Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of ecological environment monitoring as a foundation for ecological protection and pollution prevention, advocating for improved monitoring data quality and the implementation of advanced technologies to enhance monitoring capabilities [1][2][3]. Group 1: Improving Monitoring Data Quality - The article suggests enhancing the accuracy, comprehensiveness, and timeliness of monitoring data to support precise pollution control. It highlights the need for the widespread application of Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) and unified regulatory frameworks for monitoring institutions [1]. - It calls for a shift in focus for monitoring personnel from merely ensuring data quality to also emphasizing the application of monitoring data, thereby strengthening its role in precise pollution control [1]. Group 2: Accelerating Digital Transformation of Monitoring Systems - The article advocates for the digital transformation of ecological environment monitoring systems, leveraging technologies such as artificial intelligence and cloud platforms to modernize monitoring capabilities [2]. - It emphasizes the need to develop monitoring technologies with independent intellectual property rights and to enhance the automation and intelligence of monitoring processes [2]. - The establishment of a comprehensive ecological environment smart monitoring system is recommended, which would improve the ability to trace pollution sources and enhance environmental quality forecasting [2]. Group 3: Strengthening Legal and Regulatory Frameworks - The article stresses the necessity of a solid legal foundation for ecological environment monitoring, particularly in clarifying the legal status of automatic monitoring data from polluting entities [3]. - It points out that currently, only data from waste incineration power plants can be directly used for administrative enforcement, indicating a need for broader legal recognition of monitoring data [3]. - The role of social monitoring institutions is highlighted, with a call for clear legal definitions regarding the use of their data in environmental enforcement to enhance their contribution to ecological management [3].

Group 1 - The year marks the conclusion of the "14th Five-Year Plan" and the planning phase for the "15th Five-Year Plan," with a focus on improving air quality through systematic measures [1] - The continuous improvement of the environmental standards system since 2015 has been a key driver in enhancing air quality, necessitating strong measures for deep emission reductions to achieve the goal of a beautiful China [2] - Current emission reduction measures are categorized into regular and emergency reductions, with many regions relying on collaborative reduction and enhanced pollution source inspections, which have shown limited effectiveness due to the small scale of pollution sources involved [2][3] Group 2 - Local governments are empowered to establish stricter environmental standards than national ones, allowing for tailored approaches to emission reductions based on regional conditions [3] - A well-established environmental standards system can maintain a healthy market order by setting a unified environmental baseline for enterprises, preventing unfair competition and promoting green development [3] Group 3 - The formulation of standards must be scientific and reasonable, ensuring both feasibility and alignment with local realities while referencing advanced practices from other regions [4] - Each standard should focus on addressing key issues, such as discrepancies in emission levels compared to advanced provinces and gaps in monitoring and control processes [4]