Core Viewpoint - The tariff case is described as one of the "most important cases in American history" by President Trump, emphasizing that the removal of tariffs would harm the U.S. economy and strategy, potentially leading to devastating consequences for the nation [1] Tariff Policy - In April, the U.S. announced a "reciprocal tariff" policy, implementing a 10% "minimum baseline tariff" on all trade partners, with higher rates for certain partners [1] Supreme Court Hearing - On November 5, the U.S. Supreme Court held a hearing to debate the legality of the government's comprehensive tariff policy, with several justices questioning the Trump administration's justification for imposing high tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) [1] - Chief Justice Roberts noted that these tariffs effectively act as a tax on Americans, which has traditionally been a core power of Congress [1] Economic and Political Impact - The New York Times highlighted the significance of the case, indicating that its outcome could have substantial economic and political implications for U.S. businesses, consumers, and the President's trade policies [1]

最高法院周二宣布将于11月初就此案进行听证，这一异常紧急的时间安排表明法院试图迅速解决这一争议。涉及的进口税影响数 万亿美元的国际贸易，关税目前仍维持执行。 特朗普政府援引1977年《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)为关税政策辩护，该法律赋予总统应对国家安全、外交政策和经济紧急状 况的广泛权力。政府首席出庭律师D.John Sauer向法官表示，"规范进口的权力包括对进口商品征收关税或税收的权力"。 据央视新闻，美国联邦巡回上诉法院8月29日裁定，美国总统特朗普批准对多国征收关税时援引的法律，实际上并没有赋予其征收 这些税款的权力。法院的裁决书说，IEEPA授权总统在紧急情况下颁布某些经济措施，以应对"异常和特殊威胁"，但不允许总统采 取全面行动。 受到挑战的关税包括特朗普政府4月2日实施的所谓"对等关税"，对大部分美国进口商品征收10-50%的税率，这是自1930年《斯穆 特-霍利关税法》推行以来美国进口税的最大幅度增长。特朗普对钢铁、铝和汽车征收的关税是根据不同法律实施的，因此不直接 受到此次上诉影响。 全球最大白银etf--iShares Silver Trust持仓报告显示，9月9日白银etf持有量 ...

Core Points - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the broad tariffs implemented by the Trump administration lack legal basis but temporarily upheld the tariffs while the White House appeals to the Supreme Court [1] - The court's decision, made with a 7-4 vote, supports a previous ruling that the Trump administration overstepped presidential authority regarding tariffs [1] - The ruling could impact negotiations between the U.S. and certain trade partners if upheld by the Supreme Court, although it does not address tariffs on specific industries like steel and automobiles [1] Group 1 - The U.S. International Trade Court previously ruled that Trump lacked the authority to impose global tariffs without explicit Congressional authorization under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) [1] - The Appeals Court noted that it could not identify any clear Congressional authorization for the President to exercise tariff powers in such cases [1] - The Trump administration's rationale for imposing tariffs, citing reasons like "fentanyl cross-border input," was deemed insufficient by the court [1] Group 2 - Following the ruling, Trump criticized the court's decision on social media, claiming that if upheld, it would lead to the destruction of the U.S. [2] - Trump emphasized that tariffs are essential tools for supporting American workers and manufacturing [2] - Cabinet members warned that ruling against the President's authority to impose global tariffs could severely damage U.S. diplomatic and economic security [2]

Group 1 - The Trump administration insists that tariff policies will continue despite court setbacks, with plans to appeal to the Supreme Court if necessary [1][2] - The administration is considering alternative legal powers, including Sections 232 and 301, to implement tariffs if the appeal fails [2][3] - The use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) has been a key strategy for imposing tariffs, allowing the president to bypass Congress [2][3] Group 2 - The White House warns other nations that the president retains other tariff powers, such as Section 232, to protect U.S. interests [3] - The administration is not currently planning to initiate new Section 232 investigations but emphasizes the availability of other legal powers [3][4] - Trump has previously utilized Section 232 powers to impose tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automobiles, with ongoing investigations for additional tariffs on various products [2][3] Group 3 - Trump has publicly discussed the possibility of submitting his tariff plans to Congress, although this could complicate his agenda given the narrow Republican control [4] - The administration is expected to outline its response to recent tariff rulings in the coming days [4]