Core Viewpoint - Recent investigations by Norway, Denmark, and the UK into Chinese-made buses suggest potential "remote control" risks, reflecting underlying political biases rather than actual safety concerns [1][2] Group 1: Safety Investigations - The UK claims that a significant number of Chinese electric buses may pose national security risks, with media exaggerating the potential for these vehicles to disrupt London [1] - No evidence has been presented to support claims that Chinese electric buses have been remotely controlled to stop in Europe, indicating a lack of substantiation for these safety investigations [1][2] - European experts acknowledge that while electric buses can theoretically be remotely disabled, similar capabilities exist in many Western bus brands, raising questions about the selective targeting of Chinese manufacturers [1] Group 2: Chinese Companies' Response - Chinese bus manufacturer Yutong emphasizes compliance with local laws and standards, asserting that data collected is solely for maintenance and improvement purposes, and cannot be accessed without customer consent [1] - The confidence of Chinese companies in their product safety is highlighted by the fact that over 2 million electric vehicles were exported globally last year without any incidents of remote control issues [1] Group 3: Broader Implications - The narrative of "remote shutdown" reflects a broader trend of irrational fears and biases against Chinese enterprises, which could harm Sino-European relations and hinder technological innovation in Europe [2][3] - The overemphasis on security risks in trade relations may obstruct Europe from embracing new technologies, ultimately threatening its competitive edge in the global market [2] - The current geopolitical climate, characterized by protectionism and unfounded fears, could lead to significant disruptions in global supply chains and energy transition efforts [3]

Core Viewpoint - The takeover of Nexperia by the Dutch government highlights the hypocrisy of Western legal and contractual principles, revealing the geopolitical motivations behind such actions [1][6]. Group 1: Impact on Global Supply Chain - Nexperia holds a 9.4% share of the global automotive chip market, with 40% of Europe's automotive chips relying on its supply, indicating its critical role in the industry [2]. - The Dutch government's unilateral actions, including invoking a 70-year-old law for the takeover, disrupt the established norms of international investment and trade [2][3]. Group 2: Political and Economic Ramifications - The incident reflects the increasing politicization and securitization of international trade relations, with Western nations using security as a pretext for regulatory actions [3][5]. - The actions taken by the Dutch government are seen as influenced by U.S. export control policies, which aim to restrict Chinese companies' access to critical technologies [3][5]. Group 3: Legal and Contractual Integrity - The behavior of the Dutch government is viewed as a blatant challenge to international legal order, undermining the principles of contract and law that are supposed to govern global trade [6]. - The incident raises concerns about the reliability of the Netherlands as a business environment, questioning the commitment to contractual integrity and the rule of law [2][6]. Group 4: Strategic Implications for Europe - The event underscores the need for Europe to avoid falling into the "security trap" set by the U.S. and to adhere to the principles of law and multilateralism to protect its own interests [4][5]. - The EU's so-called "strategic autonomy" is called into question, as its policies towards China appear heavily influenced by U.S. pressures, undermining its independent decision-making [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed support for Chinese companies to engage in mutually beneficial cooperation, responding to the EU's investigation into Anglo American's sale of nickel mining operations to China Minmetals [1] Group 1: Company Actions - The EU has announced an investigation into Anglo American's sale of its nickel mining business to China Minmetals [1] - The Chinese government encourages its enterprises to adhere to principles of mutual benefit and practical cooperation across various sectors [1] Group 2: Market Environment - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized the importance of maintaining an open commitment and respecting market economy principles [1] - There is a call for fair competition and a transparent, non-discriminatory business environment for companies from all nations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government supports its enterprises in conducting international cooperation based on mutual benefit and market principles, while also emphasizing the importance of investment security for Chinese companies [1] Group 1: Investment Plans - Mingyang Smart Energy, a Chinese wind power equipment manufacturer, plans to invest £1.5 billion in building a wind turbine factory in Scotland [1] Group 2: Concerns and Responses - There are concerns in the UK regarding the potential national security threats posed by the investment project [1] - The Chinese government has noted that the politicization of normal economic projects in the UK has been increasing, particularly since the introduction of the UK's National Security and Investment Act in 2022, which has led to prohibitions or conditional approvals of several Chinese investments [1] - The Chinese government opposes the broadening of the national security concept and the politicization of economic issues, arguing that such actions could negatively impact Chinese companies' assessments of the investment environment in the UK [1]

