公开资料显示，*ST星农成立于2004年，注册地址为浙江省湖州市和孚镇星光大街，公司第一大股东为 星光农科控股集团有限公司。公司主要从事农业机械的研发、制造、销售与服务。 （来源：唐僧财经） 9月30日，星光农机股份有限公司公告称，近日，公司收到证监会下发的《立案告知书》，因公司涉嫌 信息披露违法违规，证监会决定对公司立案。 9月27日，*ST星农（维权）公告称公司更正了前期会计差错，其中涉及2023年度、2024年度、2025年 一季度、半年度财报中的合并资产负债表的相关科目，2023年度、2024年度财报中的合并利润表和现金 流量表中的相关科目。 对于前期会计差错原因，*ST星农解释称，2023年公司创新开拓农事服务，因业务运营经验及过程管控 机制存在不足，导致在实际运营过程中出现了一定偏差。经公司自查，2023年度农事服务业务所涉及的 公司客户存在资金回流的情形，未实际进行采收业务，不具备商业实质，不满足收入确定的条件。 值得关注的是，经济导报记者梳理更正数据后发现，*ST星农此次调整的财务指标金额规模较大。其 中，2023年度公司营业收入被调减6072.74万元，该调减金额占当年原披露营业收入的比例高 ...

然而，这次收购结果令人失望。通拓科技在被收购后遭遇内部纠纷和外部环境变化，业绩持续下滑。最 终，公司在2023年底以7亿元的价格出售了通拓科技100%股权。 这一买一卖之间，华鼎股份损失了22亿元价值。如此重大的投资失误，自然让投资者对公司新一轮募资 计划持谨慎态度。 2025年9月26日，华鼎股份收到上交所出具的《关于受理义乌华鼎锦纶股份有限公司沪市主板上市公司 发行证券申请的通知》，公司定增事项获受理。 根据定增预案，华鼎股份控股股东真爱集团将以2.83元/股的发行价全额认购本次增发股份。这一价格 较当前股价有显著折扣。 华鼎股份定增发行价格锁定为 2.83 元 / 股，这一价格仅为同期市场价的 65%，且低于每股净资产3.57元 （2025年上半年数据）。 诡异的是，就在定增计划获受理的前两周，真爱集团的一致行动人让义乌金控（持股99，077，372股， 占比8.97%）、顺和公司（持股3，172，500股，占比0.29%），计划转让持有的华鼎股份合计9.26%股 权，公开征集转让的价格不低于5.36元/股，预计套现5.5亿元。 一买一卖之间，控股股东定增认购价格与一致行动人转让价差接近50%，引发市场 ...

一边是员工持股平台陆续减持，一边是公司推进定增收购、募集配套资金，天地在线的资本作节奏引市 场关注。 2025 年 9 月，天地在线一边推进配套募资不超过 1.74 亿元的定增计划，发行价格为 12.58 元 / 股，另 一边控股股东及一致行动人人天津一鸣天地企业管理咨询合伙企业（有限合伙）（下称"一鸣投资"）、 天津一飞天地企业管理咨询合伙企业（有限合伙）于 9 月 4 日至 9 日通过大宗交易减持 76.98 万股，均 价约 18元 / 股，减持价格较定增价高出 43%。这种 "高卖低买" 的操作引发市场对利益输送的质疑。 2025年7月11日，天地在线公告股东减持计划。一鸣投资和一飞投资两个员工持股平台计划在2025年8月 4日至11月3日期间，通过大宗交易或竞价交易方式减持公司股份。减持原因表示为"基于平台内员工的 自身资金需求"。这些股份来源于公司首次公开发行前持有的股份及资本公积金转增股本取得的股份。 这一进一出的资本运作引发市场关注。一方面，员工持股平台在股价相对高位进行减持；另一方面，公 司通过定增引入资产，发行价格相对减持价格很低。 从时间线看，此次定增定价基准日为2024年10月30日董事 ...

编辑 | 董鑫 日前，四川省成都市召开全市国资国企改革发展工作会，现场通报了成都产业投资集团有限公司原副总 经理李朝林严重违纪违法案。李朝林从试图通过经商办企业赚"外快"到收受他人贿赂填"窟窿"，一步步 滑向违法犯罪深渊，为在场国企领导干部敲响警钟。 公开信息显示，李朝林出生于1964年3月，四川彭州人，2023年7月在成都产业投资集团副总经理任上被 查。 国企领域违规经商办企业问题是"靠企吃企"的典型表现，不仅扰乱正常的市场秩序，阻碍国企健康发 展，还极易滋生权钱交易、利益输送等腐败问题。 据《中国纪检监察报》9月20日报道，四川省成都市统筹市纪委监委、市国资委、市审计局成立工作 组，聚焦市属国企领域存在的违规经商办企业问题以及衍生的系统风险和监管漏洞，开展系统整治。 对16家市属国企干部职工经商办企业情况的全面摸底。排查范围首次从国企领导干部"关键少数"拓展至 全体管理人员"绝大多数"。 通报指出，他借用管理服务对象钱款，违规经商办企业，挖空心思搞权钱交易，为他人在工程项目承 揽、工作入职等方面谋取利益，索要和收受财物，数额特别巨大。 "从近年查处的违纪违法案件来看，不少国企从业人员特别是领导干部，利用国 ...

