来源：参考消息 转自：北京日报客户端 据韩联社12月23日报道，二战时期被日军强制征兵的韩籍遇难者遗属，23日针对日本靖国神社向首尔中 央地方法院提起诉讼，要求其撤下擅自被合祀的先人牌位。遗属们还向日本政府和靖国神社提起索赔诉 讼，要求赔偿共8.8亿韩元（约合人民币416.6万元）。 报道称，韩国民间机构民族问题研究所和太平洋战争受害者赔偿推进会当天在首尔召开记者会并发布上 述消息。掳日强征韩籍遇难者遗属向韩国法院提起关于取消靖国神社合祀的诉讼尚属首次。韩籍军人和 军属遗属共10人要求靖国神社在写有死者姓名和死亡日期的"祭神名簿"和"祭神名票"中移除祖辈名字。 转自：北京日报客户端 据韩联社12月23日报道，二战时期被日军强制征兵的韩籍遇难者遗属，23日针对日本靖国神社向首尔中 央地方法院提起诉讼，要求其撤下擅自被合祀的先人牌位。遗属们还向日本政府和靖国神社提起索赔诉 讼，要求赔偿共8.8亿韩元（约合人民币416.6万元）。 报道称，韩国民间机构民族问题研究所和太平洋战争受害者赔偿推进会当天在首尔召开记者会并发布上 述消息。掳日强征韩籍遇难者遗属向韩国法院提起关于取消靖国神社合祀的诉讼尚属首次。韩籍军人和 军 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the concerning trend in Japan of downplaying its historical aggression, particularly regarding the Nanjing Massacre, as part of a broader revisionist narrative that seeks to reshape public perception of Japan's wartime actions [1][2][3] Group 1: Historical Revisionism - Japan's Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum plans to change the term "Nanjing Massacre" to "Nanjing Incident," reflecting a wider trend of minimizing Japan's wartime atrocities [1] - There is a systematic reduction or removal of exhibits that accurately portray Japan's colonial aggression, leading to a scarcity of museums that present a complete and objective history [1] - Right-wing forces in Japan continue to propagate false narratives, claiming Japan never invaded and framing its actions as liberatory, while ignoring the atrocities committed [2] Group 2: Impact on Public Perception - A recent survey indicates a significant decline in the recognition of Japan's wartime actions as aggression, with only 35% of respondents acknowledging it as such, down from 52% in 1994 [2] - The number of respondents who are unsure about Japan's wartime history has risen dramatically to 48%, compared to 15% in 1994, indicating a troubling trend in historical awareness [2] Group 3: Military Expansion and Nationalism - Japan is increasingly abandoning its "defensive" military posture, seeking to expand its military capabilities under the guise of external threats, which raises concerns about regional stability [3] - The Japanese government is planning to deploy missiles on the Yonaguni Island and is discussing revisions to its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," signaling a shift towards militarization [3] - The resurgence of militaristic ideologies poses a significant risk to peace in Asia, necessitating vigilance from countries that suffered under Japanese militarism [3]

