Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the misleading use of trademarks by companies, which often leads to consumer confusion and potential exploitation of their purchasing decisions [1][2][3]. Group 1: Misleading Trademarks - Companies are using trademarks that create confusion, such as "一品牛肉干" which is actually a pork product, misleading consumers into thinking they are purchasing beef [1]. - Examples include "小尾花黑猪肝" which misleads consumers into believing they are buying a premium product when it is just regular pork liver [2]. - The use of descriptive terms in trademarks, like "六个核桃" or "手打"挂面, does not guarantee the product's quality or characteristics, leading to consumer misconceptions [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Issues - The article highlights that many misleading trademarks have passed regulatory scrutiny, indicating potential flaws in the trademark examination process [5][9]. - The distinction between registered and unregistered trademarks is emphasized, with unregistered trademarks being easier to misuse without oversight [4]. - There is a call for improved regulatory frameworks to prevent misleading trademarks from being registered and used in the market [10][11]. Group 3: Consumer Impact - Consumers often find it difficult to seek redress when misled by trademarks, as the burden of proof lies heavily on them [8][10]. - The article notes that misleading trademarks not only harm consumers but also disrupt fair market competition, potentially driving honest businesses out of the market [8]. - There are instances where consumers have paid significantly more for products due to misleading branding, such as "壹号土" black pork ribs priced much higher than regular options [7]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - The article suggests that a multi-faceted approach is needed to address the issue, including better regulatory practices and consumer education [10][11]. - It advocates for a collaborative effort among regulatory bodies, industry associations, and consumers to create a more transparent and fair market environment [11]. - The establishment of a credit commitment system for trademark registration is proposed to penalize those who obtain trademarks through deceptive means [11].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around companies using misleading trademark strategies to gain competitive advantages, which can lead to consumer confusion and mistrust [1][2][3] - Companies are increasingly engaging in wordplay with trademarks, such as splitting words or exaggerating descriptions, to create misleading perceptions among consumers [1][2] - The market's tolerance for deceptive marketing practices is decreasing, and companies that rely on such tactics may face long-term repercussions [1][2] Group 2 - Integrity is emphasized as a vital component for sustainable business development, with trademarks serving as a representation of a company's reputation and brand value [2][3] - The trademark law prohibits deceptive marks that can mislead the public regarding product quality or origin, highlighting the need for honest marketing practices [2][3] - Companies are encouraged to focus on product innovation and quality improvement rather than resorting to gimmicks in trademark usage [2][3] Group 3 - Maintaining a healthy industry ecosystem requires preventing businesses from benefiting from deceptive practices, necessitating stricter trademark registration and usage regulations [3] - Regulatory bodies should enhance scrutiny of trademark applications and monitor compliance to prevent misleading marketing tactics [3] - A transparent approach in branding can strengthen consumer trust and contribute to a healthier market environment, ultimately supporting economic growth [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding certain food products that use misleading branding and labeling, leading to consumer backlash and questions about the legality and ethics of such practices [1][2][3] Group 1: Misleading Branding - Several food products, such as "壹号土猪肉" and "千禾0酱油," have been criticized for using ambiguous terms that mislead consumers about their true nature [1] - The recent case of "多半袋面" and "多半桶面" highlights how consumers felt deceived when they discovered that the products did not contain the expected quantity [1] - Companies involved, like 壹号食品 and 白象集团, defended their practices by stating that they do not deceive consumers and that their products meet certain standards [1][2] Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Aspects - Experts indicate that the registration of such trademarks may not have been thoroughly scrutinized, as the concept of "土" (earthy) has gained popularity over time [2] - The legality of using these trademarks depends on the context and manner of their use, and even registered trademarks can be declared invalid if they violate legal standards [2] - The article emphasizes that companies must be cautious, as consumer protection laws can lead to penalties if products do not align with consumer expectations [2] Group 3: Consumer Trust and Perception - Consumer trust is crucial, as brands serve as a quick reference for product quality and origin; misleading branding can erode this trust [3] - When brands deviate from consumer understanding, they risk criticism and damage to their reputation, questioning the value of their branding strategies [3] - The article uses a humorous analogy to illustrate the absurdity of misleading branding, suggesting that companies should avoid becoming a joke in the eyes of consumers [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rising concerns over the misuse of trademarks in advertising, highlighting the confusion among consumers regarding product labeling and the need for improved regulatory mechanisms to protect consumer trust [1][6][11]. Group 1: Consumer Confusion - Consumers are often misled by trademarks that do not accurately represent the product, such as "一品牛" which is a trademark for a product made from pork, not beef [1][3]. - The term "树上熟" used for fruits misleads consumers into thinking the fruits are ripe when they are not, leading to dissatisfaction [3]. - The "供港" label on milk products creates a false impression of being sourced from Hong Kong, while it is merely a registered trademark [4]. Group 2: Trademark Registration Issues - Current trademark registration processes are strict, but there are still loopholes that allow misleading trademarks to be registered, such as "安踏断码" which was deemed invalid [7][11]. - The article emphasizes that terms like "0添加" and "零添加" have not been successfully registered as trademarks, indicating a trend towards stricter enforcement of labeling standards [7][11]. - The lack of clear definitions for certain terms, such as "土" in product names, allows companies to exploit consumer perceptions for competitive advantage [8][11]. Group 3: Regulatory Recommendations - Experts suggest that a more robust post-registration mechanism is needed to address trademark misuse, allowing consumers and market regulators to challenge misleading trademarks [11][12]. - The article calls for enhanced enforcement of trademark laws and better clarity in trademark examination processes to prevent consumer deception [12]. - Companies are encouraged to adopt honest marketing practices and comply with trademark regulations to mitigate legal risks and foster long-term growth [12].