出品：新浪财经上市公司研究院 作者：君 9月5日，琻捷电子首次向联交所递交上市申请，拟以18C章在港股主板上市，由中金公司、国泰君安国际担任联席保荐人。 近三年一期，琻捷电子营业收入快速增长，但尚未实现盈利，累计净亏损逾3亿元。 不过，更值得关注的是，琻捷电子于2022年发生的一笔颇为异常的高溢价收购。彼时，琻捷电子以1.26亿元价格收购聚洵半导体100%股权，次年即全额计 提商誉减值损失7613.6万元。其中，向A股上市公司科隆股份收购聚洵半导体51%股权时，聚洵半导体的增值率高达743.13%。 此外，其余交易对方均通过共青城英锐创间接入股琻捷电子，且共青城英锐创的执行事务合伙人为琻捷电子执行董事徐红如全资持有。这一连串复杂关系背 后，琻捷电子或涉嫌利益输送，甚至涉嫌误导性陈述。 深陷持续亏损泥潭 投后估值高达36.35亿元 据新浪财经上市公司研究院统计，琻捷电子目前已完成8轮融资，融资总额逾10亿元。截至D+轮，公司投后估值约36.35亿元，较天使轮飙升133.6倍。 琻捷电子的投资者包括纪源资本、经纬创投、华登、诚通混改、国风投、君海、鸿泰、华泰保险、华金资本、厦门建发、海望、广发信德、千乘等知名 V ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding actress Yu Shuxin and her family's business dealings, particularly focusing on the partnership between her father's company and a state-owned enterprise, raising questions about transparency and potential conflicts of interest [4][11][31]. Group 1: Business Background - Yu Shuxin's father, Yu Pijie, is the actual controller of Xinyu City Huashang Mining Co., Ltd., which was established in 2007 with a registered capital of 2 million yuan [4][5]. - Huashang Mining partnered with Xinyu Steel Group, a major state-owned enterprise, to form Xinyu Xingu Mining Co., Ltd., which became a key supplier for Xinyu Steel [5][12]. - The transaction volume between Xingu Mining and Xinyu Steel surged from 18 million yuan in 2009 to over 630 million yuan in 2013, totaling over 1.5 billion yuan in five years [5][16]. Group 2: Controversy and Allegations - Allegations arose questioning whether Yu Pijie gained undue benefits through his company's dealings with state-owned enterprises, particularly regarding the lack of transparency in the partnership [5][17]. - The partnership raised eyebrows due to the small size of Huashang Mining compared to the scale of Xinyu Steel, leading to speculation about the legitimacy of the business relationship [13][15]. - Yu Pijie has publicly stated that Huashang Mining acted solely as a financial investor and that all transactions were conducted through public bidding [17][24]. Group 3: Financial Implications - In 2010, Xinyu Steel provided 210 million yuan in funding to Xingu Mining, which raised concerns about the nature of the financial relationship between the two companies [22][24]. - By 2013, Xingu Mining had utilized 740 million yuan of Xinyu Steel's funds, which was not adequately explained, leading to further scrutiny [24][27]. - The financial strain on Xinyu Steel was evident, with a debt ratio of 74.53% in 2013, highlighting the potential risks associated with the partnership [26][27]. Group 4: Public and Regulatory Response - The controversy has sparked a broader discussion about the transparency of celebrity wealth accumulation and the implications for public interest [31][34]. - Xinyu Steel has acknowledged the public's concerns and stated that they are addressing the situation, indicating potential regulatory scrutiny [34][35]. - The ongoing investigation into the matter reflects the public's demand for accountability and clarity regarding the relationships between private enterprises and state-owned companies [31][35].