Group 1 - The core argument highlights the resurgence of Japanese militarism, as evidenced by recent statements from Japanese politician Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan, which challenge China's core interests and threaten regional stability [1][3] - The internal factors contributing to this resurgence include the lack of thorough criticism and eradication of militaristic ideologies in post-war Japan, with right-wing elements gaining influence in politics [1][2] - The historical revisionism in Japan, including the denial of wartime atrocities such as the Nanjing Massacre and the comfort women issue, reflects a growing trend among certain politicians and right-wing groups to reshape Japan's narrative as a victim rather than an aggressor [2][3] Group 2 - The external factors influencing Japan's militaristic revival include Western historical perspectives that downplay Japan's wartime actions, leading to a distorted understanding of its militarism [2][3] - The Cold War context allowed Japan to evade full accountability for its militaristic past, as some countries sought to use Japan as a bulwark against communism, resulting in the early release of war criminals and the return of militaristic figures to power [3] - The current political climate, marked by provocative statements from leaders like Kishi Nobuo, indicates a troubling continuity of militaristic sentiments that could destabilize international relations and peace [1][3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the resurgence of Japanese militarism and its implications for regional and global stability, particularly concerning Taiwan [1][3]. - The internal factors contributing to the persistence of militarism in Japan include the lack of thorough criticism and eradication of militaristic ideologies post-World War II, with right-wing elements gaining influence in politics [1][2]. - The external factors involve historical revisionism and the misinterpretation of Japan's wartime actions, which have been perpetuated by some Western narratives that downplay Japan's aggression during the war [2][3]. Group 2 - The articles discuss how Japan's political landscape has allowed militaristic figures to regain power, undermining the post-war order and posing challenges to international peace [3]. - The recent statements by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan represent a provocative stance that could be seen as a challenge to China's core interests and a threat to regional stability [3]. - The narrative surrounding Japan's victimhood in World War II is being used to obscure its historical aggressions, as seen in the denial of events like the Nanjing Massacre and the exploitation of "comfort women" [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's potential nuclear ambitions, suggesting that recent comments from Japanese politicians are a test of reactions from both allies and neighboring countries [1] Group 1: Political Intentions - Japanese politician Takashi Saimai's remarks are seen as a strategy to gauge responses from the United States, United Kingdom, France, and neighboring countries like China, Russia, North Korea, and South Korea [1] - The underlying intention is to assess whether the timing for pursuing nuclear capabilities is deemed appropriate based on the reactions received [1] Group 2: Criticism of Military Nationalism - The article criticizes Japanese militarism, labeling its proponents as manipulative and deceitful, suggesting they are skilled in using underhanded tactics [1] - There is an implication that these nationalists may attempt to advance nuclear ambitions through covert means, including potentially bribing politicians [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's diplomatic actions, characterized by deception and manipulation, pose significant implications for regional and global stability, reflecting a historical pattern of dishonesty in its foreign relations [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Historical Context - Historical examples illustrate Japan's tendency to engage in deceitful diplomacy, notably during World War II when it misled the United States while preparing for war [2] - The attack on Pearl Harbor exemplified Japan's strategic use of deception, leading to a profound sense of betrayal in American society [3] Group 2: Current Implications - Japan's current political maneuvers, including the promotion of "China threat" narratives, suggest a desire to escape post-war constraints and pursue military expansion [3][4] - The actions of Japanese right-wing politicians indicate a persistent refusal to confront historical war crimes, raising concerns about their strategic intentions and potential provocations [4] Group 3: International Response - The international community is urged to remain vigilant against Japan's strategic opportunism and revisionist tendencies, as historical grievances remain unaddressed [4] - There is a call for a long-term perspective to prevent the resurgence of Japanese militarism, which could disrupt the existing international order [4]

【环球时报-环球网报道 记者李萌】在12月16日外交部例行记者会上，有记者提问称，16日上午，日本 防卫大臣小泉进次郎在国会答辩中就日本增加军费应询称，"你应该想想该说谁，比如中国，20年间军 费增加7倍，最近3年涨幅也明显超过日本。" 中方对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆表示，日方无端指责、恶意抹黑中国正当国防建设，态度恶劣，令人不齿。在和平与安全问题 上，中国是世界上记录最好的大国。中国国防费的增长合理合法，既是应对安全挑战、维护国家正当利 益的需要，也是为了更好履行大国国际责任和义务。日方作为有严重侵略前科的国家，没有任何资格说 三道四。 郭嘉昆表示，由于罪恶罄竹难书的侵略历史，日本的军事安全动向一直备受亚洲邻国和国际社会关注。 2025财年，日本国民人均防卫费、防卫人员人均费用分别是中国的3倍和2倍多，近年来日本大幅调整安 保政策，防卫费13年连增，近5年激增约60%。日本还自我松绑集体自卫权，发展所谓"对敌基地攻击能 力"，修改武器出口原则，强化"延伸威慑"合作，图谋修改"无核三原则"。 "日方嘴上说坚持'专守防卫'和'被动防御'，行动上却一再背弃《开罗宣言》和《波茨坦公告》对日明确 规定的战败国义务，违背自 ...

