来源：中青看点网 PSM（锚定稳定模块）作为维持USDD价格稳定的核心机制，获得 Messari 重点评述。该模块支持用户 以USDT/USDC与以太坊USDD进行1:1兑换，依托套利机制有效维系锚定。Messari 强调，PSM 的套利 机制为 USDD 建立了稳固的价格锚，使其在二级市场始终维持在 1 美元附近，有力保障了流动性与用 户信心。 过去两个季度的流动数据进一步印证了PSM的核心作用：截至2025 年 9 月 8 日（尽管第三季度尚未结 束），用户以USDT/USDC 兑换 USDD的总量已从第二季度的11.5 亿美元增至 25 亿美元，环比增长 117%；同期赎回量从 12.4 亿美元增至 27 亿美元，环比增长119%。这表明 PSM 目前已能够有效应对大 规模需求波动，并通过套利机制将 USDD 维持在锚定价位。 Messari 分析，自2025年1月重新上线以来，USDD 2.0 协议展现出稳健的发展态势。截至 2025 年9月 初，其储备抵押品总价值峰值已超过 6.2亿美元，且始终高于USDD的流通供应量，严格保持超额抵押 状态，充分彰显出USDD强大的风险抵御能力与长期价值潜力。 在 ...

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve is gradually opening the door to interest rate cuts, with a new monetary policy framework emphasizing flexible inflation targeting and abandoning the previous compensatory inflation strategy [1] - The adjustment in the monetary policy framework is partly a response to unprecedented revisions in recent employment data by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, raising questions about the credibility of employment data [1][2] - The new framework retains the complementary assumption between employment and inflation targets, allowing the committee some discretion in policy evaluation, which may lead to uncertainty and instability in decision-making [3] Group 2 - The current environment of uncertainty for the Federal Reserve is influenced by potential data distortions in employment statistics and price indices, necessitating a clear response in the new monetary policy framework [2] - Digital technology is transforming the transmission mechanisms of monetary policy, complicating the speed and boundaries of policy effectiveness, which requires the Federal Reserve to adapt its support framework accordingly [2] - The emergence of decentralized stablecoins is shifting some monetary policy functions from the Federal Reserve to the U.S. Treasury, challenging the traditional belief in the independence of central bank monetary policy [2] Group 3 - The impact of the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts on global financial markets may differ from the past due to the restructuring of the global economic system, with liquidity primarily affecting new U.S. trade scenarios and stablecoin dynamics [3][4] - The influence of Federal Reserve rate cuts on global markets will not be uniform but will depend on the correlation of countries' trade relations with the U.S. and their acceptance of dollar-based stablecoins [4] - Central banks worldwide are prompted to rethink their traditional policy frameworks in light of new technologies and transmission mechanisms, facing challenges posed by these innovations [4]

Core Viewpoint - The signing of the "Genius Act" marks the establishment of a clear legal framework for stablecoins in the U.S., ending their previous ambiguous legal status and reshaping the industry landscape [1][4][26] Group 1: Definition and Regulatory Framework - The "Genius Act" defines compliant stablecoins as "payment stablecoins," emphasizing their role as payment or settlement tools rather than investment products [4][5] - This definition excludes stablecoins from being classified as legal tender, bank deposits, financial securities, or commodities, thus simplifying the regulatory path for issuers [4][5] - The act signals that compliant stablecoins will be recognized as legitimate financial payment tools, moving away from being seen as risk assets [4][5] Group 2: Market Dynamics and Participants - The act creates a new power structure where traditional financial institutions, particularly banks, will dominate the issuance of stablecoins [9][10] - Only "insured depository institutions" and "regulated non-bank entities" can issue stablecoins, favoring established banks like JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America [9][10] - Non-financial giants like Amazon and Meta face significant barriers to entering the stablecoin market, as the act restricts issuance to companies primarily engaged in financial services [12][24] Group 3: Compliance and Cost Implications - The act imposes strict compliance requirements, including a 1:1 reserve mechanism and monthly audits, significantly increasing operational costs for stablecoin issuers [17][18] - The previous practices of leveraging reserves for additional returns will be curtailed, as only high-liquid assets like cash and short-term U.S. Treasury securities can be used [17][18] - Smaller firms may struggle to meet the new compliance standards, leading to a market dominated by larger institutions [13][18] Group 4: Opportunities for Web3 Infrastructure - The new regulatory environment presents significant opportunities for Web3 infrastructure providers, as banks seek to develop their own stablecoins [19][26] - Companies like Alchemy and Fireblocks are positioned to offer essential services to banks, potentially leading to a booming market for Web3 infrastructure, projected to reach $55 billion by 2033 [19][26] Group 5: Future of Existing Stablecoins - Tether's USDT faces compliance challenges under the new act, as it must secure regulatory approval to continue operating in the U.S. market [22][23] - The act mandates that stablecoin issuers must back their tokens with cash and short-term U.S. Treasury securities, which may be difficult for Tether to achieve given its current asset composition [23][24] - Algorithmic stablecoins are temporarily excluded from the regulatory framework, with further research required to assess their risks and potential uses [24][25]