Group 1 - Trust is the cornerstone of international cooperation, and its erosion has led to a global trust deficit, impacting economic recovery and international collaboration [1][2] - Major powers are increasingly engaging in unilateralism and populism, undermining international agreements and creating uncertainty in global markets [1][2] - The current geopolitical landscape is characterized by a shift from a unipolar to a multipolar world, with some nations clinging to outdated Cold War mentalities, exacerbating tensions and mistrust [2][3] Group 2 - The international community must work collaboratively to rebuild trust, focusing on mutual respect for core interests and avoiding misjudgments [3][4] - China is promoting a vision of a shared future for humanity, advocating for multilateralism and proposing initiatives to address the trust deficit [4][5] - High-level cooperation and cultural exchanges are essential for strengthening global trust and overcoming ideological barriers [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the critical need to rebuild international trust, which has been eroded by major powers' actions, leading to global instability and a lack of cooperation [1][2][3]. Group 1: Erosion of Trust - The trust deficit among major powers is creating uncertainty and undermining global cooperation, pushing the world towards division and conflict [2][3]. - Some countries are resorting to unilateralism and populism to maintain hegemony, undermining international rules and creating trade barriers [2][3]. - The current international landscape is marked by a profound adjustment, where security concepts are distorted into geopolitical tools, leading to increased competition and military spending [2][3]. Group 2: Need for Collaborative Solutions - The article calls for a collaborative approach to address the trust deficit, highlighting the importance of mutual understanding and respect for core interests among major powers [3][4]. - It advocates for a shift from zero-sum thinking to a focus on shared global interests, promoting high-level cooperation to enhance economic openness [3][4]. - The need for systemic reforms in multilateral institutions is emphasized, particularly in addressing urgent issues like climate change and public health [4][5]. Group 3: China's Role in Rebuilding Trust - China is positioned as a responsible major power, advocating for multilateralism and proposing initiatives to enhance global cooperation and trust [5][6]. - The country has committed significant resources to climate change initiatives, signing numerous cooperation agreements with developing nations [5][6]. - China's efforts to expand visa-free travel and promote cultural exchanges are seen as steps to strengthen international trust and cooperation [5][6].

Group 1 - Snam plans to acquire nearly 25% of OGE, Germany's largest natural gas network operator, but faces scrutiny from the German government due to concerns over Chinese influence [1][2] - The acquisition is valued at €920 million, with Snam purchasing 24.99% of Vier Gas Holding, which owns all shares of OGE [1] - OGE operates a pipeline network of approximately 12,000 kilometers and has an annual gas transmission capacity of about 21 billion cubic meters, serving over 400 end customers [1] Group 2 - The German Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy has initiated a thorough investment review process to assess potential risks to public order and safety from the transaction [2] - Germany's recent approach towards China has been characterized by a "de-risking" strategy, categorizing infrastructure, especially energy, as critical and sensitive [2][3] - The trend of "pan-security" has emerged, where even ordinary research cooperation and cultural exchanges are subjected to scrutiny, reflecting a decline in trust towards China [3]

Group 1 - The "2025 China Enterprises Going Global Summit" was held in Shenzhen, focusing on providing a high-end platform for Chinese companies to address challenges in international expansion amidst global industrial chain restructuring [1] - The summit aimed to facilitate resource connections, rule dialogues, and intellectual exchanges to explore paths for ecological win-win transformations [1] Group 2 - Ma She, former Deputy Director of the European Department of the Ministry of Commerce, highlighted the historical breakthroughs in Chinese enterprises' foreign investments over the past 40 years, which were once welcomed globally [3] - He pointed out that the current global landscape is marked by significant risks and challenges due to political and economic restructuring, including globalization protectionism and unilateralism impacting international trade rules [3] - Ma identified three major risk areas: the rise of political protectionism and unilateral sanctions against China, the increased risk of wars due to geopolitical conflicts, and the shift towards digital and green economies leading to trade investment protectionism under the guise of environmental concerns [3] - He cited ESG as an example of how some countries use development concepts to restrict Chinese enterprises, specifically mentioning unilateral restrictions on Chinese electric vehicles by the US and EU [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the Canadian government's decision to shut down Hikvision Canada Ltd. under the pretext of "national security," which is viewed as a significant infringement on the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises and a disruption to normal Sino-Canadian economic cooperation [1] Group 1 - The Chinese government expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to Canada's actions, emphasizing the encouragement of Chinese enterprises to invest abroad in accordance with market principles and international rules [1] - There is a call for Canada to cease politicizing economic issues and to provide a fair, just, and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies to operate [1] - Hikvision strongly opposes the Canadian government's decision, arguing that it lacks evidence and is a discriminatory act against Chinese enterprises [1]

Group 1 - The Canadian government ordered Hikvision Canada to cease operations in Canada, citing "national security" concerns, which severely harms the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and disrupts normal Sino-Canadian economic and trade cooperation [1] - The Chinese government encourages its enterprises to invest abroad based on market principles and international rules while complying with local laws, and firmly opposes the misuse of national security concepts to discriminate against Chinese companies [1] - China urges Canada to stop politicizing economic issues and to provide a fair, just, and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese enterprises to operate, emphasizing the need for healthy and stable development of Sino-Canadian economic and trade cooperation [1]