忘记历史就意味着背叛，否认罪责就意味着重犯。今年是世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年，共同维护历史 正义，防止日本军国主义死灰复燃是国际社会正义力量的共同意志。俄罗斯转交历史档案，法国青年向 中方捐赠揭露二战时期日军轰炸上海、屠杀平民等罪行的照片，日本学者捐赠侵华日军华南细菌战"波 第8604部队"名册的彩色扫描件……我们欣慰地看到，越来越多国家和人民加入到守护历史记忆、捍卫 人类正义的行列中来。"承认已经发生的事情并不可耻，真正可耻的是把发生过的事情当作没发生""回 避历史真相将难以走出军国主义阴影"……日本右翼政客应好好听一听这些有识之士的声音，切实深刻 反省侵略历史，彻底清算军国主义遗毒，真正走和平发展道路，以实际行动取信于亚洲邻国和国际社 会。 当天，中央档案馆公布了一批由俄罗斯转交中方的苏联审讯侵华日军731部队解密档案。二战期间，日 本军国主义对中国人民犯下的侵略罪行罄竹难书：南京大屠杀的惨烈，灭绝人性的细菌战等，是人类历 史上极为黑暗的一页。俄方转交的这批档案披露，与731部队罪行相关人员多达200余人，其中被公开审 判的12名战犯对其违反国际公约、准备和实施细菌战的罪行供认不讳。这批档案与中方保存的 ...

Core Viewpoint - The historical crimes of Japanese militarism against the Chinese people, particularly during World War II, are firmly established and will not change with time. The recent release of declassified documents related to the Unit 731 war crimes reinforces this historical truth [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The Nanjing Massacre and the inhumane actions of the Japanese military, including biological warfare, are highlighted as dark chapters in human history [1]. - International legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation established principles against aggression and for the punishment of war criminals after World War II [2]. - The Far East International Military Tribunal and Chinese military courts legally defined and investigated the Nanjing Massacre, solidifying the condemnation of Japanese militarism [2]. Group 2: Current Implications - Japan has not genuinely reflected on its historical responsibilities, with right-wing forces attempting to revise history and revive militarism [2]. - The current Japanese administration, under Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide, has made provocative moves regarding Taiwan and is seeking to amend post-war principles, indicating a potential resurgence of militarism [2]. - The international community is urged to remain vigilant against these trends, as they threaten the post-war international order [2]. Group 3: Collective Memory and Responsibility - The importance of remembering history to prevent the resurgence of militarism is emphasized, with various nations and individuals contributing to the preservation of historical memory [3]. - A call for Japanese politicians to acknowledge historical truths and genuinely reflect on their past actions is made, stressing the need for peace and trust in international relations [3]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The establishment of a national memorial day for the victims of the Nanjing Massacre serves to remember past suffering, not to perpetuate hatred, but to learn lessons for the future [4]. - China is committed to a path of peaceful development and aims to collaborate with other peace-loving nations to counter any attempts to revive militarism and fascism [4].

Core Viewpoint - The recent release of declassified Soviet interrogation documents regarding the Japanese Unit 731 exposes the systematic and organized nature of their crimes against humanity, reinforcing the historical truth of these atrocities [1][2]. Group 1: Evidence and Documentation - The newly released documents cover a period from May 1939 to December 1950 and reveal that over 200 individuals were involved in the crimes of Unit 731 [1]. - The scientific assessments conducted by Soviet experts in various fields concluded that the purpose of Japan's bacterial research was to utilize bacteria for large-scale human destruction [1]. - The documents complement existing evidence from China regarding the Unit 731 site and its crimes, forming a comprehensive evidence chain that confirms the organized nature of Japan's biological warfare [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and Reactions - Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in the crimes of Unit 731, with various archives being uncovered, including detailed experimental data and photographs that provide undeniable facts [2]. - Despite the overwhelming evidence, some political factions in Japan continue to engage in historical revisionism, attempting to distort the narrative through textbook modifications and portraying Japan as a victim on the international stage [2]. - The actions of Japanese right-wing forces, including visits to the Yasukuni Shrine and attempts to increase military spending, signal a troubling revival of militarism that challenges post-World War II international order [3]. Group 3: Importance of Historical Memory - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of remembering historical events to prevent future conflicts, advocating for the release of documents not to perpetuate hatred but to promote peace [3]. - The commemoration of historical atrocities, such as the Nanjing Massacre, serves as a reminder to protect and uphold the truth of history, ensuring that the crimes of the Japanese military are permanently recognized [3].