欺诈发行
Search documents
*ST高鸿虚增营收 12.5亿定增欺诈发行由华融证券保荐
Zhong Guo Jing Ji Wang· 2025-08-13 03:20
Core Viewpoint - *ST Gaohong is facing severe penalties from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) due to fraudulent activities, including inflated revenue and profits from 2015 to 2023, which may lead to forced delisting from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [1][20]. Group 1: Fraudulent Activities - The company engaged in fraudulent issuance of shares and inflated financial reports, with significant discrepancies in reported revenue and profits from 2015 to 2023 [1][2][20]. - Specific inflated figures include a total of 6.94 billion yuan in revenue for 2015, peaking at 56.34 billion yuan in 2020, and a total profit inflation of 2.19 billion yuan in 2020 [2][8]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The CSRC has proposed a total fine of 1.6 billion yuan against the company and involved parties, with individual penalties for key executives ranging from 100,000 to 750,000 yuan [4][17]. - The company is also facing a potential 10-year market ban for its chairman and the actual controller of a related trading company, while the financial director may face a 5-year ban [5][18]. Group 3: Impact on Company Operations - The fraudulent activities have led to a significant risk of delisting from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, as the company’s actions violate multiple regulations [1][20]. - The company’s non-public stock issuance in 2020, which raised 1.25 billion yuan, is also under scrutiny for containing false information [9][15].
对近200亿元财务造假、欺诈发行竟没有察觉甚至“打保票” 国新证券是否勤勉尽责待考
Xin Lang Zheng Quan· 2025-08-12 10:20
Core Viewpoint - *ST Gaohong faces significant risks of forced delisting due to nearly 20 billion yuan in financial fraud and fraudulent issuance, as indicated by the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) administrative penalty notice [1][4][5] Group 1: Financial Fraud Details - From 2015 to 2023, *ST Gaohong inflated its revenue by a total of 198.76 billion yuan through various fraudulent activities, including fictitious trade operations [3][12] - The inflated profits over the same period amounted to 76.23 million yuan, with the highest annual inflation occurring in 2019, where approximately 50% of the revenue was fabricated [3][13] - The fraudulent activities were primarily facilitated by the company's major stakeholders, including Jiang Qing and his spouse, who controlled key suppliers and customers [12][13] Group 2: Role of Guoxin Securities - Guoxin Securities, as the sponsor and independent financial advisor for *ST Gaohong's 2020 private placement, failed to detect the extensive financial fraud over seven years, during which the fraud amount reached 187.47 billion yuan, accounting for 94.32% of the total fraud [2][6] - Despite having a legal obligation to conduct thorough due diligence, Guoxin Securities did not identify any anomalies in *ST Gaohong's financial reports or related documents [5][11] - The lack of oversight by Guoxin Securities during the critical years of 2015-2021 raises questions about their diligence and responsibility in safeguarding investor interests [11][12] Group 3: Regulatory Actions and Consequences - The CSRC plans to impose penalties exceeding 160 million yuan on *ST Gaohong and related parties, including a fine of 135 million yuan for the company [4][5] - The potential for criminal charges against key individuals involved in the fraud is also being considered by the CSRC [4][5] - Guoxin Securities has not yet faced any formal investigation or penalties, but the ongoing scrutiny may lead to future accountability [5][12]
上市公司持续9年财务造假、虚增收入近200亿元!
Jing Ji Wang· 2025-08-12 06:59
Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authorities have imposed severe penalties on *ST Gaohong Network Co., Ltd. for engaging in financial fraud over nine years, inflating revenues by nearly 20 billion yuan [1][4]. Group 1: Financial Fraud Details - From 2015 to 2023, *ST Gaohong inflated its revenue by approximately 19.8 billion yuan and profits by over 76.2 million yuan through fictitious trade activities [2][3]. - The fraudulent activities involved a closed-loop system with no actual goods flow, organized by the actual controller of a trading company [2]. - The company used inflated financial statements to raise funds, constituting fraudulent issuance of shares [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) plans to impose a fine of 135 million yuan on *ST Gaohong and an additional 26.75 million yuan on nine involved executives [4]. - The chairman and former general manager, Fu Jinglin, faces a dual penalty of 7.5 million yuan and a 10-year market ban [4]. - The CSRC has indicated that *ST Gaohong may face mandatory delisting due to serious violations, including fraudulent issuance of shares and false financial reporting [4][5]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The crackdown on *ST Gaohong reflects a zero-tolerance policy towards securities violations, aiming to maintain market order and protect investor rights [1][7]. - The regulatory environment has intensified, with an increase in criminal accountability for financial fraud among listed companies [7].
东兴证券、康达律所、天健会所起诉39名被告,索赔3.7亿!
