国内食用油龙头金龙鱼下属子公司广州益海构成合同诈骗罪一审落槌，被判处罚金100万元，同时需承担被害单位相应的经济损失。 金龙鱼表示，根据本案开庭时查明的事实，在安徽华文与云南惠嘉违规从事融资性贸易过程中，云南惠嘉通过长期行贿"被害人"安徽华文高管及员 工，与安徽华文相互勾结、共同造假，造成国有资产巨额损失。 广州益海未参与任何"诈骗行为"，也不知晓，更未实施过任何帮助行为；广州益海每次货权转让前均取得了安徽华文授权人员的确认，并以多种方式 告知了安徽华文实际库存情况；广州益海的采购价格并未低于"市场价格"，甚至高于市场价格，并未获取任何不当利益，不构成合同诈骗犯罪。 金龙鱼称，一审司法程序、认定事实、采信证据及适用法律错误，判决广州益海构成合同诈骗罪的从犯于法无据，据以定罪量刑的观点和事实依法均 不能成立。广州益海此前亦就本案委托七位权威刑法学专家进行了法律论证，专家一致认为，广州益海依法不构成合同诈骗罪。广州益海不认可一审 判决，并当庭提出上诉，公司亦会依法全力支持广州益海上诉。 金龙鱼(300999)11月19日晚间公告，11月19日，公司下属子公司广州益海收到淮北市中级人民法院作出的（2024）皖06刑 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of Inner Mongolia Green Company highlights a significant loan fraud involving the misrepresentation of collateral, where duck meat was falsely pledged as sheep and beef, leading to substantial financial losses for the bank and affected farmers [1][4][5]. Group 1: Company Background - Green Company is located in Inner Mongolia's Xilin Gol League, specializing in the slaughter, processing, storage, and sale of sheep and beef, with an annual production capacity of 6000 tons of meat products [3]. - The company was once recognized as a leading poverty alleviation enterprise in Inner Mongolia, actively engaging in social responsibility initiatives [11][12]. Group 2: Fraud Details - The legal proceedings revealed that the company’s representative, Hu Guodong, was convicted of loan fraud and contract fraud, resulting in a 15-year prison sentence [8][9]. - Hu Guodong fraudulently obtained over 40 million yuan in loans by pledging 808.74 tons of water-injected duck meat as collateral, while only about 65 tons of actual sheep and beef were present [4][5]. - The bank suffered a loss of approximately 39.86 million yuan due to this fraudulent activity [5]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The court found that Hu Guodong had misled farmers into selling livestock under false pretenses, resulting in losses of over 16 million yuan for more than 70 victims [1][9]. - The case involved multiple loan applications and a lack of proper oversight from the bank and the third-party regulatory company, which failed to verify the authenticity of the pledged collateral [7][10]. Group 4: Financial Impact - The assets of Green Company, including slaughtering and freezing equipment, were auctioned off multiple times, with the latest auction yielding only 17.698 million yuan, significantly lower than previous valuations [2][3]. - The company’s financial troubles escalated, leading to a debt of over 57 million yuan and a complete breakdown of its operational capacity [9][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the severe issues faced by investors in Yongkun Gold, highlighting the inability to redeem investments and the company's misleading promises regarding gold investment safety and returns [1][12]. Group 1: Company Operations - Yongkun Gold (Zhejiang Yongkun Holdings Co., Ltd.) has been accused of failing to fulfill its gold custody business, leading to significant financial losses for investors, some amounting to millions [1][12]. - The company previously claimed that investors could redeem gold at a profit when prices rose or receive a full refund when prices fell, which has proven to be misleading [2][12]. - Yongkun Gold has been operating since 2014 and claims to be a comprehensive service provider in the gold industry, with a presence in multiple provinces and over 50 retail outlets [12]. Group 2: Investor Experiences - Many investors, including those who have invested for over a decade, are now unable to redeem their gold, with reported amounts reaching up to 700 million yuan [4][6]. - Investors were drawn to Yongkun's offerings due to the perceived safety provided by insurance policies from companies like Taiping Property Insurance, which promised to cover their investments [8][11]. - However, the insurance policies do not cover losses due to the company's operational failures, leading to further investor concerns [8][11]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Issues - Local law enforcement has initiated criminal proceedings against Yongkun Gold, but there are concerns about the ability of online investors to recover their losses due to the lack of formal contracts [13]. - Legal experts suggest that Yongkun's business practices may constitute illegal public fundraising, and the investigation will determine if fraud charges are applicable [13].