanese authorities criticized for their lack of resistance to U.S. demands [1] Group 1: U.S.-Taiwan Trade Relations - U.S. Commerce Secretary's statement about a trade agreement with Taiwan highlights the ongoing negotiations regarding tariffs, which the Taiwanese government denies [1] - The Taiwanese industry views the U.S. stance as coercive, suggesting that it is unfair to Taiwan and TSMC [1] Group 2: Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry - Taiwan's semiconductor industry, once a competitive advantage, is now seen as vulnerable to U.S. exploitation due to the Taiwanese government's conciliatory policies [1] - The current situation is described as a shift from a position of strength to one of desperation, reflecting a decline in Taiwan's industrial autonomy [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent agreement between Taiwan and the U.S. for a $10 billion agricultural procurement is criticized as detrimental to Taiwan's agricultural sector, with concerns that it will lead to market disruption and reduced income for local farmers [1] Group 1: Economic Impact - The procurement agreement involves Taiwan committing to purchase over $10 billion (approximately NT$301 billion) worth of agricultural products from the U.S. over four years [1] - This large-scale purchase is expected to negatively impact Taiwan's agricultural market, affecting prices and sales channels for local products [1] Group 2: Political Commentary - The spokesperson from the Taiwan Affairs Office criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for compromising Taiwan's interests in favor of U.S. relations, labeling it as "kneeling to the U.S." [1] - There is a growing sentiment among the Taiwanese public that U.S. policies prioritize American interests, potentially leading to Taiwan being exploited economically [1]

Core Viewpoint - The sentiment in Taiwan is shifting from pro-American to anti-American, as evidenced by a significant increase in negative perceptions of the U.S. among the Taiwanese population, particularly in light of the U.S. imposing a "20%+N" tariff on Taiwan [1] Group 1 - A report from the Hopkins Association indicates that 40.5% of Taiwanese people hold a negative view of the U.S., marking a substantial increase of 16.3 percentage points since July 2024 [1] - The spokesperson, Zhu Fenglian, emphasized that the Taiwanese authorities' reliance on the U.S. is misguided, as the U.S. prioritizes its own interests above all [1] - Zhu highlighted that the future and well-being of Taiwan depend on peaceful cross-strait relations and national unification, suggesting that the mainland's strong economic foundation offers better opportunities for Taiwanese businesses [1]

Core Viewpoint - The commentary from the spokesperson highlights the U.S. prioritization of its own interests, using the guise of "security guarantees" to extract "protection fees" from Taiwan, while asserting that Taiwan's independence efforts will ultimately lead to abandonment [1] Group 1 - The U.S. is perceived to be leveraging Taiwan's security concerns to further its own agenda, as indicated by the remarks from the Brookings Institution scholar [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes that no matter what strategies the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) employs in collaboration with external forces, it cannot alter the fact that Taiwan is part of China [1] - The statement reinforces the international community's commitment to the one-China principle, suggesting that Taiwan's attempts at independence will not change this fundamental stance [1]

Group 1 - The United States is leveraging tariffs as a new diplomatic tool, pressuring South Korea to make concessions in various areas, including defense spending [1] - The U.S. has demanded South Korea increase its defense budget from 2.6% of GDP to 3.8%, effectively forcing South Korea to allocate more funds for defense [1] - The U.S. is also pushing for an increase in the cost-sharing for U.S. troops stationed in South Korea, with a demand of $1 billion for 2024 [3] Group 2 - The U.S. is adopting an isolationist approach, prioritizing its own interests, which includes demanding higher defense spending from South Korea and Japan [5] - South Korea's increased defense budget will benefit the U.S. as it purchases more military equipment, such as the F-35A fighter jets [5] - Japan is also under pressure to increase military spending and has committed to purchasing more U.S. weapons, indicating a deep military partnership [7] Group 3 - Despite the potential for increased tariff revenue, the U.S. is facing a significant national debt exceeding $37 trillion, highlighting a fiscal crisis [8] - The U.S. is trapped in a cycle of fiscal deficits, leading to the necessity of issuing more debt, which could have severe implications for the economy [8]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the U.S. is increasingly dependent on China despite initiating a tariff war, as China's industrial output has surpassed that of the U.S. [1] - The U.S. has conducted two rounds of trade talks with China and has ceased its tariff war, seeking cooperation on rare earth regulations [3] - The U.S. initiated the tariff war primarily to increase fiscal revenue, but this has led to rising prices that are being passed onto American consumers [5] Group 2 - The trade scale between China and the U.S. is significant, with China enjoying a large trade surplus from the U.S. market [6] - The U.S. Republican government’s actions are seen as detrimental to the interests of ordinary American citizens, as recent budget bills have favored the wealthy while burdening the general populace [6] - The U.S. Treasury Secretary's call for citizens to contribute to repaying national debt highlights the government's strategy of shifting financial burdens onto the public [8]

Core Points - The United States has announced its third withdrawal from UNESCO, reflecting its "America First" stance and prioritizing national interests over international laws and rules [1][2][3] - This decision is seen as part of a broader trend of unilateralism by the U.S., which is perceived to weaken its soft power and international influence [1][3] - The withdrawal will take effect on December 31, 2026, and is attributed to the U.S. government's belief that UNESCO promotes divisive social and cultural initiatives [2][4] Group 1: U.S. Withdrawal from UNESCO - The U.S. has previously withdrawn from UNESCO twice, first in 1984 due to allegations of corruption and mismanagement, and again in 2017 [4] - The current withdrawal is based on ideological differences and a lack of willingness to lead globally, rather than solely financial considerations [3][4] - UNESCO's budget has been growing, with voluntary contributions doubling since 2018, despite the U.S. reducing its financial support [4][5] Group 2: International Reactions and Implications - UNESCO's Director-General expressed regret over the U.S. decision, emphasizing that it contradicts the principles of multilateralism [2][3] - The Chinese government has criticized the U.S. for its lack of responsibility as a major power and has reiterated its commitment to multilateralism and support for UNESCO [2][5] - The withdrawal raises questions about the reliability of the U.S. in international organizations and may create opportunities for China to enhance its influence within UNESCO [3][4]