梧桐树下V· 2025-08-12 06:20
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal actions taken against Gel Software and other parties involved in the fraudulent issuance and information disclosure violations related to Zeda Yisheng Technology Co., Ltd, highlighting the financial implications and the ongoing litigation process [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - On August 12, Gel Software announced that it, along with 38 other defendants, is being sued for a total of approximately 37,227.26 million yuan across three cases related to fraudulent issuance and information disclosure violations [2]. - The three cases involve claims of 12,345.51 million yuan, 21,533.20 million yuan, and 3,348.55 million yuan respectively, with the total amount claimed being 37,227.26 million yuan [2]. - The plaintiffs include Dongxing Securities, Tianjian Accounting Firm, and Beijing Kangda Law Firm, all of which were intermediaries in Zeda Yisheng's initial public offering [4]. Group 2: Background and Financial Impact - In April 2023, Zeda Yisheng was penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission for fraudulent issuance and information disclosure violations, leading to investor lawsuits against Zeda Yisheng and its intermediaries [4]. - Following the penalties, Dongxing Securities, Tianjian Accounting, and Kangda Law Firm collectively paid approximately 493 million yuan to investors and the regulatory authority, prompting them to seek recovery of these costs through litigation against other involved parties [4]. - Gel Software's involvement stems from business transactions with Zeda Yisheng in 2018 and 2020, which were later found to lack commercial substance during a self-examination process [4].
*ST高鸿严重财务造假被重罚
Jin Rong Shi Bao· 2025-08-12 01:01
Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authority has imposed severe penalties on *ST Gaohong (000851) for engaging in financial fraud over nine years, inflating revenues by nearly 20 billion yuan, reflecting a zero-tolerance stance towards securities violations [1][4]. Group 1: Financial Fraud Details - From 2015 to 2023, *ST Gaohong inflated its revenue by approximately 19.8 billion yuan and profits by over 76.2 million yuan through fictitious trade activities [2][3]. - The fraudulent activities involved a closed-loop system where suppliers and customers were orchestrated by Jiang Qing, with no actual goods being exchanged [2]. - The company also misused inflated financial statements to raise funds, constituting fraudulent issuance during its non-public stock offering in 2020, which raised 1.25 billion yuan [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) plans to impose a fine of 135 million yuan on *ST Gaohong and an additional 26.75 million yuan on nine involved executives, including a 7.5 million yuan fine and a 10-year market ban for the chairman [4]. - Jiang Qing, the actual controller of Nanjing Qingya, will also face a 7 million yuan fine and a 10-year market ban for his role in the fraudulent activities [4]. - The company has issued a risk warning regarding the potential for mandatory delisting due to serious violations, including fraudulent issuance and false reporting in annual reports [4][5]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The crackdown on financial fraud is part of a broader regulatory effort to maintain market integrity and protect investors, with an increasing number of companies and individuals facing criminal charges for similar offenses [6][7]. - The regulatory environment has become more stringent, with a focus on creating a comprehensive deterrent system against financial misconduct, enhancing the overall standard of the capital market [7].
A股异动丨ST高鸿一字跌停 财务造假近200亿 可能被实施重大违法强制退市
Ge Long Hui A P P· 2025-08-11 07:01
Group 1 - Company *ST Gao Hong (000851.SZ) has been placed under investigation by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for suspected violations of information disclosure laws, leading to a trading halt with shares dropping to 2.1 yuan and over 4 million shares on hold [1] - The CSRC's notice indicates that the company engaged in fraudulent issuance of shares during its non-public offering in 2020, and its annual reports from 2015 to 2023 contain false records, potentially leading to mandatory delisting [1] - Investigations revealed that *ST Gao Hong inflated its revenue and profits through fictitious trade activities, resulting in a total inflated revenue of 19.876 billion yuan and inflated profit of 76.2259 million yuan from 2015 to 2023 [1] Group 2 - The CSRC plans to impose a fine of 160 million yuan on the responsible parties and an additional 7 million yuan on third parties involved in the fraudulent activities [1]
2025年大案:公司被罚1.35亿元 前董秘兼财总被罚600万
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-08-11 02:17
2025年处罚金额最大的上市公司违规案例来了!上市公司被罚1.35亿元,董监高合计被罚3375万元,合 计被罚超1.6亿元。上周五, *ST高鸿 公告收到证监会《行政处罚事先告知书》,公司涉及重大违法并 触及强制退市风险。 | 本公司及董事会全体成员保证公告内容的真实、准确和完整,不存在虚假 | | --- | | 记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 | 其中2015 年至2021年,高鸿股份通过子公司北京大唐高鸿科技发展有限公司(简称高鸿科技)参与南 京庆亚贸易有限公司(简称南京庆亚)实际控制人江庆组织开展的笔记本电脑虚假贸易业务。该业务供 应商和客户均由江庆联系撮合,业务资金、合同、物流单据流转形成闭环,无实际货物流转,相关交易 不具有商业实质。 上述虚假业务导致高鸿股份2015年至2021年年度报告分别虚增营业收入6.94亿元、24.52 亿元、24.20 亿 元、30.63 亿元、56.34 亿元、24.80 亿元、18.05亿元;分别虚增营业成本6.93亿元、24.49亿元、24.18亿 元、30.60亿元、56.12亿元、24.68 亿元、17.96 亿元;分别虚增利润总额67.36 万元、243.8 ...
