Core Viewpoint - The management of Jiaoda Onlly (交大昂立) has accused five former executives of illegal insurance purchases and refunds, leading to significant financial implications for the company [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against Former Executives - The company purchased a total of 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.54 million USD) in group annuity insurance from Tianan Life in October 2016 and paid 12.84 million yuan (approximately 1.8 million USD) in insurance premiums to Pacific Life from January to June 2018, with the insured being the five former executives [2]. - The five former executives refunded a total of 3.79 million yuan (approximately 0.53 million USD) from Tianan Life and 13.145 million yuan (approximately 1.83 million USD) from Pacific Life, totaling 16.937 million yuan (approximately 2.36 million USD) in refunds [2]. - The company’s assistant president stated that the approval process for these insurance payments lacked necessary documentation, suggesting potential illegalities in the refund process [2]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Financial Impact - In December 2024, the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning regarding the company’s inaccurate disclosure of executive compensation in its annual reports for 2016 and 2018 [3]. - The company filed a civil lawsuit against the five former executives for damages amounting to approximately 21.04 million yuan (approximately 2.9 million USD) but later withdrew the lawsuit before the court hearing [3]. - The chairman indicated that the actions of the former executives resulted in a loss of approximately 21 million yuan (approximately 2.9 million USD) to the company, leading to a criminal report filed with the local police [3][4]. Group 3: Business Operations and Client Relationships - The company disclosed that it had significant sales to Hefei Sanzi Yang, totaling 5.1575 million yuan (approximately 0.72 million USD) and 3.1611 million yuan (approximately 0.44 million USD) in the second and third quarters of 2024, respectively, making it the largest customer during that period [5]. - However, by the fourth quarter of 2024, Hefei Sanzi Yang was no longer listed among the top ten customers, and the CEO of Sanzi Yang resigned from the board of Jiaoda Onlly [5][6]. - The chairman mentioned that the company has identified better business opportunities, leading to the cessation of collaboration with Sanzi Yang [6].

陕西广电网络传媒（集团）股份有限公司： 依据《公开发行证券的公司信息披露内容与格式准则第 2 号——年度报告的 内容与格式》（以下简称《格式准则第 2 号》）《上海证券交易所上市公司自律 监管指引第 3 号——行业信息披露》（以下简称 3 号指引）等规则的要求，经对 你公司 2024 年年度报告的事后审核，为便于投资者理解，根据本所《股票上市 规则》第 13.1.1 条的规定，请你公司进一步补充披露下述信息。 亿元，较上年同期下降 33%，归母净利润-10.59 亿元，较上年同期亏损增加，报 告期内工程施工、商品销售业务收入合计 2.14 亿元，下滑幅度超过 60%。此外， 年度报告显示部分项目建设完成之后，公司负责日常运营维护或提供线路租赁等， 获得数据传输、运维服务等运营服务类业务收入。请公司补充披露：（1）2023 年-2024 年商品销售业务的经营模式，所涉商品类型、后续用途、定价机制、应 收预付情况、盈利水平、收入确认政策，以及前十大客户和供应商信息，包括名 称、合作年限、交易内容、金额、信用期及回款情况等，说明主要客户和供应商 是否与公司、控股股东等存在关联关系；（2）2023 年-2024 年公 ...

年内又一家银行理财子收千万级罚单！ 近日，国家金融监督管理总局披露，中银理财因"非标债权投资管理不到位，理财产品投资 集中度、流动性不符合监管要求，信息登记管理不到位等违法违规行为"，被罚1290万元。 此次为该公司时隔一年后再次领罚，去年6月因理财业务存在未能有效穿透识别底层资产等 被罚250万元。 事实上，中银理财并非今年首家收到千万级罚单的理财子，2月，交银理财因理财产品信息 披露不规范，理财业务投后管理勤勉尽职义务履行不到位等，被罚1750万元。 中银理财被罚1290万，涉理财产品投资集中度不符要求 时隔1年，中银理财再领一张金监总局下发的罚单。 具体来看，金监总局公布的行政处罚信息公示表显示，中银理财因存在多项违法违规行为被 罚1290万元，其中包括非标债权投资管理不到位；理财产品投资集中度、流动性不符合监管 要求；信息登记管理不到位等，公布罚单的时间为6月27日。 | 序 | 当事人 | 主要违法违规行为 | 行政处罚 | 作出决 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 름 | 名称 | | 内容 | 定机关 | | 1 | 中国进出 | 部分种类贷款和政策性业务 ...