与此同时，金融监管总局还对梁栋禁止终身进入保险业，对陈堃禁止10年进入保险业，对朱加麟、曾松柏、刘国辉禁止5年进入保险业。 在上述人员中，梁栋为恒大人寿董事长，朱加麟曾任恒大人寿董事长、副董事长，彭建军也曾担任恒大人寿董事长，曾松柏为恒大人寿总经理， 陈堃曾任恒大人寿副总经理、首席投资官。 恒大人寿成立于2006年5月11日，恒大集团（南昌）有限公司持股50%，新加坡大东方人寿保险有限公司和重庆财信企业集团有限公司分别持股 25%。 2023年9月，深圳金融监管局负责人表示，恒大人寿严重资不抵债，依据《中华人民共和国保险法》及相关监管制度规定，监管部门已对其实施贴 身监管并开展风险处置，目前公司经营稳定。中国保险保障基金有限责任公司、广东省、深圳市和重庆市地方国有企业及太平人寿保险有限公司 共同设立的海港人寿保险股份有限公司已开业，并依法受让恒大人寿资产负债，承接机构网点及人员，全面履行保险合同义务，切实保护保险消 费者及各有关方面合法权益。 9月12日，国家金融监督管理总局披露的罚单显示，恒大人寿保险有限公司20名相关责任人员被罚。 就处罚案由来看，罚单显示，恒大人寿相关责任人员存在保险资金运用严重不合规、 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses serious allegations made by Fan Siqi, a co-founder of Jingqi Investment, against other internal members of the company, claiming they are involved in abnormal trading, profit transfer, and misappropriation of fund assets [2][3]. Group 1: Allegations of Abnormal Trading - Fan Siqi's allegations include that Tang Jingren and Xue Haoran manipulated the "Jingqi Tiangong No. 2 Private Securities Investment Fund" to engage in abnormal subscription and redemption activities with funds managed by Shenzhen Lejin Asset Management [3][4]. - The report details instances of repeated subscription and redemption, such as Lejin Zhongshang Yungong Fund redeeming over 120 million yuan from "Tiangong No. 2 Fund" and then re-subscribing 110 million yuan just two days later, indicating potential fee exploitation [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Misconduct - The allegations suggest that Tang Jingren, as the financial head of Jingqi Investment, orchestrated a scheme where management fees and performance bonuses from abnormal transactions were funneled into the company's accounts and subsequently transferred to personal or related company accounts, constituting serious misappropriation of fund assets [4][5]. - The total amount involved in the abnormal subscription and redemption transactions related to "Tiangong No. 2 Fund" exceeds 200 million yuan, excluding some transactions that did not incur subscription/redemption fees [4][5]. Group 3: Industry Perspective - Industry insiders indicate that it is currently impossible to reach a definitive conclusion regarding the allegations without further investigation into the specific fund contracts, the existence of any related party relationships, and the substantive purpose behind the transactions [5][6]. - The lack of specific regulations on the frequency of private fund subscriptions and redemptions means that the mere act of frequent trading does not inherently violate any laws [5][6]. Group 4: Company Background - Jingqi Investment was established in 2015 and manages 55 funds, while Lejin Asset Management, also founded in 2015, manages 19 funds [6]. - There is no direct ownership relationship found between Jingqi Investment and Lejin Asset Management based on publicly available information, although both companies share a fund manager, Xue Haoran [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The internal conflict at Jingqi Investment has escalated, with founder Fan Siqi issuing a public complaint about alleged misconduct by other executives, including abnormal trading and misappropriation of fund assets [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Misconduct - Fan Siqi accused co-founder Tang Jingren and fund manager Xue Haoran of engaging in illegal activities, including repeated trading operations that harm investor interests [1][2]. - The complaint highlights that the "Jingqi Tiangong No. 2 Private Securities Investment Fund" was involved in suspicious transactions with funds managed by Shenzhen Lejin Asset Management Co., indicating potential structured trading and asset misappropriation [2][3]. - Specific instances of abnormal transactions were noted, such as a fund redeeming over 120 million yuan from "Jingqi Tiangong No. 2" and then reinvesting 110 million yuan shortly after, leading to repeated subscription fees [2][3]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The total amount involved in the suspicious transactions related to "Jingqi Tiangong No. 2" exceeds 200 million yuan, excluding some transactions that did not incur subscription or redemption fees [3]. - Allegations also include that management fees and performance rewards from these transactions were systematically funneled into company accounts and subsequently transferred to personal or related company accounts, indicating severe misappropriation of fund assets [3]. Group 3: Industry Perspective - Industry insiders suggest that it is currently impossible to draw definitive conclusions regarding the allegations without further investigation into the specific fund contracts and the relationships between the parties involved [4][5]. - The lack of direct evidence of a relationship between Jingqi Investment and Lejin Asset Management raises questions about the necessity for special disclosures regarding the transactions in question [6]. - The regulatory framework does not explicitly limit the frequency of fund subscriptions and redemptions, making it challenging to determine if the actions taken were outright violations of regulations [5].

Core Points - Southwest University has been accused of monopolizing the campus food delivery service by restricting it to a designated platform operated by Shandong Yanwen Network Technology Co., Ltd. [1] - The topic of "Southwest University food delivery monopoly" trended on Weibo, sparking widespread discussion among netizens [2] - In response to complaints about chaotic food delivery practices on campus, the university announced the selection of a single platform to manage food delivery [3] - Many netizens expressed skepticism regarding the university's justification, suggesting that the decision may involve monopolistic practices and potential conflicts of interest [5] - Additionally, it was discovered that the food delivery platform had previously been fined over 56,000 yuan by the Yantai Market Supervision Administration [6]