九年虚增营收近200亿!*ST高鸿遭三记重锤:1.6亿罚款+触及退市+重罚第三方
Zhong Guo Jing Ying Bao· 2025-08-09 13:39
Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has imposed a hefty fine of 160 million yuan on *ST Gaohong Network Co., Ltd. for financial fraud, marking a significant crackdown on financial misconduct in the capital market [2][8]. Group 1: Financial Misconduct Details - *ST Gaohong engaged in fraudulent activities by inflating revenue and profits through non-substantial transactions involving notebook computers, violating securities laws from 2015 to 2023, resulting in a total inflated revenue of 19.876 billion yuan and inflated profits exceeding 76.2259 million yuan [2][4][6]. - The company’s fraudulent activities included a non-public stock issuance in 2020, which constituted fraudulent issuance due to the use of inflated financial data from 2018 to 2020 [7][9]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions and Penalties - The CSRC plans to impose fines of 135 million yuan on the company and 26.75 million yuan on nine responsible individuals, with the company’s chairman facing a personal fine of 7.5 million yuan and a 10-year market ban [7][8]. - This case reflects a broader regulatory trend of holding not only companies but also third-party collaborators accountable for financial fraud, as seen in the recent penalties against third parties involved in similar misconduct [8][10]. Group 3: Market Implications and Trends - *ST Gaohong is the tenth company since early 2025 to enter mandatory delisting procedures due to significant violations, indicating a tightening regulatory environment compared to previous years [9]. - Experts suggest that despite increased penalties, the potential benefits of financial fraud still outweigh the risks for some companies, highlighting the need for a more robust regulatory framework to deter such behavior [10].
一上市公司9年财务造假、欺诈发行被重罚!第三方配合造假者被罚700万
梧桐树下V· 2025-08-09 02:38
文/梧桐兄弟 8月8日,*ST高鸿(000851)披露了关于收到中国证券监督管理委员会《行政处罚事先告知书》及重大违法强制退市风险提示公告,公司于2025年8月8日收到中国 证监会下发的《行政处罚事先告知书》。 根据《告知书》认定的事实,公司 2020 年非公开发行股票构成欺诈发行、 2015 年至 2023 年年度报告存在虚假记载,将触及《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》第 9.5.1 条第一项、第 9.5.2 条第一款第(六)项规定的重大违法强制退市情形, 可能被实施重大违法强制退市。 值得注意的是,*ST高鸿一名董事配偶并不在上市公司任职,但 其明知涉案笔记本电脑虚假贸易业务对于高鸿股份而言属于"空转""走单"贸易业务,将导致高鸿股 份业绩虚高,仍主动联系高鸿科技开展合作,将其纳入该贸易业务链条,其行为与高鸿股份 2015 年至 2021 年信息披露违法行为构成共同违法,应当受到处罚。 根据《告知书》披露,高鸿股份及相关人员违法事实情况主要如下: 一、高鸿股份通过参与、组织开展虚假贸易业务的方式虚增收入和利润,2015 年至 2023 年年度报告存在虚假记载 (一)高鸿股份通过参与笔记本电脑虚假贸易业务的方 ...
*ST高鸿: 关于收到中国证券监督管理委员会《行政处罚事先告知书》及重大违法强制退市风险提示公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-08-08 16:23
Core Viewpoint - 大唐高鸿网络股份有限公司 is facing severe regulatory scrutiny from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) due to allegations of fraudulent activities, including false financial reporting and fraudulent issuance of stocks, which may lead to mandatory delisting from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [1][2][12]. Summary by Sections Administrative Penalty Notice - The company received an administrative penalty notice from the CSRC on August 8, 2025, indicating that it is under investigation for serious violations of securities laws [1][2]. - The notice outlines that the company’s non-public stock issuance in 2020 constitutes fraudulent issuance, and its annual reports from 2015 to 2023 contain false records [1][2]. Violations and Financial Misrepresentation - The company engaged in fictitious trade activities to inflate revenue and profits, with reported inflated revenues of 6.94 billion, 24.52 billion, 24.20 billion, 30.63 billion, 56.34 billion, 24.80 billion, and 18.05 billion from 2015 to 2021 [2][3]. - The fraudulent activities included false trade transactions involving notebook computers and IT systems, leading to inflated revenues of 977.69 million and 308.19 million in 2018 and 2020, respectively [2][3]. Consequences and Penalties - The CSRC plans to impose a total fine of 1.35 billion on the company for the violations, alongside individual penalties for responsible executives, including fines ranging from 75 million to 750 million [9][11]. - Key executives, including the chairman and financial director, face market bans ranging from 5 to 10 years due to their involvement in the fraudulent activities [10][11]. Company Response and Future Actions - The company has committed to cooperating with the CSRC and aims to improve its internal governance and compliance with securities laws to protect shareholder interests [12][13]. - The company acknowledges the need to enhance the quality of information disclosure and ensure accurate reporting in the future [12].